Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

June Turner

Ref: 2026-0351 Date: 8 Jul 2026 Coroner: Mary Hassell Area: Inner North London 2 responses identified · 2 indexed addressees View PDF

Response deadline: 3 September 2026 (stated in the report).

Date 8 Jul 2026
56-day deadline 3 Sep 2026 stated in the report
Responses identified 2 of 2

Coroner's concerns

Coroner’s Concerns (source excerpt)
My understanding is that there is Department of Health guidance regarding the risk of severe life threatening reactions after immunisation, but no guidance regarding the risk following steroid injections. This seems an omission.
View full coroner's concerns
My  understanding  is  that  there  is  Department  of  Health  guidance regarding the risk of severe life threatening reactions after immunisation, but no guidance regarding the risk following steroid injections. This seems an omission.

Responses

2 respondents

Department of Health and Social Care

Central Government
PDF
AI-classified response stance Action Planned
AI-generated response summary

The MHRA plans to formally review product information for all steroid injection licenses by the end of the year to ensure consistent anaphylaxis warnings and will assess the need for further communications to healthcare professionals. The Department of Health and Social Care is also reviewing recommendations from the National Allergy Strategy regarding improved allergy care and drug allergy recording.

View full response
Dear Ms Hassell, Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 8 July sent to the Department of Health and Social Care about the death of June Turner. I am replying as the duty Minister. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of June’s death, and I offer my sincere condolences to their family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. Your report raises concerns over the lack of clinical guidance regarding the risk of severe life- threatening reactions following the administration of steroid injections. In preparing this response, my officials have made enquiries with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) to ensure we adequately address your concerns. The MHRA functions to regulate medicines, including vaccines, supplied in the UK. The Agency’s activity spans the whole of a medicine’s lifecycle. The MHRA ensures that medicines are efficacious and acceptably safe, and that any possible side effects are appropriately described in the authorised product information of that medicine. This information comprises the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC, intended for healthcare professionals), labelling, and Patient Information Leaflet (PIL, provided to patients in each medicine pack). The SmPC is a source of advice for healthcare professionals on the safe and effective use of a medicinal product. Currently, most steroid products in the UK contain a warning within section 4.8 of the SmPC regarding the adverse drug reaction (ADR) of anaphylaxis. These warnings are mirrored in most PIL of steroid products. Anaphylactic reactions related to steroid use are rare. Based on the available evidence, corticosteroids remain a safe class of medicines which are vital for the treatment of several conditions.

[Page 2] Nevertheless, MHRA plan to begin formally reviewing the product information for all steroid injection licenses by the end of this year, to ensure that the ADRs and warnings listed for anaphylaxis are appropriately present and consistent in terminology. This will ensure alignment with information resources from other stakeholders such as the NHS, available here: Side effects of hydrocortisone injections - NHS. The exact time frame for publishing any required communications following this will depend on the findings of the product information review, and whether the manufacturers of these products need to be contacted to amend any text. The MHRA will seek to action any required updates, as soon as possible. Further communications to remind prescribers and healthcare professionals of the potential for anaphylactic reactions to steroid injections could be useful, especially considering the nature of their indicated use. Therefore, the MHRA will assess by the end of the year whether updates to healthcare professionals are needed, and that any agreed communications are actioned accordingly. The MHRA takes reports from healthcare professionals, patients and stakeholders seriously. The MHRA will continue to monitor for any adverse trends concerning this matter and will respond in a risk proportionate manner if any further issues come to our attention. Further to this the Government acknowledges the need for improved allergy care and support and is committed to ensuring that people with allergies receive high-quality care. We recognise that allergies can be serious, and in some cases, life-threatening. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has published guidance on the diagnosis and management of drug allergies. The guidance includes recommendations on documenting and sharing information on a patient’s allergies with other healthcare professionals. As a minimum, information on the drug name, the signs, symptoms and severity of the reaction, and the date when the reaction occurred, should be documented on a person’s medical record. Healthcare professionals should always check a person’s allergy and confirm it with them (or their family members or carers as appropriate) before prescribing, dispensing or administering any drug. The National Allergy Strategy Group published its National Allergy Strategy in April 2026. The strategy was developed by a wide range of allergy stakeholders and presented to the Government to take forward many of its recommendations. The strategy includes recommendations on drug allergy. In particular, it recommends establishing an expert strategic panel to promote improvements in the recording of drug allergy in medical records and national NHS systems. The Department of Health and Social Care is thoroughly reviewing all the recommendations included in the National Allergy Strategy and carefully considering the feasibility and viability of implementing each of the recommendations attributed to government departments or arm’s length bodies.

[Page 3] I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. I am committed to improving patient safety and it remains at the heart of our health service.

Resuscitation Council UK

Local Authority
PDF
AI-classified response stance Existing Practice
AI-generated response summary

Resuscitation Council UK states its remit is resuscitation guidance, not procedural guidance for specific interventions like steroid injections. It advises that specialist bodies and the MHRA are better placed to provide guidance on precautions and observation times for steroid injections, and encourages reporting to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme and UK Fatal Anaphylaxis Register.

View full response
Dear HE Hassell, Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Jane Turner Thank you for your report dated 8 July 2026 regarding the death of Jane Turner. On behalf of Resuscitation Council UK (RCUK), I would like to express our sincere condolences to Jane’s family and all those affected by this tragic event. In preparing this response, I have received expert input from Prof. Jasmeet Soar, RCUK Executive Committee member, Co-lead of RCUK’s Anaphylaxis Guidelines writing group and Chair of RCUK’s Advanced Life Support Subcommittee, and Prof Paul Turner, Co-lead of RCUK’s Anaphylaxis Guidelines, upon whose advice this response is based. You have asked RCUK to respond to specific matters of concern: “My understanding is that there is Department of Health guidance regarding the risk of severe life threatening reactions after immunisation, but no guidance regarding the risk following steroid injections. This seems an omission.” Resuscitation Council UK’s remit is the development of resuscitation guidance and training, including guidance on the recognition and emergency treatment of anaphylaxis. RCUK does not produce procedural guidance for specific interventions such as joint or soft tissue injections, nor guidance for individual drugs or groups of drugs. These procedures are undertaken by a range of healthcare professionals, including general practitioners, radiologists, orthopaedic surgeons, rheumatologists, pain specialists, specialist physiotherapists and nurses, in both community and hospital settings. The relevant specialist bodies and regulatory organisations are therefore better placed to advise on procedural standards, patient information, and post-procedure observation requirements for steroid injections. HM Coroner has queried why there is Department of Health guidance regarding the risk of severe life-threatening reactions after immunisation, but no guidance regarding the risk of steroid injections. 60–62 Margaret St, London, W1W 8TF, Registered Charity Number: 1168914 resus.org.uk | enquiries@resus.org.uk | 020 7388 4678 Expert • Compassionate • Inclusive Page 1 of 3

[Page 2] The current UK guidance for managing allergic reactions as an adverse event following immunisation (AEFI) is produced by the UK Health Security Agency and appears in the 'Green Book’, most recently updated in July 2025 - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/vaccine-safety-and-adverse-events- following-immunisation-the-green-book-chapter-8. That guidance is primarily based on RCUK Emergency treatment of anaphylactic reactions: Guidelines for healthcare providers published in May 2021 (this will be updated in 2026/2027)
- https://www.resus.org.uk/library/additional-guidance/guidance-anaphylaxis/emergency-treatment- anaphylactic-reactions. The Green Book chapter states: ''Anaphylaxis following vaccination is rare, occurring at less than 1 per million doses for vaccines in the UK…” RCUK also co-produced a separate document for vaccine settings in 2021 (https://www.resus.org.uk/about-us/news-and-events/anaphylaxis-guidance-vaccination-settings). This was released to support vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic, when rates of anaphylaxis to vaccines against COVID-19 were initially reported to be much higher than to other vaccines (although evidence now suggests that rates are similar or only slightly higher, at up to five events per million doses for first doses, and much lower for subsequent booster doses (Khalid and Frischmeyer-Guerrerio,
2022)). The existence of specific guidance for vaccination settings reflects the national immunisation programme and the need for consistent standards across a very high-volume public health intervention. RCUK is not aware of an equivalent national programme or centrally produced guidance relating to steroid joint injections. In addition, joint injections may involve a steroid, a local anaesthetic, and excipients, any of which could potentially act as triggers in susceptible individuals. This complexity is one reason why guidance on procedural precautions and observation following joint injection is likely to sit more appropriately with specialist procedural bodies, medicines regulators, or organisations responsible for the safe use of medicines. We note that there is guidance from The Primary Care Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Medicine Society [updated 2021] https://pcrmm.org.uk/resource/pcrmm-joint-and-soft-tissue-injection- recommendations/ that includes: 'The patient should be advised to remain in the department for 20 minutes post injection.’ The reason given in the guidance is as follows: 'According to the Resus Council UK website, the time course for cardiopulmonary arrest resulting from injected medication predominantly occurs between 2 and 20 minutes post-injection. It would seem sensible therefore that patients are asked to remain on site for the full 20 minutes’. Resuscitation Council UK considers the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency 60–62 Margaret St, London, W1W 8TF, Registered Charity Number: 1168914 resus.org.uk | enquiries@resus.org.uk | 020 7388 4678 Expert • Compassionate • Inclusive Page 2 of 3

[Page 3] (MHRA) https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/medicines-and-healthcare-products-regulatory- agency would be best to advise further on precautions after joint injection and the optimal time for observation, and disseminate this in an alert, if necessary. We would encourage reporting of this event to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme if this has not already been undertaken: https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/. We also advise that this event is reported to the UK Fatal Anaphylaxis Register https://www.bsaci.org/workforce/bsaci-registries/ukfar/ (UKFAR). In summary, RCUK provides guidance on the emergency recognition and treatment of anaphylaxis, and this guidance underpins national vaccination guidance. RCUK does not produce procedure-specific guidance for steroid or joint injections. We agree that the prevention of future deaths requires careful consideration of whether patients undergoing such injections should be given consistent advice about the risk of severe allergic reactions and the period of observation after injection. In our view, this question is most appropriately considered by MHRA, together with the relevant specialist organisations responsible for procedural guidance in this area.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 3 October 2025, one of my assistant coroners, Richard Brittain, commenced an investigation into the death of June Turner, aged 77 years.  I concluded the inquest on 7 May 2026.  I apologise to you and to Ms Turner’s family for the delay in making this report. 

I recorded the medical cause of death as:

1a       hypoxic encephalopathy 1b    anaphylaxis  1c       injection allergy 

June  Turner  died  from  anaphylaxis  caused  by  a  steroid  injection administered to her shoulder at her general practitioner surgery.
Circumstances of the death
Ms Turner had the injection at 11.42am on 12 September 2025, returned to the surgery complaining of shortness of breath at 11.52am, was seen by a doctor at 11.56am and became peri arrest at 11.57am, when an ambulance was called. She died in hospital 16 days later.
Action should be taken
In my opinion unless action is taken to address the above concerns then there is a significant risk of future deaths and I believe that you have the power to take such action.
Copies sent to
SIGNATURE ME HassellJune TurnerPrevention of future deaths report20260351_PublishedDownload

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Report details

Reference
2026-0351
Date of report
8 July 2026
Coroner
Mary Hassell
Coroner area
Inner North London

Responses identified

Responses identified 2 of 2
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 3 Sep 2026 (stated in the report).

Sent to

Chief Medical Officer Department of Health and Social Care
President Resuscitation Council UK

Source links