Source · IMB Annual Report
Risley
Year: 2021
Published: 27 Jan 2022
Type: Prison · Cat C
Population: 1,100
Recommendations: 5
Key concerns
Positive findings
HMP Risley demonstrates high safety standards with reductions in self-harm and violence, good healthcare provision, and strong equality and diversity initiatives. However, the Board raises significant concerns about long repatriation times for foreign nationals and property management issues. The pandemic severely impacted regime, education, and Key Worker scheme delivery, leading to limited time out of cell and restricted activities.
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 5 | — |
| Self-harm incidents | 386 | 674 |
| Prisoner assaults | 145 | 322 |
| Assaults on staff | 67 | 85 |
| Use of force | 334 | 409 |
| Drug finds | 220 | 229 |
Positive findings
The Board notes that the overall safety of the prison meets a high standard, with a steady decline in incidents of self-harm and violence. Managerial oversight of the use of force is commended, with incidents of PAVA spray and baton use significantly reduced. The prison has reacted well to challenges in reducing drug ingress and the catering quality remains very impressive. The Key Worker scheme has notably reduced violent and self-harm incidents. Equality and diversity have a high profile, and transgender prisoners report feeling safe and supported. The chaplaincy team provides excellent pastoral support, and healthcare services are generally good, with timely provision of special aids and adaptations.
Key concerns
Resettlement/Release
With reference to items 4.2.10 and 5.4.16 in the body of the report, what discussions are you having with colleague ministers in order to help improve the long repatriation/deportation timeframes for foreign national prisoners?
Resettlement/Release
There are frequent instances of prisoners being transferred to establishments that cannot facilitate the courses needed for their identified requirements with regard to sentence management and rehabilitation.
Other
Repeated
The Board continues to receive a large number of applications regarding loss of prisoners’ property.
Safety
Repeated
There have been instances where the Board has not been called to serious incidents, particularly out of hours.
Other
Repeated
The Board still has concerns about the efficient provision of prisoners’ property.
Regime/Time Out of Cell
Repeated
the observation regarding the absence of any provision of books and/or magazines made in our last report is still a valid one.
Complaints/Property
the complaints processes are not always consistently handled and/or explained verbally in any depth, which has caused some confusion, especially for first-time prisoners.
Regime/Time Out of Cell
sessions are not always consistent in the delivery of information – for example, sometimes not mentioning the role of the Board, the Samaritans, Listeners or the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman service.
Safety
Emergency evacuation procedures are not covered as part of the induction session.
Estate/Conditions
Repeated
The issue of many of the cell vents on F wing being inoperable and in need of repair is ongoing.
Regime/Time Out of Cell
Repeated
Again, the issue of telephone faults has been a consistent problem.
Other
The Board still has concerns that cell clearances are not carried out promptly when a prisoner moves location within the prison, leading to loss of property and also potentially posing risks due to Covid-19.
Regime/Time Out of Cell
Discussions are continuing with regard to the Board’s concerns over the issuing of clothes and footwear, as there have been issues of new arrivals not receiving clothing from the stores.
Mental Health
The Board remains concerned about the vulnerable prisoners with mental health issues held in the CSU. We believe that more appropriate accommodation should be provided for these individuals.
Safety
many prisoners with disabilities say that they have experienced a high level of bullying and/or victimisation, which corresponds to the results published in the recent HMIP survey.
Education/Purposeful Activity
The Board would welcome a modernisation of the current work offer for prisoners, giving them the chance to gain skills for the current and, indeed, future world of work, which could help them gain employment when they leave prison.
Resettlement/Release
It is of concern that there are no intervention programmes offered to these prisoners, who are often sent to other establishments to carry out relevant schemes.
Resettlement/Release
Repeated
continual complaints from prisoners about the lack of contact with their allocated person (POM).
Regime/Time Out of Cell
Repeated
significant delays in telephone call monitoring. As yet, there appears to have been no improvement in this.
Recommendations
| # | Recommendation | Addressee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
With reference to items 4.2.10 and 5.4.16 in the body of the report, what discussions are you having with colleague ministers in order to help improve the long repatriation/deportation timeframes for foreign national prisoners?
Response
I acknowledge the Board’s comments about improving the deportation timeframes for foreign national prisoners. Officials at the Home Office are making every effort to ensure that an individual’s removal coincides, as far as possible, with their release from prison on completion of their sentence. As highlighted by your Board, where this is not possible, a decision on suitability to transfer to the immigration removal estate is made on a case-by-case basis. It is important to note that individuals held in prison are there because they have been assessed as unsuitable for the conditions of immigration removal centres (IRC), because they pose a high-risk or high harm to others. As already mentioned by my predecessor, when an individual is deemed unsuitable for an IRC, their circumstances are regularly reviewed. Changes in circumstance can impact on this decision and individuals may, following reassessment, be considered suitable and accepted. Additionally, case progression panels provide a second line of assurance by reviewing the appropriateness of ongoing detention for all individuals detained at three month intervals (or when additional scrutiny is required given a person’s vulnerability), ensuring a consistency of approach, driving case progression and additional oversight for managing potentially vulnerable people. I share your concerns about the self-harm rates among the foreign national population and recognise that they are at higher risk of suicide and self-harm and have specific vulnerabilities. Foreign national prisoners are more likely to experience feelings of social and cultural isolation in prison and lack of family support. Uncertainties about their immigration status can add to their levels of anxiety and increase their risk as their deportation date approaches. Furthermore, it is recognised that language barriers can make it very difficult to adjust to prison life and to communicate with staff and peers, increasing their feelings of isolation. Providing direct support to prisoners, is an intended outcome of good quality key work to help reduce levels of violence and self-harm incidents and make prisons safer. HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) issued a staff safety learning briefing in July 2021 on the risk of suicide and self-harm among the foreign national population. I hope to assure the Board that the briefing reinforced the importance of using approved translation services to assess prisoners’ communication needs, help them understand prison processes and procedures and feel part of the prison community. Likewise, caseworkers in the Home Office and the Immigration Prison Team now receive mandatory training on managing Detention and Release and Return and separate training on Vulnerability to provide greater awareness of such issues/risks and tools to help staff manage. Immigration staff who work in prisons receive suicide and self-harm training to enable them to recognise early indicator signs and they work alongside HMPPS colleagues to help manage vulnerabilities. The Adults at Risk policy applies to all individuals detained under immigration powers, regardless of location, allowing for the impact of vulnerabilities to be fully considered when making detention decisions. Careful consideration based on all available evidence is given to the impact of continued detention on a person’s vulnerabilities. A joint HMPPS and Home Office policy will be published in due course to bring together a separate status for prison immigration detainees as well parity to the formal reporting mechanisms on vulnerability, such as Rule 35 of the Detention Centre Rules 2001 and Rule 21 of Prison Rules 1999. It will also include a formalised process for relevant staff in prisons to report to the Home Office any identified vulnerabilities. This is due for completion in Spring 2022 (subject to any further pandemic restrictions) and once implemented, will create some parity for how similar vulnerabilities are managed across the detention estate. As part of work around exploring alternatives to detention, the Home Office has introduced new satellite tracking devices to provide more efficient electronic monitoring of foreign national prisoners on immigration bail. Since November 2021, changes have been made to the legal advice process in prisons which now allows for thirty minutes of initial advice to be available to all individuals held under immigration powers (equivalent to the service currently available in IRCs, with prisons providing access to this service). Also, HMPPS has introduced a special £5 weekly payment for all those detained in prisons under immigration powers which will bring parity with individuals in IRCs. Locally at HMP Risley, a unit on A Wing is being developed to bring collaborative working with Home Office Immigration Enforcement colleagues in order to create a supportive regime for foreign national prisoners and, where possible, increase the chances of successful repatriation. A Project Lead will manage this transition and it is hoped that further improvements outcomes in safety, bail and repatriation data are seen over 2022-23. |
Other | In progress |
| 2 |
There are frequent instances of prisoners being transferred to establishments that cannot facilitate the courses needed for their identified requirements with regard to sentence management and rehabilitation. Why are prisoners transferred to prisons which cannot ensure completion of sentence management requirements, and might the Prison Service consider a more efficient way of eradicating these problems, going forward?
Response
Over the last year the prisoner population at HMP Risley has changed in line with the offender flow designation equally split across main category C, category C prisoners convicted of sexual offences and foreign national prisoners. This is regarded by the Governor as a positive move for HMP Risley and resettlement strategies are currently being developed for each cohort. Within these population groups there are prisoners who do not fit HMP Risley’s designation and, where possible, the prison is working with HMPPS Population Management Unit management to move them to training prisons. There are a number of men who are within the resettlement window but have not completed their identified programmes to demonstrate risk reduction. A business case to deliver further programmes has been put forward and is awaiting a regional review of provision and potential options. HMP Risley’s Prison and Probation Offender Managers are aware of the number of programmes outstanding and are working with Psychology and Community Offender Managers to look at possible options to complete on a one-to-one basis or in the community. It should, however, be recognised that there are complex and wide-ranging issues involved in transferring prisoners and allocation decisions must reflect both the specific needs and circumstances of a prisoner, as well as the operating environment and range of services at the receiving prison. Within the context of these often competing operational and logistical demands, HMPPS Population Management Unit seeks to ensure that prisoners who have been accepted for transfer are moved as soon as is practical. However, the Covid-19 pandemic is having a lasting impact on the adult male estate. Where progressive prisoner moves do occur, these are consistently being completed in line with the offender flows with a success rate of approximately 90% across the estate. In all other instances the Probation Service provides commissioned rehabilitative services for sentenced prisoners wherever they are held and released. The National Allocation Protocol has an escalation route (through the operational management line) to help resolve any transfer issues when they do occur. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 3 |
The Board continues to receive a large number of applications regarding loss of prisoners’ property. What plans does the Prison Service have to introduce a more streamlined system of handling prisoners’ property when being transferred between prisons? This would avoid unnecessary distress for prisoners being transferred and also minimise the number of compensation claims.
Repeated
Response
Following a pause in the development of the new Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework due to Covid-19, HMPPS circulated the draft Framework last year with internal and external stakeholders, including the IMB Secretariat and the IMB representatives previously consulted. Further operational engagement was necessary following that consultation. The feedback received has been considered and, where appropriate, adjustments to the new Framework have been made. The Framework is currently going through the necessary clearance processes and will be published as soon as those processes are concluded. The Framework aims to ensure that property is handled with efficiency, care and respect and that staff and prisoners are clear on the arrangements in place. It provides clear requirements and strengthens guidance on known problem areas. This includes providing stronger guidance to ensure volumetric control limits are respected, so that prisoners do not build up excessive amounts of property. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 4 | There have been instances where the Board has not been called to serious incidents, particularly out of hours. What are your plans, going forward, to ensure that Board members may monitor and observe serious incidents, while maintaining all appropriate safety and security protocols? Repeated | Governor / Director | |
| 5 |
The Board still has concerns about the efficient provision of prisoners’ property. What plans does the prison have regarding developing a more efficient, consistent and streamlined approach to handling and allocating prisoners’ property, on arrival, departure and movement within the prison?
Repeated
Response
Following a pause in the development of the new Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework due to Covid-19, HMPPS circulated the draft Framework last year with internal and external stakeholders, including the IMB Secretariat and the IMB representatives previously consulted. Further operational engagement was necessary following that consultation. The feedback received has been considered and, where appropriate, adjustments to the new Framework have been made. The Framework is currently going through the necessary clearance processes and will be published as soon as those processes are concluded. The Framework aims to ensure that property is handled with efficiency, care and respect and that staff and prisoners are clear on the arrangements in place. It provides clear requirements and strengthens guidance on known problem areas. This includes providing stronger guidance to ensure volumetric control limits are respected, so that prisoners do not build up excessive amounts of property. Following a review of property related processes and storage areas HMP Risley has invested in an updated system to help improve the way property is managed in the prison. Men returned from category D status often arrive with excessive amounts of property over the normal transfer limits. Staff are working with local open prisons to take steps to minimise the impact of this and provide additional compliance controls on property limits. |
Governor / Director | In progress |
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation (including transfers) | 45 | 38 |
| Discipline | 2 | 1 |
| Healthcare | 18 | 11 |
| Legal | 8 | 12 |
| Other | 30 | 16 |
| Property | 102 | 88 |
| Release (including immigration) | 19 | 19 |
| Sentence management | 13 | 12 |
| Total | 237 | 197 |
Related inspections & investigations
12 Apr 2023
HMIP · Unannounced
Safety 3
· Respect 2
· Activity 1
· Release 2
Other reports for Risley
Report details
- Establishment
- Risley
- Type
- Prison · Cat C
- Report year
- 2021
- Published
- 27 January 2022
- Responsible body
- HMP Risley
- Recommendations
- 5
- MoJ rating (2024/25)
- 2 — Concern
Population
| Population | 1,100 |
| Time out of cell | 1.0h/day |
Service providers
Education
Novus
Family services
Phoenix Futures
Healthcare
Greater Manchester West NHS Foundation Trust
Library
Livewire
Substance misuse services
CGL