Source · IMB Annual Report
Wealstun
Year: 2024
Published: 20 Sep 2024
Type: Prison · Cat C
Population: 908
Recommendations: 12
Key concerns
Positive findings
HMP Wealstun, a Category C training and resettlement prison, experienced significant population pressures and increased prisoner churn during the reporting year. While some areas like healthcare access and catering showed improvements, the Board raised serious concerns regarding the persistently high levels of self-harm and violence attributed to illicit materials, the poor condition of older wings, and the restrictive regime offering limited time out of cell and part-time work. The report highlights an urgent need for increased funding for staffing, purposeful activity, and addressing systemic issues related to prisoner welfare and rehabilitation.
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 1 | — |
| Self-harm incidents | 83 | 58 |
| Prisoner assaults | 15 | — |
| Assaults on staff | 2 | — |
| Use of force | 409 | — |
Positive findings
The Board found many positive aspects at HMP Wealstun, including good interventions by staff with vulnerable prisoners and positive staff-prisoner relationships, especially within the segregation unit. Healthcare provision showed improvements with quicker appointments for GPs and dentists, and the opening of a second medication-dispensing hatch. The catering team was highly praised for the quality and variety of food, supported by the in-house bakery and fresh produce. The new K wing accommodation was well-received by both staff and prisoners, offering a more relaxed regime.
Key concerns
Overcrowding
The significant increase in prison capacity and high number of receptions (up 21%) due to population pressures has impacted reception and induction processes.
Safety
The level of self-harm remains quite high, with incidents tending to be by prolific self-harmers.
Substance Misuse
Despite increased security, illicit materials, such as drugs and mobile phones, continue to enter the establishment, leading to increased debt, bullying, and violence between prisoners.
Estate/Conditions
Repeated
The condition of the older A and B wings, built in the 1960s, remains a concern as they need significant remedial action or replacement, and do not provide a humane environment for prisoners.
Regime/Time Out of Cell
Repeated
The regime offers mainly part-time work and continues to provide only a limited amount of time out of cell, especially at weekends, negatively impacting prisoner progression and rehabilitation.
Education/Purposeful Activity
Repeated
The lack of education and training places available, coupled with prisoners generally working only on a part-time basis, negatively impacts their rehabilitation prospects.
Staffing
The number of key worker sessions remains very low, indicating insufficient funding for staff when the OMiC system was introduced.
Resettlement/Release
The increased churn of prisoners and the transfer of a significant number of prisoners with limited time to serve place considerable pressure on the Offender Management Unit and hinder preparation for successful resettlement.
Mental Health
Repeated
Prisons are being used to house severely mentally ill people whilst they await a place in a suitable institution, which the Board considers inhumane.
Other
Repeated
The Board remains concerned about the inhumane treatment of prisoners imprisoned for public protection (IPP) across the prison estate.
Other
Budgets for prisons do not include sufficient funding to meet the additional costs caused by the increase in prison population, early release scheme, and considerable churn of prisoners.
Overcrowding
Repeated
Housing two prisoners in double cells is inconsistent with the obligation to provide high standards of decency for prisoners, particularly in respect of toilet facilities.
Staffing
There is insufficient funding for staff in all functional areas, not just additional officers, when populations are increased, impacting departments like OMU, resettlement, workshops, education, and healthcare.
Equality/Diversity
The change of responsibilities for equality and diversity to the safer custody team may impact on the importance of this area of work.
Recommendations
| # | Recommendation | Addressee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
As referenced in our previous report, what steps will the Minister take to ensure that prison is not used to house severely mentally ill people whilst they await a place in a suitable institution?
Repeated
Response
I fully understand the Board’s frustration that they are raising a repeated issue about the detention of severely mentally ill people in prison whilst they await transfer to a suitable institution. We are committed to improving mental health outcomes for people in contact with the criminal justice system, to ensure that offenders and defendants with acute mental health needs receive timely support and in the most appropriate setting. We also recognise that vulnerable people in prison who meet the threshold for detention under the Mental Health Act and require a transfer to hospital continue to experience delays in accessing the specialist care and treatment they need. The government has pledged to introduce the Draft Mental Health Bill in the upcoming parliamentary session. The Bill includes several flagship reforms to improve access to mental health care for patients in the criminal justice system such as the introduction of a statutory 28-day time limit for transfers from prison to hospital. This time limit, together with operational improvements, aims to reduce unnecessary delays and deliver swifter access to treatment. The reforms will prevent courts from using prison as a place of safety for those awaiting treatment or assessment under the Mental Health Act. Instead, the defendant or convicted person must be transferred directly to hospital, ensuring swifter access to the care they need. The Bill will also reform the Bail Act 1976 to prevent courts from remanding a defendant for their own protection where their only concern relates to their mental health. Courts will be directed to bail defendants and work with local health services to put in place appropriate support and care. NHS England’s Liaison and Diversion services are well established in the region and they will continue to work with stakeholders to strengthen pathways from police custody and court into treatment. |
Ministry of Justice | In progress |
| 2 |
When will the Minister end the inhumane treatment of prisoners imprisoned for public protection (IPP) across the prison estate and release all remaining IPP prisoners with no conditions?
Response
I understand and sympathise with the Board’s position around prisoners serving Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences. I am very mindful of the specific and substantial challenges faced by those serving IPP sentences and this is an issue I feel passionately about. The Board will no doubt be aware that on 5 September, the Lord Chancellor announced that the Government would implement reforms we supported in opposition to the IPP licence period in the Victims and Prisoners Act 2024. These commenced on 1 November, when the licences for 1,742 IPP offenders in the community were terminated. The remaining reforms will be implemented on 1 February 2025, when the reduced qualifying period for consideration of licence termination will see around 600 additional referrals made to the Parole Board. The Secretary of State will also has two new powers, the power to use ‘Risk Assessed Recall Review’ (RARR) for recalled IPP prisoners and the power to disapply a recall. The first enables her to re-release people who have been recalled at any point without referring the case to the Parole Board, where safe to do so. The second enables her to not reset the two-year period after someone is re-released from a recall. The Government is determined to support the rehabilitation of IPP offenders through a refreshed Action Plan, which we published on 15 November 2024. The refreshed Plan puts an important emphasis on effective frontline delivery in our prisons and the Probation Service, to ensure that those serving IPP sentences have robust and effective sentence plans, which they are actively engaging with, and that they are in the correct prison to access the right interventions and rehabilitative services. This is the most effective way to help them to reduce their risk so that they can progress towards safe release from custody. The refreshed Action Plan was published in our IPP Annual Report and can be accessed online at GOV.UK. Whilst it is right that IPP sentences were abolished, I hope that you will understand that we cannot take any steps that would put the public at risk. I can assure you the Government is committed to working with organisations and campaign groups to ensure the appropriate course of action is taken to support those still serving IPP sentences. |
Ministry of Justice | Partial |
| 3 |
How will the Minister ensure that budgets for prisons include sufficient funding to meet the additional costs caused by the increase in prison population, early release scheme and considerable churn of prisoners?
Response
Prison population pressures across the estate have been well documented. When the population of a prison changes significantly, a review is undertaken into the staffing of that prison which is adjusted and funded accordingly. Reviews will consider population risks, infrastructure, architecture and specific delivery requirements associated with prisoner cohorts and prison functions. For non-pay costs that are specifically impacted by offender numbers, prisons are funded using a standard cost driver based on their average number of offenders. This funding is recalculated three times a year and prison budgets are updated accordingly. HMP Wealstun has been selected as one of only five prisons nationwide to receive targeted funding aimed at enhancing both resources and infrastructure. This strategic investment is also set to significantly expand prisoner opportunities at HMP Wealstun. |
Ministry of Justice | In progress |
| 4 |
As referenced in our last report, what is the prison service doing to ensure that two prisoners are not housed in double cells, as this is inconsistent with the obligation to provide high standards of decency for prisoners, particularly in respect of toilet facilities?
Repeated
Response
Further to last years’ response, HMPPS’s cell certification framework requires that cells are only shared where a Prison Group Director has assessed them to be of adequate size and condition. There are other standards set out in the framework, including adequate lighting, heating, ventilation, fittings, and access to water and sanitation. These standards ensure that prisoners are accommodated safely even when held in crowded conditions. HMPPS would like to assure the Board the Prison Group Director has taken great care to manage and deliver double-cells in as respectful, decent, and safe manner as possible. Whilst work on delivering the 20,000 additional modern, uncrowded prison places is ongoing, the adult male prison estate has been under acute capacity pressure for the last 12 months. HMPPS has been required to take decisive action to quickly increase capacity in the existing estate through doubling up cells where safe to do so. On 12 July, the Lord Chancellor announced an interim measure to free up prison places. This initiative temporarily reduces the time those sentenced to standard determinate sentences (SDS) serve in prison from 50% to 40% of that sentence. This measure (SDS40) will not apply to prisoners sentenced for sex offences and certain domestic-abuse-connected offences, irrespective of length. It also excludes serious violent offences with a sentence of four years or more. We will assess the impact of these measures on the prison population and there may be options in future to reduce crowding levels in the estate. This could enable targeted reductions of the least suitable prison places, but it is not possible to commit to numbers or locations until the policy is successfully implemented and the overall capacity position has stabilised. |
HMPPS | Noted |
| 5 |
As referenced in our last report, when is it planned to consider a complete refurbishment or replacement of the older wings (A and B wings)? It is increasingly apparent that this accommodation, built in the 1960s, needs significant remedial action for a number of reasons and is not a humane environment for prisoners.
Repeated
Response
HMPPS acknowledges the need to replace or refurbish older accommodation at HMP Wealstun, namely A and B wings. Given the scale of works required and current funding and capacity pressures, we are unable to progress the replacement of A and B wings at present but will continue to seek opportunities to do so. Until a strategic plan for the future of A and B Wings is agreed, prisoner allocation to A and B wings is managed with rigorous protocols and those that are a known arson risk are not housed there as a risk reduction measure due to the absence of smoke extraction, except in exceptional circumstances and subject to thorough risk assessments. The facilities management provider will also continue to do their best in repairing windows where possible (as and when reported), however due to the current condition it is recognised this is sometimes difficult. This consequently affects controlling temperatures, and again the facilities management provider will continue to their best in maintaining assets that are at end of life/beyond economical repair. The shower facilities are a further notable concern and will require considerable investment to address. Local management are committed to optimising the conditions within these units by regularly conducting painting, maintaining cleanliness, and performing minor repairs to ensure a clean and decent environment. |
HMPPS | Noted |
| 6 |
How will the prison service ensure that prisons receive appropriate funding for staff in all functional areas and not just additional officers when populations are increased? This includes OMU, the business hub, resettlement, workshops, education and the healthcare department.
Response
As mentioned in the Minister’s letter, a review of staffing across all functions is undertaken when there are significant changes in a prison’s population and is adjusted and funded accordingly. Staffing assumptions are based on national models but adapted to specific local needs. The growth in the prisoner population has been accompanied by a corresponding increase in the resources allocated to support this expansion. HMP Wealstun holds a weekly Regime Management Plan which enables it to effectively manage resources and, when necessary, reallocate them to address any local risks. The Yorkshire and Humber Probation Region are reviewing their current resettlement and pre-release operating models to reduce duplication of work and make the interaction with prisoners more effective, especially when working to support safe and supported releases of individuals. Education funding at site level is based on a specific cost per prisoner, and as the prison population increases, the funding should be reflected in that increase in Operational Capacity. NHS England (North East & Yorkshire region) commissioned a Health Needs Assessments across the region in 2023. This informed funding decisions for each of the prison healthcare services. Healthcare services across West Yorkshire are currently in the procurement process, additional funding and a revised model has been agreed and reflects the changing demand and need within HMP Wealstun. When NHS England is advised of an increase in the operational capacity or a re-role of a prison, work is undertaken along with the commissioned healthcare provider(s) to assess additional clinical requirements to meet changing needs. This was the case at HMP Wealstun. A business case was supported of £187,402 in July 2023 to fund an additional medication hatch/pharmacy provision, to support prison expansion/population pressures. In January 2024, an additional £206,720 was agreed to uplift the number of mental health staff to support increased demand and complexity. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 7 |
How will the prison service ensure that prisons receive appropriate funding to cover the considerable amount of extra work caused by the increased churn (reception, OMU, finance, resettlement) so that prisoners are able to access everything they require throughout their sentence?
Response
For non-pay costs that are specifically impacted by offender numbers, prisons are funded using a standard cost driver based on their average number of offenders. This funding is recalculated three times a year and prison budgets are updated accordingly. The Yorkshire and Humber Probation Region are reviewing their current resettlement and pre-release operating models to reduce duplication of work and make the interaction with prisoners more effective, especially when working to support safe and supported releases of individuals. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 8 |
How will the prison service ensure that additional funding is made available as the population increases to cover any additional costs such as prisoner wages, clothing and workshops.
Response
When the population of a prison changes significantly, a review is undertaken into the staffing of that prison which is adjusted and funded accordingly. Reviews will consider population risks, infrastructure, architecture and specific delivery requirements associated with prisoner cohorts and prison functions. For non-pay costs that are specifically impacted by offender numbers, prisons are funded using a standard cost driver based on their average number of offenders. This funding is recalculated three times a year and prison budgets are updated accordingly. HMP Wealstun has been selected as one of only five prisons nationwide to receive targeted funding aimed at enhancing both resources and infrastructure. This strategic investment is also set to significantly expand prisoner opportunities at HMP Wealstun. Management at the prison are currently undertaking a comprehensive review of prisoner wages, and it is anticipated this work will conclude by the end of the year and the outcome of the review to be implemented soon after in 2025. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 9 | How will the Governor ensure that information in an ACCT file only includes paperwork for one week whilst archiving and storing the remainder, as stated in the response to the 2022-2023 annual report (see ‘response to the last report’, below)? Repeated | Governor / Director | |
| 10 |
How is the Governor planning to increase time out of cell for prisoners by increasing the regime and providing more work and education opportunities, as this would help with their progression?
Repeated
Response
HMP Wealstun has been selected as one of only five prisons nationwide to receive targeted funding aimed at enhancing both resources and infrastructure. This strategic investment is also set to significantly expand prisoner opportunities at HMP Wealstun. HMP Wealstun holds a weekly Regime Management Plan which enables it to effectively manage resources and, when necessary, reallocate them to address any local risks. Education funding at site level is based on a specific cost per prisoner, and as the prison population increases, the funding should be reflected in that increase in Operational Capacity. |
Governor / Director | In progress |
| 11 |
How is the Governor planning to increase workshop and education capacity so that prisoners are able to work full time, with multiple benefits including wellbeing, in addition to more money for canteen (where prisoners can buy snacks, drinks, toiletries, etc)?
Repeated
Response
HMP Wealstun has been selected as one of only five prisons nationwide to receive targeted funding aimed at enhancing both resources and infrastructure. This strategic investment is also set to significantly expand prisoner opportunities at HMP Wealstun. Management at the prison are currently undertaking a comprehensive review of prisoner wages, and it is anticipated this work will conclude by the end of the year and the outcome of the review to be implemented soon after in 2025. Education funding at site level is based on a specific cost per prisoner, and as the prison population increases, the funding should be reflected in that increase in Operational Capacity. |
Governor / Director | In progress |
| 12 | How is the Governor planning to ensure that the change of responsibilities for equality and diversity to the safer custody team does not impact on the importance of this area of work? | Governor / Director |
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation (including transfers) | 45 | 38 |
| Discipline/Adjudication | 2 | 2 |
| Drugs/Alcohol | 1 | 1 |
| Family contact | 2 | 1 |
| Food/Kitchen | 8 | 12 |
| Healthcare | 21 | 26 |
| IPP | 1 | 0 |
| Other | 14 | 9 |
| Property | 41 | 43 |
| Race/Religion | 3 | 1 |
| Release/Resettlement | 1 | 1 |
| Segregation | 4 | 4 |
| Staff care/attitude | 15 | 13 |
| Visits | 23 | 18 |
| Work/Pay | 5 | 7 |
Related inspections & investigations
Other reports for Wealstun
Report details
- Establishment
- Wealstun
- Type
- Prison · Cat C
- Report year
- 2024
- Published
- 20 September 2024
- Responsible body
- HMP Wealstun
- Recommendations
- 12
- MoJ rating (2024/25)
- 2 — Concern
Population
| Population | 908 |
| Operational capacity | 908 |
Service providers
Catering (Soft)
Aramark
Dental
Time for Teeth
Education & Vocational Training
Novus
Escort Contractor
Geoamey
Facilities Management (Hard)
Amey
GP services
Wetherby Practice
Healthcare
Practice Plus Group
IMB Secretariat
Ministry of Justice
Optical
The Prison Opticians Trust
Physiotherapy & Podiatry
Premier Health
Psychosocial / Psychiatry / Psychology
Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
X-ray and Ultrasound
Global Diagnostics