Flexible Expenditure Rules
RHI Inquiry · The Report of the Independent Public Inquiry into the Non-Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) Scheme · Issued 13 March 2020 · Addressed to: Department of Finance
Government responseNorthern Ireland Executive: Accepted (Oct 2021)
DeliveryNo statement from Department of Finance found
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
Public expenditure rules should be sufficiently flexible so that false economies can be avoided. In order to deliver a policy objective, Departments should not be required to choose a more expensive option in overall terms because they cannot use the available funding in a flexible cost-effective way. The Department of Finance should engage with HMT to determine how such false economies, impacting as they must on the value for money taxpayers receive for the funds they provide, can be identified and avoided in the future in respect of government initiatives in Northern Ireland.
RHI Inquiry, The Report of the Independent Public Inquiry into the Non-Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) Scheme · 13 Mar 2020 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
AI-generated evidence summary
The Northern Ireland Executive accepted the recommendation in full in October 2021, stating that public expenditure in Northern Ireland is governed by UK budgeting rules set by HM Treasury that limit flexibility (Northern Ireland Executive response, Oct 2021). The Northern Ireland Audit Office found in October 2024 that the recommendation was implemented, noting confirmations from the Department of Finance that a revised Statement of Funding Policy was published in November 2023 and carry forward flexibilities under the Budget Exchange Scheme remained unchanged (Northern Ireland Audit Office, Oct 2024).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.
Government response
●Northern Ireland Executive · Accepted · 7 Oct 2021
These recommendations can be accepted in full.
It is important to note that public expenditure in NI is governed by the UK Budgeting rules set by HM Treasury. These rules mean that there is limited flexibility available to the Executive in some areas.
Some elements are addressed in existing guidance, including the stipulation that resources should be utilised in line with regularity, propriety and value for money considerations. Funding for some specific issues may be provided by HMT on a time-limited basis. In addition the HMT public expenditure rules mean that only very limited funding can be carried forward between financial years. However, this does not override the value for money requirement. Departments have the opportunity to revise annual budget allocations through the in-year process.
Value for Money is already a requirement in the NICS core competency framework.
These recommendations have been addressed in work to date through:
• Departments’ response to the lessons learned following PWC’s Heat Reports;
• the major and fundamental Review of the Expenditure Approval and Business Case Processes, incorporating many of the recommended elements;
• the delivery of an online package of Public Expenditure training for both budget holders and general-service grades;
• the initiation of a review of MPMNI;
• re-establishment of DoF-led Finance Director meetings
• the issue of a formal protocol for engagement with HMT.
Further work is required to:
• give consideration to the role of Casework Committees to ensure that they are rigorous and deliver the necessary scrutiny and independence, in line with the existing role of GatewayTM reviews;
• Implementation of Five Case Model guidance
• Engagement with the Treasury around ‘false economies’
• Consideration by DoF of the introduction of an Approval Panel for the highest cost and most complex proposals
• As part of the Annual Assurance Statement, departments will be asked to confirm:
- that the appropriate approvals process has been followed for all expenditure;
- that Ministers have been made aware of conditions that apply to all expenditure approvals as standard and specifically have been made aware of any non-standard conditions that had been applied to expenditure; and
- that they are content all expenditure activity has adhered to the conditions of its approval.
• Supply shall:
- include a line in non-standard approval letters to say that Ministers should be made aware of the additional conditions; and
- issue a Finance Directors letter to advise this change is coming in and that it would be for departments to determine the most suitable method for advising their Minister of such conditions.
• Progress and finalise the review of MPMNI
• deliver the strategy currently under development for the NICS finance profession;
• Gauge the demand for a further classroom-based training course. As part of that process DoF will engage with Finance Directors on departmental requirements. Should there be demand for such a course DoF will develop in conjunction with CAL.;
• keep the information sharing and knowledge transfer protocols under review, engaging with HMT and departments on their effectiveness and revising where necessary.
• assess position with both HMT and departments and review any breaches for lessons learned as part of its first review.
Response document: Executive Response to the RHI Inquiry Report Recommendations and Action Plan: Annex A Summary of Recommendations and Response
Delivery
No statement on delivery from Department of Finance has been found in the sources searched. This is separate from the response above.
What other bodies have found
●NI Audit Office · 15 Oct 2024
Implemented.
In respect of previous actions undertaken which resulted in an NIAO assessment of Implemented by 2022, DoF has provided the following confirmations in 2024:
further to the Statement of Funding Policy issued in 2020, a further iteration was published by HMT in November 2023 alongside the UK Government’s 2023 Autumn Statement; and
there have been no changes to flexibility around carry forward funding under the Budget Exchange Scheme.
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.