Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Prabhabai Cangi

Ref: 2026-0303 Date: 5 Jun 2026 Coroner: Andrew Walker Area: North London 2 responses identified · 2 indexed addressees View PDF

AI-generated concerns summaryThe coroner identified a lack of a clear pathway for specialist interpretation of abnormal ECG traces by paramedics who do not convey patients to hospital. Concerns were also raised that patients with intermittent chest pain, breathlessness, and abnormal ECGs were not taken to hospital and not advised to show the ECG to their GP.

Date 5 Jun 2026
56-day deadline 31 Jul 2026 stated in the report
Responses identified 2 of 2

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
The coroner identified a lack of a clear pathway for specialist interpretation of abnormal ECG traces by paramedics who do not convey patients to hospital. Concerns were also raised that patients with intermittent chest pain, breathlessness, and abnormal ECGs were not taken to hospital and not advised to show the ECG to their GP.
View full coroner's concerns
In the circumstances duty to report to you.

That there is no clear pathway for interpretation of ECG traces to a specialist doctor, when attending paramedics decide, where an ECG trace taken at the scene show abnormal automated interpretations, not to convey a patient to hospital.

 That Intermittent symptoms of:-
– Chest Pain
– Breathlessness
– Abnormal ECG with some ST elevation (using one or more leads) did not result in the patient being taken to the nearest emergency hospital. That where the ECG is abnormal, the patient was not advised should show the copy of the ECG to their GP (unless the patient is taken to hospital). That there is no guidance on photograph of the ECG uploaded to the record of attendance being clear and readable.

Responses

2 respondents

NHS England

NHS Trust
Letter dated 17 Jul 2026 PDF
AI-classified response stance Existing Practice
AI-generated response summary

• NHS England stated that the concerns raised relate to specific operational matters, which are the responsibility of the local ambulance service. • NHS England referred the Coroner to the Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee (JRCALC) for information on clinical guidelines. • NHS England outlined its existing Regulation 28 Working Group process for discussing reports and sharing learnings across the NHS.

View full response
Dear Mr Walker, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Prabhabai Cangi who died on 12 August 2025

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 5 June 2026 concerning the death of Prabhabai Cangi on 12 August 2025. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Mrs Cangi’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Mrs Cangi’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.

Your Report raised concerns around the following:
1. The lack of a clear pathway for interpretation of ECG traces to a specialist doctor, when attending paramedics decide, when an ECG trace taken at the scene show abnormal automated interpretations, not to convey a patient to hospital.
2. The intermittent symptoms of chest pain, breathlessness, abnormal ECG with some ST elevation using one or more leads, did not result in the patient being taken to the nearest emergency hospital.
3. Where an ECG is abnormal, the patient was not advised to show the copy of the ECG to their GP.
4. That there is no guidance on photograph of the ECG uploaded to the record of attendance being clear and readable.

Having reviewed these concerns, and shared them with the ambulance team for comment, we consider that they relate to specific operational matters, which are the responsibility of the local ambulance service. We note that your report has also been addressed to London Ambulance Service, and so we have agreed that they are best placed to respond to your concerns.

We would also refer the Coroner to the Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee (JRCALC) who develop clinical guidelines for UK NHS ambulance service paramedics on behalf of the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives and are working closely alongside National Ambulance Service Medical Directors.

National Medical Director NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG

17th July 2026

I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Mrs Cangi, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.

London Ambulance Service

NHS Trust
Letter dated 4 Aug 2026 PDF
AI-classified response stance Action Planned
AI-generated response summary

• London Ambulance Service (LAS) will commence a trial of ECG transmission to specialist clinicians for interpretation and plans an interim review of the results. • LAS will reinforce existing guidance and training related to intermittent symptoms and potential Acute Coronary Syndrome presentations, and re-emphasise best practice for providing ECG copies and patient advice. • LAS will reinforce the requirement for clear ECG images and plans to procure new ECG monitoring equipment with direct upload capability in 2026-2027.

View full response
Dear Sir,

Regulation 28; Prevention of Future Deaths Report (PFD) arising from the inquest into the death of Prabhakar CANGI

Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report dated 5 June 2026, sent to the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust (“LAS”), setting out matters of concern arising from the inquest into the death of Mrs Cangi.

We would like to begin by expressing our sincere condolences to Mrs Cangi’s family. At the conclusion of the inquest, you identified concerns which may be summarised as follows:

1. There is no escalation pathway to a specialist doctor when London Ambulance Service paramedics need to review ECG traces taken at the scene when they attend.
2. A patient with coronary syndrome was not recognised resulting in a late presentation myocardial infarction.
3. That where the ECG is abnormal, the patient was not advised to show the copy of the ECG to their GP (unless the patient is taken to hospital)
4. There is no guidance on the photograph of the ECG uploaded to the record of attendance being clear and readable.

We respond to these matters below.

The Role and Use of ECGs in the Pre-Hospital Setting

An electrocardiogram (ECG) provides a graphical representation of the electrical activity of the heart and may be used to identify a range of cardiac rhythm disturbances and other abnormalities. An ECG produces visual wave patterns and these can be interpreted to detect abnormal heartbeats (arrhythmias), signs of a heart attack, and coronary heart disease.

A 12-lead ECG provides an overview of cardiac electrical activity from twelve anatomical perspectives. It is an important diagnostic tool which may assist in identifying conditions including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), a form of heart attack. In some

2 instances, these findings will prompt direct referral and transfer by LAS clinicians to specialist Heart Attack Centres (HACs).

Training, Guidance, and Clinical Support

Paramedics are required to complete an approved Bachelor of Science degree prior to registration with the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC). Training in ECG acquisition and interpretation is a core component of paramedic education and includes recognition of features consistent with myocardial ischaemia and infarction, including STEMI.

Clinical practice within LAS is supported by national guidance produced by the Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee (JRCALC). This includes guidance on Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), encompassing conditions such as unstable angina, non-STEMI, and STEMI. This guidance highlights that symptoms such as chest pain and breathlessness—including when intermittent—may be indicative of ACS.

LAS provides ongoing training and reinforcement of ECG interpretation through:
• The annual Core Skills Refresher (CSR) programme delivered to all frontline clinical staff;
• A mandatory ECG e-learning package completed by all frontline clinicians;
• An ECG interpretation event delivered in April 2025 in conjunction with the Royal College of Paramedics; and
• Planned inclusion of further ECG-focused training and updated myocardial infarction guidance within the 2026–2027 CSR cycle.

Advanced Paramedic Practitioners (Urgent Care) also undertake Master’s-level education and advanced clinical training, further strengthening clinical decision-making capability within the service.

Clinical Decision-Making and Conveyance

ECG findings form one component of a broader clinical assessment. LAS clinicians are required to make holistic decisions based on:
• Presenting symptoms (including duration and intermittency);
• Clinical observations and examination findings;
• Past medical history, including known cardiac conditions;
• Available previous clinical records;
• The overall clinical condition of the patient; and
• The patient’s wishes and consent.

Under the JRCALC criteria below a patient should be immediately transferred to a specialist Heart Attack Centre where the clinical presentation is consistent with ACS:
• ST elevation in leads V2–V3 of greater than 1.5mm in women or 2mm in men, or
• ST elevation greater than 1mm in two contiguous leads

3

These ECG criteria were not met when Mrs Cangi was attended by the LAS on 7th August 2025 but were present when she was transferred to hospital on the 12th August 2025. Where such criteria are not met, but clinical features consistent with ACS remain present, patients should be conveyed to an Emergency Department for further assessment.

This guidance is available to all LAS clinicians and is accessible in real time via Trust-issued electronic devices.

In addition, clinicians have access to real-time clinical support. This includes the LAS Clinical Hub, which is staffed by experienced Clinical Support Managers, and an on-call clinical advice line involving senior paramedics and doctors where escalation is required. In the latter part of this year, the LAS is due to commence a trial of ECG transmission to HAC clinicians for assistance with interpretation. This will facilitate early cardiology review and admission to specialist units as required.

During a typical 24-hour period, LAS clinicians record hundreds of ECGs, a significant proportion of which demonstrate abnormalities. Many of these reflect known or chronic conditions (for example atrial fibrillation), which are often managed in primary care and do not in themselves mandate hospital conveyance where consistent with the patient’s established diagnosis and absent concerning features.

Conversely, where ECG abnormalities are new, unexplained, or accompanied by symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome, conveyance or onward referral is clearly indicated. LAS clinicians are therefore required to apply clinical judgement in interpreting ECG findings within the wider clinical context, rather than relying solely on automated ECG interpretation or isolated abnormalities.

Notwithstanding this, LAS recognises the Coroner’s concern and will reinforce existing guidance and training, particularly in relation to patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of ACS, including where symptoms are intermittent.

Provision of ECG Copies and Information Sharing

Where a patient is conveyed to hospital a photograph or digital copy of the ECG is uploaded to the electronic Patient Care Record (ePCR); and a paper copy of the ECG is routinely provided to the receiving clinician during handover.

The ePCR is accessible to receiving hospitals across the LAS operational area and is also available via the London Care Record, enabling access by other healthcare professionals involved in the patient’s care.

Where a patient is not conveyed to hospital it is standard practice to provide the patient with a paper copy of the ECG; and the patient is advised to retain the ECG and present it to any healthcare professional with whom they subsequently have contact, such as their General Practitioner. In addition to this, following clinical interaction with patients, completed clinical

4 records (which include a photographed copy of the ECG), are uploaded into the London Care Record, which is visible to healthcare professionals (including other LAS clinicians) involved in the patients care as long as accessed electronically by healthcare professionals. This combined standard approach by all LAS clinicians ensures oversight of ECGs and clinical records. The Learned Coroner may recall that Mrs Cangi’s grandson gave evidence that the paramedic left the family with a copy of the ECG.

The LAS are also part of the NHS England Single Patient Record (SPR) Programme Clinical Reference Group. The SPR programme aims to create one unified, secure view of a patient’s health and care information across NHS services in England. This intends to bring together data currently held in multiple systems (e.g. GP, hospital, ambulance, mental health etc.) into a single, joined-up record, and is a core part of the NHS 10-year plan. The initial roll-out will focus on two identified priority areas (maternity and frailty) before looking to further areas. It is intended that the first priorities will go live around 2028. The LAS remains committed and engaged with key stakeholders in technological advances which will improve oversight of clinical records and pertinent clinical information.

Quality and Clarity of ECG Records

LAS policy requires that all clinical images, including ECG photographs, are relevant, clear, and clinically usable. The Trust recognises the importance of ensuring that ECG images recorded within the ePCR are consistently clear and readable and will reinforce this requirement with staff.

The Trust is also due to commence a procurement process for new ECG monitoring equipment during the 2026–2027 financial year. A key requirement of this procurement is the capability for ECG data to be uploaded directly from monitoring equipment into the ePCR, thereby removing the need for photographic capture and improving accuracy and quality of records.

Conclusion and Ongoing Actions

The LAS has carefully considered the concerns raised in your report and is satisfied that clear national guidance exists regarding the management of suspected acute coronary syndromes, including when ECG findings necessitate conveyance. Robust training and clinical support mechanisms are in place for ECG interpretation and decision-making; and systems are in place to ensure ECG information is recorded, shared, and made available to patients and healthcare professionals.

Notwithstanding this, LAS will reinforce guidance relating to intermittent symptoms and potential ACS presentations; re-emphasise best practice regarding provision of ECG copies and patient advice; and strengthen messaging regarding the clarity and quality of ECG image capture pending implementation of enhanced digital solutions. Furthermore, an interim review of results from ECG transmission to cardiologists is planned once the pilot phase of this programme of work is complete. This will be used to guide and inform future approaches to ECG transmission pan London.

5

We hope this response is helpful and provides assurance that LAS remains committed to continuous improvement and the delivery of safe, high-quality patient care.

Thank you for bringing these matters to our attention.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 15th August 2025, I commenced an investigation into the death of Prabhabai Cangi aged 78 years.

The medical cause of death was 1a. Cardiac Arrest 1b. Pericardial tamponade (pericardiocentesis and drain insertion 12/03/2025) 1c. Late presentation myocardial infarction 1d.  II.  Hypertension, Hypothyroidism

How, when and where Prabhabai Cangi died in Harefield Hospital, Uxbridge on the 12th August 2025. Conclusion Prabhabai Cangi died as a consequence of delayed hospital treatment.
Circumstances of the death
On the 12th of August 2025 Prabhabai Cangi died in Harefield Hospital having had an ST elevation myocardial infarction at home. An ambulance attended at her home on the 7 August 2025 where she presented with, amongst other symptoms, burning chest pain within the last 3 days associated with breathless on exertion especially on climbing stairs. An ECG taken by the LAS showed an abnormal ECG with some ST elevation.

Mrs Cangi was taken to hospital where despite expert care she died the same day.

Had Mrs Cangi been taken to hospital, rather than being discharged to see her own doctor, it is likely that Mrs Cangi would not have died when she did.
Action should be taken
In my opinion unless action is taken to address the above concerns then there is a significant risk of future deaths and I believe each of you have the power to take such action.
Copies sent to
I can confirm I have sent the report to: 1. NHS England3. London Ambulance

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Report details

Reference
2026-0303
Date of report
5 June 2026
Coroner
Andrew Walker
Coroner area
North London

Responses identified

Responses identified 2 of 2
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 31 Jul 2026 (stated in the report).

Sent to

London Ambulance Service
NHS England

Source links