JB-15.11 Accepted

Training requirement for covert monitoring post officers

Jermaine Baker Inquiry · Report into the Death of Jermaine Baker · Issued 5 July 2022 · Addressed to: College of Policing

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation, 15.11

Only those officers who have received the requisite training and accreditation should be posted to a Covert Monitoring Post (CMP).

Jermaine Baker Inquiry, Report into the Death of Jermaine Baker · 5 Jul 2022 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The Metropolitan Police Service stated on 28 October 2022 that significant CMP training improvements had been made, with 172 H2-trained staff and 350 CMP operatives having completed awareness training, and that MO3 and MO5 were working to ensure training quality (MPS Response to Jermaine Baker Inquiry, October 2022).
- The College of Policing updated APP-AP in August 2023 incorporating the requirement that only officers with requisite training and accreditation should be posted to a Covert Monitoring Post (College of Policing APP-AP update, August 2023).
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by Claude (Anthropic) on 10 Apr 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The evidence above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.

Response — verbatim from government

Metropolitan Police Service

MPS formally responded on 28 October 2022 (paras 23-27). Significant CMP training improvements. MO3 and MO5 working to ensure training quality. 172 H2 trained staff; 350 CMP operatives awareness-trained; 130 more since.

Metropolitan Police Service · 28 Oct 2022 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 1 Aug 2023 The College of Policing updated Authorised Professional Practice – Armed Policing (APP-AP) in August 2023 incorporating requirements for requisite training and accreditation for Covert Monitoring Post officers. Source →

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.