Frankland

I appreciate you drawing my attention to the issue of caring for prisoners living with dementia and whether HMP Frankland or other prisons in the long-term and high-security estate (LTHSE) are the most suitable settings for individuals with such complex physical and mental health needs. Placement in LTHSE prisons is based primarily on an individual’s security classification and risk to the public, rather than health condition. Sentencing decisions are a matter for the independent judiciary, who consider all relevant factors, including any neurological or mental health conditions, in accordance with guidance set by the Sentencing Council.
However, I recognise the importance of ensuring that the needs of older and more vulnerable prisoners are considered properly. The independent review of sentencing examined whether the needs for older offenders, including those with acute mental health needs such as dementia, were met by the current framework. It recognised, as you do in your report, the operational challenges of managing those with age-related conditions, particularly given infrastructure constraints. It subsequently recommended both a national strategy to manage older offenders’ complex health needs and an expansion of the use of Early Release on Compassionate Grounds for suitable older offenders. The Government has accepted these recommendations in principle and will seek to implement these.
In the meantime, His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) continues to work closely with the NHS and Local Authorities to ensure that those in our care receive the support they need. As you report, HMP Frankland is taking steps to support those with dementia, having implemented a dementia pathway and offering additional support including partnership work with Alzheimer’s UK and Age UK.

Maintenance Contractor
We recognise how important a reliable and responsive maintenance service is for the smooth operation of the prison and the safety and wellbeing of all who live and work there. We are working closely with the maintenance contractor to enhance performance and ensure service delivery meets expectations.
Through ongoing discussions and collaboration, we have reinforced key performance indicators (KPIs) such as response time, completion rates and this process is continuing.
To support improvements, we have implemented regular audit and monthly reviews of work and outstanding defects. Clear communication has been prioritised between the management team and facilities management provider, allowing us to jointly address challenges and refine operational strategies.
The estates meeting, chaired by the Deputy Governor and attended by senior staff and an AMEY manager, also continues to allow for effective tracking of outstanding issues and escalation where needed.
The specific concerns you raised about kitchen equipment have already been escalated via the agreed national process. We will keep this under review to ensure that the issue is resolved satisfactorily.