Decisions 59,135 records
Decision date: 16 September 2026EducationOutcome: UpheldSubject: School transport
Summary (LGO's words) Mrs K complained about her two children’s school transport including late and missed pick-ups, a lack of consistency, ignoring instructions to safeguard her children and about an incident when one of her children went missing. Both children have Education, Health and Care Plans. Mrs X …
Decision date: 16 September 2026EducationOutcome: UpheldSubject: School transport
Summary (LGO's words) Mrs K complained about her two children’s school transport including late and missed pick-ups, a lack of consistency, ignoring instructions to safeguard her children and about an incident when one of her children went missing. Both children have Education, Health and Care Plans. Mrs X …
Decision date: 8 September 2026EducationOutcome: UpheldSubject: Special educational needs
Summary (LGO's words) Miss X complained about the way the Council handled her daughter, Y’s education. The Council delayed in reviewing Y’s education, health and care plan and failed to provide agreed occupational therapy provision. This caused Miss X and Y frustration and uncertainty. The Council should apologise …
Decision date: 8 September 2026HousingOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Private housing
Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about how the Council responded to her housing concerns because there is not enough evidence of fault.
Decision date: 8 September 2026HousingOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Homelessness
Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint that the Council did not progress her homelessness application promptly and that its communication with her was poor. This is because we could not add to the Council’s investigation.
Decision date: 8 September 2026Adult care servicesOutcome: UpheldSubject: Residential care
Summary (LGO's words) Mr Y complained about the way Acton Care Centre, commissioned by the Council, provided care to his late mother-in-law (Mrs X) and acted following her fall. Mr Y also said the care provider Gold Care Homes failed to respond to his complaint. We found fault …
Decision date: 8 September 2026EducationOutcome: UpheldSubject: Special educational needs
Summary (LGO's words) Ms X complained the Council failed to provide appropriate software for her child, Y, to access the provision in his Education, Health and Care Plan. We found the Council at fault for failing to properly consider whether the software provided met Y’s individual needs and …
Decision date: 8 September 2026Benefits and taxOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Council tax
Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate this complaint about a Council tax premium because there is a right of appeal to a valuation tribunal.
Decision date: 8 September 2026HousingOutcome: UpheldSubject: Private housing
Summary (LGO's words) There was no evidence of fault in how the Council oversaw the housing repairs as set out in the improvement notice for Ms X’s property. It was at fault for not retaining a copy of the report after it carried out an inspection of the …
Decision date: 8 September 2026Adult care servicesOutcome: UpheldSubject: Charging
Summary (LGO's words) Ms X complained on behalf of Miss Y about the way the Council dealt with Miss Y’s transition from children’s services to adult social care. The Council was at fault for delaying in discussing care and funding options when the staying put arrangement was due …
Decision date: 8 September 2026Other CategoriesOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Leisure and culture
Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate this complaint about the Council's decision to install mixed-sex changing facilities at a leisure centre. This is because further investigation is unlikely to find evidence of fault in the way the Council reached its decision.
Decision date: 8 September 2026Adult care servicesOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Other
Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate this complaint about a drug and alcohol service commissioned by the Council. This is because any fault has not caused a significant personal injustice to Mr X.
Decision date: 8 September 2026HousingOutcome: UpheldSubject: Other
Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s valuation of Ms X’s discount market sale property as the Council is to investigate the complaint now.
Decision date: 8 September 2026Transport and highwaysOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Parking and other penalties
Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate this complaint about the enforcement of a Penalty Charge Notice. It is reasonable to expect the complainant to apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre to seek to regain their appeal rights, and then to appeal to a tribunal.
Decision date: 8 September 2026Adult care servicesOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Disabled facilities grants
Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council completed repairs when the complainant reported damage after it provided disabled aids and adaptations at the complainant’s property. Any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.
Decision date: 8 September 2026Adult care servicesOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Charging
Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about adult social care charging by the Council. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our further involvement.
Decision date: 8 September 2026HousingOutcome: UpheldSubject: Allocations
Summary (LGO's words) The Council was at fault for failing to provide Miss X temporary accommodation when she was experiencing domestic abuse, causing her distress and frustration. Delay in a review of her housing priority banding, poor communication and delay in the Council’s complaint handling added to her …
Decision date: 8 September 2026Transport and highwaysOutcome: UpheldSubject: Other
Summary (LGO's words) Mr X complained the Council did not properly consult residents and give them the chance to object to a new Cycle Hire Only on-street parking bay opposite his home. We did not find fault in the Council’s consultation. However, the Council was at fault for …
Decision date: 8 September 2026HousingOutcome: UpheldSubject: Homelessness
Summary (LGO's words) Mr X complained the Council failed to move him to alternative accommodation after it identified the property he was living in was unsuitable. We find the Council was at fault for its delay in moving Mr X to alternative suitable accommodation. This caused Mr X …
Decision date: 8 September 2026Benefits and taxOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Council tax
Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate this complaint about council tax arrears. This is because the complaint is late and there is no good reason for this.
Decision date: 8 September 2026EducationOutcome: Not upheldSubject: School transport
Summary (LGO's words) Miss X says the Council’s school transport appeal decision for her daughter, Y, was unfair because Miss X could not attend the appeal hearing. She says this distressed her and her family and stopped Y getting school transport. The Council was not at fault.
Decision date: 8 September 2026EducationOutcome: UpheldSubject: Special educational needs
Summary (LGO's words) The Council delayed completing an education, health and care needs assessment, delayed putting in place education following an exclusion, delayed explaining the funding process for the alternative provision the school arranged, failed to keep Mrs X up to date or respond to emails and gave …
Decision date: 8 September 2026EducationOutcome: UpheldSubject: Special educational needs
Summary (LGO's words) The Council delayed completing Miss X’s child, Y’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) needs assessment in line with statutory timescales. It delayed deciding whether to issue Y with an EHC Plan within the statutory timescales, caused by a 46 week delay in obtaining Educational Psychologist …
Decision date: 8 September 2026Adult care servicesOutcome: UpheldSubject: Charging
Summary (LGO's words) The Council was at fault for the delay in completing Mr Y’s financial assessment, but its remedy was appropriate. I found no fault in the care assessment or care planning, so there is no further role for this office.
Decision date: 8 September 2026Adult care servicesOutcome: UpheldSubject: Assessment and care plan
Summary (LGO's words) Mr X complained on behalf of his mother, Mrs Y, about the Council’s failure to respond to his requests for respite care for her. The Council was at fault for failing to respond to one request and delaying in responding to another. It also delayed …