5

CQC assurance on MDT meetings

Paterson Inquiry · Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Issues raised by Paterson · Issued 4 February 2020 · Addressed to: CQC

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted (Dec 2021)

DeliveryDepartment of Health and Social Care says in progress (Apr 2026)DHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)DHSC states no delivery position (May 2024)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

We recommend that CQC, as a matter of urgency, should assure itself that all hospital providers are complying effectively with up-to-date national guidance on MDT meetings, including in breast cancer care, and that patients are not at risk of harm due to non-compliance in this area.

Paterson Inquiry, Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Issues raised by Paterson · 4 Feb 2020 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

In April 2026, Baroness Merron of the Department of Health and Social Care stated that the Care Quality Commission assesses multidisciplinary team working under its quality statement on how staff, teams, and services work together, and is consulting on sector-specific hospital frameworks where this would be assessed in future (Baroness Merron, Apr 2026). The department and NHS England previously noted in an update published in February 2026 that the commission will reflect specific cancer team prompts in service-specific guidance (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). In May 2024, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team found that the commission had added prompts on multidisciplinary teamworking to its diagnostic imaging inspection framework (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, May 2024).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted · 16 Dec 2021

Words of: Department of Health and Social Care, Government response to the independent inquiry report into the issues raised by former surgeon Ian Paterson, 16 December 2021

Accept

CQC has now added more detailed and specific prompts on multidisciplinary teamworking to the inspection framework for diagnostic imaging services in NHS and independent acute hospitals, including reference to NHSEI’s guidance on streamlining multidisciplinary team meetings for cancer alliances.

When assessing providers in the NHS and the independent sector, CQC will continue to seek assurance that patients are not at risk of harm due to non-compliance with this guidance.

The government accepts this recommendation in full and agrees it is vital that multidisciplinary team (MDT) arrangements are effective and fit for purpose, and that they meet the most up-to-date guidance regarding their use.

Extract from: Government response to the independent inquiry report into the issues raised by former surgeon Ian Paterson

Delivery

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 29 Apr 2026

Under the Care Quality Commission’s (CQC) assessment framework, the CQC assesses providers for multidisciplinary teams (MDT) working under the quality statement, How staff, teams and services work together. Where this quality statement is assessed for individual services, an assessment report with the CQC’s findings is published on the CQC website.

The CQC is currently consulting on sector-specific assessment frameworks following reviews into their operational effectiveness by Dr Penny Dash, Sir Professor Mike Richards, and the Care Provider Alliance. MDT working would be assessed in future under the hospitals framework, both secondary and specialist care, via the Safe systems, pathways and transitions key line of enquiry and via the Delivering evidence-based care and treatment key line of enquiry.

From: Health Services: Standards (written question UIN HL16571)

Site note: The question asks, citing page 219 of the report, what assessment the Care Quality Commission has made of compliance with guidance on multidisciplinary team meetings. The recommendation is addressed to the CQC; this is the Department of Health and Social Care's answer, not the CQC's.

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

The NHS Constitution sets out the six core NHS values. These include commitment to quality of care and working together for patients. These values are set at the highest level by the Department of Health and Social Care through the NHS Constitution and the Government’s Mandate to NHS England.

Effective communication and team working is a vital component in providing quality care in health. Good communication skills within and between teams benefits patients, but also those working as part of the team, helping reduce risks and providing support for staff. There are several tools which have been developed to assist this:

• The NHS Long Term workforce plan, which contains a specific focus on optimising multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs).

• Guidance on information sharing in MDTs, developed by NHS England, the Information Commissioners Office and the National Data Guardian.

• Professional regulators, such as:

• GMC guidance on Decision Making and Consent, which provides advice on wider team involvement but also the delegation of decision making.
• The GMC provide guidance on working with colleagues, outlining how respect and good communication is essential for good and safe patient care.

• Working differently together, a toolkit developed by Health Education England (now part of NHS England), provides a step-by-step guide to help progress a ‘one workforce’ approach across health and care organisations and ICSs. ‘One workforce’ is intended to be indicative of a workforce drawn from a range of health and social care disciplines, working seamlessly as a productive, multifunctional team across clinical pathways.

• Specific resources for communications in cancer

The CQC considers the effectiveness of MDT working when it assesses services. CQC have now implemented and started assessing against the new Single Assessment Framework (SAF), where MDT working is assessed under the Effective Quality Statement for how staff, teams and services work together. CQC has published high-level guidance and will reflect the specifics of the cancer MDT prompts in service specific guidance.

In July 2024, CQC appointed Professor Sir Mike Richards to review the Single Assessment Framework. The aim of this short-term review is to support CQC in addressing the concerns relating to the SAF and its implementation identified in the interim report by Penny Dash.

In March 2024, NHS England published guidance for local health and social care systems on implementing a timed breast cancer diagnostic pathway. This guidance complements existing resources such as National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. This pathway was developed by a multidisciplinary consensus group with clinical leaders from local and specialist services across England, expert advice from cancer alliances, and people with lived experience.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented – Ongoing”. Table row: section 29.2 No. P3 / Action 3.1, PDF page 742.

●DHSC states no delivery position · 15 May 2024

Action 3.1

This recommendation has been implemented. CQC has incorporated specific prompts on MDT working into its existing inspection framework for all registered IS providers, including detailed questions on practical arrangements for MDTs with reference to appropriate national guidance. CQC’s inspection frameworks for IS and NHS providers continue to include detailed questions on practical arrangements for MDTs and reference appropriate national guidance. CQC’s new regulatory model which is being rolled out in 2023 will include continued effective monitoring of MDT use.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024), The Department of Health and Social Care

Site note: DHSC's own comments on progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in February 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). They are not a finding of the Inquiry. Table row: section 26.2 No. P3 / Action 3.1, PDF page 738.

Earlier statements on delivery (0)

●Department of Health and Social Care · 23 Mar 2021

Specific questions relating to MDT are already included in appropriate CQC service frameworks. As part of a longer-term strategy (based upon a short- and medium-term action plan that includes this recommendation) the CQC will work to ensure these become mandatory elements of its assessment and inspection approaches and communicate its expectations to service providers.

From: Update on the Government's response to the Independent Inquiry into the Issues raised by Paterson (written statement HCWS869)

Site note: Written statement HCWS869 of 23 March 2021, made by Nadine Dorries, Minister of State for Patient Safety, Suicide Prevention and Mental Health, for the Department of Health and Social Care. It prints this recommendation and gives this passage under it. The recommendation is addressed to the Care Quality Commission; the passage is the Department's account of what the Care Quality Commission did, not the Care Quality Commission's own.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

Action 3.1:

Accepted by the government.

The Care Quality Commission has now added more detailed and specific prompts on multidisciplinary teamworking to the inspection framework for diagnostic imaging services in NHS and independent acute hospitals.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 26.2 No. P3 / Action 3.1, PDF page 738.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.