Joint proceedings
Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013
Source — verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
The Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care (PSA) (formerly the Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence), together with the regulators under its supervision, should seek to devise procedures for dealing consistently and in the public interest with cases arising out of the same event or series of events but involving professionals regulated by more than one body. While it would require new regulations, consideration should be given to the possibility of moving towards a common independent tribunal to determine fitness to practise issues and sanctions across the healthcare professional field.
Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:
- The Professional Standards Authority (PSA) has developed its Right-touch regulation framework (originally 2010, updated 2015, most recently updated 2025) to promote consistent, proportionate approaches across the healthcare regulators under its oversight (PSA, Right-touch Regulation, 2025).
- The PSA has advocated for a shared independent tribunal service for adjudication on fitness to practise cases across all healthcare regulators, and for reducing the number of regulators (currently 10). The PSA has stated that "creating a single regulator would be the best way to deal with problems in the current system" but acknowledges there may not be appetite for such a change (PSA, Right-touch Reform).
- The Health and Care Act 2022 includes powers (Section 121) for the Secretary of State to merge or abolish healthcare professional regulators and to move professional groups out of statutory regulation, providing a legislative basis for consolidation. However, these powers have not been exercised to date.
- Under the draft GMC Order 2026, the PSA will receive new powers to challenge interim decisions by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service, and regulators will be required to share information with the PSA. However, a common independent tribunal to determine fitness to practise issues across all healthcare professions, as Francis recommended, has not been established. The regulatory landscape remains fragmented across 10 separate regulators.
Response — verbatim from government
●Department of Health and Social Care
The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" in March 2013. Key reforms included a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthened Care Quality Commission inspection regime, a statutory duty of candour, and the fit and proper person test for NHS directors. Volume 2 (Cm 8754) contains the government's detailed responses to each of the 290 recommendations. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd486ed915d63cc65d167/34658_Cm_8777_Vol_1_accessible.pdf
Department of Health and Social Care · 19 Nov 2013 Written response →
Evidence trail — what's actually happened since
- 15 Oct 2024 · DHSC - Penny Dash Review of CQC Penny Dash Review (commissioned May 2024) found significant failings at CQC. Health Secretary declared CQC "not fit for purpose". Key findings: one in five services never rated; inspection levels well below pre-pandemic levels; lack of specialist inspector expertise; 5,000 notification-of-concern backlog. CQC consulting on resetting its approach from October 2025. View source → limited_progress
- 30 Sep 2023 · UK Government - Kark Review of FPPT Tom Kark QC reviewed the Fit and Proper Person Test in 2019 and found it essentially "does not ensure directors are fit for the post they hold, and does not stop the unfit from moving around the system." NHS England published updated FPPT Framework effective 30 September 2023 requiring standardised board-level assessments. View source → Reasonable Progress
- 6 Feb 2023 · Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis Research published 2023 marking ten years since the Francis Report found mixed results. Structural and legislative changes largely delivered (duty of candour, FPPR, CQC overhaul, revalidation, Freedom to Speak Up Guardians). However, cultural change not fully embedded; understaffing, fear of speaking up, and poor complaint handling persist in parts of the NHS. View source → Reasonable Progress
- 11 Feb 2015 · UK Government - Culture Change in the NHS Government published "Culture Change in the NHS" (Cm 9009) reporting progress on all 290 recommendations. Key achievements: 19 hospitals placed in special measures; those trusts recruited 109 additional doctors and 1,805 additional nurses; 129 board-level changes made; excess avoidable deaths fell by 450 in less than a year. View source → Good Progress
- 27 Nov 2014 · Legislation - Fit and Proper Person Requirement Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, Regulation 5: Fit and Proper Person Requirement came into force November 2014. Requires providers to ensure directors meet fitness requirements including good character, qualifications, competence. CQC can require removal of directors. View source → Confirmed Completed
- 7 Nov 2014 · Legislation - CQC Fundamental Standards New "Fundamental Standards" replaced previous CQC registration requirements from 7 November 2014. Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 introduced clearer minimum standards including: person-centred care (Reg 9), dignity (Reg 10), safe care (Reg 12), staffing (Reg 18), good governance (Reg 17), fit and proper persons (Reg 5), duty of candour (Reg 20). View source → Confirmed Completed
- 1 Oct 2014 · CQC - New Inspection Regime CQC overhauled its inspection regime in response to Francis. Professor Sir Mike Richards appointed as first Chief Inspector of Hospitals (July 2013). New methodology based on five key questions (Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive, Well-led) rolled out nationally October 2014. Four-tier ratings introduced (Outstanding/Good/Requires Improvement/Inadequate). Specialist expert-led inspection teams replaced generalist compliance model. View source → Confirmed Completed
- 19 Nov 2013 · UK Government - Hard Truths Vol 1 & 2 Government published "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) in two volumes. Vol 1 set out new actions; Vol 2 provided detailed response to each of the 290 recommendations. Approximately 204 of 290 recommendations were fully accepted. View source → Good Progress
Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.
How this page is built
Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.
This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.