Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Eleanor Brabant
Ref: 2018-0301
Date: 16 Nov 2018
Coroner: Grahame Short
Area: Southampton and New Forest
Responses identified: 0 / 1
View PDF
Observation policies for vulnerable patients were unclear, staff lacked training on safeguarding and reporting crimes, and nurses misunderstood their powers to detain informal patients. Confusion also existed regarding family involvement in care planning.
Date
16 Nov 2018
56-day deadline
11 Jan 2019
Responses identified
0 of 1
Coroner's concerns
Observation policies for vulnerable patients were unclear, staff lacked training on safeguarding and reporting crimes, and nurses misunderstood their powers to detain informal patients. Confusion also existed regarding family involvement in care planning.
View full coroner's concerns
The MATTERS OF CONCERNS are as follows: 5.1 It is unclear from the evidence whether the changes made to policies for observations on patients at Antelope House since this death apply to all in-patients cared for by the Trust and what steps have been made to train staff in their implementation, particularly in relation to prioritising the most vulnerable patients. 5.2 Witnesses who gave testimony on the subject were unclear about the need for safeguarding of vulnerable patients who are the victim of crime, such as Eleanor Brabant and their responsibility to report those crimes to the police, whether or not the patient consented. 5.3 It was apparent that the nurses on the ward felt unable to use their powers under section 5(4)
of the Mental Health Act 1983 to prevent patients from leaving the ward even when they had real concerns for the safety and welfare of that person and that they erroneously believed that informal patients were not detainable in such circumstances. The training they had received on the implementation of the Mental Health Act in relation to informal patients had not covered this aspect sufficiently. 5.4 It is Trust policy for the families of patients to be involved in care planning, but where the patient has withdrawn consent for information to be shared with their family, witnesses were unclear as to how this should be implemented, and further training appears to be necessary.
of the Mental Health Act 1983 to prevent patients from leaving the ward even when they had real concerns for the safety and welfare of that person and that they erroneously believed that informal patients were not detainable in such circumstances. The training they had received on the implementation of the Mental Health Act in relation to informal patients had not covered this aspect sufficiently. 5.4 It is Trust policy for the families of patients to be involved in care planning, but where the patient has withdrawn consent for information to be shared with their family, witnesses were unclear as to how this should be implemented, and further training appears to be necessary.
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
On 08/11/2017 00:00 I commenced an investigation into the death of Eleanor Valerie Fyfe BRABANT aged 28. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 05 November 2018. The conclusion of the inquest was: I a Hypoxic Ischaemic Brain Injury I b Cardiac Arrest I c Hanging II
Circumstances of the death
Between 00.50 and 01.09 on 2 November 2017 whilst alone in room 7-03 in Trinity Ward Antelope House Southampton, Eleanor Brabant hanged herself. She had suffered with mental illness from the age of about 11 and her most recent diagnoses were Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder and poly-substance misuse. Her compulsory detention under section 3 Mental Health Act 1983 was rescinded on 28 September 2017 following which her behaviour and mental state deteriorated, but there was no clear care plan then in place On the balance of probability she chose to end her life.
Action should be taken
7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 11 January 2019. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the family of Eleanor Brabant (Interested Persons) and to the Local Safeguarding Board (where the deceased was 18). I have also sent it to Hampshire Constabulary who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. Grahame Antony SHORT Senior Coroner for SOUTHAMPTON AND NEW FOREST Dated: 16 November 2018
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Senior Lead Nurse in Children's Wards
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Training for IPC professionals engineers and clinicians
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Southport Inquiry
Autism spectrum disorder police training
Southport Inquiry
Prevent training on online activity assessment
Southport Inquiry
Neurodiversity training for Prevent practitioners
Southport Inquiry
Balancing vulnerability with professional curiosity
Southport Inquiry
Sharing information about closed Prevent referrals
Southport Inquiry
Prevent Supervisor training on closure decisions
Southport Inquiry
Prevent referral training for organisations
Report details
- Reference
- 2018-0301
- Date of report
- 16 November 2018
- Coroner
- Grahame Short
- Coroner area
- Southampton and New Forest
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 1
1 response not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 11 Jan 2019.
Sent to
- Southern Health NHS Trust