NIVAS plans to publish guidelines in 2024 concerning the use of real time ultrasound guidance for central venous catheter insertion and the identification and management of inadvertent arterial puncture. They will also give the subject prominence at their annual conference in June 2024. (AI summary)
Maxwell Frame
The absence of a national policy for Central Venous Catheter (CVC) placement leads to inconsistent and potentially unsafe practices across hospitals. A standardised national policy is needed to ensure patient safety.
Coroner's concerns
View full coroner's concerns
Responses
The Association of Anaesthetists, Royal College of Anaesthetists, Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (FICM) and the Intensive Care Society (ICS) will ensure that updated "Safe Vascular Access" guidance has more explicit recommendations for checking CVC placement. The ICS is also developing a guideline for managing inadvertent arterial puncture during CVC insertion. (AI summary)
View full response
Re: Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths in the matter of Maxwell Frame
Thank you for sending us a copy of your report regarding the sad death of Mr Maxwell Frame. We have jointly reviewed the information available to us in the report via our Safe Anaesthesia Liaison Group (SALG). SALG is a collaborative project between the Association of Anaesthetists, NHS England’s Patient Safety team and the Royal College of Anaesthetists. One of its core objectives is to analyse anaesthesia-related serious incidents and to share the learning with the specialty across the UK. We have also consulted with the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (FICM) and the Intensive Care Society (ICS).
Your prevention of future deaths report highlighted your concern regarding the “absence of a national policy on the placement of Central venous catheters (CVCs).”
In 2016, the Association of Anaesthetists published the guidance “Safe Vascular Access”1, which was endorsed by the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Although this guidance does not contain a list of explicit recommendations for placement, information relating to how placement should be checked is included. The guideline does state "All hospitals should have clear, specific policies for insertion and documentation of CVCs (type, insertion site and tip position), and education on complications and their management." The guidance is currently being updated and we will ensure that it has more explicit recommendations for checking placement.
Since that guidance was published, the National Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (NatSSIPs)2 have been rolled out. As CVC insertion is an invasive procedure, NatSSiPs obliges every organisation to have a local standard (known as a LocSSIP), which would naturally include how placement should be checked. FICM and ICS published a Central Venous Catheter Insertion Checklist in 2017 (updated 2023)3, which can be used as the basis of the LocSSIP for individual organisations.
Additionally the ICS Standards and Guidelines Committee is currently developing a “Guideline for the management of inadvertent arterial puncture during central venous catheterisation in Critical Care”, in conjunction with experts within the Vascular Surgery specialty.
SALG publishes regular Patient Safety Updates, which are distributed to all members of the Association of Anaesthetists and Royal College of Anaesthetists. FICM publishes regular Safety Bulletins, which are distributed to all their members. Both publications have previously highlighted incidents related to CVC insertion and we will continue to do so to promote compliance with the guidance noted above.
We would be happy to respond to any questions that you might have.
NICE acknowledges the concerns but states that existing National safety standards for invasive procedures (NatSSIPs), ICS CVC Insertion Safety Checklist 2023, and AAGBI guidance already provide recommendations, and they do not consider that further NICE guidance would add to existing national recommendations. (AI summary)
View full response
Page | 2
In conclusion, the use of ultrasound in the placement of central lines is standard practice and has already been recommended in NICE guidance as well as other nationally recognised publications. I was saddened to read of the circumstances surrounding Maxwell’s death. However, on this occasion I do not consider that further NICE guidance in this area would add to existing national recommendations from relevant professional bodies and standard requirements, prevent the failure to use ultrasound or to undertake recommended checks in line placement. Please do let me know if you require any further information.
The Department of Health and Social Care acknowledges concerns about the absence of a national policy on CVC placement, but states that existing NICE guidance and national safety standards should inform local standards. They do not consider further action is needed at this time as the clinician departed from existing national recommendations, NICE guidelines and Trust policy. (AI summary)
View full response
Thank you for your Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths dated 14/11/2023, about the death of Maxwell Frame. I am replying as Minister with responsibility for Health and Secondary Care.
Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Maxwell Frame’s death, and I offer my sincere condolences to their family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. Please accept my sincere apologies for the significant delay in responding to this matter.
The report raises concerns over the absence of a national policy on the placement of Central Venous Catheter’s (CVC). I understand that although the Trust had in place a local policy for the placement of CVC’s, several doctors who gave evidence at the inquest stated that a national policy would be beneficial.
In preparing this response, Departmental officials have made enquiries with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). In their published response to your report, NICE cite existing guidance and national safety standards, including; national safety standards for invasive procedures, national CVC Insertion Safety Checklist, as well as guidance on safe vascular access (2016) which recommends the use of ultrasound locating devices for placing CVC’s. The Department understands the guidance on safe vascular access is currently being updated and is due to be published in 2024. These existing standards and guidance should be used to inform local standards developed at the Trust.
Your report explains that a landmark approach was taken to the placement of Mr Frames CVC, and that a series of steps were taken which depart from existing guidance and standard practice, including the omission of an ultrasound during placement, despite being available. Your report also describes how standards were in place at the Trust for Central Venous Access Devices, which included steps that should have been taken in this case but were not.
I was deeply saddened to read of the circumstances of Mr Frame’s death. The report has prompted careful reflection within my department, and from NICE and other stakeholders involved in the issuing of national clinical guidance as detailed in their responses. However, as you note in your report, the actions taken by the treating clinician departed from already existing national recommendations, NICE guidelines for administering this procedure and the Trusts own policy. I therefore do not consider there is any further action for the Department of Health and Social Care to take at this time.
I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.
Kind regards,
THE RT HON ANDREW STEPHENSON CBE MP MINISTER OF STATE
Report sections
Investigation and inquest
Circumstances of the death
Action should be taken
Similar PFD reports
Related inquiry recommendations
Report details
- Reference
- 2023-0449
- Date of report
- 14 November 2023
- Coroner
- Peter Merchant
- Coroner area
- West Yorkshire (Western)
Responses identified
Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 9 Jan 2024 (estimated).
Sent to
- Association of Anaesthetists
- Department of Health and Social Care
- National Infusion and Vascular Access Society
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
- Royal College of Anaesthetists