RHI-19

Business Case Approval Redesign

RHI Inquiry · The Report of the Independent Public Inquiry into the Non-Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) Scheme · Issued 13 March 2020 · Addressed to: Department of Finance

Government responseNorthern Ireland Executive: Accepted (Oct 2021)

DeliveryNo statement from Department of Finance found

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

The processes within a Department for approving new expenditure and business cases including, where it forms part of that process, the role of Casework Committees, should be thoroughly re-designed to be more rigorous, testing and independent. Such processes should be less bureaucratic and pay greater attention to examining the unique features of the project proposed.

RHI Inquiry, The Report of the Independent Public Inquiry into the Non-Domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) Scheme · 13 Mar 2020 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Inquiry recommended redesigning business case and expenditure approval processes to ensure greater rigor. In October 2021, the Northern Ireland Executive accepted the recommendation in full, reporting that it had reviewed expenditure approval and business case processes, while further work was required on Casework Committees (Northern Ireland Executive response, Oct 2021). The Northern Ireland Audit Office found in October 2024 that these arrangements remained operational, with updated guidance evolving and the use of Casework Committees continuing to be encouraged (Northern Ireland Audit Office, Oct 2024).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 1 Oct 2026.

Government response

●Northern Ireland Executive · Accepted · 7 Oct 2021

Words of: Northern Ireland Executive, Executive Response to the RHI Inquiry Report Recommendations and Action Plan, Annex A, 7 October 2021

These recommendations can be accepted in full.

It is important to note that public expenditure in NI is governed by the UK Budgeting rules set by HM Treasury. These rules mean that there is limited flexibility available to the Executive in some areas.

Some elements are addressed in existing guidance, including the stipulation that resources should be utilised in line with regularity, propriety and value for money considerations. Funding for some specific issues may be provided by HMT on a time-limited basis. In addition the HMT public expenditure rules mean that only very limited funding can be carried forward between financial years. However, this does not override the value for money requirement. Departments have the opportunity to revise annual budget allocations through the in-year process.

Value for Money is already a requirement in the NICS core competency framework.

These recommendations have been addressed in work to date through:
• Departments’ response to the lessons learned following PWC’s Heat Reports;
• the major and fundamental Review of the Expenditure Approval and Business Case Processes, incorporating many of the recommended elements;
• the delivery of an online package of Public Expenditure training for both budget holders and general-service grades;
• the initiation of a review of MPMNI;
• re-establishment of DoF-led Finance Director meetings
• the issue of a formal protocol for engagement with HMT.

Further work is required to:
• give consideration to the role of Casework Committees to ensure that they are rigorous and deliver the necessary scrutiny and independence, in line with the existing role of GatewayTM reviews;
• Implementation of Five Case Model guidance
• Engagement with the Treasury around ‘false economies’
• Consideration by DoF of the introduction of an Approval Panel for the highest cost and most complex proposals
• As part of the Annual Assurance Statement, departments will be asked to confirm:
- that the appropriate approvals process has been followed for all expenditure;
- that Ministers have been made aware of conditions that apply to all expenditure approvals as standard and specifically have been made aware of any non-standard conditions that had been applied to expenditure; and
- that they are content all expenditure activity has adhered to the conditions of its approval.
• Supply shall:
- include a line in non-standard approval letters to say that Ministers should be made aware of the additional conditions; and
- issue a Finance Directors letter to advise this change is coming in and that it would be for departments to determine the most suitable method for advising their Minister of such conditions.
• Progress and finalise the review of MPMNI
• deliver the strategy currently under development for the NICS finance profession;
• Gauge the demand for a further classroom-based training course. As part of that process DoF will engage with Finance Directors on departmental requirements. Should there be demand for such a course DoF will develop in conjunction with CAL.;
• keep the information sharing and knowledge transfer protocols under review, engaging with HMT and departments on their effectiveness and revising where necessary.
• assess position with both HMT and departments and review any breaches for lessons learned as part of its first review.

Response document: Executive Response to the RHI Inquiry Report Recommendations and Action Plan: Annex A Summary of Recommendations and Response

Site note: These are the Northern Ireland Executive's words from Annex A, "Summary of Recommendations and Response", published on this page with the Executive Response to the RHI Inquiry Report Recommendations and Action Plan on 7 October 2021, the day the Executive agreed it. The Department of Finance publishes the response, but it is the Executive's, so the site records it under the Executive. The annex is a PDF that the publisher asks automated readers not to fetch, so the site cites the page that links it.

Site note: Annex A gives this passage once, for the recommendations under its heading "GOVERNANCE AND FINANCIAL CONTROLS": recommendations 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 29, 30, 31, 32a and 33. It is the Executive's response to the group, not to this recommendation alone. Paragraph 154 of the response says a further review of Casework Committees "was therefore not considered necessary at this stage (Recommendation 19)".

Delivery

No statement on delivery from Department of Finance has been found in the sources searched. This is separate from the response above.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●NI Audit Office · 15 Oct 2024

Implemented.

In respect of previous actions undertaken which resulted in an NIAO assessment of Implemented by 2022, DoF has provided the following confirmations in 2024:

these arrangements remain in place and are largely operating as described, with Better Business Cases NI guidance continuing to evolve, based on best practice and updated HMT guidance;

DoF continues to encourage the use of Casework Committees (or a comparable layer of scrutiny) when proportionate to the decision made and reflecting risk, complexity and value. As requested, DoF officials sit as Casework Committee observers and provide feedback around proposals to help in expediting approvals processes; and

the delivery of associated training continues across the NICS, with training demand described as ‘healthy’. An alternative ‘voiceover’ version has also been made available by DoF to departments for dissemination among their ALBs/Non-Departmental Public Bodies (NDPBs) as required.

From: Northern Ireland Non-Domestic RHI Scheme: Progressing implementation of the Public Inquiry recommendations - 2nd Report (Appendix 4)

Site note: This is the Northern Ireland Audit Office's assessment, from Appendix 4 of its second report on the Inquiry's recommendations (15 October 2024), the column "2024 NIAO Assessment". The Audit Office monitors implementation at the Inquiry's request; its assessment is shown beside the Executive's own account and does not set the recommendation's status.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.