Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Oli Hoque

Ref: 2022-0316 Date: 13 Oct 2022 Coroner: Nadia Persaud Area: East London Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

The MHRA's inability to compel timely clinical data hinders robust safety investigations into potential vaccine adverse events, impacting public interest in drug safety.

Date 13 Oct 2022
56-day deadline 8 Dec 2022
Responses identified 1 of 1
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths Other related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
The MHRA's inability to compel timely clinical data hinders robust safety investigations into potential vaccine adverse events, impacting public interest in drug safety.
View full coroner's concerns
The Inquest heard evidence from a senior medical assessor from the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The Inquest heard that from the 25th February 2021 the MHRA investigated the potential signal of immune thrombocytopenia. This identified three cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis which could possibly be associated with the Astra Zeneca Covid 19 vaccine. The MHRA could not fully consider these cases as they did not receive all of the necessary clinical information. The Inquest heard that the MHRA do not have the power to compel relevant clinical information, to assist them with safety investigations.

In light of the clear public interest in ensuring that the MHRA are able to carry out robust safety investigations, it is a matter of concern that the MHRA are unable to compel the timely production of relevant clinical data.

Responses

1 respondent
Department of Health and Social Care Central Government
12 Jun 2023 PDF
Action Taken

The MHRA has worked with the NHS to enable interoperability and connectivity of reporting systems, such as the new Learning from Patient Safety Events System (LPSE) to allow automatic electronic upload into MHRA databases. The MHRA also continues to educate and promote the Yellow Card scheme with healthcare professionals. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Persaud, From Maria Caulfield MP Parliamentary Under Secretary of State Department ofHealth & Social Care 39 Victoria Street London SW1H0EU 12 June 2023 Thank you for your letter of 13 October 2022, to the then Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Therese Coffey, about the death of Oli Hoque. I am replying as Minister with responsibility for Social Care, and thank you for the additional time allowed. Firstly, I would like to begin by saying how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mr Hoque's death and I offer my sincere condolences to his family and loved ones. It is of course vital that we take learnings where they are identified to improve NHS care, and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. In preparing this response, Departmental officials have made enquiries with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). You may wish to know that whilst significant progress has been made in the scientific understanding of vaccine-induced thrombosis with thrombocytopenia, at the time of Mr Hoque's death in April 2021 , diagnostic criteria had only recently been established and communicated to healthcare professionals. It is therefore not surprising that cases reported were of variable detail and were reclassified over time as more evidence emerged. A Yellow Card report was voluntarily made for Mr Hoque the day after his admission to hospital. Furthermore, the hospital doctor provided the requested clinical information and test results within two days of the initial report being submitted. MHRA conducted daily, proactive follow up and utilised a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA) with Public Health England (now UK Health Security Agency, UKHSA) for additional case details where needed. MHRA sought the advice of its COVID-19 Expert Working Group and the Commission on Human Medicines on emerging evidence of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia and issued regular press releases as evidence continued to amass.

MHRA do not have jurisdiction over healthcare professionals, and therefore did not comment on your consideration of whether issuance of this Regulation 28 report regarding legislative powers to access NHS case notes would assist the MHRA. There are professional guidelines in place for health care professionals to report safety issues, however, the Department is not aware of any jurisdiction globally that compels relevant clinical follow up information. MHRA recognises the importance of access to relevant clinical information for pharmacovigilance and ensured that relevant data flows were in place prior to commencement of vaccinations in December 2020 to support its four-stranded proactive vigilance strategy -
1) Enhanced passive surveillance - 'observed vs expected' analysis; 2) Rapid Cycle Analysis and Ecological analysis (analysing anonymised healthcare for pre-defined events as well as monitoring trends); 3) Targeted active monitoring; and 4) Formal epidemiological studies. It is the view of the MHRA that focus should be placed on encouraging reporting and working across the health family to streamline processes and reduce barriers to reporting. Steps taken to enable this include working with the NHS to enable interoperability and connectivity of reporting system such as the new Learning from Patient Safety Events System (LPSE) to allow automatic electronic upload into MHRA databases in a timely manner. The NHS Digital Clinical Safety Strategy1 covers integration of LPSE with the Yellow Card system; improvement of adverse events and incident reporting is a commitment made by NHSE and MHRA with a clear strategy and shared responsibilities. A recently published NHS standard contract (NHS England "2023/24 NHS Standard Contract) has a focus on interoperability which will help achieve those aims.2 Finally, MHRA continues to educate and promote the Yellow Card scheme with healthcare professionals through its five Yellow Card Centres and campaigns such as the MHRA's annual #MedSafetyWeek. I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 23 June 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of Oli Akram Hoque (aged 26 years old). The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 7 October 2022. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion:

Oli Hoque died as a result of a very rare complication of a COVID-19 vaccination.
Circumstances of the death
Oli Hoque received his first dose of the Astra Zeneca Covid-19 vaccination on the 19 March 2021. On or around the 1 April 2021 he began to suffer from headaches. These became progressively worse and on the evening of the 4 April 2021 he attended A&E at King Georges Hospital. Oli did not present with any symptoms at this time which would have required assessment in the emergency department. In the late evening of the 5 April 2021, Oli was suffering from a severe headache. His sister took him to the Royal London Hospital. A general practitioner assessed Oli and found no signs of raised intracranial pressure. The general practitioner did not consider that Oli required further assessment in the emergency department. At around 11am on the 6 April 2021 Oli's condition declined significantly and an ambulance was called. Oli was suffering from seizures at this time and was taken urgently to Queen's Hospital. In hospital, radiological investigations revealed a cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Oli received care from a multi-disciplinary team and the agreed impression was that the cerebral venous sinus thrombosis was vaccine induced. Sadly, despite all attempts to provide treatment to Oli, he passed away at Queen's Hospital on the 15 April 2021.

On the 7 April 2021 the MHRA issued new advice to healthcare professionals on a possible link between the Astra Zeneca COVID-19 vaccine and specific types of blood clot.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2022-0316
Date of report
13 October 2022
Coroner
Nadia Persaud
Coroner area
East London

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 8 Dec 2022.

Sent to

Department of Health and Social Care

Source links