Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Michael Jaggs

Ref: 2021-0333 Date: 6 Oct 2021 Coroner: Mary Hassell Area: Inner North London Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

An agency nurse provided suboptimal care, but the agency failed to provide additional training or encourage reflective learning, unlike the hospital, raising concerns about safety improvements.

Date 6 Oct 2021
56-day deadline 1 Dec 2021 est.
Responses identified 1 of 1
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths Other related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
An agency nurse provided suboptimal care, but the agency failed to provide additional training or encourage reflective learning, unlike the hospital, raising concerns about safety improvements.
View full coroner's concerns
The agency nurse accepted in court that she should have sought prompt medical attention for Mr Jaggs and that she should have made a contemporaneous medical record of all his blood sugar readings.

However, despite this sub optimal care, she said that she has not received any additional training from you following the incident. And she said that you did not ask her to draft a reflective statement, as the hospital trust had several times requested that you arrange.

The trust has undertaken a great deal of work with its own staff to reduce the likelihood of such a failure in the future. I am extremely concerned that no similar learning is taking place within your agency.

Responses

1 respondent
MedPure
PDF
Action Taken

The agency has outsourced complaints to a clinical team, implemented a policy for reflective statements upon complaint, and can offer immediate additional training; they have also assisted the nurse in self-referring to the NMC. (AI summary)

View full response
RESPONSE Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths report Michael Anthony JAGGS (died 16.01.21) CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. The agency nurse accepted in court that she should have sought prompt medical attention for Mr Jaggs and that she should have made a contemporaneous medical record of all his blood sugar readings. However, despite this sub optimal care, she said that she has not received any additional training from you following the incident. And she said that you did not ask her to draft a reflective statement, as the hospital trust had several times requested that you arrange. The trust has undertaken a great deal of work with its own staff to reduce the likelihood of such a failure in the future. I am extremely concerned that no similar learning is taking place within your agency. TIMELINE OF EVENTS 19-Jan-21 Brief incident email received with a request for a factual statement of events on trust template. Incident email confirmed SI but no specific concerns around nurse 19-Jan-21 Complaint acknowledged to the trust. Email sent to agency nurse requesting a statement of events on trust template 02-Feb-21 Statement of events sent to trust for review 09-Feb-21 We requested an update on complaints from trust 02-Mar-21 Agency complaints team chase trust for an update 16-Mar-21 Agency complaints team chase trust for an update 23-Mar-21 Agency complaints team chase trust for an update 13-Apr-21 Agency complaints team chase trust for an update 04-May- 21 Agency complaints team chase trust for an update 04-May- 21 Full incident report received from trust. A request for a reflective statement is made at this point 05-May- 21 Details of incident forwarded to agency clinical nurse for review

06-May- 21 Clinical nurse calls nurse to discuss incident and reflective statement 26-May- 21 Clinical nurse calls nurse to discuss incident and reflective statement

Nurse became unreachable after this time and we were made aware by the trust on the 28th September that an inquest took place. We did re-engage with nurse shortly after to confirm a meeting with the trust. We met with Deputy Chief Nurse, Deputy Director of People of Homerton University and nurse on the 21st October 2021. During the course of this meeting, it was decided the nurse should self refer to the NMC.

CONCERNS AND REMEDIAL ACTION
1. Initial incident and statement request was to obtain a statement of events. Further information on this initial incident could have allowed us to act more accordingly. However;

a. We have since outsourced our complaints to a 3rd party clinical complaints handling team.

b. We have implemented a policy of obtaining a reflective statement at point of complaint being received to better identify any remedial action required.

c. Our clinical complaints team are able to offer additional training where there is a need highlighted. This is provided to the nurse immediately. If face to face training is required, this is offered at the earliest opportunity.

d. It was 98 days before we received a detailed version of events from the trust. We will look to escalate this much sooner should no response be forthcoming.

Additional training requirements have since been highlighted to nurse by our clinical complaints team and we have assisted the nurse is self-referring to the NMC.

We can confirm the NMC referral has taken place and we are supporting the NMC with their investigation.

Director

Monday 6th December 2021

Complaint Process Flow Chart

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 28 January 2021, I commenced an investigation into the death of Michael Jaggs, aged 72 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 21 September 2021. I made a determination at inquest as follows. Michael Jaggs was admitted to hospital on 15 January 2021 and treated for hyperkalaemia. He developed hypoglycaemia as a complication of this treatment. The agency nurse looking after him failed to escalate his deterioration to doctors, and he died from the hypoglycaemia. He was suffering from several chronic co-morbidities, but his death occurred when it did as a direct consequence of the failure to escalate his condition for medical attention.
Circumstances of the death
Mr Jaggs was looked after by a nurse from your agency. By 3am on 16 January 2021, he had a blood sugar level of 1.9 and the agency nurse did notify the nurse in charge, who instructed her to bleep a doctor to prescribe dextrose.

The agency nurse told me that either she did not hear that instruction or she did not act upon it. In any event, she did not bleep that doctor, or any of the others available.

By 3.45pm, when the nurse in charge was able to leave her patient and take off the full personal protective equipment she had been wearing, she found from the agency nurse that Mr Jaggs’ blood sugar had dropped to 1.2 and he was unresponsive.
Copies sent to
Homerton University Hospital NHS TrustCare Quality Commission for EnglandI would have copied this report to the regulator of nurse agencies, but I have not received details of that organisation from Homerton University Hospital and my office has been unable to identify it

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2021-0333
Date of report
6 October 2021
Coroner
Mary Hassell
Coroner area
Inner North London

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 1 Dec 2021 (estimated).

Sent to

MedPure Healthcare

Source links