Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Marvin Rue
Ref: 2022-0065
Date: 3 Mar 2022
Coroner: Caroline Saunders
Area: Gwent
Responses identified: 0 / 1
View PDF
Repeated failures to conduct Multifactorial Risk Assessments for a known falls risk patient, despite multiple falls and transfers, were not addressed by previous action plans or staff accountability.
Date
3 Mar 2022
56-day deadline
28 Apr 2022 est.
Responses identified
0 of 1
Coroner's concerns
Repeated failures to conduct Multifactorial Risk Assessments for a known falls risk patient, despite multiple falls and transfers, were not addressed by previous action plans or staff accountability.
View full coroner's concerns
Marvin Rue had fallen prior to his admission to hospital on 8` January 2021 and was therefore, due to his age and circumstances, a "known falls risk". In evidence I heard that in these circumstances a Multifactorial Risk Assessment (MFRA) should take place within 6 hours of admission to hospital. It was not. Mr Rue was transferred between hospitals during his admission, initially to Nevill Hall Hospital and then to Ysbyty Aneurin Bevan. I heard in evidence that a review of the MRFA should take place after every hospital transfer. Mr Rue had no MFRA undertaken after his transfers. Mr Rue fell 5 times priorto his fatal fall in hospital on 2nd February 2021. Contrary to Health Board Policy, Mr Rue did not have an MFRA undertaken after any of these falls. In fact there was never an MFRA correctly completed for Mr Rue throughout his hospital admission. I heard evidence that during this time the staff were under significant pressure due to the effects of the pandemic, and I accept that. However the care that Mr Rue was denied was basic nursing care. the Lead Nurse and author of the Serious Concerns Report, indicated that had Mr Rue been assessed, he would have warranted 1:1 supervision . As a result I concluded that the failures in care directly contributed to Mr Rue's death. During the inquest I was presented with an action plan, however this is not the first action plan I have been presented with (in very similar circumstances) and sadly I am not convinced that this plan will prevent future deaths for the following reasons. The policies referred to above have been in place for several years. I am informed that although there is bespoke documentation training, all staff are trained in falls risk assessment from the time they are in nurse training. Therefore it is not a lack of understanding or policies which have caused these failures. None of the staff were interviewed during the internal investigation and no evidence was forthcoming as to why staff did not follow the procedures. Without this information I do not consider that the actions plan will prevent future deaths. I refer you to your previous responses to PFDs which have clearly not had the desired outcome. Despite being previously reassured that regular ward audits would take place to ensure that the risk assessments were being undertaken I heard no evidence that audits were completed at this time and so the failures went unnoticed until after Mr Rue's death.
Report sections
Circumstances of the death
The circumstances of Marvin Rue's death are set out in the narrative at Paragraph 3.
Action should be taken
I should be grateful if the following information be provided to me:
1. The action that will be taken to address the reason why staff are failing to follow the policies as indicated by their training.
2. Reassurance that Senior Management within the Health Board is fully aware of the risks posed to patients through regular monitoring of adherence to the Falls Policy.
3. A revised action plan which takes points (1) and (2) into account.
1. The action that will be taken to address the reason why staff are failing to follow the policies as indicated by their training.
2. Reassurance that Senior Management within the Health Board is fully aware of the risks posed to patients through regular monitoring of adherence to the Falls Policy.
3. A revised action plan which takes points (1) and (2) into account.
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Whole-system commissioning with cross-agency risk assessment
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Pressure damage risk assessment
Southport Inquiry
Shared multi-agency risk-assessment tool
Southport Inquiry
LCC online harms risk assessment review
Southport Inquiry
GMMH local structured risk assessment responsibility
Southport Inquiry
GMMH and Alder Hey joint SMART audit
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Amend GLOS to allow claimants oral submissions at panel hearings
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Post Office to engage in negotiations during HSSA appeal period
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Access to allied health professionals
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Inpatient facilities on risk register
Report details
- Reference
- 2022-0065
- Date of report
- 3 March 2022
- Coroner
- Caroline Saunders
- Coroner area
- Gwent
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 1
1 response not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 28 Apr 2022 (estimated).
Sent to
- Aneurin Bevan University Health Board