Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-019-061 Sector Housing Category Private Housing Decided 31 March 2026

View Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s homelessness support to his tenant because it was reasonable for him to take legal action to enforce his property rights. We cannot investigate the complaint about what happened in court.

The complaint

Mr X complained about the Council’s advice and support to his tenant, and its failure to consider his own circumstances. Mr X said the Council’s failings caused him stress and financial losses.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended) We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

What happened Mr X let a property to Ms Y. When she died, her partner, Mr Z, and children remained in the property. Mr X said Mr Z did not have a tenancy or pay any rent and he caused deliberate damage to the property.

In its complaint response, the Council confirmed it was giving advice and support to Mr Z. It had also asked Mr X to carry out some essential repairs to the property. Mr X said the Council had supported Mr Z in court to delay the eviction.

My assessment

Depending on the circumstances, councils may have a duty to support those who are homeless or threatened with homelessness. This can include advising them they can legally remain in the property until court action has been taken to evict them. Any homelessness duty is owed to the homeless applicant, not the landlord. It is reasonable for landlords to seek legal advice and take appropriate court action to enforce their property rights. For this reason, we will not investigate the Council’s actions in relation to the homelessness application.

Mr X also complains about the Council’s actions during the court action for possession. The law says we cannot investigate complaints about what happens in court. Therefore, we cannot consider this part of the complaint further.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it was reasonable for him to take court action to enforce his property rights and because we cannot investigate what happens in court.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-009-241 Other
25-006-119 25 Nov 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council granting planning permission for a development which the complainant says … Other
25-003-966 07 Sep 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to a request for CCTV and bodycam footage. The … Other
25-003-913 03 Sep 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her Code of Conduct complaints. We have … Other
25-004-357 19 Aug 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to take enforcement action against a breach of planning … Other
View all decisions for this organisation