Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Martin McGlasson

Ref: 2014-0001 Date: 6 Jan 2014 Coroner: Robert Chapman Area: Cumbria (North & West) Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

Widespread use of an unsafe work method, failure to implement inexpensive safety measures despite known risks, and inadequate dissemination of risk assessments to operating staff were key concerns.

Date 6 Jan 2014
56-day deadline 3 Mar 2014 est.
Responses identified 1 of 1
Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Widespread use of an unsafe work method, failure to implement inexpensive safety measures despite known risks, and inadequate dissemination of risk assessments to operating staff were key concerns.
View full coroner's concerns
In the circumstances it is my statutory to report to you. The Health and Safety Director for Thomas Armstrong Holdings Ltd gave evidence that the method of work undertaken by ACP prior to Mr McGlasson's death is in widespread use throughout the industry: Thus a number of your members are at risk of deaths occurring in their establishments in similar circumstances to Mr McGlasson's death, and presumably at risk of having Prohibition Notices served on them by the HSE (2) Whilst the method operated had not apparently previously caused any accidents at ACP Concrete, evidence was given of an accident at Bison Concrete Products in 2002 involving the death of Mr David Jenkins . understand that whilst it involved the overturning of a staircase, it occurred in a storage yard in a "domino effect" (3) The method of preventing an accident as occurred to Mr McGlasson by installing a "toast rack" and gravel pit are inexpensive and do not affect production (4) The risk of an accident occurring should be weighed in the balance with the potential injuries (which in this case are likely to be fatal or serious), and the cost involved in preventing such injuries (which in this case are very small) There cannot be any serious argument about affecting production.

(5) Care should be taken to ensure that Risk Assessments or their contents are disseminated or explained to the staff actually operating the process to ensure that what is done on the ground is reflected in the Risk Assessment, and proper care given t0 then assess the actual risk. They duty being

Responses

1 respondent
DWF
30 Apr 2014 PDF
Action Taken

Lightwater Quarries Ltd has implemented a newly adopted Risk Assessment & Method Statement as the basis for training, Turning Circle awareness and management, changes in lifting from the crane, safety talks, newly employed services of external training providers and has created a Safety Committee in order to improve and raise standards of health and safety at work. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Chapman; MR MARTIN MCGLASSON (DECEASED) INQUEST 17 TO 20 DECEMBER 2013 RESPONSE TO REGULATION 28 REPORT Weewrite in reference to your Regulation 28 Report dated 6 letter of response dated 3 March 2014. January 2014 and further to our To set the background, the Inquest the evidence was that the by the Company which had been in operation for 23 system of work adopted years without incident was that: baAfter removal from the mould by overhead crane the staircase battens (depending on the size of the staircase was set down on two or more 2 The operator would "sweep" and any landings it had); underneath, before the with the battens to ensure that had no debris the staircase down; 3 Heiwould also seek to place the batten under the widest stability; part of the stair to ensure maximum stathes operator would take the tension off the crane ad then staircase and attempt to move, or rock it, to check its take hold of the top of the unstable he would lift it and move the battens stability. If he was concerned that it was
5. Once satisfied or the staircase; as to stability he would remove the chains and leave the unsupported, to be slurried. staircase frkfter the slurrying process had been completed the staircase forks of a forklift truck and then removed to was "rocked over' onto the the storage yard. This system of work was an industry wide practice_ As a result of the Inquest your Report provided that which will prevent future we respond with actions we have taken received from the British deaths (our actions taken after advice and guidance Precast Federation "BPCF) ~in 'iWi F"llit|ue<:.4 4 " x7: 'me :ATtd " ""a '"p' " ,40k1 DWann#u:Nm MnikU; Vinl t4 m1um0E: F0ft; n| {4" | ""rURMIN50024/29882/ {Whce. Sott Htort Inuri 8trul. Muklkne M+A 19587666-dorseri mt regulaterd Ey Me Solititors ReguluoMAutunA Nwvr ! ['m441srh %- fnju m;uS Aulhorised regulaled' by Ihe: Fiaricinl Corill # Aullwcrity {nualerl pracIlce by Ihie Law Society cl Scollar! (Eujisteuex} TMyr ISO) 'NHJ1 P O(JK Cerlili ale No | RO A(Nar2# icn | = [ 6 41a1 Place Our during floor they setting help being being Pmc- and

dwf Your Report set out that we provide a written response by Monday 3 March 2014. wrote to You on 3 March 2014 to request respond to the Regulation 28 letter. This afo extension of time for the Company to formally Federation [BPCF] guidance which was to allow us time to evaluate British Precast additional and necessarya changescto therComvalable at that point in time and make process the Company's internal procedures any and manufacturing We understand the British Precast wrote to its instruction seriously and you On 28 February 2014 stating that it was action set out the actions it had already taken and timetable for The British Precast and its members confirmed had already - Formally consulted and discussed Federation, whose members with their product group Precast 2 Formally consulted and manufacture stairs. Associationowtioecmenbefiscuased with their product group the Structural Precast 3 Visited ACP Concrete manufacture stairs and the where the accident measures installed. occurred to see the remedial Had extensive internal discussion whole and beyond their eegacding how to promote improved safety across the membership. The proposed timetable of their action, including actions completed was confirmed as follows: Consult and discuss with relevant meeting of our Health and Safetyr parts of British Precast by 14 March including to be held on 11 March at Committee on March and the next SHAD 2 Checkicg; Ofh Bisrctoncreeregaducid asidea sHulland Ward faciorndereysnire from the death of Mr. Jenkins Productscand past management forany relavediTessons 3 Develop proposed by 12 March. Hold best practice by end March 2014 a consultation period on proposed best also with manufacturers that are not practice with HSE, within membership and 5, Issue best practice guidance members on May 1 at our AGM and conference PRECAST2014, By way of background information British product producers operating permanent IDrecest is the trade association for UK concrete have over 70 manufacturing members Or long-term temporary manufacturing facilities Precast target is to create a zero harrer accounting for 70% of output. The British workplace for all. We can confirm that_ Director) and Managing Director of the of the British Finance Director; met with (Group HS surrounding Mr McGlasson crdeatFedeeation We can confirm that the discussed. death, the subsequent investigation and tthe (nquestances Inquest were Company premises ad of the British Precast Concreta Federation Workington. this visit visited the and URMN5O024/29882/9587666-1 We the very taking they the Flooring factory industry Steering They industry Compan During

viewed and assessed the procedures and precast stairs ad in particular the systems in place relating to the manufacture of their edges_ restraining systems employed when staies mwerefacooc on Subsequent to this meeting
2014. This had been called falso attended a BPCF safety meeting on 12 March where the British Precast have in relation to improving safety of prestressing process meeting specifically related task group working with the HSE Part of the therefore to the stability of stairs their agenda of this was an opportunity to address the issues Of stair manufacture process and She BPCF hasnow evaluated all the evidence safe finishing of precast and has developed best practice guidance on consultation with: - concrete stairs. This guidance has been developed in TheAspecialist product groups of British Precast the Architectural and Structural Precast the Precast Federation and The wider membership of Btitash? PeecsSAssociation Non-members of British Precast as bess The Health and were able to do Executive Seite Company received draft copy of the BPCF Members sets out the best practice guidance. We Document No 11/2014 which document and agreed to the cant-confirm that the Company has reviewed the implementation of its comments ana guidelines. We can confirm the best practice guidance is as follows:- A risk assessment and safe system of with all relevant staff. It is industry workcshould be developed, communicated and agreed needed. If placing on edge is benepracticeato avoid placing stairs on theircedge aglesd required then standard practice is: - To support by craneage_ To support by a restraint system (e.g: toast rack type system) A copy of the Members No: 11/2014 2014 is enclosed_ which shall be formally circulated by the BPCF on The Company has listed below the actions stair manufacturing process Actions implemented in relation to the precast concrete accident and prior to recommencement that were implemented immediately post the fata of the stair manufacturing process: _ Immediate cessation of the practice of their edges without storing and on staircases standing on 11/2014 specifically any means of restraint The British Precast Guidance their estates that "it is industry best practice to avoed No: edge unless needed". stairs on 2 Installation of the TOAST RACK stair their stringer edge between support system; whereby the stairs are placed on for further stability before upright steel posts, the placement of chock blocks released the crane hooks and having subsequent URMN50024/29882/9587666-1 stringer meeting the during safety factory Flooring they Safety Briefing briefing Briefing May working stringer placing including being from

dwf dressing works applied. The British Precast toast rack type system as suitable Guidance 11/2014 specifically refers to placing on edge is required then stantare stracticsystem: The guidance states that "If practice To support by craneage. To support by a restraint system (e.g: toast_ rack type system) 3 Immediate cessation of manually Iaid flat on their soffit tipping stairs their stood edges to Installation of a TIPPING PIT RACKS fo teaTIPPINGG PPT; wsiegebheauverirs are t9 be transported the TOAST the top edge stringer of the using overhead and purpose points gravel TIPPING PIT nrecast stair, where the stair is then slowfy on rallowing the stair to rotate Gafely lowered into the the crane operator are stationed onto its soffit, AlI operatives PIT. at a safe distance external to the TIPPING As result of the death of Mr unprecedented circumseance %f Ie incGesson and in light of the particular and which include: incident; other measures havenelsoabeenl taken
5. In consultation with the Precast Stair Assessment was revised ranasareaidedeporkirent Operatives & Supervisors, the Risk the in practices iorking procedures were drawnOp teeflesk stair units as detailed above. agreed the Support and of precast A series of further TOOLBOX the Managemener SupervisOr TAarufaere also held all those revised Risk & Manufacture of Precast Concrete concerned in issued Assessment & Safe Working Method and Stairs reflecting the to all those noted above: a copy of these documents were supervisors in hestaioteeparovent Sutseg eonsui to all general operatives of an agreed safe further consultation took place and system of work in the manufacturing in adoption mould preparation to completion. process of precast stairs, from In common with the department remaithencer ponytartheverocndese working practices in the staircase review oi all company peacticestadericedand the Company carried out a full formal review of all Management; procedures, as well as and including a full formal relative to Health & Siapevesors & General Operativesntraining consultation on safe Sayetersaragement and Awareness: The procegsi lureviewhane to all of work, was rolled out to and Road cherzproducts manufactured by ACP aothe production processes safe Verrington Risehow; Maryporcturedafford Park production facilities at Lakes systems of works adopted Manchester, resulting in agreed 8_ full review of all training refresher training, new iraningcareditatioate was carried out and where applicable included and updated methods specifically relating to Health and Safety were actioned, This awareness and management URMN5O024/29882/9587666-1 is: - from stringer being from the crane, lifting including changes working including Turning involving issue resulting Safety including relating the being training training

These were introduced through a series of internal training newly adopted Risk Assessment & Method toolbox the employed the services of external Statement as the basis The Compangalse managers on health and training providers for the training of supervpsory ad of Occupational Safetyrand afetlth aregesis ancbmanagement including the Institution General Certificate in [LO.SH] & obtaining certification of the International Occupational Health and Safety [NEB.Oaio The Company has created Safety Committee in of health and safety at work The aim order to improve and raise standards can approach their respective of tforming the committee is 5o that employees representative can then representatives with issues and suggestions, Whictyehe intended that the Committee to the meetings and promote to the committee It is shall include hold a meeting every 4 6 weeks. The attendees at this the three named representatives and two management team. The nominated members of members ofthe the Production Manager and the management team arel are not available another Group Health and Safety Director: participate member of the management team would be invited to
10. The company wants to raise awareness of Company to prevent accidents and have current safety standards set by the This involves a new starter review introduced new procedures to achieve thise instruct and train new employees. throughewhich the Company will monitor;eassess, meeting, safety issues are to be It is intended that week at the supervisors discussed any accidents that have occurred. The stated aim of the Company is the prevention of any re-occurrence of accidents. faithfully DWF LLP URMN50024/29882/9587666-1 talks, using safety bring meeting the they every including Yours

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 12"h September 2011 commenced an investigation into the death of Martin Geoffrey McGlasson, aged 37. The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest before a on 20"h December 2013. The conclusion of the inquest was: The Cause of death was: Multiple Injuries The Conclusion of the jury was: Mr McGlasson died as a result of an accident
Circumstances of the death
Mr McGlasson was plant operative employed by ACP Concrete Limited, part of Thomas Armstrong Holdings Limited, in Workington; Cumbria. On the 2nd September 2011 he was slurrying a concrete staircase that had, that morning; been removed from a mould. The staircase had been transported by another operative by overhead crane ad placed o its edge on two wooden battens o the floor. The staircase was not supported by the crane, or by other means whilst Mr McGlasson worked on it. He had slurried the back of the staircase and had started on the stairs side when the staircase fell on him , crushing predominantly his chest: The staircase was removed by use of the crane but it was clear that he was dead at the scene: The stairs weighed almost 3 tonnes. No one witnessed the accident; The evidence was that the system of work, which had been in operation for 23 years without incident; was that: After removal the mould by overhead crane the staircase was set down on two or more battens (depending on the size of the staircase and any landings it had);
2. The operator would "sweep" the floor with the battens to ensure that they had no debris underneath, before setting the staircase down; He would also seek to place the batten under the widest part of the stair to ensure maximum stability; The operator would take the tension off the crane and then take hold of the of the staircase and attempt t0 move or rock it, it to check its stability. If he was concerned that it was unstable he would lift it and move the battens or the staircase; Once satisfied as to stability he would remove the chains and Ieave the staircase, unsupported, to be slurried. After the slurrying process had been completed the staircase was "rocked over" onto the forks of a forklift truck and then removed to the storage yard. Area the Jury
1.a. from top

The evidence at the Inquest was that method of work was followed on the of Mr McGlasson's death: The work area was busy ad the operative moved the staircase to what was considered to be an unusual place, in front of the joiners bench. During the police and HSE investigation there was evidence of debris at the scene; such as small offcuts of plywood, screws etc, that may possibly have been under one or more of the wooden battens It appears that the battens had been placed under the staircase at almost the narrowest part of the stairs rather than the widest part. specialist HSE Inspector gave evidence at the Inquest to the effect that in normal circumstances substantial effort, in excess of the power of one man; would be needed to push Or over a staircase if placed properly on the wooden battens. However in this case the most likely explanation for the overturn was that there was debris under the battens There was clearly concern why this instability was not felt by the operative when he put down the stairs, or Mr McGlasson as he was slurrying; and no explanation was forthcoming: There had been, in 2003, a short attempt to change the method of work to ensure that the staircase was supported by the crane slurrying: This was found to be impracticable and was abandoned. returned to the former method of work, as described above, and that remained in use until Mr McGlasson's death. However the Risk Assessments for several subsequent years and up until the death, which had been prepared by the Health ad Safety Department at Thomas Armstrong Holdings Ltd showed that the method of work in operation was that the stairs were supported by the crane. There appears to have been no recognition by the managers, health and safety department or the supervisors of the difference in what was actually happening on the shop floor to what was said in the Risk Assessments. Following Mr McGlasson's death the HSE immediately served a Prohibition Notice on ACP Concrete limited, Within a few days they had in place new method of work so that a "toast rack" was installed in front of each mould. These are steel pillars which slide into the floor and which support the staircases which are also chocked; during the course of slurrying: The evidence at the Inquest was that the cost involved in the "toast rack" was small, and its use has not appreciably affected the speed of the process_ do not make fewer stairs as a result of the new method of work. the day pull during They put building They

Coincidentally there had been another accident at the ACP works on the morning of Mr McGlasson's death: A 17 year old had been rocking a small staircase onto the forks of a fork lift truck when the staircase rocked back at him and pinned his against the front of the mould_ Fortunately a bolt sticking out from the front of the mould had prevented the staircase crushing his legs. As a result of this accident ACP Concrete have devised method of overturning stairs after slurrying that does not involve men rocking the stairs onto the forks now transport the staircases by crane to a sloping gravel pit. Again the cost of installing the gravel pit was small and it has made no appreciable difference to the rate of production. Not surprisingly the evidence at the Inquest was that the new method of work was much safer in that it eliminated the risk of injury or death in slurrying or finishing the staircase and then subsequently handling it
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths ad believe that the British Precast Concrete Federation has the power to advise your members to take such action;

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2014-0001
Date of report
6 January 2014
Coroner
Robert Chapman
Coroner area
Cumbria (North & West)

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 3 Mar 2014 (estimated).

Sent to

British Precast Concrete Federation

Source links