Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 24-006-330 Sector Transport And Highways Category Parking And Other Penalties Decided 19 August 2024

View Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice as there is a statutory appeal process which Mr X can reasonably make use of.

The complaint

Mr X complains he was issued with a parking penalty charge notice (PCN) despite him having paid to park. Mr X says the Council’s parking app selected the wrong car park and despite him having shown that he paid to park, the Council has not cancelled the PCN. Mr X also complains the Council has failed to provide information about his case that he has requested. Mr X wants the Council to cancel the PCN.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended) We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection/access to information. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Parliament has provided an appeal mechanism by which Mr X can challenge the PCN, ultimately to an independent tribunal, the Traffic Penalty Tribunal (TPT). It can consider Mr X’s case and decide whether the PCN should stand. We are not another level of appeal and are not empowered to do this or to ask the Council to cancel the PCN.

It is reasonable to expect Mr X to follow the appeal process followed in law and as such, we will not investigate.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is the UK’s independent regulator in respect of access to information and is best placed to determine whether the Council has withheld information from Mr X that he is entitled to. We are not empowered to make such decisions.

For these reasons, we will not investigate.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he has the right to appeal against the PCN to the TPT and the ICO is best placed to respond to the concerns he raises about access to information.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-019-061 Other
25-009-241 Other
25-006-119 25 Nov 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council granting planning permission for a development which the complainant says … Other
25-003-966 07 Sep 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to a request for CCTV and bodycam footage. The … Other
25-003-913 03 Sep 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her Code of Conduct complaints. We have … Other
View all decisions for this organisation