CQC assurance on MDT meetings
Paterson Inquiry · Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Issues raised by Paterson · Issued 4 February 2020 · Addressed to: CQC
Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted (Dec 2021)
DeliveryDepartment of Health and Social Care says in progress (Apr 2026)DHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)DHSC states no delivery position (May 2024)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
We recommend that CQC, as a matter of urgency, should assure itself that all hospital providers are complying effectively with up-to-date national guidance on MDT meetings, including in breast cancer care, and that patients are not at risk of harm due to non-compliance in this area.
Paterson Inquiry, Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Issues raised by Paterson · 4 Feb 2020 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
In April 2026, Baroness Merron of the Department of Health and Social Care stated that the Care Quality Commission assesses multidisciplinary team working under its quality statement on how staff, teams, and services work together, and is consulting on sector-specific hospital frameworks where this would be assessed in future (Baroness Merron, Apr 2026). The department and NHS England previously noted in an update published in February 2026 that the commission will reflect specific cancer team prompts in service-specific guidance (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). In May 2024, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team found that the commission had added prompts on multidisciplinary teamworking to its diagnostic imaging inspection framework (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024).
Sources
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
Government response
●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted · 16 Dec 2021
Accept
CQC has now added more detailed and specific prompts on multidisciplinary teamworking to the inspection framework for diagnostic imaging services in NHS and independent acute hospitals, including reference to NHSEI’s guidance on streamlining multidisciplinary team meetings for cancer alliances.
When assessing providers in the NHS and the independent sector, CQC will continue to seek assurance that patients are not at risk of harm due to non-compliance with this guidance.
The government accepts this recommendation in full and agrees it is vital that multidisciplinary team (MDT) arrangements are effective and fit for purpose, and that they meet the most up-to-date guidance regarding their use.
Extract from: Government response to the independent inquiry report into the issues raised by former surgeon Ian Paterson
Delivery
●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 29 Apr 2026
Under the Care Quality Commission’s (CQC) assessment framework, the CQC assesses providers for multidisciplinary teams (MDT) working under the quality statement, How staff, teams and services work together. Where this quality statement is assessed for individual services, an assessment report with the CQC’s findings is published on the CQC website.
The CQC is currently consulting on sector-specific assessment frameworks following reviews into their operational effectiveness by Dr Penny Dash, Sir Professor Mike Richards, and the Care Provider Alliance. MDT working would be assessed in future under the hospitals framework, both secondary and specialist care, via the Safe systems, pathways and transitions key line of enquiry and via the Delivering evidence-based care and treatment key line of enquiry.
From: Health Services: Standards (written question UIN HL16571)
●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026
The NHS Constitution sets out the six core NHS values. These include commitment to quality of care and working together for patients. These values are set at the highest level by the Department of Health and Social Care through the NHS Constitution and the Government’s Mandate to NHS England.
Effective communication and team working is a vital component in providing quality care in health. Good communication skills within and between teams benefits patients, but also those working as part of the team, helping reduce risks and providing support for staff. There are several tools which have been developed to assist this:
• The NHS Long Term workforce plan, which contains a specific focus on optimising multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs).
• Guidance on information sharing in MDTs, developed by NHS England, the Information Commissioners Office and the National Data Guardian.
• Professional regulators, such as:
• GMC guidance on Decision Making and Consent, which provides advice on wider team involvement but also the delegation of decision making.
• The GMC provide guidance on working with colleagues, outlining how respect and good communication is essential for good and safe patient care.
• Working differently together, a toolkit developed by Health Education England (now part of NHS England), provides a step-by-step guide to help progress a ‘one workforce’ approach across health and care organisations and ICSs. ‘One workforce’ is intended to be indicative of a workforce drawn from a range of health and social care disciplines, working seamlessly as a productive, multifunctional team across clinical pathways.
• Specific resources for communications in cancer
The CQC considers the effectiveness of MDT working when it assesses services. CQC have now implemented and started assessing against the new Single Assessment Framework (SAF), where MDT working is assessed under the Effective Quality Statement for how staff, teams and services work together. CQC has published high-level guidance and will reflect the specifics of the cancer MDT prompts in service specific guidance.
In July 2024, CQC appointed Professor Sir Mike Richards to review the Single Assessment Framework. The aim of this short-term review is to support CQC in addressing the concerns relating to the SAF and its implementation identified in the interim report by Penny Dash.
In March 2024, NHS England published guidance for local health and social care systems on implementing a timed breast cancer diagnostic pathway. This guidance complements existing resources such as National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. This pathway was developed by a multidisciplinary consensus group with clinical leaders from local and specialist services across England, expert advice from cancer alliances, and people with lived experience.
●DHSC states no delivery position · 15 May 2024
Action 3.1
This recommendation has been implemented. CQC has incorporated specific prompts on MDT working into its existing inspection framework for all registered IS providers, including detailed questions on practical arrangements for MDTs with reference to appropriate national guidance. CQC’s inspection frameworks for IS and NHS providers continue to include detailed questions on practical arrangements for MDTs and reference appropriate national guidance. CQC’s new regulatory model which is being rolled out in 2023 will include continued effective monitoring of MDT use.
From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024), The Department of Health and Social Care
Earlier statements on delivery (0)
●Department of Health and Social Care · 23 Mar 2021
Specific questions relating to MDT are already included in appropriate CQC service frameworks. As part of a longer-term strategy (based upon a short- and medium-term action plan that includes this recommendation) the CQC will work to ensure these become mandatory elements of its assessment and inspection approaches and communicate its expectations to service providers.
What other bodies have found
●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024
Action 3.1:
Accepted by the government.
The Care Quality Commission has now added more detailed and specific prompts on multidisciplinary teamworking to the inspection framework for diagnostic imaging services in NHS and independent acute hospitals.
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.