Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Glynn Storey

Ref: 2018-0246 Date: 27 Jul 2018 Coroner: Leslie Hamilton Area: County Durham and Darlington Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

Confusion regarding responsibility for ensuring windows meet building standards between building control and builders created a false sense of compliance.

Date 27 Jul 2018
56-day deadline 21 Sep 2018
Responses identified 1 of 1
Other related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Confusion regarding responsibility for ensuring windows meet building standards between building control and builders created a false sense of compliance.
View full coroner's concerns
(1) There is confusion as to whether the approved building control inspector or the builder is responsible for ensuring that such windows meet building standards Detailed enquiries by the police have shown that responsibility lies with the builderlowner: However; the ownerlbuilder felt that as the building had been inspected on multiple occasions, all standards had been met;

Responses

1 respondent
CICAIR
28 Aug 2018 PDF
Noted

CICAIR clarifies the responsibilities of Approved Inspectors versus builders in ensuring buildings meet safety standards, emphasizing that Approved Inspectors provide a spot-checking process and cannot guarantee compliance. It references existing guidance and complaint procedures. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Dr Hamilton, RE: REGULATION 28 REPORT GLYNN MATTHEW STOREY write in reply to your letter dated 27 July 2018 with the above reference: should first explain that CICAIR Limited is the body currently designated by the Secretary of State under section 49 of the Building Act 1984 t0 carry out his executive and administrative functions in respect of Approved Inspectors. It is not part of CICAIR's functions to give definitive interpretations of the legislation so what follows is only CICAIR's opinion. As am sure you are aware, only a court can give a definitive interpretation: raised a matter of concern as follows: (1) There is confusion as to whether the approved bullding control inspector or the builder is responsible for ensuring that such windows meet building standards Detailed enquiries by the police have shown that responsibility lies with the builder/owner. However, the owner/builder felt that as the building had been inspected on multiple occasions, all sofety standards had been met: The Building Act 1984, the Building Regulations 2010 and the Building (Approved Inspectors etc) Regulations 2010 place the to comply with the building regulations onto the person carrying out the work: The person carrying out the work, depending on the context, would be the person physically carrying out the work (e-g. developer, builder or installer) or, in most circumstances, the owner and/or occupier of the property. The person carrying out the work retains ultimate responsibility for compliance with the building regulations ad the quality of the finished product: Approved Inspectors (and local authorities when acting as building control bodies) do not have this responsibility under the legislation. The responsibilities of a Approved Inspector are conferred by regulation 81) of the Building (Approved Inspectors etc ) Regulations 2010 which requires that Approved Inspectors take such steps as are reasonable to enable the Approved Inspector to be satisfied within the limits of professional skill and care that the applicable requirements of the building regulations are complied with The building control function carried out by a Approved Inspector is necessarlly spot checking process as there is no requirement for an Approved Inspector to be continuously on site whilst work is being carried out: CICAIR 26 Store Street London WCIE 7BT United Kingdom T+44 (0120 7399 7400 Ecicair@cicorg.uk WWW:- cicorg;uk VAT Registration Number 266 8002 01 Company Registration Number 08881582 You duty

An Approved Inspector cannot provide a guarantee of compliance with the building regulations and the appointment of an Approved Inspector does not remove the obligation of the person carrying out the work to achieve compliance The Final (i.e. compliance) Certificate which an Approved Inspector gives is therefore evidence , but not conclusive evidence, of building regulations compliance. In your report, vou have suggested that action needs to be taken to provide clarity on who is responsible for ensuring that buildings meet safety standards. CICAIR publishes clear guidance outlining the role and remit of an Approved Inspector and we operate complaints procedure whereby allegations that an Approved Inspector has not adhered to the CICAIR Code of Conduct for Approved Inspectors can be investigated. The guidance and complaint process is publicly available at http lLcic_ org_uklservices/complaints phg It is also possible to make claim against a Approved Inspector in the civil courts (negligence, breach of contract or misrepresentation etc): There is also guidance on responsibilities on the Government's Planning Portal website: https:LLww planningportalco uklinfo/200187Lyour_resgonsibilities trust this helps to clarify your matter of concern: As CICAIR is acting on behalf of the Secretary of State am copying this letter to the Rt Hon. James Brokenshire MP, Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government:

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 06.06.2017 commenced an investigation into the death of Glynn Matthew Storey, 32 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 27 July 2018. The conclusion of the inquest was Accident: medical cause of death was Ia. Injuries to back 1b. Fall from a height
Circumstances of the death
The deceased was staying with a friend (in a ilat with which he was notfamiliar) During the night; under the influence of alcohol, he fell from a second floor window onto a fence below sustaining fatal injuries. The window did not meetE building regulations (it was a low window and did not have a safety guardlopening restrictor titted) . Further investigations revealed that none of the 40 flats in the development, completed in 2011,_ had safety devices fitted: Local remedial action has been taken:
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe your organisation have the power to take such action: There needs to be absolute clarity as to how is responsible for ensuring that buildings meet safety standards. Building The safety

Your RESPONSE You are under a to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report;, namely by 21st September 2018. !, the coroner, may extend the period, Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out timetable for action: Otherwise you must explain why noaction is proposed.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2018-0246
Date of report
27 July 2018
Coroner
Leslie Hamilton
Coroner area
County Durham and Darlington

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 21 Sep 2018.

Sent to

Construction Industry Council

Source links