Source · Prevention of Future Deaths
Patrick Soames
Ref: 2023-0124
Date: 18 Apr 2023
Coroner: Edmund Gritt
Area: South London
Responses identified: 0 / 2
View PDF
Multiple agencies lacked a unified system for sharing critical information about the patient's serious self-harm across different geographic areas, compounded by no national 'risk flagging' system or out-of-hours GP access.
Date
18 Apr 2023
56-day deadline
13 Jun 2023
Responses identified
0 of 2
Coroner's concerns
Multiple agencies lacked a unified system for sharing critical information about the patient's serious self-harm across different geographic areas, compounded by no national 'risk flagging' system or out-of-hours GP access.
View full coroner's concerns
1. 5 NHS Trusts and 3 police forces in different geographic areas had contact with Patrick in the final month of his life and each thereby gained some information about the risk to him. However, that information was by reason of the agencies falling into different geographic areas. There was no single effective global focus for the information being acquired piecemeal about Patrick’s pattern of serious self-harming behaviour. The various agencies were significantly impeded in forming a single clear picture of Patrick’s pattern of behaviour (which was particularly necessary in circumstances where he was not engaging and therefore not assisting in providing a complete history himself).
2. GPs act as a repository for information about contact with other clinical agencies (such as attendances at accident and emergency departments) and therefore serve as a point of contact for information about past history. However, I heard evidence at inquest from accident and emergency consultants that it is either not possible to access information held by a GP practice out of GP surgery hours or where it is possible to do so that is only available if the GP is in the same geographic area as the accident and emergency department. Several of Patrick’s attendances at accident and emergency departments were out of GP surgery hours.
3. I was informed at inquest that one local authority (in whose area Patrick resided) had been made aware by police of the risk to Patrick following one of his self-harm incidents (in respect of a particularly important piece of information) and had relayed that information to a 6th NHS Trust (not one of the 5 from which I heard evidence at inquest) but Patrick did not reside in that Trust area. Those Trusts which did have direct contact with Patrick were never made aware of that piece of information nor had any means of accessing it.
4. I heard evidence that there is no national ‘risk flagging’ system: for example, when a person attends an accident and emergency department having self-harmed, the fact of a previous self-harm attendance at a different accident and emergency department is not systematically flagged up.
5. In summary, there was no single effective global focus consolidating the information which was flowing into the various agencies about Patrick; no global focus to which those agencies could in turn refer in emergency to obtain the totality of information about Patrick’s recent pattern of behaviour; no national ‘risk flagging’ system to alert those agencies to his significant recent history.
2. GPs act as a repository for information about contact with other clinical agencies (such as attendances at accident and emergency departments) and therefore serve as a point of contact for information about past history. However, I heard evidence at inquest from accident and emergency consultants that it is either not possible to access information held by a GP practice out of GP surgery hours or where it is possible to do so that is only available if the GP is in the same geographic area as the accident and emergency department. Several of Patrick’s attendances at accident and emergency departments were out of GP surgery hours.
3. I was informed at inquest that one local authority (in whose area Patrick resided) had been made aware by police of the risk to Patrick following one of his self-harm incidents (in respect of a particularly important piece of information) and had relayed that information to a 6th NHS Trust (not one of the 5 from which I heard evidence at inquest) but Patrick did not reside in that Trust area. Those Trusts which did have direct contact with Patrick were never made aware of that piece of information nor had any means of accessing it.
4. I heard evidence that there is no national ‘risk flagging’ system: for example, when a person attends an accident and emergency department having self-harmed, the fact of a previous self-harm attendance at a different accident and emergency department is not systematically flagged up.
5. In summary, there was no single effective global focus consolidating the information which was flowing into the various agencies about Patrick; no global focus to which those agencies could in turn refer in emergency to obtain the totality of information about Patrick’s recent pattern of behaviour; no national ‘risk flagging’ system to alert those agencies to his significant recent history.
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
On 6th July 2021 an investigation was commenced into the death of Patrick Soames, who was 24 years old when he died on 21st June 2021. I assumed conduct of that investigation on about 18th February 2022 and I concluded that investigation at the end of Patrick’s inquest on 21st February 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was one of suicide with a medical cause of death: Ia suspension.
Circumstances of the death
Patrick lived at home with his parents and was employed. However, in the final month of his life, Patrick experienced a severe emotional deterioration. He engaged in repeated episodes of serious self-harm including cutting his arms, medication overdose and uncharacteristic excessive alcohol misuse. At one point, he briefly went missing when he travelled to Yorkshire – where he also self-harmed.
On 9 occasions during that final month, Patrick attended various hospital accident and emergency departments (in different NHS Trust areas), following incidents of self-harm. Some incidents also involved police contact. Patrick, however, declined to engage with psychiatric liaison services on these occasions and abruptly terminated a brief engagement with psychiatric assessment services following referral. Patrick had mental capacity to refuse treatment.
On 9 occasions during that final month, Patrick attended various hospital accident and emergency departments (in different NHS Trust areas), following incidents of self-harm. Some incidents also involved police contact. Patrick, however, declined to engage with psychiatric liaison services on these occasions and abruptly terminated a brief engagement with psychiatric assessment services following referral. Patrick had mental capacity to refuse treatment.
Copies sent to
Croydon Health Service NHS TrustSurrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS TrustSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondon Borough of SuttonMPS, Keston Medical Practice and Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Southport Inquiry
Response officer access to case information technology
Southport Inquiry
Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
GMMH and Alder Hey joint SMART audit
Southport Inquiry
National guidance on SMART action points
COVID-19 Inquiry
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
COVID-19 Inquiry
Proportionate Access to Linked Healthcare Records
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Full staff access to care plans
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Clear records and disclosure policies
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry
Regional service map with vacancies
Infected Blood Inquiry
Share Clinical Assessor Advice
Report details
- Reference
- 2023-0124
- Date of report
- 18 April 2023
- Coroner
- Edmund Gritt
- Coroner area
- South London
Responses identified
Responses identified
0 of 2
2 responses not yet linked
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 13 Jun 2023.
Sent to
- Department of Health and Social Care
- NHS England