Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Liam Sutton

Ref: 2026-0090 Date: 10 Feb 2026 Coroner: Catherine Wood Area: Kent and Medway Responses identified: 2 / 4 View PDF

Persistent delays in discharging medically fit patients due to inadequate community care provision block acute beds, leading to dangerous overcrowding in emergency departments and delayed critical care.

Date 10 Feb 2026
56-day deadline 8 Apr 2026
Responses identified 2 of 4
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Persistent delays in discharging medically fit patients due to inadequate community care provision block acute beds, leading to dangerous overcrowding in emergency departments and delayed critical care.
View full coroner's concerns
The court heard at the inquest revealed that the resuscitation department where Mr Sutton was admitted was busy and the evidence indicated that this was and is almost a daily occurrence at the Trust. Mr Sutton remained in the Emergency department resuscitation area for longer than 24 hours and should instead have been transferred to a suitable bed in the hospital. The Intensivist who gave evidence was clear that he should have been transferred to the High Dependency/ Intensive Care department and that patients who are admitted in a timely manner have a much better chance of survival. This also means that bays in the resuscitation department are not free to admit or attend to new acutely ill patients arriving at the hospital. The court heard that the main issue is trying to discharge a patient to a suitable area in the hospital to free up a cubicle or bay in the resuscitation department. This in turn is due to beds being occupied by patients who are medically fit to be discharged. On any given day we heard that up to a third of the hospital beds can be filled with patients who are fit to leave hospital. The court heard that the main delay is in discharging patients to appropriate settings or placements and the Trust have taken all steps they can internally to improve the flow of patients through the hospital. From the evidence the court heard it would appear that those responsible for providing care in the community including both the social care providers and the community healthcare providers are not providing either timely appropriate care packages in the patient's home or a bed in an alternative placement be that a nursing home or residential home placement. The evidence suggested that where patients were self funding the delays in discharge were less acute. This means patients are kept in hospital for longer and thus are more at risk of contracting hospital acquired illness themselves which could lead to their own death but are also blocking beds which are needed to treat patients who require acute care in a suitable setting. This is leading to patients being kept longer in the emergency department and reducing available space to receive new critically ill patients. Both of these options can lead to death and there is clearly a risk of death for others requiring clinical care in an acute hospital

Responses

2 respondents
Kent County Council Local Authority / Fire Service
10 Feb 2026 PDF
Action Taken

• Kent County Council's Short Term Pathways Team supports hospital discharge pathways in partnership with Medway NHS Foundation Trust. • The council attends daily Transfer of Care Hub meetings to discuss patients with complex discharge support needs. • The Local Authority continues to operate a Discharge to Assess model and home first approach in line with national guidance. (AI summary)

View full response
To: Ms Catherine Wood, Area Coroner for Kent and Medway

Kent County Council Corporate Complaints County Hall Maidstone, Kent ME14 1XQ

RE: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths

This report has been prepared in response to a request from the coroner for a Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths dated 10 February 2026 in respect of the death of Mr Liam Andrew Sutton.

Firstly, I would like to offer my condolences to the family and friends of Mr Sutton.

Processes and challenges at the time of the death

Kent County Council’s Short Term Pathways Team is a team of social care staff who support the hospital discharge pathways. The team works in partnership with Medway NHS Foundation Trust and based on a hub and spoke model, is part of the Integrated Discharge Team working at Medway Maritime Hospital. The team is also a partner in the Medway Hospital Transfer of Care Hub which is a system-level coordination point that includes a multi- agency team of health, social care and voluntary sector agencies.

KCC attends daily Transfer of Care Hub meetings, Monday to Fridays, where discussions take place regarding patients with the most complex discharge support needs to agree the most appropriate discharge pathway for those individuals.

At the time of Mr Sutton’s death, KCC operated a Discharge to Assess model and home first approach in line with national statutory discharge guidance, Hospital discharge and community support guidance - GOV.UK. The Local Authority continues to operate this model.

2

There is a significantly lower number of people leaving Medway Maritime Hospital from KCC’s boundary areas and with KCC commissioned support than from partner and neighbouring authorities. KCC typically receives an average of around 11 referrals per week to support people with discharge from Medway Hospital. This level of demand has remained consistent from the time preceding the death of Mr Sutton until present day.

The number of bed days lost due to people occupying acute beds who have No Criteria to Reside attributable to KCC is typically below 5% of the total bed days lost at any given time. This has also remained fairly consistent from the time preceding the death of Mr Sutton until present day.

Over 95% of people whose discharge is supported by KCC, are discharged back to their own home with an enablement service provided by Kent Enablement at Home. This is KCC’s in-house service that provides assessment and enablement support for people in their own home.

For the particular week that Mr Sutton died KCC received almost twice the average number of referrals from Medway Hospital and the majority of these people were discharged home with a service delivered by Kent Enablement at Home.

Current processes and challenges and change made.

During this period, the team was running with a 20% vacancy factor. The vacancy factor combined with the increase in demand led to an increase in the time from referral to discharge for these people which was an average of
3.8 days during the week that Mr Sutton died. A recruitment campaign and efficiencies created within Kent Enablement at Home’s referral processes has reduced the timescale for people discharged with home care support to 1.8 days. This has been consistent for the last three months and is in line with key performance indicators set by Medway Hospital of a 48-hour timescale for discharge back to a person’s own home. A small number of people are discharged to a short-term bed where they receive a period of enablement and/or assessment of their longer-term care and support needs. The majority of these people are discharged to KCC’s Adult Short Stay Services which are in-house enablement beds. During the month of December 2024 when Mr Sutton died, KCC identified one person who required support from this pathway and the time for discharge to be facilitated from the time of referral was 6 days. Since the time of Mr Sutton’s death, improvements have been made to the referral processes for this pathway, and the current average transfer of care time is 3 days.

Ongoing challenges beyond the control of the Council

Despite the improvements made to the length of stay for people with No Criteria to Reside attributable to KCC, our data clearly shows that 50% of referrals experience delays beyond the control of KCC. The main reasons for these delays are availability of discharge documentation, medication, and

3 transport availability. These delays are reported in Medway Hospital’s No Criteria to Reside report and KCC continue to work with the trust in identifying themes and trends that delay hospital discharge. Improvements identified

KCC continues to review hospital discharge practice and guidance in collaboration with system partners. The local authority is currently undergoing a review of the Short-Term Pathways practice and processes, and the commissioning of hospital discharge services. KCC will continue to focus on the principles of Discharge to Assess and home first with the ambition of further increasing timely discharges into Pathway 1 home-based services.
Kent and Medway ICB Integrated Care Board
7 Apr 2026 PDF
Action Taken

• The Trust stated it had taken all internal steps to improve the flow of patients through the hospital. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Wood

Regulations 28 and 29 Reports regarding Liam Andrew Sutton

I write in response to the Prevention of Future Death Report dated 10th February 2026, sent pursuant to paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 concerning the death of Liam Andrew Sutton 25th December 2024.

The Coroner raised the following concern(s):
1. The court heard at the inquest revealed that the resuscitation department where Mr Sutton was admitted was busy and the evidence indicated that this was and is almost a daily occurrence at the Trust. Mr Sutton remained in the Emergency department resuscitation area for longer than 24 hours and should instead have been transferred to a suitable bed in the hospital. The Intensivist who gave evidence was clear that he should have been transferred to the High Dependency/Intensive Care department and that patients who are admitted in a timely manner have a much better chance of survival. This also means that bays in the resuscitation department are not free to admit or attend to new acutely ill patients arriving at the hospital.

2. The court heard that the main issue is trying to discharge a patient to a suitable area in the hospital to free up a cubicle or bay in the resuscitation department. This in turn is due to beds being occupied by patients who are medically fit to be discharged. On any given day we heard that up to a third of the hospital beds can be filled with patients who are fit to leave hospital.

Office of the Chief Nursing Officer NHS Kent and Medway 2nd Floor, Gail House Lower Stone Street Maidstone ME15 6NB

Letter reference: 2026.02.10 PFD - Liam Andrew Sutton

3. The court heard that the main delay is in discharging patients to appropriate settings or placements and the Trust have taken all steps they can internally to improve the flow of patients through the hospital. From the evidence the court heard it would appear that those responsible for providing care in the community including both the social care providers and the community healthcare providers are not providing either timely appropriate care packages in the patient's home or a bed in an alternative placement be that a nursing home or residential home placement. The evidence suggested that where patients were self-funding the delays in discharge were less acute.

4. This means patients are kept in hospital for longer and thus are more at risk of contracting hospital acquired illness themselves which could lead to their own death but are also blocking beds which are needed to treat patients who require acute care in a suitable setting. This is leading to patients being kept longer in the emergency department and reducing available space to receive new critically ill patients. Both of these options can lead to death and there is clearly a risk of death for others requiring clinical care in an acute hospital

I am responding on behalf of NHS Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board (ICB) to the concerns in your Regulation 28 and 29 reports. The concerns relate to the risk to critically unwell patients when emergency departments (EDs) are congested and transfer to an appropriate inpatient bed is delayed.

NHS Kent and Medway takes your findings very seriously and we offer our heartfelt condolences to the family of Liam Andrew Sutton.

While the majority of patients leave our hospitals when they are well enough to go home, we know more needs to be done to prevent the delays that some experience. These delays can be for a number of reasons from internal hospital processes to the complexity of arranging ongoing care before a patient can be safely discharged.

I would like to outline the steps we have taken to reduce unnecessary bed occupancy by improving the discharge process and how ongoing support is organised.

As you are aware, NHS Kent and Medway has a statutory oversight role in making sure providers of care, including acute hospital trusts, meet the standards set out in the NHS Constitution.

The Medway Care Transfer Hub now acts as the single coordination and escalation point for the Local Authority and Health to support patients requiring new residential or nursing placements. This ensures consistent, person-centred decision making and removes delays associated with variable processes. The Hub provides weekly reports to the ICB on performance, issues, and escalations.

Letter reference: 2026.02.10 PFD - Liam Andrew Sutton

Discharge pathways

Over the last six months we have taken coordinated actions with Medway Council, Medway Foundation NHS Trust (MFT) and wider system partners to make several improvements to the main, nationally agreed pathways, which are used by the hospital for discharge. The pathways have been developed to address individual patient need and circumstances:

1. Strengthening same‑day discharge (Pathway 0, the national discharge definition, simple discharge home) – MFT have implemented a structured daily approach to maximise safe same-day discharge once a patient is deemed medically fit. This includes senior clinical review, early identification of patients suitable for discharge, and prompt resolution of simple barriers. This process is now fully operational and monitored through daily hospital management mechanisms.

2. Expanding the Home First/short‑term support capacity (Pathway 1, Discharge home with short-term support) – capacity for short-term care at home has been increased so more people can leave hospital safely with e necessary support. Oversight of capacity, flow and performance is provided through the Medway System Discharge Group, a local MDT approach supporting discharge.

3. Increasing access to short-term community rehabilitation beds (Pathway 2) and reducing transfer delays – work is underway to expand access to short-term community rehabilitation beds improving onward flow for patients who no longer need acute inpatient care. A new bed-coordination (brokerage) function will be operational by quarter three of 2026 ahead of winter with clear accountability for timely allocation and progress monitored monthly through ICB assurance routes.

The ICB and MFT have also jointly identified a programme of work focused on reducing hospital avoidable delays for patients whose discharge is delayed by internal processes or hospital-based constraints. This work runs in parallel to the community pathway improvements described above.

The Medway Care Transfer Hub now acts as the single coordination and escalation point for patients requiring new residential or nursing placements. This ensures consistent, person-centred decision making and removes delays associated with variable processes. The Hub provides weekly reports on performance, issues, and escalations.

NHS Kent & Medway ICB acknowledges that delays in discharge increase the risk of harm for people waiting in the ED for specialist inpatient care. The actions set out above constitute the system’s agreed, time-bound programme reviewed with the national team on a quarterly basis to address those risks. Oversight arrangements ensure that delivery continues to be monitored closely, with escalation through formal governance routes where necessary.

If you require any further information or clarification, I would be happy to provide this.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 8 January 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Liam Andrew SUTTON. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 7 January 2026. The conclusion of the inquest was Narrative 'He died as a consequence of chest sepsis which developed following his discharge home on an increased dose of opiates after a left total knee replacement.' 1a Respiratory Distress Syndrome 1b Pneumonia

1c Recent total Knee Replacement Surgery and unintentional opioid toxicity 1d II High body mass index and hypertension
Circumstances of the death
Liam Sutton had a complex past medical history including obesity, type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperchoesterolamia, previous pulmonary embolism, chronic pain, anxiety, depression, gout and previous joint replacement as well as spinal surgery and chronic osteomyelitis of his clavicle requiring multiple procedures. As a result of his chronic intractable pain he was prescribed slow release opiates in the form of Buprenorphine patches as well as other analgesic agents in addition to medication for his other conditions. He used a walking stick to mobilise and was limited in his mobility due to the severe osteoarthritis he suffered from. He was booked for a total knee replacement at KIMS hospital in Maidstone on 9 December 2024 which was an uncomplicated procedure undertaken under spinal anaesthetic. His Buprenorphine patch had been removed prior to surgery and post operatively the anaesthetist advised keeping the patch on and he was prescribed Oxycodone a longer acting opiate and Oramorph to be given to manage his acute post operative pain. The former was changed to Morphine 20mg slow release at Mr Sutton's request but at an equivalent dose. His drugs to take home when he left hospital on 10 December 2024 included 10mg Morphine Sulphate modified release to be taken twice a day and Morphine Sulphate in the form of Oramorph 10mg/5mls to be taken up to 4 times a day for breakthrough pain. He was known to take the Oramorph by sipping the drug rather than as prescribed but the staff at the hospital were not made aware of this information. He was found unconscious by his wife on the afternoon of 12 December 2024 and she called an ambulance. The ambulance crew gave him Naloxone which improved his level of consciousness, although he remained confused following this and he was taken to Medway Maritime hospital where he showed signs of sepsis likely due to pneumonia and he was showing signs of acute kidney injury. He was initially treated with intravenous antibiotics and fluids and supplementary oxygen. A pulmonary embolism was ruled out after investigations and despite treatment he remained confused and his condition fluctuated. He had remained monitored in the resuscitation department in Accident and Emergency and was transferred to the High Dependency Unit on the evening of 13 December 2024 and by the following day he became more agitated and required sedation to manage his presentation. His sedation was increased with little effect so a decision was made to transfer him to the Intensive Care unit so he could be sedated and ventilated which happened in the evening of 14 December 2024. On 15 December 2024 he had an increase in his oxygen requirement and a pneumothorax was seen on a chest xray and treated with a chest drain. His infection markers improved and his oxygen requirement reduced by 21 December so a sedation hold was tried but he needed to be re-sedated. On 22 December 2024 a second sedation hold led to a more appropriate response which led to him being extubated but he became quite tired and required reintubation after around 6 hours. On 23 December 2024 he spiked a temperature and an infection screen was undertaken and antimicrobials and antifungals were commenced. By 25 December 2024 his oxygen requirement had reduced and his inflammatory markers had improved and the decision was made to have another trial of extubation following which he became acutely unwell and a decision was made to reintubate him. During reintubation he suffered a cardiac arrest from which he could not be resuscitated and he died that afternoon.
Action should be taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you the Secretary of State for Health, Kent County Council, Medway Council and Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board have the power to take such action.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2026-0090
Date of report
10 February 2026
Coroner
Catherine Wood
Coroner area
Kent and Medway

Responses identified

Responses identified 2 of 4
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 8 Apr 2026.

Sent to

Department of Health and Social Care
Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board
Kent County Council
Medway Council

Source links