Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Maureen Colclough

Ref: 2017-0318 Date: 27 Jul 2017 Coroner: Jean Harkin Area: Cheshire Responses identified: 2 / 2 View PDF

Care home staff received inadequate training to recognise emergency situations and relied on presumptions when encountering an unresponsive patient.

Date 27 Jul 2017
56-day deadline 28 Jan 2018 est.
Responses identified 2 of 2
Care Home Health related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Care home staff received inadequate training to recognise emergency situations and relied on presumptions when encountering an unresponsive patient.
View full coroner's concerns
Inadequate training of staff to recognise emergency situation:
2. Relying on presumptions when finding an unresponsive patient in a serious situation.

Responses

2 respondents
CQC Regulator / Inspectorate
16 Oct 2017 PDF
Action Taken

CQC has raised the provider's failure to notify them of the death, conducted an inspection, found all staff received basic life support training in August/September 2017 with additional training in late September/early October, and is taking substantive enforcement action requiring an action plan to improve care. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear HM Coroner Ref: Maureen Colclough Re: Regulation 28 Report Inquest into the death of Maureen Ann Colclough Thank you for sending the Care Quality Commission (CQC) a copy of the Regulation 28 Report issued following the inquest touching on the death of Maureen Ann Colclough: We are writing to you with our response to the matters of concern raised in relation to Unique Care Services_ We note the legal requirement upon CQC to respond to your report within 56 days and thank you for granting CQC a four week extension to provide a response_ Following the receipt of the Regulation 28 Report we held three internal management review meetings to discuss the findings of the report and determine what action CQC should take. We reviewed our records and found that the Registered Provider had not notified us of the death of Maureen Ann Colclough as legally required: This failure to report has been raised with the Registered Provider and we will consider whether criminal enforcement action is appropriate. Ann

We also agreed to conduct an inspection of the service, reviewing staff training in the event of an emergency and also the oversight that is provided by Two inspectors visited the service on 11 September 2017 and 21 September. detailed some of our findings under your specific questions below_ Background The Registered Provider, was registered on December 2014. In May 2017 , the Registered Provider moved location from Unique Care Services, 19 Caldy Drive, Great Sutton, Ellesmere Port; Cheshire, CH86 4RN to Stanlaw Business Centre, Unit C11 Stanlaw Abbey Business Centre, Dover Drive, Ellesmere Port; Merseyside , CH85 9BF . Unique Care Services was inspected on 17 and 24 October 2016. The service was rated 'inadequate' in the Well Led domain, 'requires improvement' in the Safe domain and 'good' in the Responsive, Effective and Caring domains_ The service was rated 'requires improvement' overall. We issued a requirement notice for a breach of regulation 17 (good governance): We inspected the service again in May 2017. The service was rated 'good' overall with 'good' ratings in four domains (Safe , Effective, Caring and Responsive) and 'requires improvement' in the Well Led domain: Coroner's concerns In relation to the specific matters of concern raised in your report: Inadequate training of staff to recognise emergency situations_ During our recent inspection we found that all members of staff had received basic life support training This took place August and early September 2017 . The Registered Provider confirmed that additional classroom based training has been provided to staff on 26 September and 3 October 2017. We also noted that the two members of staff involved in the incident had received training to the incident and one of them has subsequently received updated training on emergency procedures_ CQC is of the view that although the Registered Provider has provided adequate training for staff in dealing with emergency situations in response to the death of MC, the lack of training for some staff to December 2016 and the delay in provision of that training put service users at risk at that time. Although the risk has been mitigated whereby all staff have now had training, CQC considers that there had been system failure to oversee the management of the service have during prior prior the

Relying on presumptions when finding an unresponsive patient in serious situation:. CQC is of the view that carers relying on presumptions when finding an unresponsive patient in a serious condition place that individual at high risk: Whilst some of this risk has been mitigated as emergency training has been provided for staff, more robust action by the Registered Provider is required with regard to oversight of the service Due to the concerns found during our inspection CQC is now taking substantive enforcement action; In addition, the Registered Provider is required to provide CQC with an action plan detailing how intend to improve the care provided to service users. Inspectors will continue to monitor the service to ensure that service users receive safe and effective care_ A copy of the report detailing our findings will be available when published on our website_ Should you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me on my telephone number
Unique Care Services
PDF
Action Taken

Unique Care Services has notified all employees and revised performance appraisals to include recognizing emergency situations, ensured new starters receive relevant information, and mandated extra Emergency First Aid training for all employees. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mrs. Harkin: am in response to your request for Unique Care Services to provide details of actions and proposed actions taken regarding your concerns after the passing away of Maureen Ann Colclough: will always be open to new suggestions or information of how to continuously improve the training that we provide for all employees at Unique Care Services In response to your concerns have provided details of actions we have already taken since the inquest took place as well as further steps that we have taken in an effort to prevent future deaths. AlI employees have been notified and almost ALL have undertaken a revised performance appraisal (regardless of any recent or up to date training) containing specific information and questions relating to recognizing an emergency situation as well as steps to take when finding an unresponsive service user All new starters will be given the relevant information and must answer series of questions and show satisfactory level of competence and understanding in recognizing an emergency situation and responding accordingly. (Employees have always been given this information in the past in the form of a handbook and have been required to sign to confirm receipt) AII employees of Unique Care Services have been made aware of that MUST attend an extra Emergency First Aid training course on either of the dates provided and confirmed (Tuesday 26th September & Tuesday 3d October) writing We they

sincerely that the actions and extra measures that we have taken prove to be satisfactory for you report but please do not hesitate to get in further contact if there is anything else you require from myself or any other employees. Please allow me to state that we as a company have ALWAYS provided the relevant training as well as promoting the options of many other training courses and qualifications even for developing skills unrelated to Domiciliary Care: state this in relation to the unchallenged evidence provided by Iduring the recent inquest: stated that she had not been given the relevant first aid training: This is statement that must declare false but was unfortunately made out of our hands: We have since provided the Care Quality Commission with training_records as well as qualification certificates as evidence: When asked why had made such statement; she stated that she had not understood the question answered while under oath Unfortunately the matter remains unresolved as has been on sickness leave for a number of months since suffering a stroke and has not returned to work Sincerely Registered Manager hope yet

Report sections

Circumstances of the death
On the 16" December 2016 he deceased was found unresponsive at home by two carers from Unique Care Services at 1600 hours on 16" December 2016. The deceased was breathing heavily and her eyes were flickering, the carers were unable to rouse her despite sitting her up higher in bed and shouting her name. The carers telephoned their care manager who agreed that the deceased be left asleep as she was breathing The carers presumed she had been drinking alcohol and that was why she would not wake up. The carers then left the property at approximately 16.15 Hours. The Deceased's daughter returned home from work at 17.25 hours ad on finding her mother unresponsive called 999. Sadly paramedics confirmed her deceased at 17.41 hours_ The deceased had recently completed a 12 week alcohol reduction programme and there was no evidence presented in court by police or other witnesses that there was alcohol abuse by the deceased, No bottles or glasses were found near or around the deceased. The evidence of fact was that the deceased was likely in a comatose state ad that earlier intervention could have saved her, The deceased was taking opiates for pain and had alcoholic fatty liver disease along with other co morbidities It emerge that the carers remained of the opinion that acted accordingly: care manager, after hearing evidence in court, confirmed that had she known the detail she would have advised calling the emergency services rather than leaving the deceased alone Mrs July they The

An advanced nurse practitioner gave evidence that the deceased was likely in a comatose state that could have been reversed with appropriate medical intervention. Evidence in court also confirmed the fact that the carers had lifted the deceased into a higher position on the bed, this did not awaken the deceased,
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2017-0318
Date of report
27 July 2017
Coroner
Jean Harkin
Coroner area
Cheshire

Responses identified

Responses identified 2 of 2
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 28 Jan 2018 (estimated).

Sent to

Care Agency
Care Quality Commission

Source links