Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Averil Hart

Ref: 2021-0058 Date: 3 Mar 2021 Coroner: Sean Horstead Area: Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Responses identified: 4 / 1 View PDF

Widespread and continuing lack of training, knowledge, and experience among medical professionals regarding eating disorders, coupled with a severe shortage of specialists, risks future deaths.

Date 3 Mar 2021
56-day deadline 28 Apr 2021 est.
Responses identified 4 of 1
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Widespread and continuing lack of training, knowledge, and experience among medical professionals regarding eating disorders, coupled with a severe shortage of specialists, risks future deaths.
View full coroner's concerns
Evidence at both Averil’s inquest, and those of the women referred to above, established that a number of the serious matters raised by the Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) Report ‘Ignoring the alarms: How NHS eating disorder services are failing patients’ published on 8th December 2017 and then reiterated in the ‘Follow-up Report’ to the latter, published by the House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) on 18th June 2019, had not been adequately addressed. The Government provided a Response to the recommendations of the PACAC ‘Follow-up Report’ dated 13th August 2019. However, in my view, unless and until the following concerns are appropriately addressed there remains a risk of avoidable future deaths. The specific concerns giving rise to the risk of future deaths are as follows:

(1) Inadequate training of doctors and other medical professionals re eating disorders

Evidence from a wide range of clinicians who had engaged with Averil in 2012 echoed the evidence of clinicians attending the four inquests of the women referred to above. All five inquests revealed a common theme of wide-spread and continuing lack of training, knowledge, or experience on the part of physicians and medical staff (including GPs and nurse practitioners, as well as acute hospital doctors, nurses and dieticians) regarding eating disorders (EDs) and specifically Anorexia Nervosa (AN). Many witnesses (from both the death 2012 and those in 2017/2018) conceded that they had had only the most superficial knowledge of the often complex issues relating to recognition, monitoring, management and treatment of EDs and AN specifically. Their evidence often reflected a lack of familiarity with the King’s College Guidance for the treatment of AN in the community. The evidence of hospital staff revealed, at best, inconsistent implementation of the Royal College of Psychiatrists MARSIPAN guidance for the emergency treatment of AN patients and, at worst, a failure to implement the Guidance at all. Evidence at Averil’s inquest (and at those of ) suggested that limited progress has been made in respect of the PHSO recommendation with regard to the training of doctors and other medical professionals, (notwithstanding the further recommendations of the PACAC Follow-up Report and the Government Response to the latter’s Recommendations). These concerns have been reiterated by the Position Statement of the Royal College of Psychiatrists (PS04/20) of September 2020 “Improving core skills and competence in risk assessment and management of people with eating disorders: What all doctors need to know.”

The evidence at inquest of senior practitioners in the fields of psychiatry, psychology, acute medicine, dietetics, gastroenterology and GP practice all confirmed that there remains, as there was in 2012, a continuing and serious shortage of eating disorder specialists across the country with many Trusts finding it difficult to fill vacancies; such shortages inevitably impact upon the level and quality of support available to primary care providers and other specialists and therefore, in my view, risks avoidable future deaths.

(2) Lack of formally commissioned service level agreement for the provision of robust and effective monitoring of moderate to high risk AN patients by primary or secondary care providers

Evidence confirmed that in response to the PHSO Report an Expert Reference Group (ERG) was convened by NHS England (NHSE) to address the specific recommendation for NHSE to review the existing quality and availability of services to achieve parity for adult ED services with children and young people’s ED services. The National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (NCCMH) was commissioned to develop new guidance published in August 2019: “Adult Eating Disorders: Community, Inpatient and Intensive Day Patient Care – Guidance for Commissioners and Providers”.

However, the clear and unchallenged evidence received at Averil’s inquest confirmed that there remains a lack of formally commissioned provision for the monitoring of AN patients in primary or secondary care across large parts of the United Kingdom. Whilst the evidence received indicated that Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust are seeking to develop models to ensure the provision of medical monitoring for all ED sufferers, including moderate to high risk patients, there are many areas in the country – including parts of the East of England Region – which still have no such formally commissioned provision. Further, unchallenged evidence identified a number of regions as not even having consultant level psychiatric in-put to the ED services that are purportedly available.

There was unanimity on the part of each of the senior clinicians who gave evidence, as well as a number of independent, instructed experts in the fields of ED and AN, that the continued absence of such monitoring and treatment provision gave rise to not only the risk of avoidable future deaths, but - in the views of many - the inevitability of the same. Evidence confirmed that whilst AN has the highest mortality of any mental disorder affecting young people and adults this should not be simply accepted and that AN and other EDs are treatable mental disorders, with even severe complications such as malnutrition safely reversible. The evidence further established that whilst in the long term primary prevention strategies including early recognition and treatment of the disease was critical, in the short to medium term, improving access to treatment and the effective monitoring of the severely ill is to be regarded as essential to address the risk of avoidable future deaths.

(3) Lack of robust and reliable data regarding the prevalence of eating disorders

Evidence also confirmed that the lack of precise information on the prevalence of eating disorders in the United Kingdom, described by the PHSO Report and the PACAC Follow-up Report as “shocking, given the claim that up to 1.25 million people are suffering from an eating disorder and the fact that eating disorders have the highest mortality rate of mental illnesses” persists. The witness evidence also confirmed the view expressed in the PACAC Report: “This vagueness limits the ability of NHS commissioners to gauge what services need to be provided and encourages them to devote resources to better recorded diseases.”

Further, I am concerned that there may also be a significant under-reporting of the extent to which EDs have caused or contributed to deaths, leading to cases either not being referred to the coroner or, if they are, the coroner in question determining that death was one of ‘natural causes’ with only the terminal cause of death, and not the underlying ED cause or contribution to the death, being recorded. In such circumstances there is a concern that a number of such deaths (where, for example, lack of care may have contributed to the death) are neither investigated appropriately by the coroner nor taken to inquest with a concomitant risk of a significant under-estimation of the true mortality rate of EDs.

(I propose to explore this issue in separate correspondence with the Medical Examiner for England and Wales (copied in to this Report), the Office for National Statistics and the Coroners’ Society of England and Wales).

In my view, taken together, the absence of statistically robust data on the numbers of those suffering from EDs and the potential under-estimation of those deaths to which EDs may have caused or contributed, gives rise to an objective risk that avoidable ED deaths will continue in the future.

(4) The impact of the COVID 19 pandemic

I am concerned that the matters giving rise to the risk of future deaths identified at points (1) to (3) above have been - and will continue to be - significantly exacerbated by the on-going pandemic. I therefore request that responses to the above recognise and expressly address this concern.

Responses

4 respondents
NHS England NHS / Health Body
3 Mar 2021 PDF
Action Planned

NHS England and NHS Improvement are improving adult eating disorder services with a national programme backed by investment. They are also improving data on the prevalence of eating disorders in adults, joining the APMS steering group to influence questionnaires. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Sean Horstead,

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Averil Miranda Hart (15.12.2012)

Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report dated 3rd March 2021 concerning the death of Averil Hart on 15.12.2012. Firstly, I would like to express my deep condolences to Averil Hart’s family.

The inquest concluded that Averil Hart’s death was a result of 1a Anorexia Nervosa but death was avoidable and that it was contributed to by neglect.

Following the inquest, you raised concerns in your Regulation 28 Report to NHS England and NHS Improvement (amongst other organisations) regarding:

• Inadequate training on eating disorders for doctors and other medical professionals
• Lack of formally commissioned service level agreement for the provision of robust and effective monitoring of moderate to high risk Anorexia Nervosa patients by primary or secondary care providers
• Lack of robust and reliable data regarding the prevalence of eating disorders
• The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic I understand that colleagues in other organisations will also be responding to this. My response will therefore focus on what we are doing to improve adult eating disorder services in the NHS, both nationally and within the East of England region.

Eating disorders (ED) are serious, life-threatening conditions with some of the highest mortality rates of any mental health disorder. Improving eating disorder services is a key priority for NHS England and Improvement (NHSEI) and a fundamental part of our commitment to expand and improve mental health services. We have developed a national programme of work, backed by significant investment committed as part of the NHS Long Term Plan, to ensure that systemwide changes to improve adult eating disorder services are delivered at pace.

Adult Eating Disorder Service Transformation and Funding

Sean Horstead, Assistant Coroner, Coroner area of Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Coroner’s Service, Lawrence Court, Princes Street, Huntingdon PE29 3P

National Medical Director Skipton House 80 London Road SE1 6LH

4th May 2021

NHS England and NHS Improvement

The NHS Long Term Plan commits to the implementation of new integrated models of primary and community mental health care that improve care for adults and older adults with a range of severe mental health problems, including eating disorders, in all Sustainability and Transformation Partnerships (STPs) in England by 2023/24.

All STPs/Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) are required to start work to transform their community eating disorder (CED) pathways in line with published guidance by 2023/24. Local plans submitted to NHSEI indicate that at least 22 ICSs are starting this transformation in 2021/22, and have dedicated over £6m. All other areas due to commence in 2022/23.

To support local strategic planning and development of transformed ED pathways in line with published guidance, regional adult eating disorder clinical leads have now been appointed across England.

Additionally, NHSEI has additional implementation support available in 18 sites across the country to embed First Episode Rapid Early intervention for Eating Disorders (FREED) to support early intervention services for young people, aged 16-25, with an eating disorder. Use of the FREED model means people coming forward could be contacted within 48 hours and could begin treatment within two weeks. Evidence shows that this model reduces the waiting times for assessment and treatment and that patients experience better outcomes.

Medical monitoring and the role of Primary Care

National action

NHSEI issued national guidance in August 2019 which sets out a clear expectation that CED services develop integrated pathways with primary care and where responsibility for medical monitoring sits. The guidance outlines that “Medical monitoring needs to be based on local medical monitoring agreements clearly established across the CED service and primary care network, with one consistent protocol agreed on by local commissioners.” and includes the following table setting out responsibilities:

We are committed to ensuring a more integrated service across primary and secondary care for people with severe mental illnesses, including EDs, and NHSEI have a Long Term Plan ambition to give 370,000 adults and older adults with severe mental illness greater choice and control over their care and support them to

live well in their communities by 2023/24.

NHS England and NHS Improvement

In order to receive system development funds for the expansion of adult community eating disorder services, when developing funding bids STPs were required to “be clear on the arrangements for medical monitoring in partnership with primary care to manage the physical health needs of people with eating disorders”.

In 2019/20 and 2020/21, 12 STPs/ICSs were funded to test new models of integrated care, which will include CED. Eight of these sites chose to focus on improvements to CED services as a specialty area. We will ensure that the learning from the community early implementers sites will be shared via the Adult ED Clinical Leads forum to support services as they embed robust medical monitoring pathways.

In addition, the 2021/22 GP contract and Standard Contract are embedding mental health practitioners in Primary Care Networks (PCNs). Although these practitioners will not directly undertake the medical monitoring themselves, they will be able to liaise with the staff who will undertake it and help to ensure adequate oversight of the care of patients with severe mental illnesses, including eating disorders, across primary and secondary care.

Additional East of England actions underway

Further work to support formal commissioning arrangements for medical monitoring will be led by the Eating Disorders Strategic Oversight Board which reports to the East of England Regional Mental Health Strategy and Transformation Board. Since the death of Ms Hart, both Cambridgeshire & Peterborough (C&P) and Norfolk & Waveney (N&W) Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) have taken steps to improve commissioning arrangements for medical monitoring. C&P CCG are piloting a commissioned medical monitoring pathway (initially within Peterborough with a view to rollout across the CCG) as part of the Adult Community Mental Health Transformation Programme and N&W CCG has an established route for people living with EDs to receive medical monitoring in primary care through a Locally Commissioned Service (previously termed Local Enhanced Service or LES). Both CCGs continue to work in establishing improved and more equitable access to ED pathways of care.

Training

National action

NHSEI are working with Health Education England (HEE) to improve workforce training for the adult eating disorder workforce. This is in line with NHS Long Term Plan commitments and backed by significant investment (funding in place up to 2023/24).

The training courses that are being offered / developed include:

• Adult Eating Disorder Whole Team Training (WTT): to ensure that the entire team has the skills necessary to function effectively and safely within an eating disorder service. WTT is open to primary care staff. In 2020/21 approximately 240 staff (from around 90 teams) were enrolled in the WTT

NHS England and NHS Improvement training course nationally. The length of this course will vary per service and will be organised to ensure continuation of service, so it is expected that some of this cohort will have completed this training in 2021/22.
• Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Eating Disorders (CBT-ED): This a post-graduate course for mental health professionals and once completed will give individuals the skills to provide this NICE recommended (NG69), evidenced-based therapy. In 2020/21, 47 staff were enrolled in the CBT-ED training course, nationally. This is a 1-2 year course (depending on prior qualifications).
• Maudsley Model of Anorexia Nervosa Therapy for Adults (MANTRA): MANTRA is a cognitive-interpersonal treatment. This course is aimed at experienced mental health professionals, to provide them will the skills necessary to deliver this evidence based and NICE recommended treatment. A training provider will be commissioned to deliver this course in 2021/22.
• Guided Self-Help (GSH): We plan to work with HEE, ED clinical experts and people with lived experience to develop a training offer that will support services to provide guided self-help (NICE recommended for binge eating disorder and bulimia- nervosa). Curriculum development for GSH is currently planned to take place in 2021/22.

MARSIPAN The published guidance links to the MARSIPAN (Management of Really Sick Patient with Anorexia Nervosa) guidance. Providers and commissioners are encouraged to develop pathways and protocols in line with this advice. The use of MARISPAN in inpatient settings is being promoted through the development of quality frameworks in the adult eating disorder Provider Collaboratives.

Wider training

NHSEI agree that it is imperative that doctors and other medical professionals receive sufficient training on mental health and in particular eating disorders to support parity of esteem and improve patient care.

This is not within our gift to deliver but we stand ready to support HEE, the General Medical Council and partners in their efforts to achieve this objective.

I would recommend that this report is extended to the Medical Schools Council; who are able to influence the curriculums and training standards for doctors and medical professionals, in order to support this work.

Additional East of England actions underway

The regional East of England mental health team have worked jointly with HEE to support education and guidance to systems in managing eating disorders, with learning to be shared. This has included:
• Several webinars, learning events and annual conferences to target all professionals who support people with eating disorders and parents/carers.
• Funding has also been made available for all acute trusts in the region to access training for medical staff in managing patients who present at A&E or require admission to a medical ward for self-harm or an eating disorder that requires medical stabilisation. Cambridgeshire & Peterborough (C&P) and Norfolk

NHS England and NHS Improvement & Waveney (N&W) both now offer specialist ED training to all primary care clinicians in GP practices and outside of primary care.
• The East of England Regional Mental Health Strategy and Transformation Board is supporting Trusts to develop comprehensive policies and procedures to manage patients with Anorexia Nervosa, in line with the MARSIPAN guidelines

Prevalence data NHSEI recognise and agree that there is a need to improve the data on the prevalence of eating disorders in adults. We have joined the APMS steering group (alongside DHSC and other ALBs) to influence the questionnaires that are included in the next survey to ensure representation of eating disorders.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Despite the challenges of the pandemic, mental health services have remained open and CED service have been working hard to minimise disruptions in care by using virtual platforms for appointments and social media to continue support. Where face to face appointments were needed, services acted in line with safety protocols to protect themselves and their patients.

In the April 2020 we held a national webinar to share key messages with service providers and commissioners, to support service continuation throughout the pandemic and beyond this we will continue to support services via the regional clinical leads.

During the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic some aspects of transformation work within our 8 Adult ED early implementer sites were slowed or paused due to the need to prioritise the immediate COVID-19 response. However, despite the pandemic, progress continues with new, expanded or transformed services going live over recent and coming months.

Finally, an extra £500m has been announced for Mental Health services to respond to the rising level of need from the pandemic, which includes an additional £58m to support the additional expansion of community services for people with severe mental illness, including people with an eating disorder.

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
GMC Regulator / Inspectorate
21 Apr 2021 PDF
Action Taken

The GMC has used its regulatory powers to address inconsistency in training to address patient safety concerns, and is working with medical schools to ensure ED training is delivered more consistently. A new e-learning programme for medical students and foundation doctors has been launched, and existing curricula have been updated. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Horstead Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths The details of the tragic circumstances of Averil Hart’s death are upsetting to read. I extend my sincere condolences to Averil’s family and to other families affected. You list four key concerns in your report. As the Medical Director and Director of Education and Standards at the General Medical Council, I can respond to the first (Inadequate training of doctors and other medical professionals re eating disorders) and also your fourth key concern about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The provision of consistent, comprehensive medical education and training on eating disorders (ED) remains an important issue for us since the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) identified concerning themes in their 2017 ‘Ignoring the Alarms’ report. I appeared before the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs [Select] Committee in 2019 to give evidence about our progress towards the PHSO’s recommendation that we review training for all doctors. The written evidence I submitted may be helpful as it details our regulatory role, our requirements for doctors, and our early actions in response to the PHSO report. Since then, we’ve used our regulatory powers and influence to find solutions to inconsistency in training to address patient safety concerns. I will summarise our role as a regulator and how it relates to the education and training of doctors around ED, and then describe the actions we’ve taken since the PHSO report. Our role as a medical regulator Our powers in medical education, as set out in the Medical Act 1983, are two-fold: to set the outcomes for graduates of UK medical schools leading to entry on to the medical register, and to approve the curricula for postgraduate training of doctors. We quality assure both aspects of medical training against our standards for the management and delivery of medical education and training. The principle of patient safety drives our work.

Medical education must adapt to the needs of society and be appropriately responsive to patients and the public. We keep our standards and requirements for medical education up to date with timely revisions to make sure they reflect changing patient needs as well as contemporary medical practice, scientific basis, and professional behaviours. We review our guidance to make sure it keeps up to date with new information and developments in healthcare. Undergraduate education We determine and publish the high-level outcomes all medical students are required to demonstrate in order to graduate. We updated our ‘Outcomes for graduates’ in 2018 after extensive consultation. Our powers don’t extend to mandating specific content in undergraduate curricula, but the outcomes do describe relevant key themes around mental health, nutrition, and vulnerable groups. We required schools to embed the new outcomes in undergraduate curricula for all students commencing academic year 2020/21. However, many schools had already introduced changes to their curricula for current student cohorts. To keep driving improvement, we’re introducing a new way of assessing medical students, as well as international medical graduates, that will ensure they meet a common and consistent threshold for safe practice before they’re licensed to work in the UK. The Medical Licensing Assessment will be based on a comprehensive content map which sets out the range of skills and knowledge that students will be required to have and could be tested on. The content map is available on our website. It includes eating disorders. All students graduating from UK medical schools from the academic year 2024/25 will need to pass the new assessment, which will also replace our current test for international medical graduates in early 2024.

Foundation Programme All doctors enter the two-year Foundation Programme after graduating from medical school. It trains graduates to develop a range of essential interpersonal and clinical skills for managing acute and long-term conditions. The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC) develops the Foundation Programme curriculum, which describes specific outcomes all Foundation doctors should demonstrate on completion of the programme. Our regulatory role is to approve the curriculum. It requires doctors to show skills including: recognising eating disorders, referring to specialist services, addressing nutritional needs, and communicating these during care planning, formulating recovery plans, and investigating and managing weight gain. Specialty training The curricula for postgraduate specialty training are set by individual medical royal colleges and faculties. We approve them against our standards for postgraduate curricula. In 2017 we published new standards requiring curricula to be mapped against our framework of shared generic and specialty-specific outcomes. Our ‘Generic professional capabilities framework’ sets the essential capabilities which underpin professional medical practice and are a fundamental part of all postgraduate training programmes. The capabilities include mental health, nutrition, safeguarding vulnerable groups, communication, leadership, and multidisciplinary team (MDT) working. Most specialty curricula have now been mapped to the new outcomes. Specific

requirements for identifying, assessing, and safely managing patients with ED are specified in a number of relevant specialty and GP curricula.

Changes we’ve made to the training of doctors re eating disorders You highlight that there is a widespread and continuing lack of training, knowledge, or experience on the part of doctors and other healthcare staff. The provision of education and training on ED is evidentially inconsistent and sometimes insufficient to prepare all doctors to recognise and manage or refer patients with ED. Since the PHSO report, we’ve taken actions in collaboration with others to strengthen education and training around ED. Crucial to preventing future deaths is for all doctors to have skills to recognise ED and support care, including the recognition and management of emergencies such as life-threatening nutrition. Patients may present to doctors in various contexts with other symptoms and complications, which could include: diabetes, abdominal issues, fertility problems, suicide attempts, and multiple others. Every interaction with patients is an opportunity to identify and act on these signs. The earlier they are picked up, the more treatable the underlying ED. Doctors’ capabilities in ED should become progressively more complex as their responsibility for, or level of exposure to patients who have eating disorders, increases.

It is acknowledged that early intervention for ED is crucial to successful treatment. This means doctors have a pivotal role to play in identifying the potential that a patient presenting to them with varying symptoms may have an eating disorder. We are asking education providers to reach an agreed core set of knowledge and skills for all doctors to be able to draw on in critical meetings with patients, although enforcing exactly what education providers teach is not within our remit. Survey of medical schools

To build a better picture of coverage in undergraduate curricula, I sent a letter to all medical schools in 2019 raising the issue and requesting details of teaching in ED. All 35 medical schools responded with helpful detail on how students are taught about ED. The survey identified some good practice but also areas where education and training could be improved. There was variability across schools in coverage, in links between teaching on mental and physical health, and in exposure to patients with ED. We are working with schools to ensure coverage is improved and especially the link between physical and mental health. We reported our findings to schools, highlighting both good practice and gaps, and suggesting schools work together to develop a shared approach. We’re currently working with schools, in collaboration with Beat, the eating disorders charity, to address these gaps and bring consistency to undergraduate education on ED.

Training resources We supported Beat, the eating disorders charity, in their development of new all-encompassing training resources, with expertise from the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Faculty of Eating Disorders, which are available to use as of March 2021. They introduce students and Foundation doctors to the knowledge, skills, and tools they need to identify, diagnose and treat or refer patients. We’re working with representatives from the UK Foundation Programme as well as the

Medical Schools Council and education and curriculum leads from individual medical schools to develop implementation plans for the new resources. Although there are pressures on space in the curriculum, encouragingly, education providers have expressed enthusiasm to make use of this helpful resource. We hope that teaching on ED will be embedded in their teaching programmes. We’ll include this in our quality assurance of medical schools in 2022 to ask about changes they implemented, or if they need further support. We hope that this will give schools time to embed the new training resource. Data from the e-Learning platform will help us to monitor uptake of the training and consider what further work is required. Shared learning across postgraduate specialities We are working with the AoMRC on the details for a process to identify and develop areas where key learning can be shared in postgraduate training across the various specialties and subspecialties. The aim of this will be to ensure high standards in core clinical areas. We have asked that one of the case studies to test the shared learning process must be ED. As the shared learning work develops, we will feed into the AoMRC’s work that these skills are needed. The process to identify and develop shared learning across specialties will consider post-qualification development as part of a programme of lifelong learning across a doctor’s career. We expect this work will begin later in 2021. Health Education England (HEE) and NHS England/Improvement (NHS E/I) have developed intensive ‘whole team’ adult eating disorder training with expertise from the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Faculty of Eating Disorders, where specialist ED or non-specialist e.g. GP practice team members jointly acquire the knowledge and skills to enable the safe and effective management of patients with ED. We welcome the initiative by HEE and NHSE/I, and we’re actively following HEE and NHSE/I’s work. As it matures, we will consider ways to showcase this whole team ED training as good practice, and as part of our lifelong learning strategy to enable doctors to develop throughout their career. Progress towards the PHSO recommendation I hope this assures you that we have already taken significant actions within our powers to address the concerns you raise. I have also identified areas where we can take further actions and have indicated timelines for these. Shortage of ED specialists The final point you raise as part of the first concern is that there is a serious shortage of ED specialists. We’ve heard evidence of a continuing shortage of ED specialists across the country, with many trusts finding it difficult to fill vacancies. These shortages inevitably impact on the level and quality of support available to primary care providers and other specialists. Your report evidences this staffing crisis, whereby heavy workloads with insufficient staffing compounded failings in Averil’s care. Although workforce issues are not specifically within our powers, we are working with the workforce bodies and health care providers across the UK to identify and implement solutions.

The impact of the COVID 19 pandemic You identify a concern that the pandemic increases the risk of further deaths because it has impacted all aspects of care, including training. The pandemic has impacted on training across all countries of the UK and in different ways for the differing specialties. A lot of teaching was moved online, but the clinical experience was inevitably affected. We are working with medical schools, the MSC, the national education bodies and service providers to re-establish all training opportunities as quickly as possible. We continue to work with education providers to ensure students and doctors in training can meet their outcomes and progress safely, and we’re reviewing the impact of the pandemic on training. The pandemic also impeded our plans for this work in 2020. We had planned to follow up with medical school Deans one year after our 2019 survey, but we decided to postpone this measure since schools faced significant disruption. Instead, we communicated with schools in other ways, by contributing to a letter HEE sent to schools encouraging uptake of the new training resources, as well as communicating directly with medical school education leads and the Medical Schools Council. Final reflections Thank you for highlighting these important issues in your report. Better care for ED is so important, especially considering its growing prevalence. We’re committed to providing workable solutions to address the risk of insufficient training, knowledge, and experience of doctors. We believe the changes we’re making to enhance medical education and training will contribute to improved patient outcomes, and we will monitor progress to ensure they are effective. I’m extremely grateful for the efforts of our partners in this work who’ve collaborated to achieve significant goals in better care for people with eating disorders.
Department of Health Social Care Central Government
28 Apr 2021 PDF
Action Planned

The Department of Health and Social Care acknowledges concerns about eating disorder treatment and highlights the Mental Health Recovery Action Plan, which includes significant funding to expand children's and adult mental health services, including eating disorder services. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Horstead,

Thank you for your letter of 3 March 2021 to Matt Hancock about the death of Averil Hart. I am replying as Minister with responsibility for Mental Health.

I would like to begin by expressing my most heartfelt condolences to Averil’s family, friends and loved ones. I am deeply saddened by the failings in care highlighted in your report. That Averil’s death was avoidable and contributed to by neglect is extremely distressing.

I also wish to express my deepest sympathies to the families and loved ones of

who you include in your report. It is clear that we must do all we can to implement the learnings from these tragic deaths to ensure the safety and quality of eating disorder services.

Eating disorders are serious, life-threatening conditions and improving services in England is a priority for this Government. We want to ensure that everyone affected has access to the right support, in the right place, at the right time.

Your report raises important concerns regarding adult eating disorder treatment. Following the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) report ‘Ignoring the alarms: how NHS eating disorder services are failing patients’1, regarding the death of Averil Hart, the Department remains committed to working to address the recommendations through a delivery group that includes representation from NHS England and NHS Improvement (NHSEI); Health Education England (HEE); the General Medical Council (GMC); the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); and, the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych). We accept the recommendations from this report and will take them into account when planning improvements to adult eating disorder services.

1 Ignoring the alarms: How NHS eating disorder services are failing patients | Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO)

In relation to the training of medical professionals in eating disorders, we agree that doctors should have the necessary knowledge and experience to assess patients holistically, considering the individuals’ physical, social and psychological needs. Through the PHSO delivery group, NHSEI is working with HEE and other partners to procure training courses that will increase the capacity of the existing workforce to allow them to provide evidence-based treatment to more people, as they have set out in detail in their responses. I share your concerns on the shortage of eating disorder specialists across the country. I understand that colleagues in the GMC; HEE and the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges will also address this in their responses.

We recognise that eating disorders have some of the highest mortality rates of any mental health disorder. We agree that appropriate monitoring of patients with anorexia nervosa by primary and secondary care providers is vital to ensure everyone with an eating disorder gets the right support.

Under the NHS Long Term Plan, we are committed to ensuring a more integrated service across primary and secondary care for people with severe mental illnesses, including eating disorders, and to giving 370,000 adults with severe mental illness greater choice and control over their care and support them to live well in their communities by 2023/24. To support improvements in mental health care more generally, including eating disorder care, we remain committed to expanding and transforming mental health services in England and to investing an additional £2.3 billion a year in mental health services by 2023/24.

In addition, in August 2019, the Adult Eating Disorders: Community, Inpatient and Intensive Day Patient Care Guidance2 was published to support the delivery of effective models of Adult Eating Disorders care. This guidance emphasises that “the ability to comprehensively monitor and manage the physical health of all people with an eating disorder […] is an essential function of a community eating disorder service”. We expect commissioners and providers to adhere to this guidance.

Transformation of community-based mental health care for adults with severe mental illness is underway in 12 national sites that have been in receipt of ongoing transformation funding since 2019/20. Eight of these sites have received additional funding to transform the eating disorders pathway, including early intervention for young adults with eating disorders. Local areas will be supported to redesign and reorganise community mental health teams to move towards a new place-based, multidisciplinary service across health and social care aligned with primary care networks. Local areas will need to demonstrate that they are equipped to perform medical monitoring as per the 2019 Adult Eating Disorders guidance.

A four-week waiting time standard for adult community mental health services, including eating disorder services, is being piloted and considered as part of the clinically led review of NHS access standards. Further information on the definition of a potential standard will be shared in 2021/22.

2 NHS England » Adult Eating Disorders: Community, Inpatient and Intensive Day Patient Care – Guidance for commissioners and providers

In addition, NHSEI has announced additional early intervention services for young people aged 16-25 with eating disorders in 18 areas across the country, so young adults seeking support could be contacted within 48 hours and begin treatment within two weeks.

We fully agree that there needs to be improved information about the prevalence of eating disorders. NHS Digital’s 2007 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey3 (APMS) showed that up to 6.4 per cent of adults displayed signs of an eating disorder. The latest survey, published in 2016, did not collect information on eating disorders. However, the SCOFF eating disorder questionnaire was included in the 2019 Health Survey England (HSE) and showed that 16 per cent of adults aged 16 and over, screened positive for a possible eating disorder; women were more likely to screen positive than men; and, the proportion screening positive increased as household income decreased. While the two surveys cannot be directly compared, the data from both provide an indication of eating disorder prevalence in 2007 and 2019.

The consultation for the next APMS (2022) is expected to begin shortly. NHS Digital has appointed NatCen Social Research to conduct the survey. The steering group for the APMS includes the Department of Health and Social Care, NHS Digital, NHSEI and NatCen. The steering group will lead the consultation and make decisions on the questionnaires and topic areas to be included in the APMS 2022 based on the responses received. The Department of Health and Social Care is working closely with stakeholders and interest groups to ensure they can feed into the consultation.

In relation to your concern on the potential under-reporting of the extent to which eating disorders have caused or contributed to deaths, I welcome your plan to explore this issue further with the National Medical Examiner for England and Wales, the Office for National Statistics and the Coroners’ Society of England and Wales.

Finally, we recognise that NHS eating disorder services are facing increased demand during the COVID-19 pandemic. During the first 9 months of 2020/21, a total of 7,555 children and young people started treatment and 84.7 per cent started treatment within the standard timeframe. This compares with 5,831 children and young people that started treatment in the first 9 months of 2019/20. Given the high risk presented by COVID-19 in this group, all areas have been advised to continue prioritisation of service delivery, and to take steps to mitigate the potential impact of COVID-19 on this vulnerable group.

As part of the Government’s commitment to build back better post-COVID, on 27 March we published our Mental Health Recovery Action Plan4, backed by an additional £500million of targeted investment, to ensure that we have the right support in place over the coming year.

As part of this funding, £79million will be used to significantly expand children’s mental health services, enabling 2,000 more children and young people to access eating disorder

3 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys - NHS Digital

4 COVID-19 mental health and wellbeing recovery action plan - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

services. £58million will be allocated to accelerate the adult community support to bring forward the expansion of integrated primary and secondary care for adults with severe mental illness, including eating disorders.

I hope this reply helps to reassure you that we continue to be committed to ensuring that everyone with an eating disorder has access to timely and integrated care and we are actively working with our arm’s length bodies to improve services and data.

NADINE DORRIES

MINISTER OF STATE FOR PATIENT SAFETY, SUICIDE PREVENTION AND MENTAL HEALTH
NHS England NHS / Health Body
30 Apr 2021 PDF
Action Taken

HEE has a range of high quality training available via its e-Learning arm, e-Learning for Healthcare, around eating disorders, particularly on its MindEd programme, which is targeted at professionals and their families. This training includes a new programme for medical students and foundation doctors, developed in partnership with RCPsych and the eating disorder charity, Beat. (AI summary)

View full response
Department of Education and Quality 2nd Floor Stewart House Russell Square London WC1B 5DN

30th April 2021 I write in response to your report of 3rd March 2021, made under the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 (“the Regulations”). May I begin by extending my sincere condolences to Miss Hart’s family following her tragic death from Anorexia Nervosa (AN). Every death is a tragedy and whilst your report is difficult reading, we have shared it widely in our organisation so that our staff can see the impact on families and ensure our focus remains on working with partners and families to improve Eating Disorder services. Your report raises concerns regarding the training of doctors and other medical professional regarding eating disorders (ED). As you note, the 2017 Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) Report, Ignoring the alarms, made recommendations regarding training for doctors about eating disorders. This recommendation was more recently reiterated in the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) Follow-up Report, published in
2019. Whilst there are many reports detailing widespread issues for patients and families, many in HEE have experience of services as clinicians who are working on solutions and have contributed to this response. To respond to your concerns, I will first clarify Health Education England (HEE)’s role, and how we work with partners to plan, recruit, educate and train the health workforce. I will also provide an update on the measures that HEE has taken in response to the PHSO and PACAC recommendations regarding education in eating disorders. Health Education England (HEE) is the executive non-departmental public body responsible for promoting high quality education and training for the healthcare workforce in England. We fund and manage the highest quality education and training to deliver high quality health professionals who work effectively in multi-disciplinary teams for the benefit of patients. As well as planning for and training our future workforce, we are committed alongside employers and other stakeholders to the development of the current NHS workforce. The standards for medical education in the UK are set by the independent professional regulator, the General Medical Council (GMC). Each individual medical school sets its own undergraduate medical curriculum, which must meet the standards set by the GMC, who then monitor and check to make sure that these standards are maintained. The curricula for postgraduate specialty training are set by individual royal colleges and faculties, and the GMC approves curricula and assessment systems for each training programme.

By Email:

Sean Horstead, HM Assistant Coroner, Cambridgeshire & Peterborough

HEE funds clinical placements for undergraduate doctors and pre-registration healthcare students, and commissions postgraduate medical training in England. We set our expectations for the quality of the educational environment in our multi-professional Quality Framework. The overarching objective of Framework is to promote inter-professional learning and to support and facilitate service transformation that meets current and future patient needs. We also have a key role in supporting service development and delivery of the NHS where key priorities, including ED, require additional post qualification training and education support to the system. We have several mechanisms to do this, including system transformation, workforce development funding and continual professional development (CPD) programs. Doctors in training Our Postgraduate Deans and Foundation School Directors manage the quality of postgraduate medical education and work with employers to design training programmes that equip doctors with the skills they need to provide high-quality patient care. Since the publication of the PHSO and PACAC reports, HEE has introduced changes to medical education to improve mental health awareness across the medical profession. This includes HEE commissioned learning resources for medical students and Foundation 1 and 2 doctors provided in partnership with BEAT and the Royal College of Psychiatrists.

As set out in Stepping forward to 2020/21: The Mental Health Workforce Plan for England, published in July 2017, HEE is working with the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPysch) to address the fill rates in psychiatry specialty training. Part of this work has resulted in an increase in the number of doctors in the Foundation Programme working in a four-month psychiatry post to 47% nationally in 2018, and HEE continues to work with the RCPysch to improve on this. HEE is also working to develop and pilot enhancements to GP training. One of the priorities for this reform is to enhance the delivery of the mental health elements of the GP Specialty Curriculum. This includes increasing GP trainee time in General Practice to 24 months from 18months and ensuring that all GP trainees are able to gain enhanced experience in the treatment of mental health in primary care settings. Wider clinical workforce For the wider healthcare workforce, HEE’s National Mental Health Programme has undertaken a project to scope eating disorder training nationally, mapping what currently exists in order to understand existing training and professional presence/skills across the Eating Disorders pathway. We know that all of us in the NHS need to do more to facilitate patient access to high quality safe interventions, particularly between physical and mental healthcare, and between general and specialist services. Stepping Forward to 2020/21: The Mental Workforce Plan for England (HEE 2017) set out a high level roadmap and reflected the additional staff required to deliver mental health service transformation based on best evidence. The December 2020 data, which is the latest available, demonstrates that the mental health workforce has increased by 14,480 WTEs since March 2016, many of whom will be delivering care for eating disorder services across the different pathways. The 2020 Mental Health Implementation Plan (MHIP) builds on the ambition to grow the workforce by a further 27,460 by 2024. In addition to the Stepping Forward and MHIP workforce

growth targets, education programmes are being commissioned to upskill the existing workforce working with children and adults in psychological therapies and eating disorder treatments. This training is provided across the whole of the mental health workforce ranging from specialist practitioners such as in CBT in eating disorders, teams via Whole Team Training and general awareness such as upskilling junior doctors and nurses.

Many of the expanded workforce will be delivering psychological interventions for people with an eating disorder, the growth of which has been complimented by the HEE provision of 4,500 adult Improving Access to Psychological Therapies practitioners. For children and young people we have recruited 700 new practitioners and trained 3,400 existing NHS staff between 2016 and 2021. HEE has also increased the number of clinical psychologists in training by 25% in 20/21 and 21/22. A psychological professions workforce plan is in train which will map the further expansion of, psychological therapies and related roles to guide local workforce planning and education provision. In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of eating disorder education and training needs, in 2019 HEE commissioned an England wide benchmarking report, to inform the planning and discharge of future training commissions and to develop a comprehensive compendium of training., This is now being used to support regional system leaders and local services to manage training in response to local need, drawing on learning resources already available and further training opportunities via HEE commissions. The additional commissions we subsequently made included Cognitive Behaviour Therapy specifically for eating disorders, delivered via whole team training from late 2020. This training covers the whole range of expertise, including ED specialists (70 trained) as well as well as other staff delivering care in eating disorders services (270 trained to date).

To further support the expansion of psychological therapies provision, in March 2021 HEE commissioned the development of a national curriculum and commissioning specification for the Maudsley Model of Anorexia Nervosa Treatment for Adults to enable a nationally consistent approach.

HEE has also commissioned BEAT to develop a programme for all nursing staff to gain confidence to understand, respond compassionately, and appropriately signpost clients with eating disorders.

Further to this, in support of the whole workforce, HEE has developed the ‘Psychological Interventions for People with Eating Disorders: A competence framework in partnership with University College London, which is aimed at all health workers, trainers and supervisors, clinical managers and service commissioners to guide workforce capability development and enhance patient safety. In 2021/22, HEE will be working with NHSE/I to develop physical health check training relating to eating disorder, that is supported by the Physical Health Competency Framework for Mental Health and Learning Disability Settings (HEE December 2020) HEE is currently working with NHSE/I within a joint eating disorder expert advisory group to ensure effective planning for future commissioning activities and determine the workforce requirements of eating disorder services across the demographic. This work will include the urgent development of an education and training commissioning framework agreement.

E-Learning for Health In addition to the above, HEE runs an e-learning platform called e-Learning for Health (e-LfH), working in partnership with the NHS and professional bodies to support patient care by providing e-learning to educate and train the health and social care workforce. HEE has a range of high quality training available via its e-Learning arm, e-Learning for Healthcare, around eating disorders, particularly on its MindEd programme, which is targeted at professionals and their families. This training, which is available nationally and accessible 24/7, includes, but is not limited to:
• Anorexia and Bulimia
• Eating Disorders in Young People
• Combining therapies to support young people with an eating disorder.

These titles include a new programme for medical students and foundation doctors, developed in response to the PHSO investigation into avoidable deaths from eating disorders in partnership with RCPsych and the eating disorder charity, Beat. The programme, launched in March this year, is designed to ensure that all medical students and foundation doctors are trained to understand, identify and respond appropriately when faced with a patient with a possible eating disorder. A full list of eating disorders materials hosted by HEE e-LfH is appended to this response.

*******************

I hope this response provides you with the assurance that HEE is committed to taking the learning from the tragic death of Avril Hart and is working proactively with partners to better equip the healthcare workforce to recognise, diagnose and treat patients with eating disorders, to improve experiences and outcomes and ultimately save lives. This includes work to expand the mental health workforce, to enhance medical education pathways and produce doctors with a greater understanding of mental health and wellbeing, and to develop world-class eating disorders education resources.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 23rd January 2018 I commenced an investigation into the death of Averil Miranda Hart, aged 19 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 6th November 2020. The medical cause of death was confirmed as 1a Anorexia Nervosa; I recorded a narrative conclusion that the death was avoidable and that it was contributed to by neglect. I identified the following systemic and individual failings:

(1) The lack of a formally commissioned service for the provision of medical monitoring of an Anorexia Nervosa (AN) patient at high risk of relapse and, in this lacunae, the absence of a written service level agreement between primary and secondary care, led to confusion as to precisely how the two services were to work together. This systemic failure contributed significantly to the lack of clear two-way communication between the GP practice at the UEA Medical Centre and the Norfolk Community Eating Disorder Service (NCEDS), which in turn impacted upon the assessment and management of, and response to, Averil’s risk of relapse.

(2) In the context of a severe staffing crisis, the inappropriate allocation by NCEDS of an AN patient at a high risk of relapse to the case load of an inexperienced trainee psychologist designated the dual roles of therapist and Care Coordinator, but for whom inadequate training and insufficient supervision for the latter role was provided, in turn compounded by a lack of proactive support from the wider NCEDS team leading to significant shortcomings in the coordination of Averil’s case. (3) The failure of the NCEDS team to speak directly with Averil’s father following his raising of grave concerns regarding his daughter’s serious deterioration (over a week prior to her collapse) to obtain details of his concerns, leading to a missed opportunity to arrange an urgent medical review of Averil and, on balance, avoid the subsequent collapse and emergency admission to hospital; (4) The failure to adequately plan for or provide any nutritional support to Averil over the course of four days at North Norfolk University Hospital (NNUH), in the context of her severely malnourished condition (recognised on admission), directly contributed to Averil’s death and was a gross failure amounting to neglect. (5) Inadequacies in the commissioned structure at NNUH resulted in the absence of weekend support from both a consultant psychiatrist fully conversant with eating disorders and a dietician trained to provide AN dietetic support as required by the MARSIPAN Guidance. In the context of the lack of any nutritional support, the failure by staff to recognise and manage Averil’s Anorexic behaviours whilst on the Acute Medical Unit contributed to her continued deterioration which in turn led to her emergency transfer to Addenbrookes Hospital (AH). (6) An unexplained four-hour delay before the consultant gastroenterologist was informed following her arrival at AH was compounded by the eight hour delay in Averil being clerked by a junior doctor and her bloods being taken. This led to a missed opportunities to (a) start nasogastric feeding on the afternoon of her arrival; and (b) rapidly identify and treat her hypoglycaemia which was left untreated overnight (7) These missed opportunities were compounded by miscommunication over the telephone in the early hours of the following morning between the junior doctor on the ward and the responsible consultant with respect to the recognition of Averil’s (continuing) hypoglycaemia and treatment thereof. However, given the already greatly diminished chances of survival Averil faced following her period at NNUH prior to her arrival at AH, it could only be safely concluded that the identified failings in care at AH possibly contributed to her death.
Circumstances of the death
On 15th December 2012 Averil died from Anorexia Nervosa at Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridgeshire 6 days short of her twentieth birthday. On 3rd August, Averil had been discharged from Ward S3, the Specialist Eating Disorder Unit, run by Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (CPFT), based at Addenbrookes Hospital. She had received 11 months’ treatment for the AN from which she had been suffering for some three years prior to her admission. At discharge her weight had increased from 30.4 kg (with a BMI of 11.2) on admission to 45.2 kg (a BMI of 16.6). Averil had accepted an offer of a place to study at the University of East Anglia and moved in to University halls of residence in September 2012. GPs at the UEA Medical Centre, where she registered on 29th September, agreed to provide Averil with medical monitoring on a weekly basis. From mid-October Averil also received therapeutic counselling (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy) from a trainee clinical psychologist at the Norfolk Community Eating Disorder Service (NCEDS – also run by CPFT) during the course of which it was decided that Averil was to be weighed by the therapist (rather than the UEAMC GPs) on a weekly basis. Averil was last weighed at NCEDs on 23rd November, after which her therapist was on leave for a fortnight. Her weight was recorded on that occasion as 38.2 kgs, with a BMI of 14.

On the 28th November, having met up with his daughter earlier that day for the first time in a month, Averil’s father had contacted Ward S3 to raise his grave concerns regarding Averil’s apparent physical and mental presentation which he considered had dramatically deteriorated. He told the recipient of the call that, in his opinion, her BMI appeared to be lower than when she had been admitted to hospital the previous year. was later informed that the NCEDS team had been made aware of his concerns. Averil’s scheduled therapy session for the 30th November, where her weight would have been taken, did not take place as her therapist was on leave. Alternative arrangements for another member of the team to review Averil and her weight had not been made. On Friday 30th November the Lead Consultant Psychiatrist for NCEDS, having been alerted to concerns about his daughter’s weight loss, reviewed the NCEDS records relating to Averil and concluded that a medical review should be undertaken by a fellow consultant psychiatrist. He emailed his colleague to this effect the same day and a medical review was subsequently arranged for Friday 7 th December, some nine days after the concern raised by . On the evening of the 6th December Averil cancelled the appointment.

The following morning she was found in a collapsed state in her University accommodation and was taken to Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH) by ambulance. On admission her weight was recorded as 30.7 kg with a BMI of 11.3: her over-all weight loss in four months since discharge from Ward S3 was therefore some 14.5 kg, a third of her body weight. Although Averil was assessed by clinicians at NNUH, including a Consultant Gastroenterologist (who was also the Lead in Nutrition) and recognised to be severely malnourished, over the course of her four-day admission she received no monitored oral nutrition and nor did she receive feeding via a nasogastric tube; in addition, her continuing Anorexia driven, energy-expending behaviours were not addressed. Averil’s condition continued to deteriorate and by the morning of Tuesday 11th December she was struggling to swallow; an emergency transfer by ambulance with blue lights and siren for specialist care at Addenbrookes Hospital was arranged.

Despite the urgency of the transfer, Averil was not reviewed by the specialist medical team at AH, led by a Consultant Gastroenterologist, until around 19.00 hours, approaching five hours after her arrival; Averil was only formally clerked in by a junior doctor (and her bloods taken for analysis) sometime after 22.30 hours that evening. Overnight her finger prick blood sugar level was “unrecordable” and once the results of her blood test were received in the early hours of the morning, these confirmed that her laboratory serum glucose was 1.9 mmols/l. Notwithstanding the written instructions of the Consultant that Averil’s blood sugar levels should be carefully monitored overnight and that she should receive oral glucose should her BM fall below 3 mmols/l (and following a miscommunication during a telephone call between the consultant and the junior doctor on the ward) Averil’s hypoglycaemia remained entirely untreated. On the morning of the 12th December the Consultant visited Averil and found her in a state of collapse. She was treated with intravenous dextrose, oxygen and nasogastric feeding but she further deteriorated, did not regain consciousness and passed away on the 15th December.
Copies sent to
Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (CPFT)University of East Anglia (UEA)University of East Anglia Medical Centre (UEAMC)North Norfolk Clinical Commissioning Group (NNCCG)Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trustfollowing

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2021-0058
Date of report
3 March 2021
Coroner
Sean Horstead
Coroner area
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough

Responses identified

Responses identified 4 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 28 Apr 2021 (estimated).

Sent to

SoS for Health and Social Care, NHS England, General Medical Council, Academy of Medical Medical Royal Colleges and Health Education England

Source links