Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Devon County Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-011-945 Sector Other Categories Category Other Decided 02 December 2022

View Devon County Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with the complainant’s request for information. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate as this is a matter best dealt with by the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Mr X, has complained about how the Council dealt with his request for information and says it has still not provided the information he asked for.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he can complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) if he is concerned about how the Council dealt with his request for information. The ICO is the independent body set up to uphold information rights and is best placed to deal with Mr X’s concerns.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Devon County Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-006-120 Upheld
25-003-251 Upheld
25-016-559 Other
25-028-323 Other
25-009-679 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation