F236

Identification of who is responsible for the patient

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: Healthcare providers

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted (Nov 2013)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Feb 2015)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

Hospitals should review whether to reinstate the practice of identifying a senior clinician who is in charge of a patient's case, so that patients and their supporters are clear who is in overall charge of a patient's care.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England reported in February 2026 that regulations require providers of primary medical services to ensure each registered patient has a named accountable GP, citing 2014 guidance from the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges that care during a hospital stay should be coordinated by an individual named clinician (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). Also in February 2026, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team noted that the government accepted the recommendation and had recorded in 2015 that more than two thirds of trusts had implemented the "Name Above the Bed" or a similar initiative (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, Feb 2026).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

About this summary
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The record above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.

Report-level response context

Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted · 19 Nov 2013

Speaker not recorded. Source: Department of Health, Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First, volume 2 (Cm 8777-II), November 2013

Accepted.
In his speech on patient safety on 21 June 2013, the Secretary of State for Health signalled his support for the practice of hospitals identifying a named consultant who is responsible for a patient’s care. This happens in a number of Trusts already – University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Kings College Hospital in London have agreed to introduce it and the Department would encourage others to do so, including mental health providers. At a seminar hosted by the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges on 25 September 2013, it was clear there was a strong professional consensus on this approach and the Academy is leading work to take it forward. The Academy will produce key principles with worked examples on how this can be implemented in a way that sustains professional support.
The Government is also proposing the introduction of a named accountable clinician for patients receiving care outside hospitals, starting with vulnerable older people. The Government proposes that the most vulnerable elderly would benefit from having someone in primary care taking responsibility for ensuring that their care is coordinated and proactively managed. Just as patients in hospitals are under the care of a named consultant, we need to ensure that when a vulnerable older patient needs follow-up or ongoing support having left hospital, that somebody is accountable for their care. Although this clinician may not provide the care directly themselves, they would be the person with whom the buck stops and would be an identifiable point of contact for a patient or their family.
The Government has been testing its proposals over the summer through engagement with patients, carers, health and social care staff, and will be setting out its plan for improving out- of-hospital care for vulnerable older people later in the year. This was reflected in the refreshed Mandate to NHS England for 2014–15.

Extract from: Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume Two of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Response to the Inquiry's Recommendations

Site note: This is volume two of "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777-II), the government's response to the Inquiry's 290 recommendations, published by the Department of Health on GOV.UK on 19 November 2013 and dated to that day here. The PDF the row links to is the accessible edition, whose title page reads "January 2014". The Department of Health has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018. The volume says it includes accounts from each of the national organisations the recommendations name, but it does not mark which passage each organisation wrote, so every row is filed under the Department that published it.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

The NHS Constitution sets out that patients have the right to express a preference for using a particular doctor within your GP practice, and for the practice to try to comply. It also includes rights to make choices about the services commissioned by NHS bodies and to information to support these choices.

The National Health Service (General Medical Services Contracts) Regulations 2015 require providers of primary medical services under a contract with NHS England must ensure each registered patient has a named accountable GP.

The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges published guidance in June 2014 stating that a patient’s entire stay in hospital should be coordinated and caring, with an individual named clinician.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented - Ongoing”. Table row: section 18.2 No. 236, PDF page 548-549.

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 11 Feb 2015

Following the Secretary of State for Health’s support for hospitals to reintroduce the practice of placing the name of the responsible nurse or doctor above a patient’s bed, so making it clear the responsible clinician for that patient’s care during their stay in hospital, the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges agreed to lead the work with the professional community to produce guidance. This guidance has a strong professional consensus around it – and the various contributing Royal Colleges have signed up to it and have been promoting it with their members. The guidance describes the purpose of the responsible clinician role and named nurse with some key considerations for implementation including:
• the overall responsibilities for the coordination and continuity of a patient’s care during their hospital stay including discharge, any transfers within hospital and readmission;
• the role as a point of contact for the patient, their carers and family (the guidelines includes a set of key messages to patients that hospitals might wish to use);
• the role of the named nurse role recognising the need for more flexibility because of shift working arrangements; and
• displaying information about accountable clinicians including the importance of patient consent. To date more than two thirds of Trusts reported that they have implemented the ‘Name Above the Bed’ or a similar initiative. The General Medical Council is also working with the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges to strengthen the professional, non-technical skills needed by doctors in postgraduate curricula. The adoption of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges’ guidance on the role of the responsible clinician will be reflected in the regulatory and planning frameworks of the NHS. The Government will also be discussing with the professions, NHS England and employers what further action is needed to foster a stronger culture of professional responsibility for individual patients and ensuring continuity of care for people with complex and multiple needs. As part of this, the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges has now agreed to consider developing this approach to apply outside of the inpatient setting and will publish preliminary findings in the spring of 2015. The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges is developing for May 2015 a new definition of clinical accountability that will span hospital and out-of-hospital care. NHS England will ask clinical commissioning groups to publish by the end of 2015 the percentage of their patient population living with long-term conditions who are receiving care and support in line with this definition.

From: Culture Change in the NHS supporting Annex (annex to Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries)

Site note: This is the supporting annex published on 11 February 2015 with "Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries" (Cm 9009), attached to the GOV.UK page as "Culture change in the NHS supporting annex". The annex has no title page; that title is GOV.UK's and the PDF's own. Its table has four columns (No., Recommendation, Hard Truths Government response, Progress update), and the row carries the Progress update cell. No column says which organisation wrote an update, so the row is filed under the Department of Health (now the Department of Health and Social Care), which published it.

Site note: The Inquiry addressed this recommendation to healthcare providers, not to the Department of Health. The annex gives this update in the Department's publication and does not say who wrote it, so the row is the Department's report of the progress made on it.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 27 Feb 2026

This recommendation was accepted by the Government.

In the January 2014 Hard Truths report, the Department of Health indicated its support for this practice and said it would encourage providers to adopt it.

In the February 2015 Culture Change report, the Government said that more than 2/3 of trusts had reported they had implemented the ‘Name Above the Bed’ or a similar initiative. The Government also said that adoption of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges’ guidance on the role of the responsible clinician would be reflect in the regulatory and planning frameworks for the NHS, with the professions, NHS England and employer to consider what further action was needed to foster a stronger culture of professional responsibility for individual patients.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 18.2 No. 236, PDF page 548-549.

Earlier findings (1)

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

This recommendation was accepted by the Government.

In the January 2014 Hard Truths report, the Department of Health indicated its support for this practice and said it would encourage providers to adopt it.

The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges published guidance in June 2014 supporting the recommendation.

In the February 2015 Culture Change report, the Government said that more than 2/3 of trusts had reported they had implemented the ‘Name Above the Bed’ or a similar initiative. The Government also said that adoption of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges’ guidance on the role of the responsible clinician would be reflect in the regulatory and planning frameworks for the NHS, with the professions, NHS England and employer to consider what further action was needed to foster a stronger culture of professional responsibility for individual patients.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 16.2 No. 236, PDF page 507.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.