MPFT acknowledges the concerns about commissioning difficulties for patients living near county boundaries, explains how they have worked with other trusts to provide care, and states that the matter has been forwarded to commissioners for consideration. (AI summary)
View full response
r~t:bj Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust A Keele University Teaching Trust live close to county boundaries. I wonder if anything can be done to facilitate arrangements for secondary psychiatric care in these circumstances. Following discussions within the mental health seNices in the Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Care Group and with corporate seNices, I am now in a position to respond to the specific concern raised during the course of the inquest. In 2020, the period covered in the serious incident investigation report, Mrs Adams had contact with a number of mental health providers during periods of crisis, according to the geography you describe in the matter of concern. Mrs Adams lived in Dosthill, Tamworth, and it would not be uncommon for individuals in Tamworth to touch on services delivered by the three NHS providers described here:
• Midlands Partnership Foundation Trust (MPFT): Mrs Adams' husband contacted the Access pathway in MPFT - pathway staff would offer advice, and forward any calls to the MPFT crisis resolution team when Mrs Adams was in crisis; these assessments would always be offered when required. They would also offer details for Coventry and Warwickshire services as Mrs Adams' commissioned provider, should she require future interventions.
• Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation trust (BSMHFT): Mrs Adams frequently attended Good Hope Hospital where she was seen by the mental health liaison team, a seNice delivered by BSMHFT. The BSMHFT liaison team communicated with the Access team at MPFT and identified no mental health needs that necessitated care from secondary seNices.
• Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust (CWPT): As Mrs Adams' GP commissioned services from CWPT, advice would be for their services to be accessed where needed. However, when she was in a period of crisis the assessment would be undertaken by the team who were geographically closer to where she was. For example, on 19th July 2020 CWPT crisis team communicated with MPFT, MPFT provided the response to Mrs Adams with no delay. Throughout this period Mrs Adams' difficulties were deemed to be related to alcohol misuse with no acute mental health problems that would require secondary mental health services. In earlier years when Mrs Adams did require a secondary mental health services (1999 2005, 2014-2015, 2018, 2019) this was offered by MPFT (or the predecessor organisation South Staffordshire and Shropshire Foundation Trust). Throughout all of Mrs Adams' episodes of care, including that in 2020, MPFT has worked well with partners to ensure people living on the county border are not disadvantaged in terms of seNices offered and in delivering patient-centred collaborative working between organisations. However, given your concerns, we believe the matter is one for commissioners to consider and have therefore forwarded this case to them for their consideration and are happy to support the outcome of those conversations, as appropriate.
r~L:kj Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust A Keele University Teaching Trust I hope this response helps to address your concerns. However, if you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me.