Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Maud Patrick

Ref: 2017-0151 Date: 8 May 2017 Coroner: Nigel Meadows Area: Manchester (City) Responses identified: 0 / 3 View PDF

Systemic hospital care failures included no mental capacity assessment, poor A&E handover, unprogressed investigations, inadequate patient observations, and insufficient staffing and senior nursing leadership.

Date 8 May 2017
56-day deadline 2 Jan 2018 est.
Responses identified 0 of 3
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Systemic hospital care failures included no mental capacity assessment, poor A&E handover, unprogressed investigations, inadequate patient observations, and insufficient staffing and senior nursing leadership.
View full coroner's concerns
In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report t0 you Mental Capacity There was no apparent consideration t0 the issue of whether or not the deceased had mental capacity from admission to A & E and transfer to AMU.
2. Ensurng all investigationslassessments are completed before a patient leaves A&Eand ensuring an appropriate handover It is appreciated that it will not be possible for all investigations and tests to be performed before a patient leaves the A & E department but if that is the case then the receiving ward should be infored and there should be a clear documented audit trail s0 that it is clear what is outstanding: Trnsfer and hand over of a patient to AMU_fromA & E There was no clear hand over process and review when the deceased arrived on the AMU. It would seem sensible that a Senior Nurse/Sister be informed and can then ensure appropriate care is given. Ensurng investigations are progressedas approprate_There was no progression of necessary basic assessmentsltests which remained outstanding_ For example, a chest 5_ Ensurng that all neurological andor general observations are approprately undertaken_accurately recorded and calculated but also escalated as necessary_It is a fundamental part of basic medical and nursing care that a patient who requires neurological or general observations has them completed in a timely manner; accurately recorded and calculated and then appropriately escalated. This was simply not done and simple systems or protocols could be introduced to ensure that this is completed. It would seem that the primary responsibility for this should be shared between the Nurse in charge of the individual patient and the nurse in charge of the AMU: 6_ Staffng levels competence and seniorty: The levels and competence of staff ( whether agency or Trust employees ) needed to deliver safe and appropriate care and with sufficient senior Nursing staff in leadership roles requires assessment and implementation:

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
The deceased died on the 23 March 2015 and her death is reported t0 my but was not told that any incident had been recorded and was being investigated relating to her care_ No post mortem examination was undertaken and her body was released and no investigation was commenced because at that stage there was no reason to suspect that the death was unnatural. Subsequently, UHSM completed a RCA investigation report which was disclosed to the family who then took legal advice and contacted me. then commenced an investigation and the inquest was resumed on the 4 2017 and concluded the following day: recorded the pathological death as: 1a. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome 1b. Sepsis Ic. Pneumonia
11. Schizophrenia
Circumstances of the death
In rehearsing the history below have used staff surname initials simply by way of ease of reference. have not and would not be granted anonymity and were publicly identified during the hearing: The Solicitor representing UHSM and all staff involved agreed and accepted that Article 2 of the ECHR was engaged because there was an arguable breach of the general or systemic duty owed to the deceased by the State or agents of the State. Consequently, this was an inquest which complied with S.5 (2) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. Towards the end of the hearing when was able to give an indication that was May They considering reporting land to the NMC , Sister F obtained separate legal advice and was represent by counsel recognised her as an interested person. The deceased was 79 years of age and suffered from hypertension and a chronic mental health illness, namely paranoid schizophrenia, which by its nature was a relapsing and remitting condition. She had a history of partial compliance with her medication and she lived in her own accommodation with support from her family. On the 15 March 2015 she exhibited behaviour; which gave her family concem that she may not be taking her anti-psychotic medication and she also appeared to becoming generally unwell and was increasingly unresponsive with reduced mobility a significant reduction in the amount of urine that she was passing_ The out-of-hours GP services was contacted and she was seen and assessed. She was then admitted to the accident and emergency department ( A & E at Wythenshawe Hospital
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2017-0151
Date of report
8 May 2017
Coroner
Nigel Meadows
Coroner area
Manchester (City)

Responses identified

Responses identified 0 of 3
3 responses not yet linked

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 2 Jan 2018 (estimated).

Sent to

Care Quality Commission
Manchester Clinical Commissioning Group
University of South Manchester Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Source links