Independent Monitoring Boards annual report

Wealstun

Report year 2020 Published 15 Oct 2020 Type Prison, category C Population 795 Responsible body HMP Wealstun 15 recommendations

The summary and positive findings below were written from the report by an AI model. The Board's own wording is in the report linked above.

Summary

Summary written by this site (AI-generated)
The reporting year at HMP Wealstun was characterized by three distinct periods: improvements prior to an HMIP inspection, subsequent regime curtailments due to financial pressures, and the COVID-19 lockdown. While the prison generally treated prisoners fairly and humanely and healthcare provision was good, the pervasive availability of drugs significantly impacted safety, leading to violence and self-harm. Staffing shortages caused frequent regime restrictions, limiting purposeful activity, and raised concerns about key worker implementation and PAVA training compliance. The Board highlighted a number of ongoing issues, including inadequate resources for equality and diversity, and challenges in managing IPP prisoners and transfers.

Positive findings

Summary written by this site (AI-generated)
The Board commends the safer custody team for ensuring vulnerable prisoners are well supported and for improvements made. The kitchen consistently produces a variety of good quality food, catering well for religious diets and festivals, and enabling a prisoner to gain ROTL experience in the farm shop. Stable staffing in the segregation unit during lockdown improved prisoner interaction, and a new governor proactively brought stability and raised morale. Adjudication hearings were generally respectful and engaging. Staff had more time to interact with prisoners during lockdown, and the chaplaincy team gained an experienced managing chaplain. The prison also appreciates the need for timely responses to complaints, and property handling in reception is good. Notably, workshop output increased during lockdown despite fewer prisoners, and the prison benefits from the Jigsaw Charity's family support work, a self-harm support group, a problem support mentor scheme, and the creative Good Vibrations group. The Construction Skills Certificate Scheme has a high success rate.

Recommendations

All 15 recommendations

Key concerns

All 12 key concerns

Recommendations 15 items · 1 repeated

Recommendations were extracted from the report by AI, and responses and their status from the ministerial response by AI. Each recommendation shows whether its wording has been checked against the report.

Recommendation 1

Response: Rejected

Addressee: Ministry of Justice · Topic: Resettlement

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Ensure that all prisoners serving indeterminate sentences for public protection (IPP) are released and, if recalled, are not automatically an IPP prisoner again (see paragraph 7.3.6).
Government response (as published)
I acknowledge the Board’s concern about prisoners serving indeterminate sentences for public protection (IPP) and when they are recalled on licence. The population of prisoners serving IPP sentences across the custodial estate was over 6,000 at its peak in 2012. The latest published figures show the unreleased IPP population stood at 1,895 at the end of September 2020, which is itself a reduction from 2,134 at the end of December 2019 – demonstrating good progress and improvement in opportunities available to progress in their sentence. However, it is important to note that, as the unreleased IPP population continues to decrease, those remaining in the prison population present the most complex and challenging cases. Many of these prisoners are still assessed as posing a high risk of committing further violent or sexual offences. HMPPS will continue to work with these individuals to offer opportunities to reduce their identified risks but ultimately these risks must be addressed before the independent Parole Board can consider the prisoner for release.
This is not a simple task but HMPPS remains committed to doing all it can to support the progression of IPPs and to help them reduce their risk to the point where the Parole Board determines that they may be safely released. Work is delivered via a joint IPP Action Plan, developed in partnership with the Parole Board which is regularly reviewed. HMPPS is prioritising post-tariff prisoners in accessing rehabilitative interventions which includes Psychology Service led reviews and enhanced case management for those with complex set of risks and needs. These reviews have identified pathways for individuals who have not progressed, following two or more parole hearings. The pathways include access to services available through the Offender Personality Disorder provision. To date over 1,500 reviews have taken place with 310 IPP prisoners having achieved release, and 394 having a progressive move to open conditions. HMPPS has also invested in four specialist Progression Regimes across the country providing 385 places dedicated to supporting indeterminate prisoners struggling to achieve release via the usual routes.
It was disappointing to hear that almost all of the 35 IPP prisoners released were subsequently recalled to prison (including 19 Lifers). The decision to recall is based upon the offender’s reported behaviour, there need not be a criminal conviction for a recall to be made. Equally, should authorities decide not to take further action against an alleged offence, or where the offence is considered by the courts by way of a further sentence, it does not automatically follow that the Parole Board will direct the recalled offender’s re-release on IPP licence. However, it is worth highlighting that an IPP licence remains in force for a minimum of 10 years and those recalled will continue to be reviewed under their IPP sentence in custody until the Parole Board has directed their re-release. They will then remain on IPP licence unless they are successful in applying for their licence to be terminated. There is a statutory requirement for the Parole Board to review each case for detaining a recalled IPP prisoner, and only they may direct the re-release. There are no plans to change this requirement.

Source text verified

Recommendation 2

Response: Implemented

Addressee: Ministry of Justice · Topic: Staffing

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Ensure that funding for prisons is sufficient to allow full regimes to be provided to all prisoners, officer training requirements to be met and the prison to be able to support prisoners’ rehabilitation, to enable their successful resettlement.
Government response (as published)
I acknowledge the Board’s comments about having sufficient funding to provide full regimes, meeting prison officer training requirements and supporting rehabilitation. Prisons at the moment are faced with the challenges surrounding Covid-19 and HMPPS has provided a helpful summary within the attached annex which sets out the position.
HMP Wealstun has sufficient funding in line with the operational staffing benchmark to provide a Covid regime / full regime and post Covid-19 recovery a new staffing profile will be introduced.

Source text verified

Recommendation 3

Response: In progress

Addressee: HMPPS · Topic: Safety

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Ensure that the requirements are clear about when prisons which were part of a pilot should undertake refresher training afterwards (see paragraph 4.5.7).
Government response (as published)
The four sites who piloted PAVA (incapacitant spray) are still considered as pilot sites whilst HMPPS continues to monitor and learn from their practices. This position will be reviewed as the wider rollout progresses and is eventually completed.

Source text verified

Recommendation 4

Response: Accepted

Addressee: HMPPS · Topic: Resettlement

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Consider whether locating IPP and life-sentenced prisoners at a prison without access to relevant programmes, and with ineffective processes to manage them, is an appropriate way to enable them to progress towards release (see paragraph 7.3.9)
Government response (as published)
Regarding the location of IPPs, it is accepted that these prisoners should be located at an establishment best placed to meet their sentence planning needs in terms of interventions, and for those assessed as needing access to certain interventions in other prisons staff will seek to find a suitable location as promptly as is reasonably possible. To support IPP prisoners, HMP Wealstun intends to recommence the monthly forum group by December 2020 and will also look at providing additional training and or one to one work to assist in terms of their sentence progression.

Source text verified

Recommendation 5

Response: In progress

Addressee: HMPPS · Topic: Resettlement

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Provide more category D open prison places, so that transfers are not delayed once a prisoner is recategorised (see paragraph 7.3.3).
Government response (as published)
As part of the 10,000 additional prison places programme, plans are also being developed to increase capacity in the Category D estate to enable more men to move to open conditions to support their rehabilitation. Locally, there are currently approximately 32 Category D prisoners held at HMP Wealstun. Several of these prisoners are deemed unsuitable for allocation to HMP/YOI Hatfield Category D Resettlement Prison as this establishment cannot facilitate supervised medication to the men held in their care. Some individuals are approved a move but require a completed offender assessment review prior to the transfer, due to a change in risk. The Category C estate is unfortunately currently inadequately resourced to enable these reviews to take place, creating a system grid lock. This grid lock is under review and HMP Wealstun is part of a pilot that intends to improve this capability.

Source text verified

Recommendation 6

Response: In progress

Addressee: HMPPS · Topic: Mental Health

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Ensure that as prisons move out of lockdown, any long-term effects on prisoners are identified and plans are in place to address them.
Government response (as published)
The key worker scheme has been largely targeted towards very vulnerable prisoners during Stage 4 of the Covid -19 regime delivery, as HMP Wealstun fully progresses into Stage 3, and when staffing availability allows, staff will start to deliver more key worker sessions. With the introduction of the new Offender Management in Custody staffing profile, this will allow for keyworker activity during the morning and afternoons to ensure all prisoners receive their allocated keyworker time. All Prisoner Offender Managers (probation, operational and non-operational) will be assigned an area of special interest, one of these areas will be IPP/Lifers.

Source text verified

Recommendation 7

Response: In progress

Addressee: Governor / Director · Topic: Safety

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Ensure that once approval is given to resume training, refresher training in PAVA and rigid-bar handcuffs is given priority (see paragraph 4.5.6).
Government response (as published)
In response to ensuring HMP Wealstun’s prison officers are up to date with their training, the use of force instructors at all four of the pilot sites, which includes HMP Wealstun, were up skilled in both PAVA and Spontaneous Protection Enabling Accelerated Response training to then carry this training out with officers locally. Whilst the responsibility rests with individual prisons to ensure staff training is delivered and is current, HMPPS Safety and Rehabilitation Directorate were aware of some delays and the impact of Covid-19 has further hindered progress due to all training being paused. However, the prison has a Safe Operating Procedure in place and will commence training at the earliest opportunity. The Governor intends for staff to be fully compliant and receive their training by June 2021 with support from Physical Safety Group (Safety and Rehabilitation Directorate).

Source text verified

Recommendation 8

Response: Implemented

Addressee: Governor / Director · Topic: Equality · Repeated from a previous year

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Ensure that adequate staffing is allocated to equality and diversity (disappointingly, an ongoing issue) (see paragraph 5.4.3).
Government response (as published)
Resources have now been provided to the Equalities team; the Senior Manager Equalities Lead position was re-evaluated and has been replaced with a Band 6 Equalities Manager who took up post in September 2020. A part time Band 3 Administrator has also joined the team.

Source text verified

Recommendation 9

Addressee: Governor / Director · Topic: Regime

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Ensure that all relevant paperwork and witnesses are available for all adjudications, especially for those to be heard by the independent adjudicator (see paragraph 5.2.14).

Source text verified

Recommendation 10

Response: In progress

Addressee: Governor / Director · Topic: Regime

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Ensure that when lockdown restrictions are lifted, key workers are fully in place for all prisoners (see paragraph 5.3.5).
Government response (as published)
The key worker scheme has been largely targeted towards very vulnerable prisoners during Stage 4 of the Covid -19 regime delivery, as HMP Wealstun fully progresses into Stage 3, and when staffing availability allows, staff will start to deliver more key worker sessions. With the introduction of the new Offender Management in Custody staffing profile, this will allow for keyworker activity during the morning and afternoons to ensure all prisoners receive their allocated keyworker time. All Prisoner Offender Managers (probation, operational and non-operational) will be assigned an area of special interest, one of these areas will be IPP/Lifers.

Source text verified

Recommendation 11

Addressee: Governor / Director · Topic: Healthcare

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Ensure that Care UK has a process for replying to prisoner complaints within an agreed timescale (see paragraph 6.1.3).

Source text verified

Recommendation 12

Addressee: Governor / Director · Topic: Regime

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Ensure that post is collected from the post room daily by the wing staff (see paragraph 7.2.4).

Source text verified

Recommendation 13

Response: In progress

Addressee: Governor / Director · Topic: Resettlement

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Ensure that funding is available to reinstate the Resolve offending behaviour programme, given the significant number of prisoners with a history of domestic violence. (see paragraph 7.3.5).
Government response (as published)
Resolve OBP only ceased due to Covid -19 restrictions and although HMP Wealstun is hoping to procure a further years funding for Tackle It, the domestic violence programme run in partnership with Leeds Rhinos, this also will be subject to Covid restrictions as delivery of the programme involves group activity work. Recently six staff were trained to deliver Time Wise, an intervention designed to address violent behaviour which will be rolled out once the prison has appropriate IT to deliver it.

Source text verified

Recommendation 14

Response: In progress

Addressee: Governor / Director · Topic: Resettlement

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Ensure that the monthly forum for IPP and life-sentenced prisoners with the OMU is reinstated (see paragraph 7.3.9).
Government response (as published)
To support IPP prisoners, HMP Wealstun intends to recommence the monthly forum group by December 2020 and will also look at providing additional training and or one to one work to assist in terms of their sentence progression.

Source text verified

Recommendation 15

Response: Rejected

Addressee: Governor / Director · Topic: Food

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Consider reducing the cost of food in the visits hall to the same as that in the staff mess (see paragraph 7.4.3).
Government response (as published)
The costing of items sold in the staff mess and the visits hall refreshment bar are not informed by regional policy. The staff mess is operated both as a learning and business enterprise by the provider of education Novus and HMP Wealstun has no influence over their pricing structures. The visits hall refreshment bar costing is in comparison and comparable to the services provided by a local community café and similar pricing to other establishments within the Yorkshire region.

Source text verified

Key concerns 12 items

Key concerns were extracted from the report text by an AI model.

Key concern 1

Substance Misuse · Repeated from a previous year

Drugs have been readily available throughout the majority of the reporting year, meaning the prison is not as safe as it should be. This leads to debt, bullying, violence, and self-harm.

Key concern 2

Safety

The standard of completion and control of ACCTs documents were a concern in the early part of the year.

Key concern 3

Segregation

The effectiveness of segregation management varied greatly throughout the year owing to a lack of stable staffing, leading to prisoners staying on the unit for longer periods.

Key concern 4

Regime/Time Out of Cell

It was also noted by the Board that a significant number of adjudications heard by the independent adjudicator were not proceeded with or were dismissed owing to a lack of available evidence/paperwork.

Key concern 5

Equality/Diversity · Repeated from a previous year

The lack of staffing for equality and diversity meant these areas were not given the priority they deserved (an ongoing issue).

Key concern 6

Regime/Time Out of Cell

One of the main issues throughout the year, even before lockdown, was the regular curtailment of regimes due to the lack of staff, which meant that prisoners’ time out of their cells was limited. How well are prisoners progressed towards successful resettlement? Again, this was rather varied throughout the year, as staffing in the offender management unit (OMU) was inconsistent and regime curtailments meant that prisoners were confined to their cells far too frequently, rather than being able to attend work or education.

Key concern 7

Safety

5 A major issue raised by the Board was that while Wealstun continued to deploy PAVA as a post-pilot site, there was no requirement to conduct refresher training (as would be the case with other control and restraint training), and eventually 64% of officers became ‘out of ticket’ but continued to carry PAVA.

Key concern 8

Resettlement/Release

The Board is concerned that IPP prisoners and lifers are located at Wealstun, where access to relevant programmes is limited and the processes necessary to manage them do not seem to be working.

Key concern 9

Resettlement/Release

The Board has received a number of applications from prisoners waiting for moves to open prisons but there is no available space.

Key concern 10

Healthcare

The Board has received a few applications about healthcare over the year, and on investigation has found that the prisoner has made a complaint but not received a reply. There seems to be no timescale for replying to healthcare complaints, and no one chases for responses. The Board would like to see the prison address this with Care UK.

Key concern 11

Regime/Time Out of Cell

6 One issue which the Board raised regularly was that prisoners’ post, including details of allocation to work, and so on, was not being collected by the wings, and at times post was a week old.

Key concern 12

Resettlement/Release

There is a legacy of OASys assessment backlogs, and assessments are not regularly updated, impacting sentence progression and parole hearings.

Safety statistics

Incidents during the reporting year.

IndicatorThis yearPrevious
Deaths in custody2not recorded

Population

Population795
Operational capacity810
CNA (designed for)810 (98% occupied)
Time out of cell0.5h/day

Report details

Establishment
Wealstun
Type
Prison, category C
Report year
2020
Published
15 October 2020
Responsible body
HMP Wealstun
Recommendations
15
MoJ rating (2025/26)
3, Good

Service providers

ServiceProvider
Dental servicesTime for Teeth
Escort provisionGEOAmey
Facilities management and site maintenanceAmey
Family intervention servicesJigsaw
Learning and skillsNovus
Optical carePen Optical
Physical/mental healthcareCare UK
Physiotherapy and podiatryPremier Health
Psychosocial services, psychiatry and psychology servicesMidlands Partnership Foundation Trust
Resettlement servicesSt Giles Trust
X-ray and ultrasoundGlobal Diagnostics

Related inspections and investigations

HMIP inspection, 3 Oct 2022

Unannounced

HMIP inspection, 15 Oct 2019

Unannounced

Lewis Johnson

Prevention of future deaths report · 12 Dec 2022 · State Custody related deaths | Suicide (from 2015)

Other reports for Wealstun

2026

Published 30 Sep 2026 · Key concerns recorded

2025

Published 25 Sep 2025 · Population 908 · Key concerns recorded

2024

Published 20 Sep 2024 · Population 908 · Self-harm 83 · Key concerns recorded

2023

Published 27 Sep 2023 · Population 850 · Key concerns recorded

2022

Published 12 Oct 2022 · Population 800 · Key concerns recorded

2021

Published 14 Oct 2021 · Population 809 · Key concerns recorded