Clarify separation of SIO and firearms commander roles
Jermaine Baker Inquiry · Report into the Death of Jermaine Baker · Issued 5 July 2022 · Addressed to: College of Policing
Government responseMetropolitan Police Service: Noted (Oct 2022)College of Policing: Noted (Oct 2022)
DeliveryNo statement from College of Policing found
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation, 15.1
There should be clearer guidance from the MPS, College of Policing and/or the NPCC on the separation of roles between the Senior Investigating Officer (SIO) and the Tactical and Strategic Firearms Commanders (TFC and SFC). The guidance should be clear that not only should the SIO and TFC/SFC be different individuals, but the importance of the separation of responsibilities under those roles should also be emphasised.
Jermaine Baker Inquiry, Report into the Death of Jermaine Baker · 5 Jul 2022 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
In October 2022, the College of Policing stated that it was drafting amendments to national armed policing guidance and training curriculum content to further clarify and emphasise the separation of command and investigation responsibilities (Andy Walker response, Oct 2022). The Metropolitan Police Service reported in the same month that an interim policy remained in force requiring strategic firearms commanders to come from its firearms command to guarantee separation from investigators (Metropolitan Police Service response, Oct 2022). The record holds no update since the College of Policing's response of October 2022 (Andy Walker response, Oct 2022).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
About this summary
Government response
●Metropolitan Police Service · Noted · 28 Oct 2022
The MPS firearms command, MO19, commenced an internal review on this subject in July 2021, informed by evidence heard during the Inquiry hearings ongoing at that time. As part of that review, Deputy Assistant Commissioner (‘DAC’) Barbara Gray authorised an interim position requiring the SFC role in any given operation to be performed by an officer from MO19 itself, thereby guaranteeing separation between the SFC and the investigation team. This policy remains in force. The only exception to this rule relates to kidnap operations which might be conducted by a SFC from the Central Crime or Flying Squad Commands. There are clear reasons why the command structure in a kidnap firearms operation is subject to different considerations as set out in APP-AP. 1 6. In September 2021, Chief Inspector Tom Williams led the development of a formal MO19 recommendations paper, incorporating an assessment of practices in other U.K. police forces which included matters relevant to this recommendation. This paper was submitted to the Armed Policing Delivery Group on 23 February 2022. Having considered the paper, and in light of the national impact of the recommendations, a meeting was held on 8 September 2022 between MO19 and national armed policing colleagues to make progress on responding to the recommendations at a national level. It is understood that APP-AP and the National Police Firearms Training Curriculum (NPFTC) are to be updated to emphasise the need for both the role and the function of the SIO and TFC to be separated to ensure a consistent approach is taken in firearms operations across the country. This is a matter that is already addressed in MPS training. This includes learning from this Inquiry and the Chairman’s recommendations. If further input to MPS training is required following changes to APP-AP and the NPFTC this will of course be done.
Response document: Public Inquiry into the Death of Jermaine Baker: Update on Recommendations
●College of Policing · Noted · 27 Oct 2022
The APP-AP currently requires that the functions of SFC or TFC must not be undertaken by the senior investigating officer (SIO) responsible for the investigation of the offence(s) for which the firearms operation is being conducted, or by any other person who is involved in the investigation. This requirement to separate firearms command and investigation roles has been clearly articulated in APP-AP and previous national guidance for several years. This guidance is reinforced during the training for commanders of armed operations. As a consequence of this recommendation, the College is drafting an amendment to APP-AP and NPFTC content which will further clarify and emphasise the requirement for separation, not only in respect of functions but also in terms of specific responsibilities.
Response document: Jermaine Baker Public Inquiry (College of Policing and NPCC Armed Policing update to the Inquiry)
Delivery
No statement on delivery from College of Policing has been found in the sources searched. This is separate from the response above.
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.