Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Joanna Kowalczyk

Ref: 2025-0040 Date: 22 Jan 2025 Coroner: Leila Benyounes Area: Gateshead and South Tyneside Responses identified: 4 / 2 View PDF

A paramedic lacked crucial stroke symptom training, and chiropractors do not routinely obtain medical records before assessment, particularly after recent hospital visits, creating significant risks for patients.

Date 22 Jan 2025
56-day deadline 19 Mar 2025 est.
Responses identified 4 of 2
Emergency services related deaths (2019 onwards) Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
A paramedic lacked crucial stroke symptom training, and chiropractors do not routinely obtain medical records before assessment, particularly after recent hospital visits, creating significant risks for patients.
View full coroner's concerns
1. The evidence from the attending paramedic was that she was not aware that symptoms of a stroke can stop after a short time as clearly set out on NHS website and guidance, and that this was not part of her training. This was directly contrary to the Head of Operations’ evidence that this was part of both paramedic training and annual continuing professional development. This was a concerning feature given the accepted evidence of the time critical period to treat patients with symptoms potentially indicative of stroke.

2. The evidence on behalf of the treating chiropractor was that he did not consider it necessary to request GP records or hospital records, before assessment or treatment despite being informed about the Deceased’s recent hospital attendance, investigation which was recommended, and her discharge against medical advice. Even in the updated consent form I have been provided with, which was designed by the British Chiropractic Association, there is no prompt or question designed for the chiropractor to ask to consider obtaining medical records before assessment or treatment, and when this may be appropriate, and the only reference to medical records is a consent to communicate as deemed necessary for the treatment, and for a report to be sent to the GP after treatment. I am concerned that consideration to obtaining medical records should always be given before assessment, particularly where recent medical treatment or investigations has been undertaken.

Responses

4 respondents
North East Ambulance Service NHS / Health Body
21 Jan 2025 PDF
Noted

The North East Ambulance Service emphasizes existing training and education for paramedics on stroke symptoms, including the possibility of symptoms dissipating, and highlights the strengthening of their Senior Clinical Leadership team. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Miss Benyounes,

Inquest into the death of Joanna Kowalczyk Regulation 28 – Report to prevent future deaths I am writing in my role as Chief Executive of North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust ("NEAS") and in response to the Regulation 28 report for the prevention of future deaths dated 21 January 2025 as issued by you following the inquest into the tragic death of Joanna Kowalczyk. I am sorry that you have had to raise concerns with NEAS following the inquest and would like to take this opportunity to pass on my sincere condolences to the family of Joanna. I am aware that the report was also issued to the General Chiropractic Council. We will not address this specific concern and simply respond to that specifically related to NEAS. I will address the NEAS point you have raised in your matters of concern below: -

1. The evidence from the attending paramedic was that she was not aware that symptoms of a stroke can stop after a short time as clearly set out on NHS website and guidance, and that this was not part of her training. This was directly contrary to the Head of Operations’ evidence that this was part of both paramedic training and annual continuing professional development. This was a concerning feature given the accepted evidence of the time critical period to treat patients with symptoms potentially indicative of stroke. In respect to the NHS website this contains information for the public in relation to stroke which I believe is what the family pointed out. The information is however directed towards the public in so far that the symptoms section contains the statement ‘symptoms of a stroke can sometimes stop after a short time, so you may think you're OK. Even if this happens, get medical help straight away’. The following link will direct you onto the information which I believe is referenced https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/stroke/. This is not intended to provide guidance to health professionals and directs the public to seek medical help which is what happened in this case.

Ambulance Headquarters Bernicia House The Waterfront Goldcrest Way Newburn Riverside Newcastle upon Tyne NE15 8NY

Tel : 0191 430 2000

Ref:

Strictly Private and Confidential Miss Leila Benyounes His Majesty's Assistant Coroner for Gateshead and South Tyneside Coroner Office, Town Hall and Civic Offices, Westoe Road, South Shields, Tyne and Wear, NE33 2RL

Date: 16th April 2025

I am aware that evidence from one of the attending Paramedics led you to believe that they were not trained to recognise that symptoms of a stroke could cease after a period of time. This was despite the Head of Operations confirming in evidence that firstly he thought the Paramedic had not understood the question. The evidence provided by the Head of Operations described how Paramedics were trained and that secondly, he would ensure that following the inquest he would feed this back to the Paramedic and send a wider update to the Paramedic cohort at the Trust reminding them of the potential for stroke symptoms to dissipate over time. Further to the conclusion of the inquest the Paramedic took it upon themselves to write a detailed Continual Professional Development (CPD) piece to demonstrate their understanding of Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA). In respect to the education and training of Paramedics I have set out the education journey and the ongoing CPD undertaken as a registered healthcare professional. Academic Education via University

During Paramedic training (this is the 3-year BSc or the older 2-year paramedic degrees), Stroke/ TIA and neurological conditions are all covered and how to recognise signs and symptoms. During the sessions covering Stroke/TIA, students are informed and taught that symptoms may have resolved on arrival but anyone who has displayed symptoms of a Stroke/TIA which have resolved will not be left on scene but referred to another healthcare professional. This would usually mean conveyance to the local hospital and/or the stroke unit should be contacted. Students are taught that symptoms of a stroke that have ‘resolved’ could be a red flag/ predisposing factor to a further stroke.

1. An example of a university course is Teesside university and the internal NEAS students (BSc level), year one includes a neurological module which talks about each condition and then how to assess symptoms which includes observations, pupil response, FAST (face, arms, speech, time), AcVPU (alert, new confusion, voice, pain, unresponsive) consciousness and GCS (glasgow coma scale), and goes into further detail such as the cranial nerve assessment. All of these points are discussed including how to identify any abnormalities.

2. Year two provides further in depth education/training in respect to the neurological system, symptoms and assessment. An example of learning is a journal article ‘a survey of UK Paramedics’ views about stroke training, current practice and the identification of stroke mimics’ by Dr Graham McClelland et al.

3. Year three education/training revisits the elements of the previous years, including signs and symptoms. This does not include additional new information and acts as a continuation of previous learning by students to ensure it is embedded learning.

Initial Onboarding Course

Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) is covered in education and training for Ambulance Care Assistants (ACA), Ambulance Support Practitioners (ASP) and Paramedics. Training for ACA/ASP include how to recognise signs and symptoms Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA). Newly Qualified Paramedics (NQP) and Qualified Paramedics courses do not revisit their previous education and training, however training covers stroke pathways and bypass care bundles. The term ‘care bundles’ relates to a collection of interventions that may be applied to the management of a particular condition i.e. stroke pathway. These care bundles are also covered in the Electronic Patient Care Record (EPCR) training alongside how to complete accurate documentation.

Newly Qualified Paramedic (NQP) Portfolio (band 5)

After graduation, Newly Qualified Paramedics (NQPs) have up to two years to complete their Newly Qualified Paramedics portfolio. This is nationally recognised process and is completed by all Newly Qualified Paramedics. Part of the portfolio is to document progression, including meetings with Mentors and identifying areas of development. During these sessions discussions include patient assessments and clinical decision-making. The process does not include anything specific for ‘neurological’, however throughout process of completing the portfolio evidence is collated to cover physical examinations, risk assessments, appropriate decision making, the use of clinical judgment to select most likely diagnosis in relation to evidence gathered, and many other areas where evidence needs to be supplied of when they have carried out that point.

During this stage of their career Newly Qualified Paramedics cannot discharge on scene, with a requirement that they ensure input of a senior clinician prior to discharging a patient at scene. As part of their continued learning and reflective practice Newly Qualified Paramedics maintain ‘clinical learning diaries’ logging specific cases they have attended, including the likes of suspected Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA).

Statutory and Mandatory Training

On an annual basis ambulance staff undergo statutory and mandatory training. The annual training is developed with various specialist departments agreeing what should be included and co-designing the packages prior to commencing the training programme. This approach includes any identified learning throughout the previous year and/or any changes in practice coming through external recommendations and/or requirements. Stroke training was included in the annual training in 2018/2019 and covered stroke statistics, definitions, risk factors, signs and symptoms, stroke mimics, assessment, treatment, current NEAS performance and potential areas for improvement.

The 2022/2023 statutory and mandatory training included Stroke and was delivered via a video/ e-learning presentation developed by Dr Graham McClelland, this included a focus on his Stroke research undertaken at that time. The training included a refresher on pre-hospital stroke care, recommendations, Paramedic Acute Stroke Treatment Assessment (PASTA) trial, thrombectomy, time = brain, FAST (face, arms, speech, time), pre-alerts, dispatch criteria, statistics, Electrocardiogram (ECG), Intravenous (IV) cannulation and not to delay on scene time.

Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee (JRCALC)

It may be helpful to explain the Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee (JRCALC) guidance. The JRCALC guidelines have evolved from many locally derived protocols to systematically developed national clinical practice guidelines based on current best evidence. The ongoing continuous updates are supported via the JRCALC Guideline Development Group (JRCALC-GDG), have over the years been responsible for developing and reviewing the national clinical practice guidelines for NHS Paramedics. JRCALC guidelines are also an important part of clinical risk management and ensure uniformity in the delivery of high-quality patient care. As such, they form the basis for UK Paramedic training and education. JRCALC combines expert advice with practical guidance to help Paramedics in their challenging roles and supports them in providing patient care.

The guidelines cover an extensive range of topics, from resuscitation, medical emergencies, trauma, obstetrics and medicines to major incidents and staff wellbeing. Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) have a full section under JRCALC too which discusses symptoms, treatment, time critical factors. It states, ‘patients with TIA may be at high risk of stroke and require urgent specialist assessment, and local pathways should be followed’. JRCALC is broken down into the following headings: introduction, pathophysiology, incidents, severity and outcome, assessment and management, audit information and key points.

In addition to education and training all NEAS Paramedics are given access to the JRCALC guidelines through individual licenses for the JRCALC Plus app. JRCALC Plus allows individual ambulance services to combine the national guidelines with their regional information, this is achieved via individual login details linking with the specific Ambulance Trust. The app contains the following which is utilised by NEAS:

▪ Complete JRCALC Guidelines ▪ Regional and local guidance specific to NEAS ▪ Clinical Notices/Bulletins ▪ Medications information including patient group directives ▪ All updates and alerts are published in real time as new guidance is issued ▪ The app works offline and is therefore accessible to our teams

Emergency Ambulance crews can access the JRCALC Plus app via iPads which are now being transitioned to personal issue, with the rollout of personal issue devices commencing in August 2024, prior to this date the iPad (or previous electronic device) was part of the standard vehicle equipment. In addition, the clinicians have the option for the App to be downloaded on other devices such as personal smart phones if they so choose so. This allows clinicians to access the guidelines whilst at the patient side and/or when travelling to the case.

Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA) have a full section under JRCALC too which discusses symptoms, treatment, time critical factors. It states, ‘patients with TIA may be at high risk of stroke and require urgent specialist assessment, and local pathways should be followed’. JRCALC is broken down into the following headings: intro, pathophysiology, incidents, severity and outcome, assessment and management, audit information and Key points.

In addition to education and training provided to our staff, we have recently strengthened our Senior Clinical Leadership team. Under the leadership of our Director and Deputy Director of Paramedicine, we have appointed three Consultant Paramedics and a Head of Clinical Development and Effectiveness. The team are working closely with internal and external colleagues to develop clinical and professional leadership of our clinical workforce, developing our capabilities, standards and opportunities for development across our system. This includes a strong link into the ongoing education and training of our clinical workforce, ultimately complimenting the details I set our previously alongside ongoing CPD undertaken as registered healthcare professionals.

I trust that this response provides you and the family with the re-assurance that, as indicated by the Trust’s Head of Operations in live evidence at the inquest, staff are and continue to be educated and trained in respect to stroke and neurological conditions including the potential that symptoms of a stroke can dissipate.

If it would be helpful, we would gladly arrange a visit to our internal Education Centre so you can see our facilities and receive an overview of the education provided to our staff. May I once again pass on my sincere condolences to the family of Joanna. If we can be of any further assistance then please do not hesitate to contact , Head of Regulatory Services via email at or telephone .
General Chiropractic Council Local Authority / Fire Service
22 Jan 2025 PDF
Action Planned

The General Chiropractic Council has established an expert group to review the coroner's findings and recommend actions to prevent similar deaths or harm to patients, with a final report expected by October 2025. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Benyounes, Inquest: Joanna Daria Kowalczyk At the conclusion of the inquest on 22 January 2025 investigating Joanna’s sad death you issued a report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. Your report was issued to, amongst others, the General Chiropractic Council (GCC) indicating that we respond by 25 April 2025. This is our response. The GCC was an interested party at the Inquest. Our investigation into the actions of the chiropractor involved in the treatment of Joanna are ongoing. We acknowledge the Regulation 28 report and that we consider [our role in ensuring] that ‘consideration to obtaining medical records should always be given before assessment, particularly where recent medical treatment or investigations has been undertaken.’ It is our intention to carefully consider your findings and ensure that any action that can be taken to prevent a further death or harm to patients in similar circumstances will be. To support us in doing so, we have established an expert group, comprised of experts from within and outside of the profession to undertake a review. The membership of the group together with its draft terms of reference and expected timeline is enclosed. We expect the work to take place between now and the summer of 2025, with the final report and recommendations being considered by the General Chiropractic Council at its meeting on 1 October 2025. Progress will also be reported to Council in public at its meetings on 19 March and 18 June 2025.

2

I am happy to provide further information to you, colleagues or other parties.
REDACTED
19 Mar 2025 PDF
Noted

The chiropractor states they will continue to follow the rules and guidance issued by their regulator (GCC) and looks forward to receiving any updated guidance from the GCC. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ma'am_ Joanna Daria Kowalczyk Inquest: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths Response write to formally respond to your Prevention of Future Deaths (PFD) Report; dated 22 January 2025_ following inquest into the sad death of Ms Joanna Kowalczyk: Your concern was as follows: "2 The evidence on behalf of the treating chiropractor was that he did not consider it necessary to request GP records r hospital records, before assessment or treatment despite being informed about the Deceased's recent hospital attendance, investigation which was recommended, and her discharge against medical advice. Even in the updated consent form have been provided with, which was designed by the British Chiropractic Association, there is no prompt or question designed for the chiropractor to ask to consider obtaining medical records before assessment or treatment; and when this may be appropriate, and the only reference to medical records is a consent to communicate as deemed necessary for the treatment; and for a report to be sent to the GP after treatment, am concerned that consideration to obtaining medical records should always be given before assessment; particularly where recent medical treatment or investigations has been undertaken. As a Chiropractor registered with the General Chiropractic Council (GCC), ensure that meet the training standards and competencies set out GCC's Code of Practice, particularly, as relevant in this case, in the context of Principle C , providing a good standard of clinical care and practice: C1 Obtain and document the case history Of each patient, using suitable methods to draw out the necessary information will continue to follow the rules and guidance issued by my regulator, look forward to receiving any updated or additional guidance put in place by the GCC in response to your Regulation 28 report. If you require any further information, please let me know:
General Chiropractic Council Local Authority / Fire Service
27 Nov 2025 PDF
Action Taken

The General Chiropractic Council established an Expert Group, comprised of members from within and outside of the profession, to consider the coroner's findings which resulted in an Action Plan with practical solutions for chiropractors to incorporate into their daily practice. The British Chiropractic Association held webinars to refresh the knowledge of their members on the symptoms and treatment of stroke and the Royal College of Chiropractors initiated work to review their emergency referral form. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Benyounes, Inquest: Joanna Daria Kowalczyk At the conclusion of the inquest on 22 January 2025 investigating Joanna’s sad death you issued a Regulation 28 (prevention of future deaths) report to, amongst others, the General Chiropractic Council (GCC). I wrote to you in March explaining that we would be establishing an Expert Group, comprised of members from within and outside of the profession, to consider your findings and any further lessons from the circumstances of her death. This letter is to update you on the findings of the Expert Group, and the Action Plan that the GCC and representatives of the chiropractic profession have agreed to take to mitigate against a comparable incident occurring in the future. Fitness to Practice Investigation Before I share the considerations that led to the Action Plan, I should inform you that our investigation into the actions and fitness to practice (FTP) of the individual chiropractor involved in Joanna’s care continues. The investigation has been kept entirely separate from the work of the Expert Group, so that each does not impede the other. However, should further lessons come to light from the FTP proceedings, these will also be acted on. The Expert Group Action Plan I have enclosed a copy of the Expert Group’s Action Plan. The group settled on four themes and sought practical solutions for chiropractors to incorporate into their daily practice. The Action Plan is purposefully heavy on activity, and light on reasoning, but I have expanded on their deliberations for your information below:

Park House, 186 Kennington Park House, London, SE11 4BT Tel: 020 7713 5155 enquiries@gcc-uk.org www.gcc-uk.org Os byddwch yn dewis ysgrifennu atom yn Gymraeg, byddwn yn ymateb yn Gymraeg. Ni fydd gohebu yn Gymraeg yn arwain at oedi. Fodd bynnag, nodwch nad oes yr un o'n staff yn siarad Cymraeg ar hyn o bryd. Theme 1 – accessing medical records. The Expert Group specifically considered your direction to: “ensure consideration to obtaining medical records should always be given before assessment, particularly where recent medical treatment or investigations have been undertaken”. While “considering” obtaining medical records was felt to be standard practice in the profession, and reflected in standard D1 of the new Code of Professional Practice (2026), it was recognised that there were systemic issues (both real and perceived) – particularly for those in private practice seeking NHS records – which could prevent or dissuade a chiropractor from “obtaining” medical records. These issues could lead to a habitual “downplaying” of the relevance of the medical records when taking a thorough case history. The actions in output 1 are designed to improve chiropractor understanding of the current best practice when accessing medical records, and using those records in the creation of a thorough case history. Theme 2 – Understanding and discussions of clinical risk The Expert Group was concerned that chiropractors and patients may both shy away from conversations around rare, but catastrophic, risks. The group recognised that if a patient is not informed of the risks of a particular type of care, then they are not able to provide valid consent, or fully partake in shared decision-making. The actions in output 2 are designed to support both chiropractors and patients in better communicating and understanding these risks, so that every individual can make decisions on the level of risk that they are prepared to accept. Theme 3 – Identifying the risk factors for cervical arterial stroke The Expert Group set aside questions of causality in favour of a “precautionary principle” position that, as health care providers, chiropractors will encounter patients at risk of stroke. They identified that there was inconsistent understanding of stroke, the symptoms and the risk factors for patients in the profession. The actions in output 3 are intended to challenge every member of the profession to reflect on their knowledge of stroke, and to direct them to reputable information to further educate themselves. Theme 4 – Responding to a stroke in progress The Expert Group noted that, while there is a low probability of any individual encountering a patient suffering a stroke in progress, it is inevitable that someone within the profession will face a similar situation. The actions in output 4 seek to develop best practice across the profession to give patients requiring urgent care the best chance of survival.

Park House, 186 Kennington Park House, London, SE11 4BT Tel: 020 7713 5155 enquiries@gcc-uk.org www.gcc-uk.org Os byddwch yn dewis ysgrifennu atom yn Gymraeg, byddwn yn ymateb yn Gymraeg. Ni fydd gohebu yn Gymraeg yn arwain at oedi. Fodd bynnag, nodwch nad oes yr un o'n staff yn siarad Cymraeg ar hyn o bryd.

The wider context within the chiropractic profession. In 2024, the GCC reviewed and updated the standards of proficiency for chiropractors. The new standards were published ahead of the inquest (31 December 2024) but must “sit” for a year before they come into effect (on the 1 January 2026). References to the Code of Professional Practice in this letter, and in the Action Plan, refer to this new document (which was not in place at the time of Joanna’s death). However, we do not believe that the changes to the Code would have made a material difference to the expectations of the chiropractor in this case. Each year the General Chiropractic Council requires every registrant to complete a focused reflection as part of their continuous professional development (CPD) record. Our experience is that the focused reflection topics create an impact across the providers of CPD events. The focus for the current CPD year (September 2025 to August 2026) is on safety and quality in clinical practice – and this will provide additional context for the activity within the Action Plan. Finally, I have been heartened by the response of the profession’s leadership to Joanna’s death. Separate to their support of the Expert Group, and the resulting Action Plan, the British Chiropractic Association held webinars to refresh the knowledge of their members on the symptoms and treatment of stroke. Furthermore, the Royal College of Chiropractors initiated work to review their emergency referral form (used by chiropractors to share immediate concerns with frontline emergency healthcare professionals). Promoting the adoption of this form is one of the activities in the fourth theme. Throughout this process, we have kept Joanna Kowalcyzk foremost in our minds. I do not intend to update you further on our progress, but hope that we have demonstrated the resolve of the GCC, and the wider profession, to learn from the circumstances of her death and provide safer care for chiropractic patients in the future

Your sincerely.

CEO and Registrar.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 26/10/21 an investigation was commenced into the death of Joanna Daria Kowalczyk. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 22/05/25.

The conclusion of the inquest was:

Joanna Kowalczyk died due to a combination of the consequences of chiropractic treatment following a naturally occurring medical event, on a background of an undiagnosed medical condition.

The medical cause of death was:

1a) Bronchopneumonia 1b) Cerebella infarction 1c) Bilateral vertebral artery dissection
2) Unspecified connective tissue disorder (undiagnosed)
Circumstances of the death
The Deceased had a medical history which included migraine and joint hypermobility. It is likely that the Deceased had an unspecified connective tissue disorder which had not been diagnosed, and which made her susceptible to arterial dissections. On 26/09/21 the Deceased underwent a personal training session at a gym when she felt a crack to her neck whilst using a piece of gym equipment and developed a severe headache. It is likely that she sustained bilateral arterial dissections at this time.

The Deceased attended the Emergency Department at hospital on 27/09/21 and there was clinical suspicion of a subarachnoid haemorrhage, so a CT scan of the head was undertaken. The scan did not identify a subarachnoid haemorrhage, and a lumbar puncture with admission to hospital was recommended to exclude this diagnosis, but the Deceased self-discharged prior to undergoing the lumbar puncture. The Deceased researched alternative treatments whilst waiting at hospital and identified chiropractic treatment.

On 28/09/21 the Deceased attended an initial appointment with a chiropractor with a complaint of neck pain, where an assessment was undertaken, and she was diagnosed with acute severe cervical facet dysfunction and associated muscle dysfunction. Treatment in the form of adjustments and manipulation was recommended which the Deceased consented to.

The Deceased informed the chiropractor that she had attended hospital and had undergone a CT scan and further investigations were advised, but she had self-discharged, and stated that the doctor was aware she was coming to see a chiropractor. The chiropractor did not obtain any medical records prior to carrying out treatment.

The Deceased underwent the first adjustment and manipulation chiropractic session on 28/09/21 after which she felt some improvement in her neck pain. The Deceased underwent three further sessions with the chiropractor on 02/10/21, 09/10/21 and 16/10/21.

During the fourth chiropractic session on 16/10/21, after the left adjustment to the neck, the Deceased experienced immediate symptoms of dizziness and room spinning. She developed double vision, tingling in her right hand and right foot, and was struggling to speak. The Deceased vomited whilst at the clinic. It is likely that the Deceased sustained acute dissections in the same location as the previous dissections during the chiropractic manipulation.

The chiropractor had initial concerns that the Deceased was suffering from a stroke so performed a FAST test which was negative. The Deceased’s symptoms began to improve, and she mobilised to a sofa in the treatment room to rest while the chiropractor sought a second opinion from a colleague.

The Deceased remained in the chiropractic clinic for some hours resting. During that time, she was advised to seek medical attention at hospital by both chiropractors, but she did not wish to attend. An ambulance was not called by either chiropractor in reliance on the improvement in the Deceased’s symptoms. The Deceased was unable to walk properly as she left the chiropractic clinic and required assistance from her partner. The chiropractor prepared a handwritten note advising the Deceased to go to A&E if any signs appeared. Those were the signs of stroke from the NHS website.

As a result of speech difficulty reported during an emergency call, paramedics attended via blue light ambulance later that day and carried out an assessment of the Deceased, including a FAST test due to possible symptoms of stroke, which was negative. The attending paramedic was reassured by a telephone conversation with the treating chiropractor that symptoms of dizziness and migraine were normal after the chiropractic treatment.

The attending paramedic was not aware that symptoms of stroke could stop after a short period of time and assessed the Deceased based on the Deceased’s reported symptoms at that time.

A diagnosis of migraine was reached by the paramedic from the reported history, the examination findings, and in reliance on the chiropractor’s reassurance that the chiropractor had no concerns, with a recording of a pain score of 6/10.

An information for healthcare professionals document was completed by the paramedic before leaving the scene which recorded dizziness symptoms and the Deceased could not open her right eye for a while. Like the previous day, the Deceased was unable to mobilise unaided and required assistance to mobilise from her partner, which was not observed or recorded by the attending paramedic. Had the paramedic observed and recorded the inability to mobilise unaided, the Deceased would have been assessed as FAST positive and transported to hospital on 16/10/21.

On 17/10/21 paramedics attended the Deceased again via blue light ambulance at the highest priority. It was identified that the Deceased was gravely unwell with a reduced level of consciousness, and a FAST test to exclude stroke, could not be performed. A decision was made to transfer to the Emergency Department. The Deceased was unable to mobilise and required the use of a chair to be transported to the ambulance. The Deceased deteriorated in the ambulance on the way to hospital and required intubation and ventilation.

A CT scan identified a maturing infarction involving the near entirety of the posterior fossa structures and a CT angiogram identified left vertebral artery dissection. Specialist advice was sought, and no treatment was available.

The Deceased deteriorated and brain stem testing confirmed death at 13.10 on 19/10/21 at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Gateshead.

Whilst it is possible that investigations undertaken on 16/10/21 either after attendance at hospital following the chiropractic treatment or following the attendance by paramedics, may have identified the dissection to one of the arteries which was subsequently identified on 17/10/21, this cannot be determined to the requisite standard of proof. It is not possible to determine whether earlier identification of the dissection on 16/10/21 would have allowed different management and treatment, so as to have changed the tragic outcome.

An investigation undertaken by the ambulance service found that there was a failure in communications made by the paramedic crew on 17/10/21, but this did not cause or contribute to the death.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2025-0040
Date of report
22 January 2025
Coroner
Leila Benyounes
Coroner area
Gateshead and South Tyneside

Responses identified

Responses identified 4 of 2
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 19 Mar 2025 (estimated).

Sent to

General Chiropractic Council
North East Ambulance Service

Source links