Wealstun

When will the Minister recognise that the additional churn of prisoners impacts staffing across the whole prison and ensure an increase in budget to recruit staff to undertake this additional work?

I recognise the concerns around increased prisoner churn and staffing pressures. His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) has reviewed staffing models across adult public sector prisons, including HMP Wealstun, as part of its Workforce Delivery Project. Implementation planning is underway, and any resource increases will be reviewed subject to affordability. Emergency measures such as End of Custody Supervised Licence, Standard Determinate Sentence (SDS40), and expanded Home Detention Curfews have helped ease capacity pressures. At HMP Wealstun, increased prisoner churn over the past year has been managed effectively. Despite added strain on the Offender Management Unit and resettlement services, staff have responded admirably. HMP Wealstun continues to lead on the employment on release at 6 weeks metric, outperforming other Category C wing prisons by 3.5%.

As referenced in previous reports, what steps will the Minister take to ensure that prison is not used to house severely mentally ill people whilst they await a place in a suitable institution?

I share your repeated concern about the detention of individuals with severe mental illness. As I outlined in my response to your last report, the Mental Health Bill, which has now completed its Commons Stages, introduces a statutory 28-day transfer limit, aiming to reduce delays in transfers to hospital. It also includes measures to prevent courts from detaining people with severe mental illness in prison as a place of safety. NHS England’s Strategic Advisory Group will oversee implementation once Royal Assent is received. A new healthcare contract for male prisons in West Yorkshire, including HMP Wealstun, is also expected from April 2026. At HMP Wealstun, segregation is rarely used for mental health cases and only when safety is at risk, with improved psychiatric referral times being achieved through the prison’s Safety Intervention meeting.

When will the Minister end the inhumane treatment of prisoners serving IPP sentences across the prison estate and release all remaining IPP prisoners with no conditions?

I understand the Board’s continued concern regarding the re-sentencing of prisoners serving Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences. The Government is not standing still on the important issue of progressing those serving IPP sentences towards a prospective future release, including those in the open estate. Whilst this Government does want to make progress in relation to IPP prisoners, we cannot take any steps that would put the public at risk. The Justice Committee Report outlined the key principles that any resentencing exercise should balance the protection of the public and justice for the offender. The Government does not think this balance could be achieved when the independent Parole Board has determined, in many cases repeatedly determined, that the IPP offenders in custody are too dangerous to be released, having not met the statutory release test. Despite the challenges, our commitment to progressing IPP prisoners towards safe release has seen good progress. As of 30 June 2025, there were 2,486 IPP offenders in custody, a reduction from 2,734 the previous year. Of these, the never been released population had fallen to 978 and 1,508 had been recalled. The refreshed IPP Action Plan, published in the HMPPS IRP Annual Report on 17 July 2025, outlines reforms focused on reducing the IPP population, improving fairness, and supporting rehabilitation. It includes measurable targets and emphasises effective delivery across prisons and probation.

What will the Minister do to help tackle the increasing rates of illicit substances entering the prison and support the prison service in this work?

I also note your concerns about illicit substances. Prisons already use a range of security measures including X-ray body scanners, Enhanced Gate Security, detection dogs, and drug trace detection equipment. Over £40 million is being invested this year across 34 prisons to strengthen physical security, including anti-drone measures at 15 priority sites. HMP Wealstun has responded effectively to this challenge through strong supply reduction tactics and support from regional teams. The prison employs intelligence-led searches, drone patrols, and works closely with law enforcement and specialist units. Measures include mail and Personal Identification Number monitoring, drug detection, mobile phone detection, and physical barriers to prevent drone deliveries. Staff are trained to identify risks and uphold security standards, while corruption prevention and community engagement remain central to operations. Despite challenges, we remain committed to disrupting criminal activity and reducing demand through health and substance misuse partnerships.

As referenced in previous reports, what is the prison service doing to ensure that prisoners are not housed sharing cells, as this is inconsistent with the obligation to provide high standards of decency for prisoners, particularly in respect of toilet facilities?

At HMP Wealstun, all places meet HMPPS criteria, and cell sharing risk assessments are carried out effectively. While continued vigilance is essential, HMP Wealstun is one of the least crowded prisons in the North of England, with 130 prisoners in 65 shared cells. All cells include privacy screens for toilets, supporting standards of decency.

As referenced in previous reports, when will sufficient restoration work take place on the older wings (A and B wings)? It is increasingly apparent that this accommodation, built in the 1960s, needs significant remedial action for a number of reasons and is not a humane environment for prisoners.

HMPPS acknowledges concerns about the condition of A and B wings. Due to the scale of work required and current funding and capacity constraints, full replacement of these wings cannot proceed at this time. Although all establishment requests are considered, maintenance demands currently exceed available funding, so projects are prioritised based on risk to life, capacity, and decency. However, HMPPS continues to explore opportunities to progress this work. Following feasibility studies, the MoJ has identified a preferred £32 million option for A and B wings, which is currently at the Options Appraisal and Outline Business Case stage. If approved, this will enhance security and decency through the installation of new flooring, toilets, sinks, and windows. A separate project to refurbish all showers in A and B wings is also under consideration. If both projects are approved, they will be aligned to minimise disruption during wing decanting. Over the past year, many cell floors have been replaced and showers partially refurbished, including upgrades to wall finishes, lighting, and drainage.

The outsourcing of drug testing to the national centre has resulted in delays in bringing prosecutions, which affects security in the prison. When will these delays be addressed?

The forensic analysis of seized items contract has been in place since April 2023. High volumes of submissions above agreed thresholds impacted the delivery of standard (non-urgent) reports to prisons in 2024 which subsequently led to a backlog of standard submissions and turnaround times that increased from the contracted 28 days to approximately 98 days. Action was taken to reduce the volume of submissions to avoid a contractual overspend and reduce the backlog and the non-urgent submission route for forensic testing was paused in December 2024. The non-urgent testing route was reopened on 1 April 2025. The urgent testing route remained in place to detect immediate risks to health and avoid drug-related fatalities, and an authorisation route was put in place to ensure that all submissions between 9 December 2024 and 31 March 2025 met the urgent testing criteria. As a result of the pause to non-urgent submissions, the backlog was reduced to a sufficient volume, standard testing resumed, and results were delivered within the contracted key performance indicator of 28 days.

Why has the performance measure on first night accommodation ceased to be collected at a time of increased pressure due to the early release schemes?

Data on prisoners’ accommodation status on first night of release continues to be collected and forms part of the prison performance framework. Prison-level data are published annually as part of the Prison Performance Ratings. The 2024/25 publication can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/prison-performance-ratings-2024-to-2025

What will the prison service do to address the retention issues amongst officers and provide better training for the role?

To address officer retention, HMPPS has implemented a Retention Strategy supported by a toolkit that outlines local, regional, and national interventions. These are used by establishments to develop tailored retention plans based on identified drivers of attrition. In 2021, a new exit interview process was introduced to gather insights into why staff leave, using structured questions aligned with the strategy. This feedback informs targeted interventions. Additionally, the Retention Research Team, led by an Occupational Psychologist, conducts interviews and focus groups to explore underlying causes of attrition and support evidence-based solutions. A Retention Oversight Process was launched in February 2023 to focus on priority sites with high attrition or other concerning indicators such as poor attendance and increased assaults. To enhance training and support retention, HMPPS introduced the Enable Programme, a workforce transformation initiative aimed at creating safer, more supportive environments. It includes a long-term reform of foundation training, shifting to experiential learning over 12 months, and the rollout of Core Capability Packages for officers with 6–24 months of service. A Capability Oversight Function will launch in October 2025 to ensure training quality and guide future development through pilot programmes in London and selected prisons. At HMP Wealstun, retention has improved, with the resignation rate now at 5.64%. This is attributed to increased pay, additional onsite training after college, and prioritised attendance at safety-critical training using the Confidence and Competence Toolkit.

When will the performance targets be set with an understanding of prisons? The current process is demotivating for staff and must impact on prisoners.

Performance targets are set through a combination of central and local processes. Some are applied uniformly across prisons of similar function, while others, like purposeful activity, are tailored to individual establishments based on available resources and agreed locally by the Governor, Prison Group Director (PGD), and Area Executive Director (AED). A common concern arises when a prison meets its target one year and is then given a stretch target the next, which can feel punitive and demotivating. A mitigation process exists at year-end to moderate the impact of overly ambitious targets, and this has been used with mixed success in regions like Yorkshire. For the racial disparity in use of force measure, changes for 2025/26 now assess outcomes for individual ethnic minority subgroups rather than comparing all minorities to the white group. Ratings are based on the subgroup with the poorest outcomes, and minimum thresholds ensure statistical validity. This requires 12 months of data, making short-term progress harder to demonstrate. HMPPS continues to refine the performance framework, with a target challenge process and end-of-year moderation in place to ensure fairness. While national consistency is necessary, it can result in unrealistic expectations for high-performing prisons. At HMP Wealstun, strong performance has led to higher targets, which some staff view as inequitable. Nonetheless, the prison remains committed to continuous improvement aligned with both local and national objectives.

How will the Governor resolve the inconsistency between wings, such as communication by officers and subtle changes to regime that are evident throughout this report?

Will the Governor consider reinstating the mental health sessions in the gym?

As referenced in previous reports, how will the Governor ensure that information in an ACCT file only includes paperwork for one week whilst archiving and storing the remainder? The size of some files make them difficult to navigate by staff and IMB members, thus potentially failing to see the continuity clearly.

How will the Governor ensure that key workers sessions are provided for each prisoner and raise their profile?