Source · IMB Annual Report
Northumberland
AI-generated report summary HMP Northumberland demonstrated exemplary management of the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in no related deaths among prisoners and commended staff and prisoner responses. The report highlights a sustained decline in violence and self-harm, alongside good staff-prisoner relationships and effective ACCT management. Key concerns include the continued lack of specialist mental health places, significantly restricted regimes impacting education and resettlement, and escalating dental waiting times.
Year: 2020
Published: 2 Jun 2021
Type: Prison · Cat C
Population: 1,222
Recommendations: 3
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 4 | — |
| Self-harm incidents | 423 | — |
| ACCT cases opened | 475 | — |
| Prisoner assaults | 152 | — |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryHMP Northumberland demonstrated exemplary management of the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in no deaths solely due to the virus and commended staff and prisoner responses. There was a significant and sustained decline in violence and self-harm incidents, and ACCT processes were well-managed. Staff-prisoner relationships were generally good, and the chaplaincy team provided exceptional support during lockdown. The healthcare contract transition to Spectrum was positive, and DART maintained high levels of support for prisoners. The prison also innovatively used technology for in-cell learning and communication and was proactive in improving resettlement experiences.
Key concerns
The lack of sufficient places within specialised facilities for men with severe mental health (MH) needs in the North East, the Board feels that this is still a pertinent concern. This concern was illustrated by one prisoner’s period in segregations, extending over 100 days due to no available places within a local specialist MH facility.
Prioritising opportunities for men to re-engage with learning, employment and training to mitigate the disadvantages of lockdown and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on preparation for release.
The Board fully supports the protective measures deployed by the prison to proactively mitigate any potential negative consequences of the pandemic, we welcome the return to enhanced regimes and recommencement of social visits for the men at HMPN at the earliest possible opportunity.
The availability of drugs inside the prison has been a continuing concern in recent years, despite the introduction of the counter measures documented in our previous reports.
At the start of the reporting year, waiting times were already long for dentistry (177 working days). The report by HMIP in September 2020 reported delays of 231 working days, and as of 31 December this was up to 249 working days, demonstrating an increase across the reporting year.
The Board reiterates the concern, which we raised in our 2019 report, about the lack of 24-hour residential care on site. Overall, there were 41 prisoners who were bed-watch patients, in outside hospitals across 2020.
Recommendations
Prioritising opportunities for men to re-engage with learning, employment and training to mitigate the disadvantages of lockdown and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on preparation for release.
Recommendation 2
Following on from our previous concern, voiced in our 2019 report, regarding a lack of sufficient places within specialised facilities for men with severe mental health (MH) needs in the North East, the Board feels that this is still a pertinent concern. This concern was illustrated by one prisoner’s period in segregations, extending over 100 days due to no available places within a local specialist MH facility.
Government response
I note the Board’s continued concerns about mental health provision, particularly in the North East. I wish to reassure you that the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) recognises the responsibility to ensure those in prison receive appropriate care in the right setting, at the right time. Where a prisoner has a severe mental health need that warrants detention under the Mental Health Act, they should be transferred to hospital and it is acknowledged that this currently takes too long. The MoJ and HMPPS are determined to improve the transfer process, ensure delays are reduced and avoid prison being used inappropriately. This is dependent on strong collaborative efforts with the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England, and a White Paper titled, Reforming the Mental Health Act, was published on 13 January 2021. The White Paper builds on recommendations made by Professor Sir Simon Wessely’s Independent Review in 2018 and provides a commitment to introduce a statutory time limit of 28 days for transfers to mental health hospitals when someone becomes unwell in custody or experiences a relapse in an existing condition. This will commence once the recently published NHS England and NHS Improvement guidance has been fully embedded. A new independent role to oversee the transfer process has also been committed which will further help to reduce unnecessary delays.
Locally at HMP Northumberland, patients on the waiting list for a transfer are discussed weekly at the regional Bed Management meeting. The meeting is part of the joint provider collaborative in place to manage bed availability across the North East and Cumbria secure services and is attended by provider and specialist commissioning colleagues. The prison’s mental health team is able to feed into this meeting on a weekly basis to provide updates on presentation and challenges in order to support with clinical prioritisation. The Mental Health service provider and NHS England commissioners also meet monthly to discuss waiting times and have the ability to escalate any concerns. Patients are regularly reviewed by the clinical team, including Forensic Psychiatry, and referral and transfer to the Integrated Support Unit in HMP Durham is arranged where cases are suitable for admission.
Your report highlights the long-term segregation of an individual at the prison whilst awaiting a place in a specialist mental health facility. It would not be appropriate to discuss the individual’s circumstances in this response. However, I wish to assure the Board that the individual was considered safest located within the Care and Separation Unit due to the risk they posed both to themselves and other individuals. The decisions surrounding his location were made through extensive multi-disciplinary meetings to which specialist health/mental health colleagues contributed.
Locally at HMP Northumberland, patients on the waiting list for a transfer are discussed weekly at the regional Bed Management meeting. The meeting is part of the joint provider collaborative in place to manage bed availability across the North East and Cumbria secure services and is attended by provider and specialist commissioning colleagues. The prison’s mental health team is able to feed into this meeting on a weekly basis to provide updates on presentation and challenges in order to support with clinical prioritisation. The Mental Health service provider and NHS England commissioners also meet monthly to discuss waiting times and have the ability to escalate any concerns. Patients are regularly reviewed by the clinical team, including Forensic Psychiatry, and referral and transfer to the Integrated Support Unit in HMP Durham is arranged where cases are suitable for admission.
Your report highlights the long-term segregation of an individual at the prison whilst awaiting a place in a specialist mental health facility. It would not be appropriate to discuss the individual’s circumstances in this response. However, I wish to assure the Board that the individual was considered safest located within the Care and Separation Unit due to the risk they posed both to themselves and other individuals. The decisions surrounding his location were made through extensive multi-disciplinary meetings to which specialist health/mental health colleagues contributed.
Recommendation 3
Whilst the Board fully supports the protective measures deployed by the prison to proactively mitigate any potential negative consequences of the pandemic, we welcome the return to enhanced regimes and recommencement of social visits for the men at HMPN at the earliest possible opportunity.
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation, including laundry, clothing, ablutions | 3 | 5 |
| Canteen, facility list, catalogue(s) | 4 | 14 |
| Discipline, including adjudications, IEP, sanctions | 3 | 3 |
| Equality | 3 | 2 |
| Finance, including pay, private monies, spends | 12 | 10 |
| Food and kitchens | 2 | 10 |
| Health, including physical, mental, social care | 26 | 28 |
| Letters, visits, telephones, public protection restrictions | 6 | 21 |
| Miscellaneous, including complaints system | 24 | 11 |
| Property during transfer or in another establishment or location | 18 | 15 |
| Property within this establishment | 17 | 30 |
| Purposeful activity, including education, work, training, library, regime, time out of cell | 9 | 14 |
| Sentence management, including HDC, release on temporary licence, parole, release dates, recategorisation | 32 | 24 |
| Staff/prisoner concerns, including bullying | 21 | 44 |
| Transfers | 12 | 21 |
Related inspections & investigations
Safety 3
· Respect 3
· Activity 3
· Release 3
John Reay · Natural causes
Khaled Hassan · Other non-natural
Vincent Oliver · State Custody related deaths
Other reports for Northumberland
Population 1,194
· Concerns
Population 1,213
· Concerns
Population 1,339
· Self-harm 463
· Concerns
Population 1,327
· Self-harm 314
· Concerns
Population 1,338
· Self-harm 312
· Concerns