Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Kent County Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 21-015-909 Sector Adult Care Services Category Assessment And Care Plan Decided 03 March 2022

View Kent County Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to properly consider Mrs B’s late aunt’s, Mrs C’s, finances. This is because there is no unremedied injustice warranting an Ombudsman investigation.

The complaint

Mrs B complained the Council should have applied a £5.75 savings disregard to her late aunts, Mrs C’s, financial assessment. Mrs B says although the Council has now agreed to do this she is concerned other service users may experience the same difficulties she has encountered because of the way the Council are undertaking financial assessments.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mrs B says the Council has now agreed to reassess Mrs C’s finances and says it will include the £5.75 savings disregard in the assessment. We are satisfied this remedies the injustice caused to Mrs C’s estate. If the Council does not complete the agreed reassessment as advised, Mrs C’s Executor can pursue this with the Council.

Mrs B is concerned the Council may be wrongly assessing finances and failing to apply proper disregards for others in its area. The regulations and statutory guidance set out what the Council should include in its financial assessments. The Council has accepted there was an error in this case but there is no evidence of a systemic failure in the way the Council carries out its financial assessment warranting an Ombudsman investigation.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because the Council has agreed to complete a reassessment of Mrs C’s finances. We are satisfied the injustice caused to Mrs C’s estate is now remedied.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Kent County Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-016-851 Other
25-017-670 Other
25-018-135 Other
25-015-340 Other
25-007-298 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation