Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Sasha Mishabi

Ref: 2023-0425 Date: 1 Nov 2023 Coroner: Emma Brown Area: Birmingham and Solihull 1 response identified · 1 indexed addressee View PDF

AI-generated concerns summaryThe coroner identified a lack of awareness and compliance with St. Andrew's Healthcare's Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management Policy, including inadequate assessments, skin inspections, and incident reporting. Concerns were also raised about the organisation's governance and quality assurance processes, which failed to identify these issues prior to the inquest.

Date 1 Nov 2023
56-day deadline 27 Dec 2023 stated in the report
Responses identified 1 of 1
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
The coroner identified a lack of awareness and compliance with St. Andrew's Healthcare's Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management Policy, including inadequate assessments, skin inspections, and incident reporting. Concerns were also raised about the organisation's governance and quality assurance processes, which failed to identify these issues prior to the inquest.
View full coroner's concerns
1. Awareness of and compliance with St. Andrew's Healthcare 'Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management ' Policy Due to his chronic physical health conditions Mr. Mishabi was at very high risk (score of 21) of pressure damage and ought to have had weekly waterlow assessments and daily skin inspections with more frequent assessment and inspection to be considered in the event of change such as the development of an ulcer. Statements were provided from , Consultant Psychiatrist, and , Lifford Ward Manager, on behalf of SAH in advance of the inquest. The statements included information on Mr. Mishabi's waterlow assessment and skin inspections, and provided some records. At no time was it identified that the SAH 'Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management Policy' was not followed in Mr. Mishabi's case. At inquest it was identified that had forgotten that there was such a policy (he initially denied there was a policy/procedure for waterlow assessments and later, after the policy had been produced, said there was but he had forgotten about it). The areas of non compliance identified at inquest were as follows:
a. failure to undertake weekly waterlow assessments in accordance with paragraph 4.2 and 4.3 of the policy;
b. failure to carry out and/or adequately record daily skin inspections in accordance with paragraph 4.4 of the policy;
c. failure to carry out a waterlow assessment when Mr. Mishabi was identified as having what were believed to be pressure ulcers on the 15th March 2023 in accordance with paragraph 4.3 of the policy;
d. failure to consider increasing the frequency of skin inspections and carry out and/or adequately record any skin inspections between the identification of ulcers on the 15th March 2023 and the admission to hospital on the 17th March 2023 in accordance with paragraph 4.4 of the policy; and
e. failure to make a datix incident report when grade II lesions were identified on the 15th March 2023 in accordance with paragraph 4.7 of the policy; and
f. failure to provide adequate monitoring and oversight of the implementation of the policy in Mr. Mishabi's case in accordance with paragraph 5 of the policy. .
2. SAH Governance, Quality Assurance and Serious Incident processors
a. SAH had not identified the issues with compliance with the policy before the inquest and could offer no explanation for how/why the failures occurred and persisted.
b. No serious incident investigation had been carried out by SAH into Mr. Mishabi's death because it was mistakenly believed that the ulcers developed during the admission to hospital between the 17th March and 2nd April 2023. However, it was acknowledged in a statement from of the 14th September 2023 that there were records showing ulcers were present from the 15th March 2023.
c. SAH Deputy Medical Director, gave evidence that the failures to comply with the policy ought to have been identified by review of the physical health dashboard in monthly ward governance huddles and the monthly divisional Integrated Quality and Performance meeting (IQPR). As there had been no investigation into what went wrong she could not explain why these systems did not work.

Responses

1 respondent

St Andrews Healthcare

Other
Indexed date: 22 Dec 2023 PDF
AI-classified response stance Action Planned
AI-generated response summary

• St Andrew's Healthcare has enlarged its physical healthcare team and established a triumvirate leadership structure to enhance oversight and accountability. • Ward-based teams have received extensive training on physical health requirements, and daily observations and assessments are now conducted during huddles. • The organisation will undertake an informal audit of daily huddles and provide face-to-face pressure sore training for staff on Lifford ward.

View full response
Dear Madam Report issued under Regulation 28 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 to St Andrew’s Healthcare
1. Introduction
1.1. I write in response to the above matter and your report dated 1 November 2023. I have been asked by the Charity’s Chief Executive, , to provide you with a response on behalf of the Charity. I have considered your report, spoken with colleagues and directed further action. For the purposes of this response I will refer to St Andrew's as "the Charity".
1.2. I would like to reassure you that the Charity is taking the issue of compliance with training and knowledge of policies extremely seriously. It is a metric that is considered in regular management meetings and an issue that all line managers prompt their colleagues on to ensure training is kept up to date.
1.3. The Charity structure is designed so that there are lines of reporting and assurance between the wards, divisions, Operational Delivery Committee, Executive Team, the Board of Directors and the Court of Governors. The structure allows for oversight and assurance being maintained for governance and quality activities, as well as for operational and financial performance via the various groups and committees at various levels throughout the Charity. I share your concern that these processes did not pick up the issues with policy compliance in the care Mr Mishabi received in early 2023.
2. Investigations Undertaken and Explanation
2.1. In preparing this response, enquires have been made with the Clinical Director and Associate Director of Nursing at the Birmingham Hospital. Registered Office Billing Road, Northampton NN1 5DG Telephone 01604 616000 Website www.stah.org Registered Charity Number 1104951 Company Number 5176998

2.2. We have spoken with about his knowledge of the Charity’s Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management Policy and we are clear that he is aware of this policy and he has explained that he was very nervous when he was giving evidence at the inquest. I also understand that during evidence he did accurately describe aspects of the policy despite him forgetting that the policy existed.
2.3. We also understand that in early 2023 when Mr Mishabi was unwell and there were issues with his pressure ulcer management, was on leave and not on the ward, so his knowledge (or any actual or perceived lack thereof) of the policy will not have been a contributory factor in the pressure ulcer care Mr Mishabi received in March 2023.
2.4. We have also enquired into the training provided to the team on Lifford ward and in addition to the e-learning, of which you have received a copy, the Charity’s Head of Physical Healthcare arranged in-person bespoke training on pressure ulcer management which was attended by members of the Lifford ward team.
2.5. It also needs to be acknowledged that on Mr Mishabi’s return to St Andrew’s on 3 April 2023 the pressure ulcer care Mr Mishabi received was of a higher quality than on and around 15 March 2023. The principle reason for this appears to be due to better communication and ownership by the physical healthcare team of the issue of Mr Mishabi’s pressure ulcers.
2.6. , Clinical Director at the Charity’s Birmingham Hospital, has also commented that he personally attended upon Mr Mishabi on 3 April 2023 following his return from the Queen Elizabeth Hospital on the evening of 2 April 2023.

clinical opinion is that it the Prevention of Future Deaths Report is incorrect to state that “Following discharge [from QEH] the ulcers proved difficult to manage and deteriorated.” view, which is supported by the RiO notes that you had access to, is that Mr Mishabi’s pressure ulcers had not been appropriately treated at QEH and he had been prematurely discharged. We can provide you with a further copy of these notes if it would be of assistance. The discharge summary provided by QEH made no mention of any pressure ulcers, no nursing discharge summary was provided nor had any pressure ulcer leaflets been provided to the Charity as QEH have claimed. It is also noted that QEH did not invite the Charity to participate in its serious incident investigation, which may have been of assistance given there have been issues with quality of the discharge summaries received by the Charity in relation to other patients. This is also supported by the Charity’s Mortality Surveillance Review, which was provided to you, which concluded: “Mr Mishabi may have been prematurely discharged by colleagues at the QE on 2/04/23 as he was rapidly readmitted. Some liaison about how psych wards work and that the level of fitness required to be discharged to a psych ward being equivalent to that required to be managed in a domestic setting may be useful for QE colleagues going forwards.”
2.7. The Charity would highlight that whilst elements of the Charity’s Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management Policy were not followed in early 2023, Mr Mishabi did have a pressure ulcer prevention care plan in place as the team on Lifford ward were aware that he was at high risk of pressure ulcers. This included ensuring Mr Mishabi had access to an airflow bed, a pressure relieving cushion for use on his wheelchair, implementation of a turning Registered Office Billing Road, Northampton NN1 5DG Telephone 01604 616000 Website www.stah.org Registered Charity Number 1104951 Company Number 5176998

regime and regular observations to prompt him to keep moving from one position. Whilst there were deficiencies in the completion of Waterlow Pressure Scores and Skin bundles, this had no effect on the care Mr Mishabi had access to as all the available options to limit his risk of pressure ulcers were already in place. Mr Mishabi was also regularly reviewed by the Physical Healthcare Team and was swiftly and appropriately escalated to the QEH on both 18 March and 4 April 2023.
2.8. A significant change at the Birmingham hospital since Mr Mishabi’s admission is that there is now a designated senior nursing leadership team in the form of an Associate Director of Nursing as well as two Quality Matrons in place who have better oversight of the governance structures designed to pick up issues such as missed Waterlow Pressure Scores. It appears that it is not a case that the clinical governance structures are inadequate – more that the implementation needed some refinement and support, which is now in place
2.9. Lastly, it should need to be acknowledged that whilst there were issues in early 2023 with the Charity’s compliance with its Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management Policy, there is a large body of evidence that overall the care Mr Mishabi received for his physical health was of a high standard. The team on Lifford ward worked extremely hard to manage Mr Mishabi’s multiple physical health illnesses, namely diabetes mellitus, hypertension, end stage kidney failure and ischaemic heart disease at times in challenging circumstances, when Mr Mishabi’s mental disorder meant that he was not willing to follow clinical advice that was in his best interests.
3. Actions Taken
3.1. The Charity is committed to learning from past incidents and has an ongoing commitment to improving care standards. Despite the concerns about the nature of Mr Mishabi’s discharge from QEH, the Charity acknowledges that there are areas where improvements are needed based on the learning from the care provided to Mr Mishabi, an individual with complex mental and physical illnesses.
3.2. Since Mr Mishabi’s death, a number of changes have already been implemented that have strengthened the physical healthcare provision and the governance arrangements at the Birmingham hospital. I would therefore highlight the following changes: Change 1: Structure of the Physical Healthcare Team The physical healthcare team now comprises three nurses and the Associate Specialist/Non-Consultant doctors, who operate under a clear escalation plan. This enlarged team is designed to ensure a comprehensive approach to both mental and physical health needs. Change 2: Improved Training for Ward Teams Ward-based teams receive extensive training and ward managers hold responsibility for daily observations, which include Waterlow Assessments, Skin Bundles and NEWS assessments. There is now extensive training provided to ward-based teams in recognising signs and symptoms of physical health requirements. Registered Office Billing Road, Northampton NN1 5DG Telephone 01604 616000 Website www.stah.org Registered Charity Number 1104951 Company Number 5176998

Change 3: Clearer Accountability and Responsibility for Physical Healthcare Since Mr Mishabi’s death, a triumvirate leadership team consisting of substantive postholders in the roles of Clinical Director, an Associate Director of Nursing and a Director of Operations is now in place. The Associate Director of Nursing has implemented robust procedures for monitoring physical healthcare, which has set physical healthcare KPIs as a priority KPI. The Associate Director of Nursing ensures that colleagues are held accountable for compliance. The Associate Director of Nursing is a physical healthcare advanced practitioner and therefore has expertise and a professional interest in this issue. A well-defined governance structure supports a multidisciplinary decision-making process including Quality Matrons who are responsible for monitoring the quality of the care provided Change 4: Clear Escalation Plan and Daily Monitoring A well-defined escalation process in place to address any health needs promptly, with ward managers holding responsibility. Regular observations, Waterlow and Skin bundles and NEWS2 assessments conducted daily during safety huddles or divisional huddles. Change 5: Incident Review: Acknowledgement of lapses in compliance with pressure ulcer prevention policies, with a commitment to continuous training and oversight. Change 6: Charity-wide Communication The Charity has already sent out a reminder to all staff about the importance of competing regular Waterlow Pressure Scores and complying with the Charity’s policies.
3.3. In addition, the Charity is going to undertake the following additional actions: Action 1: Undertake an informal audit/dip test of the Daily Huddles The Associate Director of Nursing will be undertaking a random sample of daily huddles to ensure that issues with the Waterlow Pressure Scores and other physical healthcare tests are being considered at the daily huddles. Action 2: Training The Charity is going to ensure all staff on Lifford ward, which cares for the patients at highest risk of pressure sores in Birmingham, receive face to face training on pressure sores. Registered Office Billing Road, Northampton NN1 5DG Telephone 01604 616000 Website www.stah.org Registered Charity Number 1104951 Company Number 5176998

4. Summary
4.1. Having considered your report, we acknowledge that whilst the Charity still has significant concerns about the nature of Mr Mishabi’s discharge from QEH, which are not addressed in the action plan provided to you, there are areas around the compliance with policies and the governance processes that can be improved upon.
4.2. The Charity’s Birmingham hospital has benefited significantly by the strengthened local leadership team and is now a significantly different service from at the time of Mr Mishabi’s death.
4.3. I hope the additional steps outlined in this letter will provide you with some reassurance that there is a reduced risk of future deaths following the actions that the Charity has and will take.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 2 May 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Sasha Honey MISHABI. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest . The conclusion of the inquest was; Natural causes.
Circumstances of the death
Mr Mishabi died at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham on the 18th April 2023. He was a detained mental health patient under section 37/41 of the Mental Health Act at Lifford Ward, St Andrew's Healthcare ('SAH'), Birmingham for the treatment of personality disorders and schizoaffective disorder of a severe and enduring nature. Mr. Mishabi's physical health was also poor due to diabetes mellitus type 2, essential hypertension, end stage renal failure and heart failure, he also had poor nutrition and generally used a wheelchair. Mr. Mishabi's personal hygiene was poor and due to his mental health condition he would often refuse assistance despite suffering episodes of incontinence. He had developed painful skin ulcers to his buttocks that were first identified at SAH on the 15th March 2023 and initially thought to be pressure sores. Dressings were applied. Mr. Mishabi was admitted to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital on the 17th March 2023 for management of urinary retention. He was found to have a urinary tract infection and anaemia. He was treated and clinically stable when discharged back to SAH on the 2nd April 2023. On admission it was also identified that he had grade 2 ulcers to his left buttock that were thought to be pressure related and was managed accordingly. Following discharge the ulcers proved difficult to manage and deteriorated. Therefore Mr. Mishabi was admitted to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital on the 6th April 2023 for input from the tissue viability team at which time signs of local infection were identified which were treated with antibiotics. He was reviewed by a tissue viability specialist on the 12th April 2023 who felt that the ulcers were not pressure ulcers. Consequently on the 14th April he underwent a surgical review, a pelvis CT with contrast and a dermatology opinion was obtained to consider what the nature of the ulcers was and how they should be managed. No abcesses or collections were identified and the appropriate management was advised to be ongoing antibiotics. Mr. Mishabi continued to be clinically stable with all observations within normal limites until the 16th April 2023 when he had an episode of pyrexia and tachycardia during the morning prompting investigations. The only other cause for concern on the 16th was a low blood sugar during the early evening but this responded to treatment. However at 22:35 on the 16th April 2023 Mr. Mishabi suddenly became unrousable and suffered a cardiac arrest. He was successfully resuscitated but subsequently developed an overwhelming bronchopneumonia which despite treatment lead to his death. Based on evidence heard at the inquest from a variety of clinicians and , pathologist, the medical cause of death was determined to be: 1a Bronchopneumonia

1b Cardiac Arrest 1c Local infection of unknown origin with diabetes mellitus; hypertension; end stage kidney failure; ischaemic heart disease and heart failure II Skin infection of the buttocks with superficial ulceration The skin ulcers were determined not to be pressure related and at post mortem were seen to be healing and uninfected, therefore it was concluded that they did not play a significant part in Mr. Mishabi's death. However, the inquest did examine the pressure area risk assessments, prevention management and ulcer care at the University Hospitals of Birmingham and St. Andrew's Healthcare.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Report details

Reference
2023-0425
Date of report
1 November 2023
Coroner
Emma Brown
Coroner area
Birmingham and Solihull

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 27 Dec 2023 (stated in the report).

Sent to

St Andrews Healthcare

Source links