POH-1

Respond to recommendations by 10 October 2025

Post Office Horizon Inquiry · Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry: Volume 1 Report · Issued 8 July 2025 · Addressed to: Fujitsu, Post Office Ltd, Department for Business and Trade

Government responseFujitsu: Accepted (Oct 2025)Post Office Ltd: Accepted (Oct 2025)Department for Business and Trade: Accepted (Oct 2025)

DeliveryCabinet Office says completed (Mar 2026)Department for Business and Trade says partially delivered (Oct 2025)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

HM Government and/or the Department and where appropriate the Post Office and Fujitsu shall provide written responses to my recommendations by 10 October 2025.

Post Office Horizon Inquiry, Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry: Volume 1 Report · 8 Jul 2025 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Inquiry asked the government, Post Office, and Fujitsu to respond by October 2025. In an update of February 2026, published in March 2026, Cabinet Office recorded that the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) fulfilled the recommendation by publishing its October 2025 response (Cabinet Office, Mar 2026). In January 2026, the Business and Trade Select Committee noted the government met the requirement by publishing its response (Business and Trade Select Committee, Jan 2026). In October 2025, Nigel Railton, Chair of Post Office Limited, submitted its response, while Morrison Foerster (UK) LLP, solicitors for Fujitsu Services Limited, stated it would not respond to recommendations 2 to 18 (Nigel Railton response, Oct 2025; Morrison Foerster (UK) LLP for Fujitsu Services Limited response, Oct 2025). That month, Blair McDougall, Minister for Small Business and Economic Transformation, stated the department's full response will be laid as a Command Paper after the final inquiry volume is issued (Blair McDougall, Oct 2025).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 5 Oct 2026.

Government response

●Fujitsu · Accepted · 9 Oct 2025

Words of: Morrison Foerster (UK) LLP, solicitors for Fujitsu Services Limited, letter to the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry, 9 October 2025 (Inquiry evidence RESP0000002)

Fujitsu notes that Recommendation 1 invites Fujitsu, where appropriate, to provide written responses to the Chair's recommendations by 10 October 2025. Recommendations 2 to 18 of the Volume 1 Report relate to the scope and operation of the redress schemes currently administered by Post Office Limited ("Post Office") and the Department for Business and Trade ("DBT") (namely, the Horizon Shortfall Scheme, Group Litigation Order Scheme, Overturned Convictions Scheme and Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme). Given that Fujitsu has no involvement in either the design or delivery of these schemes, Fujitsu does not consider it appropriate to provide written responses in respect of Recommendations 2 to 18 at this time.

Extract from: RESP0000002 - Letter from Morrison Foerster (UK) LLP to Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry re Volume 1 of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry Report - Fujitsu Services Limited

Site note: This letter was written to the Inquiry by Morrison Foerster (UK) LLP, solicitors for Fujitsu Services Limited, on 9 October 2025. It states Fujitsu's position, speaking of Fujitsu in the third person, so the site files it under Fujitsu.

●Post Office Ltd · Accepted · 9 Oct 2025

Words of: Nigel Railton, Chair of Post Office Limited, in a letter to Sir Wyn Williams, 9 October 2025 (Inquiry evidence RESP0000001)

This letter constitutes Post Office's response under Recommendation 1. We make the following observations in respect of the other recommendations that we have collaborated on.

Extract from: RESP0000001 - Letter from Nigel Railton to Sir Wyn Williams re Post Office Response to Volume 1 of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry Final Report

●Department for Business and Trade · Accepted · 9 Oct 2025

Words of: Department for Business and Trade, Government response to the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry report (volume 1), 9 October 2025

DBT accepts this recommendation and has fulfilled it by publishing this paper today.

Extract from: Government response to the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry report (volume 1)

Delivery

●Cabinet Office says completed · 2 Mar 2026

DBT accepted this recommendation and fulfilled it through the publication of the Department’s response to Volume 1 of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry report on 9 October 2025. The full response can be found on GOV.UK at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-response-to-the-post-office-horizon-it-inquiry-report-volume-1

From: Post Office (Horizon) Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard, February 2026 (data file)

●Department for Business and Trade says partially delivered · 9 Oct 2025

The Department's full response to the report will be laid as a Command Paper, once the Inquiry has issued its final volume.

From: RESP0000003 - Letter from Blair McDougall MP to Sir Wyn Williams re Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry (Volume 1)

Published evidence

●Business and Trade Select Committee · 6 Jan 2026

Summary by this site of the published finding

Business and Trade Select Committee noted the government published its formal response to the inquiry on 9 October 2025, meeting the requirement in this recommendation.

Read the finding in fullBusiness and Trade Committee held an evidence session on 6 January 2026 with witnesses from Fujitsu, the CCRC, DBT and MoJ. The CCRC revealed Horizon software may have been installed earlier than previously believed, potentially expanding the pool of eligible convictions. Over 4,000 claimants were still awaiting final settlement across all schemes at that date. Government accepted only 3 of 17 committee recommendations in full.

Business and Trade Committee evidence session, 6 January 2026View source →

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.