Source · IMB Annual Report
Hewell
AI-generated report summary HMP Hewell, a Category B reception prison, faced severe overcrowding in the reporting year, with its population increasing to 1,060 and many prisoners sharing cells designed for one. This contributed to a significant rise in self-harm incidents and a persistent, restricted regime where most men are locked in cells for 22 hours daily. The report highlights ongoing challenges with staff shortages, inadequate key worker training, and delays in mental health transfers, alongside concerns about resettlement provision and the unmet needs of neurodiverse prisoners.
Year: 2023
Published: 19 Jan 2024
Type: Prison · Cat B
Population: 1,060
Recommendations: 18
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 2 | — |
| Self-harm incidents | 664 | 517 |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryThe Board commended the Governor and staff for their strenuous efforts to deliver a safe, fair, and humane regime despite external pressures, acknowledging their talent and determination. Improvements in equality and diversity, including the appointment of prisoner equality advocates and a neurodiversity support manager, were noted. Staff in the segregation unit received praise for building positive relationships, and the allocation of a dedicated mental health nurse to the unit was welcomed. The prison also showed sustained commitment to improving accommodation cleanliness and decency, and made efforts to reduce food complaints and enhance family contact through in-cell telephony.
Key concerns
Despite reassuring responses from the Minister and HMPPS (HM Prison and Probation Service) to our 2021/22 annual report, overcrowding has become worse. It is not just about those who have been diagnosed with mental health conditions, but the large number of prisoners who have unmet complex social and psychological needs which impact their behaviour in and out of prison. There is increasing evidence of the neurodiversity of the prison population. Low levels of literacy have been known for a long time, but this is not reflected in the resources available for effective education, training and preparation for employment. A regime that for most means being locked up 22 hours a day, sharing a cell meant for one person and eating and defecating in the same space, is not humane and has a detrimental effect on health and wellbeing. These are not conditions in which people can be supported to turn their lives around and work towards effective resettlement.
This should not be allowed to become normal. • Regime: We are concerned about the persistent lack of time out of cell for the majority of prisoners, with no change in sight. Those who are unable to access (through staffing shortages or because they cannot meet the specific qualifications required) work or activity often remain in their cells for 22 hours a day.
Incidents (664) increased by 28.4% compared to the previous reporting year. Although an increase is to be expected due to the rise in the prisoner population levels, when measured against the comparator group Hewell ranks second highest. The key work scheme, which would be a cornerstone of reducing self-harm, has been a victim of staff shortages, with maintenance of the regime and security operations taking priority.
Inconsistent and incomplete use of body-worn video cameras (BWVCs) and a lack of timely documentation for use of force incidents.
Source wording under review
While we witnessed positive staff and prisoner interactions, key working and pathway planning has not been delivered as intended. Staff shortages and overcrowding are key factors, but so too are the number of men who are in a state of flux at Hewell. High numbers are waiting a long time on remand and for sentencing, an increasing number are serving very short sentences, and men not local to the area are waiting to be relocated and do not identify with Hewell. All this inhibits staff from forming effective relationships and providing continuity for prisoners. The impact is seen in arranging education, work and other activities, responding to prisoner concerns and complaints, and being able to consistently apply the incentives scheme. As a consequence, prisoners report frustration, anger, and disengagement from the regime. We are concerned about the high proportion of new and inexperienced staff, some of whom have little work experience in a related field. It is a tough challenge to build and sustain effective key working relationships at any time, and the challenge of doing this while maintaining discipline, order and safety is immense. The training is wholly inadequate: one and a half days on the initial training for new officers, and six hours a year for all staff (if there are resources available to deliver it). Compared to other professions, in which one-to-one relationships are the key tool in effecting change, this is woeful. It would be interesting to have this training evaluated by relevant professional bodies and training organisations.
There has been a drive to improve information in languages other than English, but insufficient help is available for foreign national prisoners. Provision for prisoners with mobility issues remain inadequate. The scarcity of wheelchair-accessible cells on the mainstream house blocks mean that some prisoners are accommodated on the specialist Oak Unit purely for reasons of mobility or access. There has been real progress in installing access ramps and the welcome commissioning of a lift has ameliorated the situation to a degree.
We continue to be concerned about men held on the unit for long periods awaiting specialist mental health or other prison facilities. While psychological support, including training for segregation staff, has improved, the investment by the prison service to address severe social, emotional and psychological damage seen in prisoners who cannot cope with an open regime is woefully inadequate.
It is frustrating to observe the persistent underuse of the opportunities for activity which are available. This is particularly true of activities which are based on the house blocks. This cannot simply be attributed to staffing levels. Attendance at those purposeful activities offered remained between 75% and 78% during the year. • Education: Some valuable work is done to address educational needs. The assessed levels of literacy among prisoners newly received make it crucial that this work is expanded and facilitated by residential staff.
A significant proportion of prisoners (25-35%) are released to homelessness, with failures in inter-agency collaboration hindering effective resettlement and increasing re-offending risks.
Source wording under review
Recommendations
What is being done to address or influence the backlogs in the court system which mean prison beds are taken up with men on remand or awaiting sentencing?
Government response
It is not appropriate for the Government or its representatives to direct court matters including the decision to remand. The MOJ is recruiting up to 1,000 judges in 22/23 and has taken steps to enable courts to sit at maximum capacity. The MOJ monitors the level of the remanded population across the reception estate and is taking steps to ensure that reception prisons can continue to serve the courts and make the best possible use of the available capacity.
Recommendation 2
Will the Minister advise on the progress of the Mental Health Bill which offered remedies for concerns raised in our annual report last year? Our concerns about the lack of appropriate services for prisoners with complex mental health needs remain and are growing.
Government response
The solutions in the draft Mental Health Bill will improve the situation, including measures to speed up access to specialist inpatient care and treatment and will introduce a statutory 28-day time limit for transfers from prison to hospital. Other comments by the Minister refer to local solutions being put in place at Hewell.
Recommendation 3
What review mechanisms/safeguards will be in place to monitor the impact of introducing rigid bar handcuffs and PAVA spray to prisons, with a consequent risk of moving to a culture focusing on control/enforcement rather than built on transformative inputs and effective relationships between staff and prisoners?
Recommendation 4
Is the Minister recognising the growing awareness of the neurodiversity of the prison population and what additional resources can HMP Hewell expect to implement the new Prisoner Education Service announced at the end of September, bearing in mind low literacy levels?
Government response
The response quoted commitments to investment as outlined in the Prisons Strategy White Paper and the setting up of a Transforming Delivery Directorate.
Recommendation 5
We repeat our call for IPP (imprisonment for public protection) cessation and reparations.
Government response
The IPP Action Plan will continue to focus on ensuring that individuals have a progression plan appropriate to their current needs.
Recommendation 6
When will Hewell have access to IT for prisoners? This would be time-saving for staff and will empower prisoners to take responsibility for organising their prison life and activities. It will reduce frustration, delay, and lack of trust inherent in paper-based systems.
Recommendation 7
What is the Prison Service doing to improve the effectiveness of agencies working together to achieve effective release and resettlement? Despite good work being done by individual agencies, we see men being released without the dots having been joined; this negates in-prison work done to achieve positive resettlement and may increase the chances of homelessness, unemployment and re-offending.
Government response
The HMPPS response was to re-iterate Government strategy and policy as outlined in the Prisons Strategy White Paper; the reductions quoted in re-offending between 2010/2021 seem meaningless in the context of our point about pressures on the prison service in our reporting year.
Recommendation 8
Is the Prison Service satisfied that training for new officers prepares them for the roles and tasks that will be expected of them? We are concerned about the length and content of training for new officers, outside aspects relating to security and control.
Recommendation 9
What is the prison service doing to ensure that the introduction of PAVA and rigid bar handcuff training is tempered with an increase in key working and a rehabilitation focus?
Recommendation 10
Improve the core regime, increasing time out of cell and maximising access to meaningful occupation of time, whether in work, vocational activity or education.
Recommendation 11
Protect staff time to deliver key work and push for national resources, including training, to make this central to the regime and culture at Hewell.
Government response
The Governor was able to evidence plans to achieve this change and how it was being rolled out across the prison.
Recommendation 12
Effectively monitor the introduction of rigid bar handcuffs/PAVA spray, ensuring that it does not shift the balance towards control and containment.
Recommendation 13
Address significant shortcomings in the immediate practical resettlement needs of men leaving Hewell, including improvement of inter-agency working, so that no man is found wandering up the drive without the means of reaching a safe destination or ability to meet release conditions.
Recommendation 14
Insist that the use of BWVCs is fully enforced alongside timely completion of use of force paperwork.
Recommendation 15
Monitor complaints by prisoners more rigorously, note the wide variation and quality of responses from staff, in particular the tone, an indicator of whether the desired culture change is being achieved throughout the prison. Improve the thoroughness of recording and responding to complaints about staff behaviour.
Recommendation 16
Continue to improve the take up of work/education and vocational activity and expand the opportunities available for meaningful activity on house blocks.
Recommendation 17
Continue to develop a culture of inclusion and respect, keeping up the momentum on neurodiversity, equality and communication across the prison.
Government response
This was accepted and was reinforced as a priority following an HMIP inspection. There has been progress in respect of analysis, attitude and engagement. There is evidence of action being taken but much more to be done to embed the change.
Recommendation 18
Ensure efficient succession planning and continue to empower and encourage senior staff to use their initiative and creativity to find solutions in their areas of responsibility.
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation (including transfers) | 45 | 38 |
| Discipline and adjudications | 20 | 18 |
| Discrimination (including protected characteristics) | 9 | 8 |
| Food | 15 | 25 |
| Healthcare | 25 | 22 |
| Money | 6 | 5 |
| Other | 11 | 14 |
| Personal property | 23 | 30 |
| Safeguarding (including self-harm and bullying) | 14 | 12 |
| Social care | 7 | 5 |
| Staff | 18 | 12 |
| Total | 222 | 219 |
| Visits, letters and phone calls | 21 | 19 |
| Work, education, activities, pay and incentives | 8 | 11 |
Related inspections & investigations
Safety 2
· Respect 3
· Activity 2
· Release 2
Brian Fletcher · Natural causes
Mesut Olgun · Self-inflicted
Duncan Abrams · Natural causes
Gary McDonald · Suicide (from 2015) | State Custody related deaths
Colin Blackburn · State Custody related deaths | Mental Health related deaths
Gareth Warburton · State Custody related deaths
Kelvin Speakman · State Custody related deaths
Liam Smith · State Custody related deaths; Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Other reports for Hewell
Population 1,008
· Self-harm 755
· Concerns
Population 1,033
· Self-harm 1,033
· Concerns
Population 886
· Self-harm 539
· Concerns
· Self-harm 380
· Concerns
· Self-harm 359
· Concerns