Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

James McLaren

Ref: 2018-0330 Date: 4 Oct 2018 Coroner: Andrew Hetherington Area: Sunderland Responses identified: 4 / 4 View PDF

Inadequate securing of commercial and communal bins, including unsecured lids and easily opened locks, increases the risk of people sheltering inside and potentially becoming trapped.

Date 4 Oct 2018
56-day deadline 26 Apr 2019 est.
Responses identified 4 of 4
Other related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Inadequate securing of commercial and communal bins, including unsecured lids and easily opened locks, increases the risk of people sheltering inside and potentially becoming trapped.
View full coroner's concerns
_ _ , as follows_ The WISH WASTE 25 Managing access to waste and recycling bins contains formal guidance to prevent death Or serious injury when people shelter in large commercial or communal domestic bins This guidance was provided t0 the Inquest: Factors increasing the foreseeability of people gaining access and getting into the bins include, but are not limited to: the bin storage area: and isolated; being dark and unlit, especially at collection times; the bins: having lids that are not secured and easy to open. heard evidence that not all bins had lids, and that those, that did, had not been locked on 23rd December 2017. [heard that where there were locks t0 the bins and their some had a generic lock that could be opened using a generic key, and that to unlock the bins would only take a matter of seconds, and that this would not be an onerous task for an operator to unlock the bin: [also heard that; although not in the location where James climbed into the bin, some customers fitted combination locks to bins with a code shared on a manifest for the collection vehicle It is not known whether; once a bin is locked, it can be opened from the inside, and this is also a concern_ This is particularly relevant with the nights becoming colder and darker; and the potential for people to seek refuge in bins due to the elements or for any other reason. raise this for your attention as to whether further steps can be taken to safely secure a bin and deter therein. For LGA: The Sunderland City Council Environmental Health Officers locally have sought to raise awareness of the issue when conducting inspections of premises and customers bins. Could you raise awareness nationally of the issue to prevent death or serious injury arising from access to commercial or communal domestic bins? For ESA: Could you raise your members awareness nationally of the issue and risk, and to provide a reminder to employers and employees to consider a heightened check to look for people who may be sheltering in the bins particularly in colder months? Would you consider suggesting that head torches are used in dark or poorly lit areas regularly to provide additional lighting which appears to be practice? For CIWM: Could you raise your members awareness nationally of the issue and risk, and to provide reminder to employers and employees to consider a heightened check to look for people_who may be sheltering in the bins particularly in colder months? Would you consider large being quiet lids; entry using large good suggesting that head torches are used in dark Or poorly lit areas regularly to provide additional lighting which appears to be practice? For HSE: Please would you clarify what it means in the WISH WASTE 25 formal guidance for bins to be secure; and whether this should include the securing ofbin lids by way of a generic lock that can also be opened from the inside to prevent someone from trapped?

Responses

4 respondents
Health and Safety Executive Regulator / Inspectorate
8 Nov 2018 PDF
Noted

The HSE clarifies the meaning of 'secure' in the WISH WASTE 25 guidance, stating that it requires a risk assessment to determine appropriate measures to prevent bin access, but does not mandate a specific type of lock. They emphasize liaison between waste producers and collectors. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Hetherington

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS – JAMES RYAN MCLAREN Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report issued following the death of James Ryan McLaren. I would like to convey HSE’s sincere condolences to James’s family. In your report you raise a number of questions with the LGA, ESA, CIWM and HSE. In particular you have asked HSE to “clarify what it means in the WISH WASTE 25 formal guidance for bins to be secure, and whether this should include the securing of bin lids by way of a generic lock that can also be opened from the inside to prevent someone from being trapped?” The Waste Industry Safety and Health Forum (WISH) is an industry led organisation that exists to communicate and consult with the waste and recycling industry to improve its health and safety performance. The guidance WISH produces, such as WASTE 25, Manging Access to Large Waste and Recycling Bins, is developed by the industry and HSE is consulted on the content. HSE are a member of, and advisor to, WISH but does not own the guidance that WISH produces. HSE does however endorse guidance produced by WISH as a means of managing risk, complying with the law and demonstrating best practice as industry standard. The legal requirements for managing access to large waste bins stems from the Health and Safety at Work etc Act and associated legislation. The legislation is, in the main, outcome based and not prescriptive on how safe outcomes can be achieved. In relation to large bins the legislation effectively requires those using such bins, and those collecting the contents, to assess risk to others and do what is reasonably practicable to manage that risk. In the case of the risks covered by WASTE 25 this is in relation to the known issue of people taking shelter in large bins and the risk of subsequent injury or death when the bins are emptied into collection vehicles. The law is not prescriptive and WASTE 25 effectively demonstrates the risk and guides users to ways in which it can be managed.

2 Recognising a growing trend of people being discovered in commercial bins and containers WASTE 25 was developed to provide advice and guidance for businesses that produce commercial waste, manage a waste bin storage area, or collect waste as part of their work activity. It sets out reasonable measures that can be taken to try and prevent people sheltering in bins to prevent the subsequent risk of injury during collection activities. It also includes the steps collection operatives can take to check bins as it recognises that the steps to prevent access are not infallible. The guidance sets out circumstances that make it more likely that a person may try to gain access to bins taking account of location, the nature of materials collected in the bin, ease of access and so on. These are the factors that a business using such bins will need to take into account to decide what measures they need to adopt to restrict access. Where it is reasonably foreseeable that someone may access a bin the legal obligation on a user is to do what is reasonably practicable to prevent access. WASTE 25 then sets the reasonable precautions that businesses can take to prevent non-employees (with the exception of collection crews) from freely accessing any bins, i.e. to keep the bin “secure”. In this context security is taken to mean preventing a person physically getting into the bin. The guidance highlights factors that could increase the potential of persons accessing commercial bins and containers
– such as leaving them in an open and/or unsecured area. Businesses should consider storing their bins within their building, within the curtilage of their premises, or in a dedicated secure area/enclosure. This in itself may be sufficient to prevent access and negates the needs for individual bins to be locked. Other deterrents such as locating bins in a well-lit area will have a role to play. If securing an area is not sufficient, or not practical, using lid locks to secure bin lids is another potential means of controlling access. There is no specific legal requirement to provide a lock on a commercial bin, nor are there any British or European Standards to which any bin locking device must comply. Therefore a wide range of locking systems, such as “service” or “cabinet” keys, padlocks, gravity locks, lockable straps or combination locks can be found in use. The type of locking system selected can depend on the location, size, type and use of the bin, and will be influenced by factors such who has supplied or manufactured it, the material from which it is constructed, and who is collecting it. Again these factors will be a matter that should be informed by a risk assessment that includes a judgement of the likelihood of a person trying to access the bins, and assessment of how robustly the locking device will withstand normal use and attempts to deliberately bypass the device. Businesses should also monitor their bins (and the surrounding areas) for any signs of attempted access or vandalism as part of their ongoing assessment of the risk. In deciding how to prevent access to their bins a business will acknowledge that higher levels of security will also add to the time and effort required by collection services to empty the bins. Bin manufacturers and suppliers have undertaken research to develop a locking system that would be effective for all types of commercial bin and container, and which does not have an adverse effect on collection crews. Part of this research has concentrated on locks that can be opened from within the bin. Whilst these types of locking system are available, it is our understanding that they have not proven popular within the industry as they have not been demonstrated to be reliable often due to the robust way in which bins are used and handled that leads to damage to the locking mechanism. As your specific question relates to what “secure” means I have not set out any detail of the role of the collection companies in this response. WASTE 25 does however give specific details of how they can work with the users of bins to manage their safety, reduce the likelihood of access and make routine checks to ensure that bins have not been accessed before they are emptied into a vehicle. Emphasis should therefore be placed on preventing persons from accessing bins. The approach outlined within WISH WASTE 25 - the effective liaison, consultation and communication between those who produce and collect waste - is key to preventing people seeking shelter in commercial bins or containers from being seriously injured or killed.

3
ESA
28 Nov 2018 PDF
Action Taken

The ESA has been raising awareness of the dangers of people in waste containers since 2009 through various means, including the press, a cross-sector steering group, a safety week, a safety alert to members, and contribution to the WISH Waste 25 guidance. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Hetherington Regulation 28 report write in response to the regulation 28 report into the tragic circumstances of the death of Mr McLaren: The Environmental Services Association (ESA) is the trade association for the waste and recycling industry: We work with all levels of government; regulators and the public to deliver more sustainable approach to the management of the UK'$ waste. Our Members provide a range of waste management and collection services for both householders and businesses. You direct two questions to ESA; | respond to each in turn below: Could you raise your Members' awareness nationally of the issue and risk, and to provide reminder to employers and employees to consider a heightened check to look for people who may be sheltering in the bins particularly in the colder months? The risks posed by people in waste containers has been high on ESA's health and safety agenda since about 2009 when this issue first emerged as a concern. Since then ESA has actively sought to raise the profile and dangers posed by people in containers to ensure that awareness, and control measures, are disseminated across the industry as widely as possible. ESA has: used the national and trade press to communicate messages; participated in a cross-sector steering group set up to reduce the risk of harm caused by people in containers; arranged a 'people in containers' safety week; issued a safety alert to ESA Members; and contributed to the development of guidance, WISH Waste 25 (people in containers) WWw. esauk org 154 Buckingham Palace Road, London SWIW 9TR Tel: 020 7824 8882 email: info@esaukorg Environmental Services Association Utd. company limited bY guarantee 0J0 962961 Londcr; VAT n0 243 8018 73 esa City key Ker

With the onset of winter, we will re-issue a safety alert in December 2018 to our Members as per your request and include a link to WISH Waste 25, which contains guidance on practical checks that can be carried out by collection crews prior to of containers. Would you consider suggesting that head torches are used in dark or poorly lit areas regularly to provide additional lighting which appears to be good practice? The servicing of any waste collection contract requires an assessment of health and safety risks, which includes an assessment of risks at the point of waste collection. Lighting conditions, along with a host of other relevant factors, are considered as part of a waste contractor's risk assessment process The risk assessment process will inform the course of action taken to address the risk and, in some cases, the provision of head torches might very well be deemed appropriate. However, within the hierarchy of control there could be other more effective measures than head torches in addressing the specific risks presented at given site. For example, the provision of LED lighting at the rear of a collection vehicle (where it was not possible to orientate the vehicle to make use of its headlamps) would help to illuminate the working area far more effectively than a head torch: Furthermore, other checks (as detailed in section 6 of WISH Waste 25) are to be just as effective in preventing harm. In practice, some ESA Members use head torches, others deploy alternative measures informed by a thorough risk assessment process. Head torches might be issued in one part of the business and not in another, where risk was assessed to be much lower Rather than endorse a 'one size fits all' approach, of significance is that the selected approach is effective, can be justified and is proportionate to the risk: An often overlooked aspect is that the hierarchy of control referred to above of equal consideration to waste producers (those businesses responsible for placing waste into container) who, as waste holders, have duty to prevent risk of harm to the public: The storage of waste containers in a secure and well-lit area is considered (among other measures) as reasonable practical step towards meeting this duty, and would be to help discourage people from seeking refuge in containers in the first place. ESA and its Members strongly advocate the approach adopted in the WISH Waste 25 guidance and aim to ensure that this is kept up to date to reflect new techniques or the safest working practices. It is also incumbent on the industry, working in collaboration with HSE and others to raise awareness of the vital part waste producers have in helping to keep people safe, and the practical steps that be taken on site towards this aim.
CIWM
30 Nov 2018 PDF
Action Taken

CIWM has produced imagery promoting the use of WASTE25 guidance and encourages waste producers and waste collectors to check the bins while filling and unloading, which has been shared on social media. CIWM will aim to write an article for the CIWM journal / website to promote the ‘People in Bins’ Steering Group and call for volunteer waste collection companies to get involved by providing data to mirror the 2014 report by February 2019. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Sir

We write in response to the Regulation 28 Report to prevent future deaths as a result of the investigation into the death of James Ryan McLaren. Section 7 of the report requires that CIWM is under a duty to respond to the report within 56 days, namely by 3 December 2018 to contain details of action or proposed to be taken, setting out a timetable for action.

The actions for CIWM were to raise members' awareness nationally of the issue and risk, and to provide a reminder to employers and employees to consider a heightened check to look for people who may be sheltering in bins particularly in colder months.

In 2014 CIWM in association with Biffa and Street Link produced a report 'Research into the issues, risks and prevention of people sleeping in bins'

content/uploads/2015/05/Streetlink_CIWM_Biffa-Research-Report-Final_Feb14.pdf

This report promotes the use of the WISH guidance document WASTE25 which was published in 2010 and is still relevant today. CIWM fully supports the work of WISH and is an active member of the organisation. CIWM and the other organisations involved in the report and the guidance document continue to promote their operational use as they remain as relevant now as when they were published.

Over the past few years, there have been a number of campaigns by waste collection companies such as the B&M and Shelter 'Refuse not Refuge' annual winter campaign which launched in 2013 and publications such as Skip Hire magazine and The Big Issue 'Whack a Bin' campaign in 2015. These campaigns, undertaken by individual operators in association with homeless charities, have been promoted to CIWM members via the weekly member newsletter and social media. This year CIWM published a press statement which was circulated to members to show support of the B&M campaign and to also highlight the use of WASTE25 guidance to waste producers.

__campaign.aspx

In 2016 three waste management companies joined forces together with CIWM, ESA and HSE to pool resources to share information and create industry wide initiatives to save lives and formed the Steering Group ‘People in Bins’. The intention of the Steering Group was to include more organisation members over time and work with local authorities too. This remains the aim of the group, however there are difficulties in involving as many organisations as we would like.

Under the Health and Safety campaign 'This time it's personal' umbrella, CIWM are in the process of restarting the ‘People in Bins’ Steering Group with the original members and including LARAC and ROSPA; the objectives of the group will be to:

- help to share the WASTE25 guidance document more widely with waste producers to ensure the contents of the bins are being checked when they are in use and when collected

- help people to be aware that large bins are not for sleeping in

- encourage waste companies to ensure collection crews receive training to check large bins before they are emptied being particularly vigilant when large bins are stored in unlit areas

- create a standard single page do's and don'ts document to encourage waste companies to issue this to their customers to encourage them to follow WASTE25 guidance to ensure waste presented has been checked prior to collection and that the bin storage area is well maintained, has adequate lighting and that bins are locked over night

- encourage waste companies to record incidents of intercepting people sheltering in bins to enable data to be gathered on common locations; times of year; etc to enable a more detailed and targeted campaign in following years

- encourage waste collection companies to share photographs of good and bad practice of bin storage areas so that waste producers can improve standards of bin storage areas thereby making the bins inaccessible to public access

- CIWM would like to undertake an update to the 2014 report to see how the situation has changed since this date.

A telephone meeting took place involving HSE, LARAC, ROSPA, WISH, CIWM, Hart District Council, O’Donovan Waste Disposal Ltd, Coastal Recycling Limited and Biffa on 7 November to discuss the above objectives. Since this date CIWM has produced imagery promoting the use of WASTE25 guidance and encourages waste producers and waste collectors to check the bins while filling and unloading. These images have been and continue to be shared on Twitter and LinkedIn regularly.

CIWM will aim to write an article for the CIWM journal / website to promote the ‘People in Bins’ Steering Group and call for volunteer waste collection companies to get involved by providing data to mirror the 2014 report by February 2019.
LGA Other
22 Jan 2019 PDF
Action Planned

The LGA will include an item on the risk of death and injury in large bins in relevant LGA bulletins and updates to councils to raise awareness at a national level. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Sir write in response to the Regulation 28 Report following your investigation into the death of Mr James Ryan McLaren: Unfortunately your letter was not received until 4 December 2018 due to email problems. An additional period of time was granted for the LGA to respond. recommendation to the LGA asked us to raise awareness at national level of the risk of death or serious injury from access to large commercial or communal bins. In response to your recommendation an item on the risk of death and injury in large bins will be included in relevant LGA bulletins and updates to councils. This includes the weekly email bulletins from the LGA's Chairman and Chief Executive, and email newsletters on environment and regulatory issues. These will be circulated in January and February: It is helpful to see that the Chartered Institute of Waste Management (CIWM) is engaging with staff in frontline waste roles, and Iocal authority waste officer networks. This communication will compliment that of the LGA with senior officers and elected Members: We will seek further opportunities to raise awareness with councils: If any further material on this matter is published from the Coroner's Office please let us know so that we can update our communications:

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 27th December 2017 an Investigation commenced into the death of James Ryan McLaren which concluded at the end of the Inquest on 3rd October 2018. The jury returned a conclusion of Accident. The Cause of Death; following Post-Mortem Examination, was: Ia Head and chest injuries
Circumstances of the death
James Ryan McLaren was last seen leaving the Arizona Nightclub in Sunderland at 3:OOam on Saturday 23rd December 2017: CCTV footage shows James walking in the direction of Vine Place at approximately 4.30am_ The information from friends was that he previously climbed into bins, when intoxicated, to sleep. Max Recycle are a private collector of trade waste, covering & number of areas including Wearside. The refuse collection vehicle arrived in Sunderland city centre at approximately 4.35am to collect mixed waste n 23rd December 2017. The used by the customers on Vine Place, are 1100 litre capacity, some of which have lids, but are not usually locked: Nothing was noted as a concern about the bin collections. Customers were still placing material in the bins at that time of Ialso heard that an Operator used a head torch to provide additional light: Civic Centre, Burdon Road,Sunderland, SRZ 7DN Tel 0191 5617843 Fax 0191 5537803 DX 60729 Sunderland WWW.sunderland: gov uklcoroner City City bins; they day:

The last collection was at 5.30am and the refuse collection vehicle returned to the Hawthorne Site. James was reported missing to the Police; and his mobile phone was tracked to the last location in the area around Sedgeletch Industrial Estate Police together with a representative of Max Recycle located James' body James was found deceased at the site of Max Recycling in Sedgeletch Industrial Estate at around 21:OOhrs on 24th December 2017_
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and [ believe you have the power to take such action.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2018-0330
Date of report
4 October 2018
Coroner
Andrew Hetherington
Coroner area
Sunderland

Responses identified

Responses identified 4 of 4
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 26 Apr 2019 (estimated).

Sent to

Chartered Institution of Waste Management
Environmental Services Associations
Health and Safety Executive
Local Government Association

Source links