Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Kent County Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 23-019-132 Sector Adult Care Services Category Transport Decided 28 April 2024

View Kent County Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about delay in the Council considering and deciding her application for a blue badge. This is because an investigation would not lead to any further findings or outcomes.

The complaint

Mrs X complains about delay in the Council considering and deciding her application for a blue badge.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mrs X first applied for a blue badge at the beginning of November 2023. There are not statutory timescales for when councils must decide blue badge applications by. Therefore, it is down to each council to set their own service standards. The Council’s timescale is 16 weeks.

The Council did not consider and decide Mrs X application until end of February 2024. The Council decided Mrs X was eligible for a blue badge and one was awarded. The Council accepted it failed to decide Mrs X’s application within 16 weeks of first receiving her application. However, I do not consider an investigation to be proportionate given the delay was likely less than a week and the Council has appropriately apologised to Mrs X for the slight delay.

Mrs X’s disability means she is unable to provide information in written format. Mrs X had asked the Council to allow her to provide the evidence the Council required verbally. The Council acknowledged it had failed to call her back as requested.

However, following the referral from us, the Council did call Mrs X and completed a telephone assessment instead. This demonstrates the Council does make adjustments to its normal service provision to ensure accessibility for those who need it. There is no evidence to suggest there are any systemic issues or lack of awareness of the need to provide reasonable adjustments where requested. Therefore, an investigation is not proportionate as it would not lead to any further findings or outcomes.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because an investigation would not lead to any further findings or outcomes.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Kent County Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-016-851 Other
25-017-670 Other
25-018-135 Other
25-015-340 Other
25-007-298 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation