Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Kent County Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-016-851 Sector Children S Care Services Category Disabled Children Decided 27 March 2026

View Kent County Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mr F’s complaint about his application for a Blue Badge for his daughter because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation, and we cannot achieve the outcome Mr F wants.

The complaint

Mr F complains the Council refused his application for a Blue Badge for his daughter.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide: there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr F applied for a Blue Badge for his daughter. She has autism spectrum disorder. At the time of his application, Mr F’s daughter was 3.

Mr F’s application and subsequent appeal were unsuccessful.

Unhappy with the outcome, Mr F complained to us.

We do not decide whether the Council should give Mr F’s daughter a Blue Badge. This is the Council’s job. Our role is to check the Council followed relevant legislation, Government guidance and Council policies. We check the Council took account of evidence and its decision-making process was fair. We are not another appeal. We cannot question a Council decision made without fault, no matter how strongly Mr F disagrees.

The Council used a specialist assessor to evaluate Mr F’s application. The assessor met Mr F’s daughter in person. The assessor was satisfied that Mr F’s daughter’s behaviours could be managed by reasonable coping strategies similar to those used by parents of any child of her age.

There is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr F’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation. We cannot achieve the outcome Mr F wants, so there is no worthwhile outcome achievable.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Kent County Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-016-530 Other
25-017-435 Other
25-018-166 Other
25-015-173 Other
25-006-524 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation