Source · IMB Annual Report
Bedford
AI-generated report summary HMP/YOI Bedford, a Category B reception and resettlement prison, continues to face challenges with overcrowding, high levels of violence, and pervasive illicit item use. While some improvements have been made in reception and living conditions, the healthcare service is under significant strain, evidenced by a CQC warning notice. The Board also highlights concerns regarding staff retention (due to visa issues), a limited education curriculum, and an antiquated paper-based system for property and complaints.
Year: 2025
Published: 21 Nov 2025
Type: Prison · Cat B, YOI, reception, resettlement
Population: 367
Recommendations: 15
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 1 | — |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryThe Board notes significant improvements in the prison's reception process, which now generates a calm atmosphere with clear induction information. Living conditions have considerably improved, with wings repainted and better cell organization. The relocation of the segregation unit to a vastly improved environment is also a welcome development. Furthermore, key worker sessions have significantly increased, and the prisoner application process shows positive changes in availability and tracking. The chaplaincy team is commended for its valuable multi-faith support and dedication to prisoner well-being.
Key concerns
The prison remains overcrowded with, in the majority of instances, two men sharing a small cell and toilet, which could be considered as inhumane.
Whilst there has been a slight fall in prisoner-on-prisoner violence, HMP Bedford is still the third worst amongst reception prisons. For most of the reporting year there was a steady decrease in assaults on staff. However, the number of assaults at HMP Bedford remains very high in comparison with other reception prisons.
All the evidence indicates that drugs and other illicit items are commonplace within the prison, with high levels of mandatory drug tests being positive, compounded by over 100 unsecure windows.
‘We served a warning notice on Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust on 01 May 2025 for failing to meet the regulations relating to the safe care and treatment of service users at HMP Bedford. The provider had failed to ensure service users received safe care and treatment and that their records contained all relevant information.’
Despite improvements in education attendance, prisoners comment on the lack of courses available other than basic English and maths, and only around 40% of prisoners are engaged in purposeful activity, which is below average.
The Board is concerned that many officers (including operational support grades) are on overseas work visas, and changes to the rules could mean that they do not earn the minimum salary, potentially leading to a significant loss of staff and impact on the regime.
While cells are not without their issues our observations are that they are mostly in a reasonable condition. • we have, for many years, set out in each annual report the horrible conditions for both prisoners and staff in the underground segregation unit, but in September 2024 the unit was relocated to a refurbished wing and it is a vast improvement on the previous environment. • the number of key worker sessions has significantly increased, although it does not yet meet the national target. • the number of complaints made by prisoners has remained around 100 per month which is the third highest of all reception prisons (when proportioning to the number of prisoners). • missing or lost prisoners’ property continues to be a source of frustration, particularly arising from transfers between prisons. The paper-based system is simply not up to the job.
What actions is the prison taking to address this? • the drug and alcohol rehabilitation strategy of restrict supply, reduce demand and build recovery appears to have had limited success in all areas. What actions will be taken to make the strategy more effective? • feedback from the HMPPS prisoner survey suggests that the high number of complaints that the prison receives could be reduced significantly if officers could address problems and queries at an earlier stage. How will the prison enable this to happen? • whilst the wing moves appear to have worked well for young adults, we are concerned that the prisoners moved to D-4 do not have access to all education courses, that there have been problems getting to the library and that the wing generally feels less well managed (for example very few application forms are available).
The glass in the observation panels of the new Care and Segregation Unit (CSU) is breakable, resulting in small shards that can be used as items for self-harm or weapons, and a more appropriate, un-breakable material has not yet been found.
Recommendations
Will the Minister influence government policy so that staff on overseas visas are not lost to the prison service?
Government response
Having read your report with care I do understand the Board’s concerns about the changes to the UK Immigration Rules. The Ministry of Justice were in active discussions with the Home Office on this issue and I am pleased to say that on 19 December, a temporary exemption came into effect to certain aspects of the immigration rules for prison officers already in the country. The change will remain in place up to the 31 December 2026 with a lower salary threshold being set for prison officers until 31 December 2027. This temporary exemption ensures that prisons can run safely with the right level of experienced staff. As indicated in your report, HMP/YOI Bedford has seen a reduction in staff resignations which has improved stability and experience levels locally.
Recommendation 2
What action will HMPPS take to ensure that the healthcare contract is properly managed?
Government response
NHS England is responsible for all health treatment in custody in prisons in England. However, HMPPS is committed to working in partnership with the health and social care partners, so that people in prison can access the equivalent standard and range of health services as they would receive in the community. The Board can be assured that NHS England have always taken direct action to ensure that the healthcare contract is properly managed via structured contract review meetings. NHS England Commissioner support has also been constructive to allow the healthcare provider to address the issues raised by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) warning notice issued on 1 May 2025. The healthcare provider promptly created a comprehensive action plan and took significant steps to address the concerns raised by the CQC. A Medicine Optimisation Service quality assurance visit was commissioned by NHS England which made further recommendations for improvements and continued support was provided to the healthcare provider, including assistance from the NHS England Regional Quality Lead and Health and Justice Commissioning Manager. In August 2025 the CQC visited to follow-up on the warning notice which was positive, resulting in the warning notice being lifted and several staff were highlighted for good practice. However, NHS England assurance and oversight continues to ensure that improvements are progressing and are being maintained in the context of a challenged and pressured prison environment. Delays in staff vetting have also been escalated to support the provider in bringing up health delivery. A new interim manager has been appointed to manage the healthcare department at HMP/YOI Bedford and the prison will continue to work closely with its healthcare partners to ensure the best possible care is provided.
Recommendation 3
Will money be made available to address this problem [unsecure windows]?
Government response
A project is under development to replace approximately 62–80 windows. This will focus on the higher risk areas within the prison, which are most vulnerable to both the weather and influx of illicit items. Whilst the specification for the new window design has been signed off, the project requires funding streams to be established and approved. In addition, HMPPS is commissioning a site-wide window survey to assess condition and inform a future bid for a more comprehensive replacement across the site. However, as demands for maintenance are much greater than the available funding, HMPPS will be prioritising works very carefully to make best use of that funding, focusing on risk to life and risk to capacity and decency. In the interim, the prison is focussing on internal cell window repairs using Perspex for the remedial work to improve cell decency during periods of colder weather.
Recommendation 4
Will HMPPS undertake research or other initiatives to find a more appropriate inspection panel material?
Government response
As a contingency arrangement for fire safety, all cell doors have an observation panel enabling staff to see the extent and size of the fire, to judge the effectiveness of the fire hose inundation port and to communicate with the prisoner. If the inundation port is obstructed, it should be possible to break or remove the observation panel to insert a fire hose. In areas where observation panels are subject to high attack rates, such as Segregation Units, a new Type 2 observation panel was introduced in October 2023 following research and live prison trials. This specification is a removable cassette-style observation panel with toughened glazing, paired with a bayonet-style inundation port. It addresses the issue of panels being easily broken but continues to provide a contingency arrangement in the event of a fire. This Type 2 specification is available to any cell doors in any category establishment, however, they must be introduced to a whole operational section of a prison, such as a Segregation Unit, a whole houseblock, or wing. Both the Type 1 specification (breakable glass) and Type 2 are available to prisons as a compliant standard. To date, only three prisons have implemented this Type 2 solution within their Segregation Units. However, due to repeat breakages of the observation panels in the Care and Separation Unit at HMP/YOI Bedford, discussions have taken place to install the more robust option and the prison is in the process of sourcing funding for this project.
Recommendation 5
Can HMPPS confirm when Launchpad will be introduced?
Government response
The Board can be assured that the installation of Launchpad is underway. The Wi-Fi installation and supporting infrastructure work is scheduled to complete within the current financial year 2025/26 and the scheduled go live is in quarter one of 2026/27 financial year. The first of three application services anticipated to be fulfilled from the end of April 2026 will give prisoners digital access and allow HMP/YOI Bedford to start to transition away from paper-based systems and towards improved interaction and services.
Recommendation 6
Will HMPPS confirm that this [consistent approach across all prisons in respect of clothing guidance for visitors and in respect of the amount of money that visitors can spend during visits] will be reviewed?
Government response
Visitor guidance is currently governed by ‘Prison Service Instruction (PSI) 16/2011 - Providing Visits and Services to Visitors’. However, as part of the work being undertaken by HMPPS Family Services nationally this policy is under review and the Board’s concerns will be considered. Where necessary the policy will be updated as part of the wider consultation. Locally, HMP/YOI Bedford has clear clothing guidance which is consistent with other prisons and is available on its government website. This guidance is also displayed in the visitors’ centre, which all visitors pass through prior to entering the prison. The amount of money allowed into HMP/YOI Bedford for use during visits is reviewed locally and currently is £20 per adult and £10 per child. This is currently considered to be more than sufficient to make purchases during visits but will be reviewed in line with any rising costs and in response to visitor feedback locally.
Recommendation 7
Will HMPPS produce clear guidelines on communication with deaf prisoners and equipment that is available?
Government response
To clarify HMPPS has in place an ‘Advancing Equality for Offenders and Children in Custody Policy Framework’ which sets out how best to manage offenders and children in custody in line with the Equality Act 2010. The framework ensures that our obligations under the Public Sector Equality Duty are met, as public sector organisations, such as HMPPS, must ensure that services are accessible to people with a disability or impairment, such as those that are deaf or hard of hearing, and all staff should be aware that people with additional support needs must not be discriminated against, either directly or indirectly. HMPPS also has a disability action plan in place for 2025/26 which is designed to improve how we identify and address the needs of disabled prisoners and people on probation, to enable a more inclusive environment for effective rehabilitation. HMP/YOI Bedford operates its local equality policy and provides clear processes to support prisoners who are deaf or have hearing impairments and these are regularly reviewed to ensure they remain effective. On reception, any prisoner declaring a disability, including hearing loss, is assessed by reception staff and healthcare to identify reasonable adjustments and determine whether a Personal Emergency Evacuation Plan (PEEP) is required. Staff are trained to follow the PEEP process and to work with partners to identify and implement suitable communication aids, equipment and safety measures where needed from the outset. NHS England also continues to work with healthcare providers to understand the needs of people who are deaf in the context of health delivery and will support the development of a pathway as clinically appropriate.
Recommendation 8
Can the Governor confirm that this [induction supported by a simple leaflet with key messages] will be delivered?
Recommendation 9
we are pleased to see the increase in key worker sessions and hope that it can meet the national target in the next 12 months. What strategy is in place to achieve this?
Recommendation 10
What actions is the prison taking to address this [assaults on staff remain far too high]?
Government response
While it is acknowledged that the prison still has more to do, I am pleased that the Board has highlighted the many positive steps being made at HMP/YOI Bedford, such as the reduction in violence against staff and prisoners and the use force to deescalate an incident.
Recommendation 11
What actions will be taken to make the strategy [drug and alcohol rehabilitation] more effective?
Recommendation 12
How will the prison enable this [officers address problems and queries at an earlier stage to reduce complaints] to happen?
Recommendation 13
Will the prison review the management of the D-4 wing and access of D-4 prisoners to education and the library?
Recommendation 14
How will the prison increase the attractiveness of the curriculum?
Recommendation 15
Will the Governor confirm that this [review rules in respect of clothing for visitors and the amount of money that can be brought in] will happen?
Government response
Visitor guidance is currently governed by ‘Prison Service Instruction (PSI) 16/2011 - Providing Visits and Services to Visitors’. However, as part of the work being undertaken by HMPPS Family Services nationally this policy is under review and the Board’s concerns will be considered. Where necessary the policy will be updated as part of the wider consultation. Locally, HMP/YOI Bedford has clear clothing guidance which is consistent with other prisons and is available on its government website. This guidance is also displayed in the visitors’ centre, which all visitors pass through prior to entering the prison. The amount of money allowed into HMP/YOI Bedford for use during visits is reviewed locally and currently is £20 per adult and £10 per child. This is currently considered to be more than sufficient to make purchases during visits but will be reviewed in line with any rising costs and in response to visitor feedback locally.
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation (including transfers) | 13 | 18 |
| Adjudications | 4 | 3 |
| Equality and diversity | 4 | 2 |
| Healthcare (including mental health) | 33 | 11 |
| Property | 22 | 55 |
| Regime | 5 | 7 |
| Safety | 3 | 5 |
| Segregation | 6 | 8 |
| Staff interactions/Decisions/Treatment by staff | 18 | 20 |
| Welfare (e.g. money, canteen, clothing, facilities, visits) | 12 | 12 |
Related inspections & investigations
Safety 1
· Respect 1
· Activity 1
· Release 2
Sorin Fodor · Natural causes
Edward Hands · State Custody related deaths
Ezra Tamiem · State Custody related deaths | Suicide (from 2015)
Mark Vagnoni · State Custody related deaths
Other reports for Bedford
Population 370
· Self-harm 484
· Concerns
· Concerns
· Self-harm 367
· Concerns
Population 370
· Self-harm 138
· Concerns
· Concerns