Source · IMB Annual Report
Pentonville
AI-generated report summary HMP/YOI Pentonville, a category B/C local prison, faces significant challenges in providing a safe and rehabilitative environment. While staff demonstrated resilience during COVID-19, and some improvements were made in drug reduction and key working, the prison's deteriorating infrastructure, high levels of violence, and persistent issues with regime delivery severely impacted prisoner welfare and resettlement. The Board highlights a lack of investment, poor maintenance, and inadequate staffing as root causes, resulting in concerns about safety, healthcare access, and purposeful activity.
Year: 2020
Published: 9 Sep 2020
Type: Prison · Cat B, C, local, YOI
Population: 1,025
Recommendations: 12
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 6 | 1 |
| Self-harm incidents | 682 | 598 |
| ACCT cases opened | 786 | 742 |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryStaff demonstrated heroic efforts and flexibility in response to COVID-19. The prison made good progress in tackling drug problems through a coherent strategy and increased dog finds. Key working was successfully restarted in January 2020. The Wellbeing Centre received a national award. Family activity days, support for young adults, creative arts courses, and pre-release initiatives increased. The complaints system saw positive changes with electronic logging and improved accountability. Healthcare waiting times were generally comparable to the community, with overall satisfaction in clinical services.
Key concerns
Hand-made weapons were found on a regular basis.
Self-harm increased by 14%.
There were six deaths in custody.
Assaults on staff increased by 30%.
No firm funding for the remaining two wings for CCTV.
Body-worn video cameras (BWVCs) were not always worn by staff and the technology failed regularly. There was insufficient management grip on the use of force.
Five dog handlers are ‘allocated’ to Pentonville from the HMPPS regional hub, but the reality is that there is only one handler who regularly works at the prison with both an ‘active’ and a ‘passive’ dog – and not daily.
Pentonville is unsuitable for the incarceration of prisoners in the 21st century. But there is still no sign of the significant and urgent financial investment noted as being needed.
Refurbished landing was ‘mothballed’ for months because of ineffective water pressure. Although £284,000 funding was agreed in September 2019 for refurbishment of showers, this work has not begun.
Organising lift engineers, plumbers or pest control seemed to be daily challenges for GFSL.
Hospital appointments were sometimes cancelled at short notice because of a shortage of prison officer escorts.
Applications to the Board about healthcare increased by around 50%.
Attendance at the wellbeing centre is not seen as a clinical priority by the prison, and during any routine lockdown the centre is empty. The Board has raised this concern repeatedly.
Many prisoners have complex and multiple needs that a local prison serving the local courts is ill equipped to address.
Despite planned improvements in provision and an effective provider, homelessness remains a problem.
Constructive use of prisoners’ time is negatively affected by what seem to be persistent problems in delivering them to education and work – the 56% average attendance figure is dismal.
Rehabilitation, as a means of progression towards successful resettlement, takes a back seat.
Despite two separate National Offender Management Service (now HMPPS) investigations mandating that 800 cells needed either their window or grille replacing (following the homicide and double escape in 2016), by the end of March 2020 the work had still not been completed – meaning that contraband can still enter in this way.
Physical condition and layout of the reception area remain poorly suited for its purpose, with a large central holding room raising safety concerns.
During the reporting period, physical screens were installed between interviewing booths, in an attempt to provide greater privacy. However, the screens offer little additional privacy, and prisoners still undergo their cell sharing risk assessment and are asked personal questions to assess their safety needs while in earshot of other prisoners.
The person escort record, which accompanies each prisoner arriving at the prison, is frequently incomplete or inaccurate. Moreover, the vans bringing prisoners arrive unpredictably and are often delayed. The result is that officer numbers in reception are often poorly matched to requirements. For example, when many vans have arrived simultaneously and late, a lack of interview-trained staff in reception has meant that the last arriving prisoner was not located in a cell until 3am.
In January, the MoJ announced that Pentonville would become one of a number of challenging prisons to be installed with an airport-style body scanner to screen new arrivals. Work was to start in the spring, with the hope that it would be fitted by summer. However, its installation has been delayed, and during the reporting period it was not clear when the scanner would be installed.
Induction sessions are not always delivered to every prisoner; vulnerable prisoners sent to the vulnerable prisoner unit often receive no induction or basic kit.
Only 10 trained Listeners for over 1,000 prisoners, described as an ‘all-time low’.
The challenge, support, and intervention plan (CSIP) scheme has been mandatory across the prison estate since February 2019 but only started to be implemented at Pentonville in January 2020, at which point two prisoners were admitted to the scheme.
Catch 22’s contract to provide analysis and support to the prison and prisoners around gang issues ended in March 2020, at which point the prison began using its own questionnaire to elicit relevant information. The Board understands that the prison is in the process of reviewing the most effective way for gang conflict information and resolution to be delivered, but with so many prisoners (especially YAs) connected to gangs, a robust solution to this seemingly intractable problem is needed as soon as possible.
Fears about visits by these prisoners to the healthcare centre continued until, in August 2019, clinics were reserved for vulnerable prisoners once a month and GPs visited their landings daily. Risks remained, however, when mixing with the wider population on the way to medication, visits or work.
Lack of a full induction for new vulnerable prisoners arriving from reception was a recurring concern.
Vulnerable prisoners with mobility problems were sometimes placed on the vulnerable prisoner unit, which was not a fit or safe location, with broken lifts, no exercise yards, and unclear fire evacuation procedures.
5 Use of force The HMIP report from April 2019 found that use of force was high, and governance very poor. When the inspectors returned for the IRP in February 2020, they found that use of force had increased, many use of force reports were incomplete and data collection was poor. They concluded that governance of the use of force remained poor overall. They also noted that BWVCs were not routinely activated in the event of an incident. BWVCs have been taken in and out of service on many occasions during the year, and the whole system needed to be sent back to Scotland for repair at one stage.
Prevalence of drugs remains a problem. Cannabis was the drug of choice and the smell was often noticeable during the day. The new Governor renewed efforts to identify culprits.
Although Rapiscan – technology for scanning mail for traces of drugs – was introduced in the second half of the year, in March 2020 it was still not in routine use because of the cost of training and staff deployment.
Persistent plumbing issues across the prison cause frequent lack of hot/cold water, blocked toilets/showers, and leaks.
Many cells still have inadequately screened toilets.
Many showers are mouldy, infested with flies and in a poor state of repair; the plan to deep-clean all toilets by end of 2019 has not been completed.
Persistent problem of vermin, especially cockroaches.
The refurbishment of a landing by GFSL Projects was completed in May 2019 but it remained non-operational owing to plumbing issues until its deployment in March 2020 for prisoners self-isolating because of COVID-19.
Several lifts were out of operation for extended periods, causing problems for prisoners (and visitors) with mobility issues.
Insufficient supplies of clothing at reception and on the wings.
However, some prisoners complain about small portions, and those without access to canteen sometimes report being hungry. There have been complaints of food arriving cold on the wings owing to faulty heated trolleys.
Kitchen management is strong and positive, despite multiple recurrent equipment issues which create significant challenges, and the presence of vermin.
Kitchen workers lack sufficient time for telephone calls, showers and association.
The Segregation Unit (CSU) suffered from a vermin problem again this year, and its overall fabric is very tired and in urgent need of further renovations, with cells often out of use and broken observation panels.
One prisoner was regrettably held on the unit for five months before a place in the high-security estate was finally found for him. Pentonville managers tried their best to move him out, and it is unacceptable that it took the Prison Service so long to facilitate this transfer.
The adjudication process is cumbersome and bureaucratic, with lengthy forms, procedural failures, frequent absence of 'charging officers', and non-availability of key evidence compromising it.
The Board believes that the resistance of some staff to embrace change has contributed to some of the problems experienced by the prison this year, including staff suspensions and governors moving between roles.
However, notwithstanding his enthusiasm, by the time HMIP returned in February 2020, they reported that no meaningful progress had been made since April 2019: ‘Equality work was still neglected and the strategy had not been updated. There had been little focused work with protected groups. Although quality assurance of DIRFs [discrimination incident report forms] had recently been introduced, it had not yet led to sufficient improvements’.
The lack of effective support led to much frustration and a loss of confidence among prisoners until early 2020, when new commitment and energy from the prison (including the creation, in February, of a new head of communities governor post) led to positive change and optimism.
At the end of this reporting year, that new local IEP policy has not materialised. Prisoners have complained regularly that they are not getting the enhanced privileges they are promised, whether it is extra association, extra gym sessions, doing their own laundry or getting microwaves and toasters.
Prisoner property continued to be a concern during the reporting period, and the Board recorded an increase in applications regarding this problem. Common concerns related to frequent delays in prisoners’ property arriving at the prison from other institutions or going missing while in transit, and delays in receiving legitimate property which had been posted into the prison by prisoners’ family or friends. Delays of up to six weeks were not uncommon, and there were frequent instances of property disappearing. The associated impact on prisoners’ morale and on the effectiveness of the IEP system (allowing, for instance, enhanced prisoners to wear their own clothes posted to them by family) was significant.
There are difficulties in coordination between prison and healthcare staff, which can have clinical consequences. This was compounded by there being no healthcare liaison governor for many months.
Inadequate supervision by officers of opiate-substitute medication queues risked diversion of drugs.
Failure to provide all prisoners with photo-identity cards raises the risk of prisoner impersonation to obtain dispensed drugs illicitly.
Secondary health tests do not always occur within seven days when incoming prisoners are not located on the early days wing.
Some prisoners are deterred from attending particular healthcare facilities because of gang tensions.
Unpredictable unlock arrangements reduced the time available to attend mental health clinics and courses.
ACCT forms for prisoners are not always brought to the Wellbeing Centre by escorts.
The team thinks that there are probably more prisoners with alcohol problems than are being picked up at reception or later. Veterans are one group which tends to mask their needs.
From mid-March, group work stopped. The team continued with individual assessments and support, within COVID-19 constraints. Through-the-gate support stopped. Prisoners on prescribed drugs were given an appointment with their local drug service, so that they could continue to get medication on release. Other prisoners were given details of local drug services, but most of these had stopped taking new clients.
Low education attendance rate of 56% due to issues with the prison’s organisation and problems delivering prisoners to education.
Recommendations
Will you take steps to reduce the population in Pentonville and invest in the fabric of the prison to provide a safe and rehabilitative environment?
Government response
I acknowledge the Board’s comments about investing in the fabric of the prison to provide a safe and rehabilitative environment. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) remains committed to the delivery of extensive structural works to HMP/YOI Pentonville’s main entrance and a redesigned gatehouse incorporating enhanced gate security screening at reception. In addition, £1.5 million has been allocated for decency based projects to be carried out during this financial year which includes A, C, E, G and J wing showers. Further funding will be sought to allow for the refurbishment to outstanding works on D and F wings. Refurbishment work to the Segregation unit is now complete and significant resource has been devoted to painting and cleaning the prison in areas such as the toilets. Likewise, Government Facility Services Limited have been tasked to tackle the vermin issue. There are currently no plans to reduce HMP/YOI Pentonville’s prisoner population, projections of the prison estate have meant that all existing prisons, other than those already earmarked for closure, are required. However, to take account of the complexities of running a regime during the pandemic, the operational capacity was reduced to 1078 (slightly lower than the maximum number the prison can hold). I would like to emphasise to the Board that ensuring prisons have sufficient capacity to cope with demand is a crucial part of the Government’s effort to create a more effective justice system. That is why the Prime Minister reaffirmed HM Prison and Probation Service’s (HMPPS) commitment to provide an additional 10,000 prison places to help create a modern, efficient estate that is sustainable into the future. My officials have been working with partners across the criminal justice system to understand and manage the impact of an additional 20,000 new police officers joining the force will have on the system.
Recommendation 2
Will you commit to giving Pentonville the funding it needs to install CCTV on those wings which still do not have it?
Government response
Regarding the Board’s questions about installing CCTV and replacing the remaining windows (including grilles) of the prison, funding has been secured for CCTV to be fitted on E and F wings over this financial year and MoJ Estates are funding a rolling programme to replace all cell windows throughout the establishment (at around 100 windows fitted per annum). HMPPS Prison Maintenance Group will ensure that the windows requiring the most urgent need for replacement are prioritised.
Recommendation 3
Will you commit to funding the repair or replacement of all remaining insecure cell windows and grilles, which were identified four years ago as needing urgent attention?
Government response
Regarding the Board’s questions about installing CCTV and replacing the remaining windows (including grilles) of the prison, funding has been secured for CCTV to be fitted on E and F wings over this financial year and MoJ Estates are funding a rolling programme to replace all cell windows throughout the establishment (at around 100 windows fitted per annum). HMPPS Prison Maintenance Group will ensure that the windows requiring the most urgent need for replacement are prioritised.
Recommendation 4
Will the investment in technology made during the lockdown be sustained going forward – for example, more video links for those having legal visits?
Government response
I support the Board’s view about a continued investment in the technology evidenced during lockdown and am convinced that technology can play an important role in helping offenders turn their lives around, both within prison and after release. Government departments have worked at speed to bring in this new technology to the forefront. In May 2020 we announced that secure family video calls would be introduced at prisons and in young offender institutes across England and Wales, and I am pleased that the facility is now available in over 100 establishments (exact figure stood at 107 on 1st September). Whilst the current video call service is a temporary measure, intended for use whilst contact with family and friends is limited as a result of social distancing measures, HMPPS is considering a longer-term solution for video calls in line with Lord Farmer’s review recommendations in August 2017, focussing on those who do not receive face-to-face visits under normal circumstances. Aside from family video calls, we have also supported virtual telemedicine and face-to-face compassionate end-of-life calls. Furthermore, HMPPS has been working rapidly to enhance the capability of video prison conferencing facilities. This work has been central to the Lord Chancellor’s, the Rt. Hon Robert Buckland QC MP, ambition to keep courts sitting so that justice can be served. The key benefit enables criminal justice service professionals (CJSP) to remotely join video calls between a court and a prison using the existing video hardware (whereas previously CJSP needed to be physically present in court). Similarly, this new technology also allows CJSP to join remotely on video calls facilitated at the prison associated to consultations on case proceedings. Steps are being taken to increase video conferencing capacity at some locations through revising and extending operating hours during the weekdays, and in some cases on Saturdays. Alongside this work, HMPPS are increasing the number of video link outlets at several critical sites where capacity is limited, as well as to support specialist courts, including the youth and women’s estate. This work will provide HMP/YOI Pentonville with additional video rooms, providing nine which can be used as legal visits for prisoners. In addition to this, the modular buildings that currently house the video-equipment where the court-facing work takes place will be replaced. This environmental improvement should significantly improve the courts’ user experience. The equipment installed during Covid-19 will continue to be a resource for prisons to help increase the number of hearings and associated consultations by video.
Recommendation 5
Will the Prison Service deliver essential refurbishment for decency, such as toilets and showers?
Government response
I acknowledge the Board’s comments about investing in the fabric of the prison to provide a safe and rehabilitative environment. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) remains committed to the delivery of extensive structural works to HMP/YOI Pentonville’s main entrance and a redesigned gatehouse incorporating enhanced gate security screening at reception. In addition, £1.5 million has been allocated for decency based projects to be carried out during this financial year which includes A, C, E, G and J wing showers. Further funding will be sought to allow for the refurbishment to outstanding works on D and F wings. Refurbishment work to the Segregation unit is now complete and significant resource has been devoted to painting and cleaning the prison in areas such as the toilets. Likewise, Government Facility Services Limited has been tasked to tackle the vermin issue. There are currently no plans to reduce HMP/YOI Pentonville’s prisoner population, projections of the prison estate have meant that all existing prisons, other than those already earmarked for closure, are required. However, to take account of the complexities of running a regime during the pandemic, the operational capacity was reduced to 1078 (slightly lower than the maximum number the prison can hold). I would like to emphasise to the Board that ensuring prisons have sufficient capacity to cope with demand is a crucial part of the Government’s effort to create a more effective justice system. That is why the Prime Minister reaffirmed HM Prison and Probation Service’s (HMPPS) commitment to provide an additional 10,000 prison places to help create a modern, efficient estate that is sustainable into the future. My officials have been working with partners across the criminal justice system to understand and manage the impact of an additional 20,000 new police officers joining the force will have on the system.
Recommendation 6
Regional allocation of dogs is not working; will you commit to basing dogs permanently at Pentonville, to tackle contraband?
Government response
Drug Dogs HMP/YOI Pentonville’s dog team has strengthened since the Board’s report. Two dog handlers are on site and the kennel area has been refurbished to ensure facilities are fit for purpose. A review of the dog provision is currently underway across Public Sector Prisons South, and this will look at strengthening sites which do not have adequate dog cover. From September 2020, changes to the South directorate team will enable dogs to be deployed more flexibly between prisons allowing for greater parity. HMP/YOI Pentonville will liaise closely with the dedicated team to increase the provision of dogs.
Recommendation 7
Will the Prison Service increase the capacity of offending behaviour programmes, so that there is a better chance of Pentonville prisoners transferring and benefitting?
Government response
Offending Behaviour Programmes (OBPs) Funding for OBPs is allocated centrally, and any increase or change is considered as part of a national strategy. The delivery of accredited OBPs is an expensive activity, targeted where there is the highest need and delivered at sites with a population most suited to the current delivery model. Needs analysis are carried out annually and this has highlighted that HMP/YOI Pentonville does not have the right population profile to make OBP delivery effective at this time. In terms of future reconfiguration, HMP/YOI Pentonville may become a part Reception and part Resettlement prison, and this potentially may well lead to revisiting the OBP position. HMP/YOI Pentonville now facilitates the Time to Change programme which targets young adults, in particular those involved in gang affiliated activity.
Recommendation 8
Will you tackle the conundrum of allocation lists and attendance at courses and workshops provided by the education department as the regime starts to ease up after lockdown?
Recommendation 9
What will you do to improve the quality assurance of assessment, care in custody and teamwork (ACCT) processes, as highlighted in the HMIP IRP report, and ensure that all relevant participants are included in reviews?
Recommendation 10
Will the recording and scrutiny of use of force incidents be prioritised?
Recommendation 11
Will you refresh the local incentives and earned privileges policy and give enhanced prisoners meaningful privileges that will incentivise sustained good behaviour?
Recommendation 12
Will you commit to updating and progressing the equalities action plan?
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation (including transfers) | 45 | 38 |
| Complaints and adjudications | 32 | 28 |
| Diet | 2 | 4 |
| Discrimination | 3 | 0 |
| Health related | 56 | 36 |
| Other | 4 | 4 |
| Property | 30 | 25 |
| Race equality | 0 | 0 |
| Release and resettlement | 5 | 4 |
| Religious | 1 | 0 |
| Safety and wellbeing | 16 | 11 |
| Staff conduct | 13 | 8 |
| Visits | 10 | 12 |
| Work and education | 12 | 11 |
Related inspections & investigations
Safety 1
· Respect 2
· Activity 1
· Release 1
Stephen Nuth · Self-inflicted
Moses Hailemichel · Self-inflicted
Peter Campbell · Other non-natural
Karim Simi · Self-inflicted
Mardan Halimi · Natural causes
Rickie Poon · State Custody related deaths
Peter Campbell · This report is being sent to: HM Prison & Probation Service | Phoenix Futures | Practice Plus Group
Mujahid Adam · Suicide (from 2015)
Gareth Chumber-Kelly · State Custody related deaths | Suicide (from 2015)
Amarjit Singh · State Custody related deaths
Other reports for Pentonville
Population 1,180
· Self-harm 435
· Concerns
Population 1,180
· Self-harm 565
· Concerns
Population 1,195
· Self-harm 610
· Concerns
Population 1,140
· Self-harm 487
· Concerns
Population 1,043
· Self-harm 564
· Concerns
Population 966
· Self-harm 556
· Concerns