Source · Ombudsman decisions

LGO decisions

Published decisions from the Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman, each linking to the ombudsman's own record.

59,135 decisions 20,392 investigated 16,519 upheld

Decisions 59,135 records

Essex County Council · 25-023-460

Decision date: 16 September 2026EducationOutcome: UpheldSubject: School transport

Summary (LGO's words) Mrs K complained about her two children’s school transport including late and missed pick-ups, a lack of consistency, ignoring instructions to safeguard her children and about an incident when one of her children went missing. Both children have Education, Health and Care Plans. Mrs X …

Essex County Council · 25-021-530

Decision date: 16 September 2026EducationOutcome: UpheldSubject: School transport

Summary (LGO's words) Mrs K complained about her two children’s school transport including late and missed pick-ups, a lack of consistency, ignoring instructions to safeguard her children and about an incident when one of her children went missing. Both children have Education, Health and Care Plans. Mrs X …

Manchester City Council · 25-020-744

Decision date: 8 September 2026EducationOutcome: UpheldSubject: Special educational needs

Summary (LGO's words) Miss X complained about the way the Council handled her daughter, Y’s education. The Council delayed in reviewing Y’s education, health and care plan and failed to provide agreed occupational therapy provision. This caused Miss X and Y frustration and uncertainty. The Council should apologise …

Southend-on-Sea City Council · 25-019-528

Decision date: 8 September 2026HousingOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Private housing

Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about how the Council responded to her housing concerns because there is not enough evidence of fault.

London Borough of Hillingdon · 25-025-098

Decision date: 8 September 2026HousingOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Homelessness

Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint that the Council did not progress her homelessness application promptly and that its communication with her was poor. This is because we could not add to the Council’s investigation.

Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea · 25-006-495

Decision date: 8 September 2026Adult care servicesOutcome: UpheldSubject: Residential care

Summary (LGO's words) Mr Y complained about the way Acton Care Centre, commissioned by the Council, provided care to his late mother-in-law (Mrs X) and acted following her fall. Mr Y also said the care provider Gold Care Homes failed to respond to his complaint. We found fault …

Isle of Wight Council · 25-020-737

Decision date: 8 September 2026EducationOutcome: UpheldSubject: Special educational needs

Summary (LGO's words) Ms X complained the Council failed to provide appropriate software for her child, Y, to access the provision in his Education, Health and Care Plan. We found the Council at fault for failing to properly consider whether the software provided met Y’s individual needs and …

Cannock Chase District Council · 26-007-062

Decision date: 8 September 2026Benefits and taxOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Council tax

Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate this complaint about a Council tax premium because there is a right of appeal to a valuation tribunal.

London Borough of Bromley · 25-011-240

Decision date: 8 September 2026HousingOutcome: UpheldSubject: Private housing

Summary (LGO's words) There was no evidence of fault in how the Council oversaw the housing repairs as set out in the improvement notice for Ms X’s property. It was at fault for not retaining a copy of the report after it carried out an inspection of the …

Leeds City Council · 25-017-503

Decision date: 8 September 2026Adult care servicesOutcome: UpheldSubject: Charging

Summary (LGO's words) Ms X complained on behalf of Miss Y about the way the Council dealt with Miss Y’s transition from children’s services to adult social care. The Council was at fault for delaying in discussing care and funding options when the staying put arrangement was due …

Dover District Council · 26-005-900

Decision date: 8 September 2026Other CategoriesOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Leisure and culture

Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate this complaint about the Council's decision to install mixed-sex changing facilities at a leisure centre. This is because further investigation is unlikely to find evidence of fault in the way the Council reached its decision.

London Borough of Bromley · 26-007-272

Decision date: 8 September 2026Adult care servicesOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Other

Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate this complaint about a drug and alcohol service commissioned by the Council. This is because any fault has not caused a significant personal injustice to Mr X.

London Borough of Hillingdon · 26-007-381

Decision date: 8 September 2026HousingOutcome: UpheldSubject: Other

Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s valuation of Ms X’s discount market sale property as the Council is to investigate the complaint now.

London Borough of Ealing · 26-015-103

Decision date: 8 September 2026Transport and highwaysOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Parking and other penalties

Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate this complaint about the enforcement of a Penalty Charge Notice. It is reasonable to expect the complainant to apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre to seek to regain their appeal rights, and then to appeal to a tribunal.

Cambridge City Council · 25-025-088

Decision date: 8 September 2026Adult care servicesOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Disabled facilities grants

Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council completed repairs when the complainant reported damage after it provided disabled aids and adaptations at the complainant’s property. Any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

London Borough of Harrow · 25-025-091

Decision date: 8 September 2026Adult care servicesOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Charging

Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about adult social care charging by the Council. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our further involvement.

London Borough of Redbridge · 25-016-260

Decision date: 8 September 2026HousingOutcome: UpheldSubject: Allocations

Summary (LGO's words) The Council was at fault for failing to provide Miss X temporary accommodation when she was experiencing domestic abuse, causing her distress and frustration. Delay in a review of her housing priority banding, poor communication and delay in the Council’s complaint handling added to her …

London Borough of Merton · 25-008-446

Decision date: 8 September 2026Transport and highwaysOutcome: UpheldSubject: Other

Summary (LGO's words) Mr X complained the Council did not properly consult residents and give them the chance to object to a new Cycle Hire Only on-street parking bay opposite his home. We did not find fault in the Council’s consultation. However, the Council was at fault for …

Westminster City Council · 25-017-803

Decision date: 8 September 2026HousingOutcome: UpheldSubject: Homelessness

Summary (LGO's words) Mr X complained the Council failed to move him to alternative accommodation after it identified the property he was living in was unsuitable. We find the Council was at fault for its delay in moving Mr X to alternative suitable accommodation. This caused Mr X …

London Borough of Lewisham · 25-019-571

Decision date: 8 September 2026Benefits and taxOutcome: Closed after initial enquiriesSubject: Council tax

Summary (LGO's words) We will not investigate this complaint about council tax arrears. This is because the complaint is late and there is no good reason for this.

Swindon Borough Council · 25-016-259

Decision date: 8 September 2026EducationOutcome: Not upheldSubject: School transport

Summary (LGO's words) Miss X says the Council’s school transport appeal decision for her daughter, Y, was unfair because Miss X could not attend the appeal hearing. She says this distressed her and her family and stopped Y getting school transport. The Council was not at fault.

Surrey County Council · 25-014-149

Decision date: 8 September 2026EducationOutcome: UpheldSubject: Special educational needs

Summary (LGO's words) The Council delayed completing an education, health and care needs assessment, delayed putting in place education following an exclusion, delayed explaining the funding process for the alternative provision the school arranged, failed to keep Mrs X up to date or respond to emails and gave …

Lancashire County Council · 25-015-394

Decision date: 8 September 2026EducationOutcome: UpheldSubject: Special educational needs

Summary (LGO's words) The Council delayed completing Miss X’s child, Y’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) needs assessment in line with statutory timescales. It delayed deciding whether to issue Y with an EHC Plan within the statutory timescales, caused by a 46 week delay in obtaining Educational Psychologist …

Coventry City Council · 25-016-429

Decision date: 8 September 2026Adult care servicesOutcome: UpheldSubject: Charging

Summary (LGO's words) The Council was at fault for the delay in completing Mr Y’s financial assessment, but its remedy was appropriate. I found no fault in the care assessment or care planning, so there is no further role for this office.

London Borough of Croydon · 25-017-333

Decision date: 8 September 2026Adult care servicesOutcome: UpheldSubject: Assessment and care plan

Summary (LGO's words) Mr X complained on behalf of his mother, Mrs Y, about the Council’s failure to respond to his requests for respite care for her. The Council was at fault for failing to respond to one request and delaying in responding to another. It also delayed …