Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Karis Braithwaite

Ref: 2019-0415 Date: 20 Sep 2019 Coroner: Nadia Persaud Area: London (East) Responses identified: 0 / 1 View PDF

Important risk information provided by a paramedic was not available to the MHA assessment team, and insufficient steps have been taken to improve the handover process from first responders to Trust staff following serious incidents in the community.

Date 20 Sep 2019
56-day deadline 23 Feb 2020 est.
Responses identified 0 of 1
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths Suicide (from 2015)

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Important risk information provided by a paramedic was not available to the MHA assessment team, and insufficient steps have been taken to improve the handover process from first responders to Trust staff following serious incidents in the community.
View full coroner's concerns
Important risk information was provided to the Trust by a first responder (paramedic) but was not available to the MHA assessment team A copy of the PRF form was left with staff but does not appear to have been uploaded to the electronic records or a paper copy provided to the assessing team The paramedic provided a verbal handover to staff which does not appear to have been documented in the patient's records_ The police officer who attended with Karis also gave evidence as to difficulties in providing a handover t0 the receiving mental health team:
5. A PFD report was written to the Trust on the 2nd December 2016 noting: There was also relevant information available to the paramedics and police that was not elicited by the assessing team It became apparent during the course of the Inquest that the police also had access to information which was relevant to the circumstances of the preceding events which would have been relevant to the mental state of the deceased: would appear that inadequate questions were asked by the receiving hospital team in relation t0 the circumstances leading to admission: from The The not day;

In light of the evidence heard at Ms Braithwaite's inquest; there is a concern that insufficient steps have been taken by the Trust to improve the handover process from first responders to Trust staff following serious incidents in the community:

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On the 5th October 2018 commenced an investigation into the death of Karis Florence Braithwaite The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on the 17*h September 2019. The conclusion of the Inquest was a narrative conclusion: Karis Braithwaite took her own life, in part because of the risk of her doing So was not adequately assessed and appropriate precautions were not taken to prevent her from doing so. and
Circumstances of the death
Karis Braithwaite was 24 years old. She suffered recurrent depressive disorder and emotionally unstable personality disorder. Karis had a long history of self-harming behaviour. She also had a history of suicide attempts. On the evening of the 23"d September 2018, Karis was involved in a disagreement with a resident in her supported accommodation: She struck the resident and then shortly afterwards left the home. She went straight to the Dagenham Heathway railway station where she stepped on to the track in the path of an oncoming train. Members of the public had to intervene. The driver performed an emergency stop and Karis had to be pulled off the track by bystanders. Paramedics attended and the Inquest heard evidence from a paramedic who considered Karis's presentation to be very different t0 previous occasions on which she attended to her_ She confirmed that Karis had voiced a clear intention to take her own life on the 23 September 2018. Karis was taken to hospital by police and paramedics under section 136 of the MHA_ paramedic confirmed that she attempted to provide a clear verbal handover to staff; as well as providing her written concerns on her Patient Report Form ("PRF") paramedic's evidence was that the staff were very receptive to a verbal handover: Some aspects of the PRF form were carried over into the Trust's electronic records but none of the detail containing the mental health risks were incorporated into the Trust's records. Karis underwent assessments by two doctors in the early hours of the 24" September 2018. It was decided that she would need a period of rest and emergency housing options to be checked before her final MHA assessment: The following Karis underwent the Section 136 MHA Assessment. She was assessed by two consultant psychiatrists, an approved mental health practitioner and a member of the home treatment team_ The team spent 27 minutes with Karis before spending a further 2 minutes to confirm their conclusion. The team considered the electronic RIO records but did not have sight of any verbal handover record from the paramedic or the PRF form from the paramedic. At 14.30 on the 24th September 2018 Karis was discharged from the Section 136. She left the hospital in contravention of the suggested plan for her to take a taxi back to her supported accommodation. She alighted 2 buses to Goodmayes railway station. She stood in front of a non-stopping fast train at 15.28 and sustained fatal multiple injuries:
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action:

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2019-0415
Date of report
20 September 2019
Coroner
Nadia Persaud
Coroner area
London (East)

Responses identified

Responses identified 0 of 1
1 response not yet linked

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 23 Feb 2020 (estimated).

Sent to

Goodmayes Hospital NHS Trust

Source links