Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Daniel Forrest

Ref: 2026-0307 Date: 15 Jun 2026 Coroner: Joanne Andrews Area: West Sussex, Brighton and Hove 1 response identified · 2 indexed addressees View PDF

AI-generated concerns summaryThe coroner notes that NHS Pathways advises callers an ambulance is being arranged, but for lower priority calls, dispatch is delayed by clinical validation without informing the caller. Additionally, callers cannot be advised of estimated waiting times for an ambulance.

Date 15 Jun 2026
56-day deadline 9 Oct 2026 est. estimated from the Judiciary.uk publication date
Responses identified 1 of 2

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
The coroner notes that NHS Pathways advises callers an ambulance is being arranged, but for lower priority calls, dispatch is delayed by clinical validation without informing the caller. Additionally, callers cannot be advised of estimated waiting times for an ambulance.
View full coroner's concerns
I heard that the NHS Pathways system tells call handlers to advise callers that  an  ambulance  is  being  arranged.  However  I  heard  that  within  SECAMB  category 3 and category 4 dispositions are validated by clinical staff before  being added to the Dispatch queue for an Ambulance to be allocated. I heard  that  this  was  in  line  with  National  Guidance  from  The  Association  of  Ambulance  Chief  Executives.  Therefore,  callers  are  not  informed  that  no  ambulance is being arranged at the time of their call.

I also heard that the NHS Pathways does not allow callers to be advised of the  estimated time that they may have to wait for ambulance attendance.   The  evidence was that SECAMB have requested that the wordings provided by NHS   Pathways   be   altered   so   that   there   is   provision   to   give   further information to callers about how long they may wait for an ambulance to  attend but this has previously been declined by NHS England.

I consider that both of the above matters mean that patients cannot make  informed decisions about whether they wait for the arrival of an ambulance or  escalate  worsening  symptoms  on  the  basis  that  they  anticipate  that  an  ambulance is being arranged so will be with them shortly when this may not be  the case.

Responses

1 respondent

NHS England NHS Improvement

NHS / Health Body
Letter dated 3 Aug 2026 PDF
AI-classified response stance Noted
AI-generated response summary

• For incidents eligible for clinical validation, exit scripts should advise patients they may receive a call back from a clinician and should keep their phone line free. • All ambulance services are required to provide appropriate exit scripts for Category 3/4 codes, including safety advice for patient deterioration. • NHS England stated that national provision of estimated waiting times via NHS Pathways was reversed, with this information now managed locally by individual ambulance services.

View full response
Dear Ms Andrews, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Daniel Charles Forrest who died on 1 October 2025.

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 15 June 2026 concerning the death of Daniel Charles Forrest on 1 October 2025. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Mr Forrest’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Mr Forrest’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.

Your Report raised the following concerns:
1. The Southeast Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust ‘SECAMB’ are incorrectly advising callers that an ambulance is being arranged, when any Category 3 or 4 dispositions are required to be validated by clinical staff before they can be added to the ambulance dispatch queue.
2. NHS Pathways does not allow callers to be advised of the estimated time that they may have to wait for ambulance attendance. SECAMB have requested that the wordings provided by NHS Pathways be altered so that there is provision to give further information to callers about how long they may wait for an ambulance to attend but this has previously been declined by NHS England.

Background of NHS Pathways Clinical Decision Support System NHS Pathways is the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) used for remote clinical assessment (triage) in urgent and emergency care. In use since 2005, it underpins all NHS 111 services and more than half of England’s 999 telephony systems. The tool also supports online triage, in-person and enhanced clinical assessments via modules such as the NHS Pathways Clinical Consultation Support (PaCCS) system. The safety of NHS Pathways triage outcomes, known as "dispositions", is overseen by the National Clinical Assurance Group (NCAG), an independent intercollegiate body hosted by the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. Alongside this external scrutiny, NHS Pathways aligns its content with up-to-date national clinical guidance, National Medical Director NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG

3 August 2026

including NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence), UK Resuscitation Council and UK Sepsis Trust. The system supports over 2.5 million triage assessments each month across telephone, digital, and face-to-face settings. NHS Pathways follows a structured clinical hierarchy. Serious and potentially life- threatening symptoms are assessed first to ensure rapid escalation - such as dispatching an ambulance or involving a clinician. The assessment then progresses to less urgent symptoms, identifying the most appropriate level of care. The tool is not diagnostic. Instead, it works by systematically ruling out more serious causes of symptoms to ensure safe, efficient triage. Relevant history is gathered where clinically necessary to minimise triage time while maintaining safety. In telephone settings, assessments are conducted by trained non-clinical health advisors. These advisors complete a rigorous training programme and are supported at all times by clinicians. If a case is complex or unclear, health advisors are required to escalate to clinical colleagues. It is therefore a condition of the NHS Pathways licence (entered into by NHS 111 and 999 providers in order to use the NHS Pathways content) that clinical supervision and escalation support must be available 24/7.

Clinical alignment of Ambulance Response Codes between systems

In 2017 NHS England undertook a review of the categorisation of ambulance responses. This programme of work was known as the Ambulance Response Programme (ARP). Further information about this can be found here NHS England » Ambulance Response Programme. As part of this, and ongoing since, activities are managed by NHS England’s National Ambulance Team to ensure the alignment of clinical scenarios between the triage systems in use in the sector. These activities are undertaken in partnership with the Ambulance sector. The NHS Pathways system is developed and maintained by the Transformation Directorate of NHS England. The ambulance responses, or dispositions, are ratified by the National Ambulance Services Medical Directors (NASMeD). This is an advisory group to the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE), comprising the Medical Directors of ambulance services in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. This group endorses the categorisation of ambulance codes across both AMPDS and NHS Pathways, and these codes are further ratified by the Emergency Call Prioritisation Advisory Group (ECPAG). The purpose of the ECPAG is to advise NHS England, Department of Health & Social Care (DHSC) on issues of ambulance call prioritisation. Its principal remit is to recommend which disposition codes should be mapped to which ambulance responses. The Group membership consists of AACE, NHS England, NASMeD, ambulance Heads of Control and representatives of the principal triage systems.

1. Call handler advice that an ambulance is being arranged

Following review of a case, and categorisation to an ambulance dispatch category, the case is transferred to the ambulance service. The information captured in NHS Pathways may allow a clinician to reassess and re-categorise the call, depending on the clinical context. This can happen either without direct contact with the patient or following further contact. The Ambulance Trust’s Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) system, rather than NHS Pathways, is used to manage the validation process. So, for incidents that are eligible for clinical validation, any delivered call exit script should outline that patients may receive a call back from a clinician to conduct a further assessment and who may guide them towards an alternative pathway of care, and patients will be asked to keep their phone line free. However, if the clinician is unable to contact the caller, as in this case, then the original categorisation would still stand, ie an ambulance would be dispatched in line with that prioritisation.

2. Providing callers with an estimated waiting time For 999 calls, all ambulance services should have in place call exit scripts and procedures for dealing with response delays when under operational pressure. NHS England has Resource Escalation Action Plan (REAP) levels which are used to manage operational pressures across ambulance services. NHS England supports a position that callers should be provided with sufficient information to make informed decisions, including whether an ambulance has been dispatched to the patient.

NHS England have been approached previously to provide a standard national script for instances where the Ambulance Response Programme (ARP) standards are not going to be met, and has worked with ambulance services to develop these. However, after deployment, due to the complexities of operational delays REAP levels and availability of clinical resource, NHS England were asked by ambulance services to reverse this work, and maintain operational information, such as wait times within emergency operations centres, as outside the remit of NHS Pathways triage. REAP level and rapidly changing operational factors can also impact which calls may be subject to clinical validation and need alternative instructions at different times, and how long an individual ambulance dispatch is likely to take. Therefore, these circumstances are now managed locally, by the individual ambulance services, following their own internal governance and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs).

NHS England is aware that these situations are complex and difficult to manage. After reviewing the sequence of events described in the inquest, regarding the timing of contacts, we acknowledge the situation would have been deeply worrying for the family.

For the reasons provided above, operation information, such as wait times within emergency operations centres sits outside the remit of triage and is best placed to be dealt with locally by individual Ambulance Trusts.

As above the National Ambulance team have advised that for incidents that are eligible for clinical validation, patients should be advised that they may receive a call back

from a clinician for further assessment, who may direct them to an alternative pathway. Patients should be asked to keep their phone line free.

All ambulance services are required to provide appropriate exit scripts for Category 3/ Category 4 codes or dispositions. For 999 calls, ambulance services should have procedures and call exit scripts in place to manage response delays during periods of operational pressure. While the specific wording of exit scripts is determined locally, the scripts must include safety advice about what action to take if the patient’s condition deteriorates.

NHS England supports a position that callers should be given sufficient information to make informed decisions, including whether an ambulance has been immediately dispatched to the patient or if a delay is likely due to demand or other operational pressures.

I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Mr Forrest, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 07 October 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Daniel Charles FORREST aged 85. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest  on  11  June  2026.  The  conclusion  of  the  inquest  was  that: Daniel Charles Forrest died on 1 October 2025 at East Surrey Hospital, 1 Canada Avenue, Redhill, Surrey from an unsurvivable head injury. He had a witnessed fall outside his home address falling onto a curb on 30 September 2025. An ambulance was called but due to a significant delay was cancelled by Mr Forrest before they attended. There is insufficient evidence from which I can conclude that this contributed to the death. He then had an unwitnessed fall  at  his  home  address  on  1  October  2025  when  emergency  services attended and conveyed him to hospital where he sadly died.
Circumstances of the death
Mr Forrest was an 85-year-old gentleman who fell outside his home at around 17:12 hrs hitting his head on a curb. A bystander called Southeast Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust (“SECAMB”) at that time but his son and daughter-in-law were also present. The call was triaged using the NHS  Pathways  system  which  concluded  that  he  needed  a  Category  3 response which at that time had a target response time of 120 minutes. The contact details of the family members who were present with Mr Forrest were taken. At the time of the call being made SECAMB was in Clinical Safety Plan level 3. The Pathways call closing script told the Emergency Medical Adviser who took the call on behalf of SECAMB that they should tell the caller that “an ambulance  was  being  arranged”  which  they  did.  In  addition  to  the  NHS Pathway  script,  the  Emergency  Medical  Adviser  told  the  caller  that  the estimated time of arrival for the ambulance would be 3 hours and 47 minutes.

An ambulance was not dispatched at that time as category 3 calls then are validated by clinicians before being added to the dispatch queue. Clinicians attempted to call back for this reason but were unable to make contact as only the contact number of a bystander rather than the family with Mr Forrest was identified on the CAD system. The callbacks were attempted at 20:42 and 21:02. As such the call was added to the dispatch queue 21:05 hours but there was no ambulance available to be allocated to Mr Forrest due to the significant number of calls outstanding in higher categories for response and earlier timed calls in category 3.

At 21:48 the family called SECAMB as there had now been 4 hours and 36 minutes since the initial call. The Emergency Medial Adviser did not re-triage the call and therefore no updated estimated time of arrival for the ambulance was  provided.  At  that  time  the  Emergency  Medical  Adviser  did  discuss whether Mr Forrest could self-convey to hospital and worsening care advice was                         given.

At 23:45 the family called SECAMB again to cancel the Ambulance as Mr Forrest wanted to go to bed and they had been waiting for 6 hours and 33 minutes. He spoke directly with SECAMB and the call was closed by SECAMB after clinical review. The family indicates that they would be staying with Mr Forrest.

Around 01:20 on 1 October 2025 the family found Mr Forrest had fallen in the house and sustained further injury. SECAMB were called and the call was triaged using the NHS Pathways system as a category 3 response. At that time, there were 138 calls outstanding including 20 category 2 calls and 110 category 3 calls outstanding. An estimated time for attendance was requested by the family but this was not produced. Worsening care advice was given.

At  02:06  Mr  Forrest  had  deteriorated  and  therefore  the  family  contacted SECAMB again and the call was re-triaged with the additional new symptoms as category 2. The ambulance arrived to assist Mr Forrest at 02:23 on 1 October and he was conveyed to hospital.

Sadly he was found to have an unsurvivable head injury from which he died later that day.
Action should be taken
In my opinion unless action is taken to address the above concerns then there is a significant risk of future deaths and I believe each of you have the power to take such action.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Report details

Reference
2026-0307
Date of report
15 June 2026
Coroner
Joanne Andrews
Coroner area
West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 2
1 response not yet linked

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 9 Oct 2026 (estimated from the Judiciary.uk publication date).

Sent to

NHS England & NHS Improvement
South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust

Source links