F158 Accepted

Training and training establishments as a source of safety information

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: GMC

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

The General Medical Council should amend its standards for undergraduate medical education to include a requirement that providers actively seek feedback from students and tutors on compliance by placement providers with minimum standards of patient safety and quality of care, and should generally place the highest priority on the safety of patients.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The GMC published "Promoting Excellence: Standards for Medical Education and Training" in 2015, which includes specific requirements for medical schools to actively seek and act on feedback from students about the quality and safety of clinical placements. Theme 5 of the standards requires that "the learning environment is safe for patients and supportive for learners and educators" and that medical schools have systems in place to identify and act on concerns about patient safety raised by students (GMC, Promoting Excellence, 2015).
- The GMC's quality assurance of undergraduate medical education includes regular reviews of medical schools, at which student feedback on clinical placement quality — including patient safety concerns — is a core source of evidence. The GMC requires medical schools to demonstrate how they collect, analyse, and act on student feedback about placement providers (GMC quality assurance of undergraduate medical education).
- The GMC conducts annual Medical Students Survey as part of its quality assurance programme, collecting data on student experiences of clinical placements including perceptions of patient safety and quality of care. Survey results are used to identify placements where standards may not be met and to trigger further investigation (GMC Medical Students Survey).
- The government's response in "Hard Truths" (Cm 8777, November 2013) supported the principle that feedback from students and trainees about patient safety should be actively sought and acted upon (Hard Truths, DHSC, November 2013).

Response — verbatim from government

Department of Health and Social Care

The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" in March 2013. Key reforms included a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthened Care Quality Commission inspection regime, a statutory duty of candour, and the fit and proper person test for NHS directors. Volume 2 (Cm 8754) contains the government's detailed responses to each of the 290 recommendations. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd486ed915d63cc65d167/34658_Cm_8777_Vol_1_accessible.pdf

Department of Health and Social Care · 19 Nov 2013 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 30 Jun 2024 · NHS England - Learn from Patient Safety Events Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) service replaced the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS). NRLS fully decommissioned 30 June 2024. LFPSE has broader coverage including primary care, uses machine learning for analysis and improved trend identification. View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 1 Oct 2023 · NHS England - Patient Safety Incident Response Framework Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) replaced the Serious Incident Framework from Autumn 2023. Shifts from individual blame to system-based learning approaches. Mandatory for all NHS-funded secondary care providers. Part of NHS Patient Safety Strategy (July 2019). View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 1 Oct 2023 · Legislation - Health Services Safety Investigations Body HSSIB formally launched 1 October 2023 as independent statutory body under Health and Care Act 2022. Replaced HSIB (non-statutory, established 2016). Has statutory "safe space" protections, powers of entry, inspection and seizure. Conducts system-focused patient safety investigations. View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 6 Feb 2023 · Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis Research published 2023 marking ten years since the Francis Report found mixed results. Structural and legislative changes largely delivered (duty of candour, FPPR, CQC overhaul, revalidation, Freedom to Speak Up Guardians). However, cultural change not fully embedded; understaffing, fear of speaking up, and poor complaint handling persist in parts of the NHS. View source → Reasonable Progress
  • 12 Sep 2022 · Legislation - Patient Safety Commissioner First Patient Safety Commissioner Dr Henrietta Hughes OBE appointed 12 September 2022 under Medicines and Medical Devices Act 2021. Independent champion for patient safety regarding medicines and medical devices. View source → Confirmed Completed
  • 11 Feb 2015 · UK Government - Culture Change in the NHS Government published "Culture Change in the NHS" (Cm 9009) reporting progress on all 290 recommendations. Key achievements: 19 hospitals placed in special measures; those trusts recruited 109 additional doctors and 1,805 additional nurses; 129 board-level changes made; excess avoidable deaths fell by 450 in less than a year. View source → Good Progress
  • 19 Nov 2013 · UK Government - Hard Truths Vol 1 & 2 Government published "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) in two volumes. Vol 1 set out new actions; Vol 2 provided detailed response to each of the 290 recommendations. Approximately 204 of 290 recommendations were fully accepted. View source → Good Progress
  • 3 Dec 2012 · GMC - Medical Revalidation GMC medical revalidation launched December 2012. All licensed doctors must demonstrate fitness to practise every five years through appraisal and evidence. Francis Report endorsed and recommended strengthening revalidation. View source → Confirmed Completed

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.