Denbighshire County Council will review the coastal risk assessment at Prestatyn, including the area near the Beaches Hotel, and carry out a joint boundary to boundary inspection of DCC coastal areas by the end of 2014. (AI summary)
View full response
In section 5 of the regulation 28 report it is identified that the area was not lit The County Council does not have duty to light highways and footpaths but has the discretion to do so. Fitting luminaires in this exposed vicinity is not considered to be reasonably practicable as the installation and maintenance costs would far outweigh any long term benefit to the public In section 5 of the regulation 28 report it is identified that the wall could reasonably be considered to be a tripping hazard. wall height on the path side is 520 mm high which equates to knee height for a person of six feet tall. It should be highlighted at this time that low walls are not that unusual in public places including coastal areas To help maintain facilities at an acceptable standard DCC carries out routine safety tours of the coastal areas under its control, issues identified during the tours are passed to the relevant section for remedial action to be carried out_ Actions taken Record search for incident data Visit to area of the incident by DCC Corporate Health and Safety. During this visit number of issues were identified that have been risk assessed with recommendations being made to the responsible engineers. It should be noted that none of the issues relate directly to incident Confirm that routine monitoring is in place Calculation of risk level using the ToR framework Proposed actions Engineers to review the prioritised actions identified in the risk assessment and carry out remedial actions as funding permits. Open timescale as none of the issues identified are considered to pose imminent danger Carry out a joint boundary to boundary inspection of the DCC coastal areas by the responsible engineers and Corporate Health and Safety by the end of 2014
The
Appendix 1 Footfall assumption used to calculate risk 1971 to 2014 = 43 years Conservative estimate of the footfall in the area during the main holiday period of six weeks is 200 individuals per Conservative estimate of the footfall in area during the remainder of the year is 50 individuals per Calculation A) 200 individuals, seven days per week for six weeks per year for forty three years Plus B) 50 individuals, seven days per week for forty six weeks per year for forty three years (200 x 7x6 x 43) + (50 x 7x 46 x 43) = 1,053,500 (iuaccptable 1 region 1 1 Tolerahle 2 rogion 1 [ Brvadly acceptable rcgion HSE framework for the tolerability of risk Boundary hetween tlle *broadly acceptahle' and "tolerahle' regions for risk entailing fatalities 130 HSE believes that an individual risk o death of one in a million per annum for both workers and the public corresponds t0 & very low level of risk and should be uscd as a guideline for the boundary between the broadly acceptable and tolerable regions. As is very apparent from Tables 1-4 at Appendix 4. We live in an environment of appreciable risks of various kinds which contribute t0 a background level of risk typically a risk of dealh of one in a hundred per year averaged over & lifetime_ A residual risk of one in a million per year is extremely small when compared to this background level of risk. Indeed many activities which people are prepared to acccpt in their daily lives for the benefits for cxample. gas and electricity; Or engaging in air travel, entail or exceed such levels of residual risk. From "Reducing risks, Protecting people" (HSE 2001)
day the day thcy bring; using