National Register of Armed Policing Recommendations
Anthony Grainger Inquiry · The Anthony Grainger Inquiry Report into the Death of Anthony Grainger · Issued 11 July 2019 · Addressed to: National Police Chiefs Council
Government responseHome Office: Accepted (May 2020)
DeliveryHome Office says in progress (Jun 2020)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
A national policing body should manage a national register of recommendations relating to armed policing, and the response to such recommendations, arising from Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) reports, prevention of future death reports made in the course of inquests, and statutory inquiries concerning fatal police shootings.
Anthony Grainger Inquiry, The Anthony Grainger Inquiry Report into the Death of Anthony Grainger · 11 Jul 2019 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
In a June 2020 parliamentary answer, Minister of State Kit Malthouse stated that the National Armed Policing lead would hold the register of recommendations on behalf of the National Police Chiefs' Council, managed through an organisational learning board that includes the College of Policing (Kit Malthouse, Jun 2020). The Home Office previously reported in May 2020 that a structured organisational learning process incorporating lessons from statutory inquiries, inquests, and conduct reports had been introduced, with the portfolio responsible for continuing to embed and monitor it (Home Office response, May 2020; Home Office, May 2020).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
Government response
●Home Office · Accepted · 19 May 2020
11. Under the leadership of Chief Constable of Civil Nuclear Constabulary, Simon Chesterman, the National Armed Policing Portfolio Lead (NAPP) has introduced a structured Organisational Learning Process. It incorporates lessons identified from IOPC reports, from Inquests' prevention of future death reports statutory inquiries concerning fatal police shootings and, where relevant, operational debriefs, reviews and exercises. The Process links to the Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles (JESIP) and Counter Terrorism Organisational Learning Processes. Revised guidance for Armed Policing Strategic Threat and Risk Assessments (APSTRAs) will include the requirement for Chief Officers to be accountable for organisational learning processes. 12. The National Armed Policing Portfolio will be responsible for continuing to embed and monitor this process.
Extract from: Government response to the Anthony Grainger public inquiry (accessible version)
Delivery
●Home Office says in progress · 9 Jun 2020
The National Armed Policing lead will hold the register of recommendations on behalf of National Police Chiefs Council. The College of Policing is represented on the organisational learning board, introduced by the NPCC lead for armed policing, which manages the national register for all recommendations. This will ensure that the learning identified can be quickly reflected in the College’s authorised professional practice (APP) and national police firearms training curriculum (NPFTC).
Earlier statements on delivery (0)
●Home Office · 19 May 2020
11. Under the leadership of Chief Constable of Civil Nuclear Constabulary, Simon Chesterman, the National Armed Policing Portfolio Lead (NAPP) has introduced a structured Organisational Learning Process. It incorporates lessons identified from IOPC reports, from Inquests’ prevention of future death reports statutory inquiries concerning fatal police shootings and, where relevant, operational debriefs, reviews and exercises. The Process links to the Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles (JESIP) and Counter Terrorism Organisational Learning Processes. Revised guidance for Armed Policing Strategic Threat and Risk Assessments (APSTRAs) will include the requirement for Chief Officers to be accountable for organisational learning processes.
12. The National Armed Policing Portfolio will be responsible for continuing to embed and monitor this process.
From: Government response to the Anthony Grainger public inquiry (accessible version)
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.