Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Sian Jones
Ref: 2016-0371
Date: 20 Oct 2016
Coroner: ME Hassell
Area: London Inner (North)
Responses identified: 0 / 1
View PDF
There is a critical lack of protocol and training for monitoring non-detained individuals in police stations, including guidance on interpreting snoring, the impact of intoxication, and effective information sharing.
Date
20 Oct 2016
56-day deadline
15 Dec 2016 est.
Responses identified
0 of 1
Coroner's concerns
There is a critical lack of protocol and training for monitoring non-detained individuals in police stations, including guidance on interpreting snoring, the impact of intoxication, and effective information sharing.
View full coroner's concerns
The MATTERS OF CONCERN related to policy in respect of the monitoring of non detained members of the public by police officers.
I heard evidence at inquest that there is no specific protocol or training regarding the monitoring of members of the public in police stations who are not in police custody. This was acknowledged by the Metropolitan Police Service to be a gap. In seeking to plug this gap by way of policy development, it may be helpful for you to consider the following.
Snoring is not always a reassuring sign and may indicate a partial airway obstruction. A partial airway obstruction can be life threatening.
In considering whether snoring is sign for concern, the fact of intoxication by alcohol or drugs or both – even if the individual is capable – is highly relevant. In addition, officers should bear in mind that members of the public sometimes lie about alcohol or drug taking, even when there seems no obvious reason to lie.
Any relevant information gleaned by officers, for example that an individual is a methadone user, should be passed on to colleagues with responsibility (and preferably recorded in some way or other).
The only way of determining whether snoring is benign is by rousing, most particularly by waking the individual and determining whether they are able to sit up and hold a conversation.
The rousing itself may have a therapeutic purpose even over and above its value as a tool of assessment. And an unresponsive individual must be treated as a medical emergency.
All police officers and staff should know the location of the nearest defibrillator. If they are attending a police station for the first time, they should make themselves aware of its location. In terms of feedback regarding officer training generally and for the officer who led this resuscitation attempt, I should also point out that after Ms Jones’s cardiorespiratory arrest, the cardiopulmonary resuscitation given was later noted by a paramedic to be extremely effective.
I heard evidence at inquest that there is no specific protocol or training regarding the monitoring of members of the public in police stations who are not in police custody. This was acknowledged by the Metropolitan Police Service to be a gap. In seeking to plug this gap by way of policy development, it may be helpful for you to consider the following.
Snoring is not always a reassuring sign and may indicate a partial airway obstruction. A partial airway obstruction can be life threatening.
In considering whether snoring is sign for concern, the fact of intoxication by alcohol or drugs or both – even if the individual is capable – is highly relevant. In addition, officers should bear in mind that members of the public sometimes lie about alcohol or drug taking, even when there seems no obvious reason to lie.
Any relevant information gleaned by officers, for example that an individual is a methadone user, should be passed on to colleagues with responsibility (and preferably recorded in some way or other).
The only way of determining whether snoring is benign is by rousing, most particularly by waking the individual and determining whether they are able to sit up and hold a conversation.
The rousing itself may have a therapeutic purpose even over and above its value as a tool of assessment. And an unresponsive individual must be treated as a medical emergency.
All police officers and staff should know the location of the nearest defibrillator. If they are attending a police station for the first time, they should make themselves aware of its location. In terms of feedback regarding officer training generally and for the officer who led this resuscitation attempt, I should also point out that after Ms Jones’s cardiorespiratory arrest, the cardiopulmonary resuscitation given was later noted by a paramedic to be extremely effective.
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
On 19 February 2015, I commenced an investigation into the death of Sian Jones, aged 47 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest earlier today.
The jury made a narrative determination, which I attach. They concluded that Ms Jones’s death resulted from methadone and alcohol intoxication, coupled with inadequate police policies, procedures and training.
The medical cause of death was recorded as:
1a diffuse cerebral ischaemia 1b cardiorespiratory arrest 1c combined toxic effects of alcohol and methadone in an individual with myocardial fibrosis and significant atherosclerotic stenosis of two major epicardial coronary arteries
The jury made a narrative determination, which I attach. They concluded that Ms Jones’s death resulted from methadone and alcohol intoxication, coupled with inadequate police policies, procedures and training.
The medical cause of death was recorded as:
1a diffuse cerebral ischaemia 1b cardiorespiratory arrest 1c combined toxic effects of alcohol and methadone in an individual with myocardial fibrosis and significant atherosclerotic stenosis of two major epicardial coronary arteries
Circumstances of the death
Ms Jones suffered a cardiorespiratory arrest in Hornsey Police station whilst waiting to see specialist officers to make a statement concerning an allegation of a historical sexual assault.
Copies sent to
Chief Inspector policy lead
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Training for IPC professionals engineers and clinicians
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Southport Inquiry
Autism spectrum disorder police training
Southport Inquiry
Prevent training on online activity assessment
Southport Inquiry
Neurodiversity training for Prevent practitioners
Southport Inquiry
Balancing vulnerability with professional curiosity
Southport Inquiry
Sharing information about closed Prevent referrals
Southport Inquiry
Prevent Supervisor training on closure decisions
Southport Inquiry
Prevent referral training for organisations
Southport Inquiry
Taxi driver duty to report criminal activity
Report details
- Reference
- 2016-0371
- Date of report
- 20 October 2016
- Coroner
- ME Hassell
- Coroner area
- London Inner (North)
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 1
1 response not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 15 Dec 2016 (estimated).
Sent to
- New Scotland Yard