Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Tribunals

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-000-807 Sector Transport And Highways Category Parking And Other Penalties Decided 28 May 2025

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about London Tribunals’ handling of his appeal against a penalty charge notice. This is because the complaint concerns the way the adjudicators considered Mr X’s case and reached their decision on the appeal and the only way to challenge this is by Judicial Review at the High Court.

The complaint

Mr X complains about London Tribunals’ handling of his appeal against a penalty charge notice (PCN). He disagrees with the decision to dismiss his appeal and says he was not given a fair hearing. His complaint sets out numerous issues with the handling of his case including that he believes London Tribunals erred in law on several points, failed to properly consider his concerns about the authority which issued the PCN and failed to properly consider his request to order the authority to attend the appeal hearing.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London. The appeals are heard by adjudicators who are appointed by the Lord Chancellor.

We have jurisdiction to investigate complaints about the administrative actions of London Tribunals. However, the adjudicators themselves act in a quasi-judicial way. We cannot consider a complaint about a decision taken by an adjudicator on an individual appeal or about the way in which they reached that decision.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr X’s concerns relate to the handling of his appeal by the adjudicator and their decision to dismiss his appeal. These are not administrative matters as they go to the heart of the decision-making process. The adjudicators have considered Mr X’s appeal, along with his request for a review of the decision, and if Mr X wishes to challenge the decision his remaining means of doing so is by Judicial Review at the High Court.

Final decision

We cannot investigate this complaint. This is because we have no jurisdiction to investigate any complaint about the adjudicator’s decision or the way in which they reached that decision.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Tribunals

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-022-813 Other
24-022-060 24 Apr 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about London Tribunal’s handling of her appeal against a penalty charge notice. … Other
24-010-032 11 Oct 2024 Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about London Tribunals’ handling of his appeal against a penalty charge notice. This … Other
24-006-989 22 Sep 2024 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about various matters in connection with Ms X’s appeal to London Tribunals about … Other
22-008-840 19 Dec 2022 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about information provided by the Tribunal. This is because there is insufficient evidence … Other
View all decisions for this organisation