Source · IMB Annual Report
Brixton
AI-generated report summary HMP Brixton experienced significant challenges in the reporting year, emerging from pandemic lockdowns with a loss of momentum in improvements. An unannounced inspection in March 2022 found the prison 'in trouble', noting declines in safety, respect, and purposeful activity since 2019. Key issues included increased violence, inadequate accommodation, insufficient purposeful activity, and significant difficulties with resettlement, particularly regarding Category D transfers and post-release accommodation.
Year: 2022
Published: 27 Apr 2023
Type: Prison · Cat C
Population: 722
Recommendations: 3
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 0 | — |
| Self-harm incidents | 204 | 204 |
| Prisoner assaults | 180 | 144 |
| Use of force | 240 | 240 |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryThe Board welcomed the excellent quality and quantity of food and noted that healthcare provision for both physical and mental health needs was good. Positive developments included the opening of an employment hub and improvements in equalities data collection and the complaints system. In-cell telephony was installed, which is seen as a significant asset for maintaining family contact and external support.
Key concerns
The standards of accommodation are generally very poor. Many prisoners share tiny, cramped, and dilapidated cells and are eating and sleeping within one metre of an open lavatory.
The prison continues to have activity and work places for only a little over two-thirds of the men accommodated.
3 Violence and violence reduction, self-isolation Assaults have averaged 15 per month, markedly higher than the previous two years which recorded averages of 11 and 12 incidents a month respectively.
Key work has not been consistently provided with a consequent reduction in support for prisoners in resolving issues causing them concern.
Shortage of Category D places and delays in transfer to open conditions: hindering resettlement.
The scarcity of affordable accommodation in London in particular militates against successful re-entry into the community and undermines good work undertaken in prison.
The impact of Covid and the delays in the criminal justice system have combined to continue to require Brixton to accommodate men who do not fit the profile for the establishment or do not arrive with sentence plans or OASys assessments, and some who need to complete courses that are not offered at the prison.
Recommendations
As last year, the shortage of category D places is impacting negatively on the prison’s efforts to resettle prisoners. In addition, the delays in transfer to open conditions, including some men missing out completely on this step towards successfully re-entering the community, reduce the incentive to work towards achieving category D status. Accordingly, an increase in the number of category D places is still urgently required.
Recommendation 2
The provision of accommodation for men released from prison during Covid was most welcome but, since the relaxation of restrictions, the number of men with no accommodation to go to has again risen. The scarcity of affordable accommodation in London in particular militates against successful re-entry into the community and undermines good work undertaken in prison. Accordingly, increasing the supply of accommodation for men released is still urgently required.
Recommendation 3
The impact of Covid and the delays in the criminal justice system have combined to continue to require Brixton to accommodate men who do not fit the profile for the establishment or do not arrive with sentence plans or OASys assessments, and some who need to complete courses that are not offered at the prison. As the Board reported last year, this sets up both the men concerned and the prison to fail. The allocation of prisoners should correspond to the profile for the prisons to which they are sent.
Government response
Since the end of summer 2022 the prison population has continued to grow requiring the best use of every available space in the resettlement and training estates to ensure reception prisons have sufficient space to serve the courts. HMP Brixton remains a resettlement prison which accepts mainstream prisoners and people convicted of sexual offences from the reception and training estate who plan to resettle within the London probation region up to 24 months prior to release. It is recognised that in some cases HMPPS has asked prisons to be flexible with their populations and the Offender Flow model does require HMP Brixton to accept a C category prisoner where they may have outstanding offender focus work on their sentence plan. However, the allocated Prison Offender Manager locally does seek a treatment site to progress the prisoner to a more appropriate prison to allow them to address these outstanding elements should their time in custody permit. Despite the challenges posed by the ongoing population pressures, the prisoner population at HMP Brixton is currently 83% resettlement compared with 76% in March 2022.
The Offender Management in Custody (OMiC) model moved the responsibility for the completion of start custody Offender Assessment System (OASys) for long term custodial cases. Prisons received refreshed staffing profiles for Prison Offender Managers (POM) to reflect this change with prisons with a trainer or resettlement function resourced to undertake OASys activity. These prisons receive prisoners without an OASys report when they are allocated directly from reception prisons post-sentencing and ideally this should happen within ten working days. However, there are also instances where prisoners transfer from one training/resettlement prison to another without an OASys report, largely due to resourcing pressures which has created a national backlog of start of custody OASys assessments. HMP Brixton has received prisoners with incomplete OASys and additionally, many prisoners arrive within 7.5 months prior to their release where the responsibility for the OASys then sits with the Community Offender Manager. Whilst the prison makes every effort to tackle the backlog, further improvements are not anticipated at this time as despite having a full complement of Prison POMs, there is only one Probation Officer POM against a target of 6.5 full time equivalent. However, the national OMiC team will be using evidence, data and learning to review and develop the current model to maximise the opportunity to deliver better outcomes which will include reviewing Key Work and case management, exploring ways in which the current model can be made more flexible to better support delivery, whilst taking into consideration the different prison functions and prisoner cohorts.
The Offender Management in Custody (OMiC) model moved the responsibility for the completion of start custody Offender Assessment System (OASys) for long term custodial cases. Prisons received refreshed staffing profiles for Prison Offender Managers (POM) to reflect this change with prisons with a trainer or resettlement function resourced to undertake OASys activity. These prisons receive prisoners without an OASys report when they are allocated directly from reception prisons post-sentencing and ideally this should happen within ten working days. However, there are also instances where prisoners transfer from one training/resettlement prison to another without an OASys report, largely due to resourcing pressures which has created a national backlog of start of custody OASys assessments. HMP Brixton has received prisoners with incomplete OASys and additionally, many prisoners arrive within 7.5 months prior to their release where the responsibility for the OASys then sits with the Community Offender Manager. Whilst the prison makes every effort to tackle the backlog, further improvements are not anticipated at this time as despite having a full complement of Prison POMs, there is only one Probation Officer POM against a target of 6.5 full time equivalent. However, the national OMiC team will be using evidence, data and learning to review and develop the current model to maximise the opportunity to deliver better outcomes which will include reviewing Key Work and case management, exploring ways in which the current model can be made more flexible to better support delivery, whilst taking into consideration the different prison functions and prisoner cohorts.
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation, including laundry, clothing, ablutions | 25 | 10 |
| Canteen, facility list, catalogue(s) | 9 | 6 |
| Discipline, including adjudications, IEP, sanctions | 14 | 10 |
| Equality | 5 | 6 |
| Finance, including pay, private monies, spends | 20 | 8 |
| Food and kitchens | 8 | 4 |
| Health, including physical, mental, social care | 80 | 33 |
| Letters, visits, telephones, public protection restrictions | 16 | 13 |
| Property during transfer or in another establishment or location | 42 | 40 |
| Property within this establishment | 16 | 12 |
| Purposeful activity, including education, work, training, library, regime, time out of cell | 17 | 4 |
| Sentence management, including HDC, release on temporary licence, parole, release dates, recategorisation | 66 | 32 |
| Staff/prisoner concerns, including bullying | 105 | 44 |
| Transfers | 16 | 16 |
Related inspections & investigations
Other reports for Brixton
Population 697
· Self-harm 277
· Concerns
Population 749
· Self-harm 351
· Concerns
Population 759
· Concerns
Population 661
· Self-harm 209
· Concerns
Population 729
· Self-harm 201
· Concerns